| Author | Post |
|---|
alostchild
Member
|
Posted: Sun Jul 5th, 2009 03:29 am |
|
grandma wrote: the problem I have with this situation is that it took nine long months for this baby, God bless her, to come to fruition. And there are those among you that are stating that Candy needs help........well why the hell didn't some of you see to it that she got it before this angelic little girl got dumped in the waste tank of a goddam porta-potty? If so many people were concerned about her, where the hell were they when she was about to give birth. LOCK THE b**ch UP>
On more than one occasion I have attempted to help her, and I got nowhere. There is only so much that a person (who is not a family member or a social worker) can do. My understanding is that someone very close in her family was trying to get her help, and because of all the "red tape" involved they were having a very hard time of it. I had not seen her for at least 6 months when I heard about this situation with the infant, and so I had no idea she was even pregnant. No one that I know (that also knows her) had seen her for a while either. I assumed she had been taken in for help. What else were we supposed to do???
|
south dorchester girl
Member
| Joined: | Thu May 10th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 109 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 4th, 2009 10:54 pm |
|
grandma wrote: the problem I have with this situation is that it took nine long months for this baby, God bless her, to come to fruition. And there are those among you that are stating that Candy needs help........well why the hell didn't some of you see to it that she got it before this angelic little girl got dumped in the waste tank of a goddam porta-potty? If so many people were concerned about her, where the hell were they when she was about to give birth. LOCK THE b**ch UP>
I don't anything about this terrible situation, but I can say that I had a loved one very dear to me that was battling mental illness for years. I did everything in my power, went to the courts time and time again, called facilities, stayed completely involved, talked to doctors and I had the same result every time, two days in and he was allowed to refuse medications and signed himself out. The system sucks, it does not care to do its job until harm had been done, it is not preventative of it. So take it from someone who has fought for help, you cannot always blame it on the loved ones because I tried and tried and maybe if someone would have thought "okay what could happen" instead of "there are no suicidal or homicidal threats" he could have been happy, healthy, and here today. So walk a mile in those shoes and then tell me how easy it is to get someone help.
|
grandma
Member
| Joined: | Thu Apr 13th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 808 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 4th, 2009 10:12 pm |
|
| the problem I have with this situation is that it took nine long months for this baby, God bless her, to come to fruition. And there are those among you that are stating that Candy needs help........well why the hell didn't some of you see to it that she got it before this angelic little girl got dumped in the waste tank of a goddam porta-potty? If so many people were concerned about her, where the hell were they when she was about to give birth. LOCK THE b**ch UP>
|
sidney
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | Maryland USA |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 4th, 2009 07:12 pm |
|
| First I would like to protect myself from any negative comments for what I am about to say. I know Candy personally and I am telling you that she needs serious help. What she did was horrible but I can tell you that she has no idea the severity of it. She is extremelly mentally ill and needs serious help. Everyone wants to point fingers at her but if the state would step in and do there job maybe this would not have happened. She has been in institutions and they always let her go. I think that there should be a law or something that makes people stay in institutions. Candy was a beautiful girl, was married to a wonderful man and also has a grown child who is also a beautiful person. For some sad reason she became ill and her family tried to help her but was unsuccesful. I understand that people get enraged, I am not a fan of this behavior myself, but please unless you know the person that we are dealing with don't scorn her, instead pray for her and that precious baby. I hope that she gets the help she truly needs and I pray that child will find a wonderful home. If you have any negative comments please think before you speak, God does not like ugly and you should not be judgemental. Until you walk in someone's shoes