| Author | Post |
|---|
CAPT WINKY
Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 03:59 pm |
|
CRIMECRUNCHER wrote: Let em come, I'll surround em, me and Smith and Wesson that is!
Yea, I like the Model 500 Smith & Wesson, you heard about them yet?Last edited on Wed Nov 12th, 2008 04:00 pm by CAPT WINKY
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 03:41 pm |
|
| Let em come, I'll surround em, me and Smith and Wesson that is!
|
CAPT WINKY
Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 03:26 pm |
|
| See I told yous that all cops are not honest like you all think. A lot of them lie,cheat etc and get away with it forever. Only a very few ever get caught.
|
abbeys mommy
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jan 18th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 540 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 03:16 pm |
|
cc - look out --you are talking about someone - 2xs is going to come after you - you might want to sleep with 1 eye open!!!! 
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 03:13 pm |
|
| According to the court webwsite, he copped an Alford plea to sexual abuse of a minor. I wonder when he will be sentenced?
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 02:45 am |
|
| I hope his cellmate is 6-9 and hasn't seen a real woman in 25 yrs.
|
Pieface
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 01:47 am |
|
CRIMECRUNCHER wrote: Thats bargain basement justice at its worst. $2 to a donut he turns down the plea and goes to trial.
Nope...he took the plea...so I'm told
|
peace maker
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 9th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 113 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 12:25 am |
|
| Bad Cambridge PD ?
|
CodyBearHed
Member
|
Posted: Sat Nov 1st, 2008 09:40 pm |
|
| He would then do 1/3 of that 4 years. Meaning he'd do a year and a few months.
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Sat Nov 1st, 2008 03:08 am |
|
| Thats bargain basement justice at its worst. $2 to a donut he turns down the plea and goes to trial.
|
Pieface
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 1st, 2008 03:03 am |
|
eastcambridge_mom wrote: There has been some updates on this case the date of initial appearance date is -
He was offered 20yrs all suspended but 4, 5yrs. supervised probation, and he has to register as a sex offender..of course the sentencing hearing is not scheduled yet.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14th, 2008 05:12 pm |
|
copspouse wrote: and perry is still a criminal and always will be ever since cpd let him get away with it.
Cambridge Police Department did not let him get away with anything, the fault falls with the States Attorney at the time, and the witness. The situation that happened at the high school was not Mr. Perry's first time taking advantage of a teenage girl and her emotions. He had done it least once before, prior to coming back to Cambridge (while he was in the service) and becoming a police officer.
I understand your need to vent, we all do. I would like to ask you personally not to make personal attacks. You do have points that are valid but others out right cruel.
|
Gordy
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14th, 2008 03:05 am |
|
Gosh , that person appears to be credible.
|
DorCouNtyGirL
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jan 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 602 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14th, 2008 02:20 am |
|
| Are you Drunk?? Was your spouse one of the ones fired???
|
copspouse
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 17th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14th, 2008 01:43 am |
|
| as i read some of the post that cc has posted on this board in diff area of his opion (sp) that he talks about how great he and other police are if i am not mastaken arent you the officer that went out on strees leave talking about wanting to kill yourself so that you can get benifits and that the had to come and get your gun and also arent you the same officer that degrade people from other contry calling camel jockies, spics, n------? also now that the police department has done there promotion which wasn't again not good noone black was promoted. and of all the people that they havfe fired...taken pictures of prisoners and then officers are posting them on the internet and the chief using the f bomb in supervisor meetings and telling officers that they are not supervisor material but you promote some who dont have and patrol skills when his whole squad complains about not wanting to work with him...i no that this will problem be remove but i needed to vent...and perry is still a criminal and always will be ever since cpd let him get away with it.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 20th, 2008 08:31 pm |
|
There has been some updates on this case the date of initial appearance date is -
Event Type:
Arraignment/Initial AppearanceNotice Date:
Event Date:
08/27/2008Event Time:09:30 AM
Result:
Result Date:
The trial date is set for-
Event Type:
Criminal Jury TrialNotice Date:
Event Date:
12/03/2008Event Time:09:30 AM
Result:
Result Date:
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Fri Aug 8th, 2008 07:03 pm |
|
The case was forwarded to Circuit Court the case number is 19K08008890.
Or the case can be followed through here,
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=19K08008890&loc=47&detailLoc=K
Last edited on Fri Aug 8th, 2008 07:23 pm by eastcambridge_mom
|
Pieface
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 05:35 am |
|
| Yup I was there and he was there in a grey suit sitting in the last bench in the courtroom by himself. His lawyer was sitting near some officers closer to the front on the otherside of the courtroom.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 06:49 pm |
|
| There is nothing noted as of this minute on the courts site. They should be posted by 4:30.
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 05:56 pm |
|
| Pieface, did you go to the hearing? From your description he waived his preliminary hearing(which the defense may do). If that is the case then the charges are forwarded to Circuit Court for trial.
|
Pieface
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 05:46 pm |
|
| Nothing happened, it was a prelim. His charges were not read out loud in court and everything must have been discussed before court started.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 07:49 am |
|
CRIMECRUNCHER wrote: A preliminary hearing is set in the case for 11 July. At a preliminary hearing the state presents evidence to a district court judge to show that it has sufficient evidence of a crime or crimes cupable to the defendant to bind the defendant over for trial in the Circuit Court.
If anyone finds out anything about the hearing can you please keep us updated ?
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 7th, 2008 03:16 am |
|
| Perusing some of the opinions on here that give the defendant much more than just the benefit of the doubt, I hope that I never have to face a Dorchester jury as a victim of a crime. I am becoming convinced that a fairly high % of locals would have trouble voting for conviction even in a sound prosecution case.
|
CodyBearHed
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 7th, 2008 02:40 am |
|
Justoneopinion wrote: Personally, these are all opinions which we all have but the truth hopefully will come out in court. If, he is found guilty then he will need to answer to his maker and only him. It is not up to us to place judgement on him. If, he knows his way around the system, he is one up on the rest of us. My ex-husband does not pay his share of child support nor does he ask to see his children. Too bad too sad for him. However, he lives in a brand new home, new truck, and a new wife with a new family. Kudos for him and her. My children are not deprived of anything because they know how their father truly behaves, and they wish not to be with him anyway. All I ask before we judge one another is to make sure that you remember your own maker and trust in him to guide you through this ordeal.
Amen, very well put. I AGREE 100%.
|
Justoneopinion
Member
|
Posted: Sun Jul 6th, 2008 08:29 pm |
|
| Personally, these are all opinions which we all have but the truth hopefully will come out in court. If, he is found guilty then he will need to answer to his maker and only him. It is not up to us to place judgement on him. If, he knows his way around the system, he is one up on the rest of us. My ex-husband does not pay his share of child support nor does he ask to see his children. Too bad too sad for him. However, he lives in a brand new home, new truck, and a new wife with a new family. Kudos for him and her. My children are not deprived of anything because they know how their father truly behaves, and they wish not to be with him anyway. All I ask before we judge one another is to make sure that you remember your own maker and trust in him to guide you through this ordeal.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 5th, 2008 03:15 am |
|
I got so many PM's that were negative on what I was saying on this subject I had to disable my PM. The PM's were nasty, So many were telling me I was off my rockers. Its like this -an alcoholic can tell another alcoholic by observing and listening to what is not said. So is it with this subject(child sexual abuse). I so feel for this child. She will be ripped apart in court. Yes I agree, the Mother had to notice the changes in her child, be it she thought it was resentment towards the "new man" in her life, or rebellion. She had to know something was not right. I have to interject again she(the mother) was in denial, and probably still is.
To address one person in particular how is it Naham paid off 100,000 home(all public record) and could not pay his child support?
He works the system ! He gets his support put down several times(public record) and then buys a house(public record/VA loan) and pays it off fast(public record). He works the system. WHAT CHANCE DOES THIS CHILD HAVE IN COURT AGAINST NAHAM? Thank goodness somebody listened!
It probably was reported to Social Services but after interviewing all the parties was not able to substantiate the accusation. Look at like this- two parents upstanding in all aspects and a complaining "troubled child". She is troubled , she was acting out. i AM SURE SHE TOLD HIM TO LEAVE HER ALONE OR SHE WOULD TELL AND RUIN HIM.
Naham claims "SET-UP, I am innocent-give me my day in court." -Naham needs to search his soul and start to make amends for the things he has done though out his whole life.
I pray the child , and the mother get individual counseling and then family counseling. I pray the natural father gets his life together and steps up to being a father , for his daughter needs him. Also Naham pays the price this time and gets major time in jail for this one.
I have tried to remain objective and see all possibilities, what I can see is this , He (Naham)sweet talks his way into females lives, takes what he wants and cares only for his self and reputation. He never seems to think about what his actions do to others around him.
Last edited on Sat Jul 5th, 2008 05:10 am by eastcambridge_mom
|
rantsey
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 4th, 2008 12:46 pm |
|
I just got the particulars last night and found the same thing - it is incest - how terrible!!!!! I asked the person who told me the same thing - how in the he** can a mother not notice changes in her daughter's behavior and/or not ask questions!!!
However, I was told that the daughter turned in both her mother and Hammie in for child abuse and nothing ever happened. I don't think they even followed up on it. The daughter has been wanting to live with her father for a very long period of time (no freaking wonder). So, a 13 year old girl who stepped out in faith to her community for help once and it fell on deaf ears - I see where she might not be willing to speak up so freely with this situation.
What a shame - I am absolutely praying for this girl!!!!
Last edited on Fri Jul 4th, 2008 12:47 pm by rantsey
|
Pieface
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 4th, 2008 05:58 am |
|
| Actually it WAS a case of incest. The young lady in question was his step-daughter. Biologically or not, it is disgusting. Whether she agreed ( which she supposedly did) or not, he should have not taken advantage of a young girl who was just discovering herself (age 13). I think we all were curious about the opposite sex at that age and he just jumped at the opportunity. But I have one question that I think only one person touched on....Where in God's name was this child's mother??? CBC- yes maybe God, Mr. Perry and the young lady knew, but where was her mother? Are we to believe that she NEVER picked up on anything in two years?? And isn't she a nurse or something? I just think they all need counseling and a lot of prayers, because everyone has been affected by this.
|
rantsey
Member
|
Posted: Wed Jul 2nd, 2008 01:29 pm |
|
My response is that I have not perceived this to be an "incest" situation or that this invloves anyone in his household so I have no thoughts on that statement in regards to this thread. I may be wrong, but I am under the impression that this is a male who approached a female for a specific cause-and did so for an extended period of time. A man of his age who engages in a sexual relationship with anyone aged 13 years old knew he was WRONG - period!
If you are speaking in general about incest relationships, I know all to well that this goes on and is usually not uncovered until the victim reaches adulthood and many times it is found to have been a parent's "significant other". It is so very unfortunate that these events take place, but I just don't have the impression that this is what is going on with Hammy...
Last edited on Wed Jul 2nd, 2008 01:40 pm by rantsey
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Wed Jul 2nd, 2008 02:31 am |
|
rantsey wrote: You cannot continue to have a relationship with anyone for nearly 2 years and NOONE know about it -
I am not disagreeing with anyone here, only part of a statement-there is an occasion of "having a relationship with anyone" that can go on and nobody knows nothing about it is called incest and it don't have to be the biological parent. It goes on and may never be spoken of , or come out when the victim has had enough and gotten the strength to speak up. We are currently having a case here in Cambridge just like that back on the first of June. I do know it will all come out in the wash (court). All any of us can do is wait to see, and keep our minds open.Last edited on Wed Jul 2nd, 2008 02:33 am by eastcambridge_mom
|
rantsey
Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 1st, 2008 03:41 pm |
|
I'm with CC - there are too many people on here who knew what happened while in Cambridge...Princess Anne is no bigger! You cannot continue to have a relationship with anyone for nearly 2 years and NOONE know about it - especially with the age differences stated in his current situation. Since the victim is one of the few that does know what happened, as yes, she is a victim, I pray that she reveals ALL when in court!
IMO the "only three people know what really happened" has been overstated. That is the obvious - but let's not limit ourselves here... I think we need to move beyond that and be realistic in knowing that others know as well and it will come out in court.
|
CRIMECRUNCHER
Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 1st, 2008 03:16 pm |
|
| Unless you were there, how do you know how many witnesses there were in addition to the three you list? A family member or someone else could have walked in or heard what was going on. There also may well be a silent witness, scientific evidence, DNA material for instance. Owing to the female being underage, the only thing that is needed to prove the case is evidence of sexual activity between the victim and Perry, consent is NOT an issue. Additionally, this is not a one act play, according to the charges it took place over an extended period of time.
|
cbothsides
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 30 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 1st, 2008 02:58 pm |
|
My grandmother always said there are three sides to every story. This one's, that one's, and the truth. Only God, Mr. Perry and the female know the truth. 
|
neverforgetcambridge
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jul 1st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 1st, 2008 08:52 am |
|
I moved from Cambridge in 2000 and this is the first I have heard of this. I must say I am not surprised. I graduated and I had a senior party. well mr. perry was there trying to mess with all the young ladies that were there but he was originally there to see one women. He is guilty, I do believe he is for sure. Back in the day he thought he was the top dog with biker shorts on parading around. I always seen the pervert in him and for those of you that defend him u cannot possibly know this man.
|
motherof4
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 11 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 07:38 pm |
|
I'm saddened to hear that yet another father is a trifling piece of work. Luckily these kids seem to have good mothers who know how to protect them.
(I've dealt with the father acting like an ass syndrom myself, my oldest son's father, luckily when I married- he has been a father to him as well as our 3 together).
Good luck in all you do and keep doing what you're doing. At least your child has one parent who cares enough about him/her to be there. I know how it feels.
|
moved_on
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 17th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 07:06 pm |
|
| Well he is consistent when it comes to all of the kids then, sad though. Maybe he can sit back and think about everything he's done and ask forgiveness from God then the victims and get some serious help.
|
rantsey
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 04:14 pm |
|
| The one child in Cambridge didn't regularly see Hammy until this incident happened. He would spend time with him occasionally but wasn't ecstatic about it. He is seeing him more now at this time - I'm sure only because Hammy is under such scrunity and has much more time on his hands. What a shame this situation is! I do pray for a fair trial and that justice will be served. I feel horrible for the girls/women who have fallen prey to him and now reading that this included males too......OMGosh!
|
moved_on
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 17th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 03:22 pm |
|
I hope no other women fall victim to him after this. YOU can trust that my child has no dealings with him, because he has always been to "busy with the ladies" to really have time also, I know his ways and didn't want my child exposed to that. I only heard from him because of this incident and he was probably afraid I heard about it and to inform me that he wasn't receiving money...you know the story from there. I am actually learning alot by dropping by and reading what is being posted. It has been years.
He only is in constant contact with the one child that is right there in Cambridge, the others don't have any contact with him.
Last edited on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 03:23 pm by moved_on
|
motherof4
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 11 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 02:27 pm |
|
I apologize if your child or any other of his children reads this, but on the same note- he is the one who makes these horrific choices. HE should think before HE acts, considering that once he is arrested for crimes such as these- it becomes public record. I was simply pointing out that he has always had this problem, but yet women are still flocking to him, people are still trusting him. And for what? I wish I was able to talk my friend into reporting him then but he had her so shaken with threats that she was terrified to do so. Even if he hadn't been charged with rape, he could've been charged with some kind of misuse of the badge or something along those lines.
I hope for all of his children's sakes that he is not allowed to influence their behavior. I'm sure you personally are very mindful of such actions and that you care enough about your child to protect him/her. I hope the other mother (s) are the same way.
|
moved_on
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 17th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 11:52 am |
|
As THE EX-WIFE (that was married to him at that time) I am glad I was not there when he was with your 17 year friend because it would've come out then! Be mindful that he DOES have more than one child and all this indiscretions of his past doesn't have to come out, keeping with the subject at hand its about him and the minors without voices that we should be thinking about. Time to time I check this site and will reply.
My only issue is that if some many knew about the other incident why didn't anyone inform UMES or Crisield PD, maybe this wouldn't have happened to this young lady.
Hopefully, the WHOLE story comes out about everything.
Hope they both get the help that is needed.
Last edited on Mon Jun 30th, 2008 11:55 am by moved_on
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30th, 2008 12:30 am |
|
cbothsides wrote:
And what are your degree's in and what college did you graduate from? Always nice to know there's a doctor in the conversation.
I will not justify your PM insults, and taunts in any manner. My degrees are irrelevant, my schooling is irrelevant. I speak from life experiences, and observations in courts. Oh I did to go college. I ignore ignorance.
You dear sir-you have an agenda which is self-serving.
I have no agenda.
ANY ONE WHOM READS MY POSTING KNOW THAT I TALK REALISTICALLY AND FACTUALLY.
It is because of people like you who try to intimidate others is why victims do not speak. I am beyond that -I can not be intimidated.
|
cbothsides
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 30 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29th, 2008 01:37 pm |
|
eastcambridge_mom wrote: If the statement is true that the mother of the victim signed and paid bail for the accused abuser, then Social Services needs to remove the child -for the mother of the victim is failing to protect the child. The mother must be in denial. It is normal for a child victim to have Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome. A parent whom would help the accused abuser over their own child is unable to care for the child, and child emotional needs. Without professional or self-help group intervention, most parents are not prepared to believe their child in the face of convincing denials from a responsible adult. Since the majority of adults who molest children occupy a kinship or a trusted relationship the child is put on the defensive for attacking the credibility of the trusted adult, and for creating a crisis of loyalty which defies comfortable resolution. At a time when the child most needs love, endorsement and exculpation, the unprepared parent typically responds with horror, rejection and blame, If the child is left in the home the victim will retract the allegations no matter how TRUE the allegations are.
Reaffirmation always occurs when the victim is an adult and the statute of limitations have ran out. Then nothing will happen to the abuser criminally period. The only recourse then is sue them civilly like what keeps happening in the Catholic church.
Remember this- this happened here in Cambridge also and because the shame, embarrassment, and fear of disclosure the victim would not cooperate!
And what are your degree's in and what college did you graduate from? Always nice to know there's a doctor in the conversation.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28th, 2008 10:54 pm |
|
If the statement is true that the mother of the victim signed and paid bail for the accused abuser, then Social Services needs to remove the child -for the mother of the victim is failing to protect the child. The mother must be in denial. It is normal for a child victim to have Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome. A parent whom would help the accused abuser over their own child is unable to care for the child, and child emotional needs. Without professional or self-help group intervention, most parents are not prepared to believe their child in the face of convincing denials from a responsible adult. Since the majority of adults who molest children occupy a kinship or a trusted relationship the child is put on the defensive for attacking the credibility of the trusted adult, and for creating a crisis of loyalty which defies comfortable resolution. At a time when the child most needs love, endorsement and exculpation, the unprepared parent typically responds with horror, rejection and blame, If the child is left in the home the victim will retract the allegations no matter how TRUE the allegations are.
Reaffirmation always occurs when the victim is an adult and the statute of limitations have ran out. Then nothing will happen to the abuser criminally period. The only recourse then is sue them civilly like what keeps happening in the Catholic church.
Remember this- this happened here in Cambridge also and because the shame, embarrassment, and fear of disclosure the victim would not cooperate!
Last edited on Sun Jun 29th, 2008 07:39 am by eastcambridge_mom
|
cbothsides
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 30 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28th, 2008 09:24 pm |
|
the sluth wrote:
In his most recent charges, the victim's mother posted bail for him.
Only God, Mr. Perry, and the female involved know the truth......
|
nsas64
Member
| Joined: | Sat Mar 1st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 310 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28th, 2008 09:20 pm |
|
That officer is now with SU.
Salisbury University????
|
the sluth
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 28th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28th, 2008 09:17 pm |
|
Officer Naham Perry with the UMES police department is the same pedophile that worked at Easton, Cambridge,Crisfield and UMES police department. The former UMES chief of police is now the assistant UMES chief of police. UMES administration knew about perry's child abuse charges at Cambridge prior to hiring him. UMES knew about allegations that during 2007 he sexually abused a male student at UMES. there were also allegations that he was sexually involved with a boy while he was a Crisfield police officer. In his most recent charges, the victim's mother posted bail for him. the assistant UMES chief of police covered up for him because they went through the police academy together. the assistant UMES chief of police was charged himself with sexual harassment at Salisbury City Police Department. during 2007 the assistant UMES chief of police extorted money from one of his own police officers. That officer is now with SU.
|
rantsey
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27th, 2008 05:04 pm |
|
| Well, I hope if he is back in town it is to spend some time with his son before he possibly goes to jail. I don't know how willing his son will be to visit him if he is convicted.
|
Just Curious
Member
| Joined: | Tue May 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | Drama Town |
| Posts: | 211 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27th, 2008 04:56 pm |
|
| And the word is he is back in town!!
|
motherof4
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 11 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27th, 2008 01:20 am |
|
I want to add something here. I know someone who had relations with Hammie when he was a CPD officer. She lived not more than two blocks from him (mind you he was married and stepping out on his wife on a regular basis) She was a highschool senior (age 17) and didn't know him veryt well, nor did she know about his wife. Hammie knew her age, and used his influence to have sex with her. He smoked marijuana with her, and bought her alcohol. He would call this girl from the station and use code to speak with her and have an excuse to come see her while he was on duty. They even had sex in his cruiser- many times.
I guess he could not be convicted since she was 17, but it goes to show his immoral behavior has existed for a long time. This was in 1994. He is a complete and utter pervert and I hope he gets what he deserves.
Now, as far as the public website giving us info about criminals, why shouldn't we have access to that. How else would the other parents in my neighborhood have foudn out about the child molester that lived here? There are many small children where I live and we need to have access to that info to keep our loved ones safe. I'm glad we did, our management finally got rid of him after months of complaints.
So, thank goodness for freedom of information.
|
eastcambridge_mom
Member
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2008 12:59 am |
|
cbothsides wrote: God, Mr. Perry, and the female involved know the truth the rest of you are only guessing.
Why do say the rest of YOU ?? Is it you know more then you are willing to say ? For you like to make comments against anyone whom says anything against Hammie. I went to school with the man. I knew the two former wives.I knew him as a cop. He treated people all the same. He graduated with a brother of mine. I can say there is reasonable doubt, based on the similarities of the accusations. Inform me via PM or in open of why I should not believe the current girl. I want to be wrong but my gut as a victim and a mom tells me other wise.
|
Current time is 01:45 am | Page: 1 2 3   |
|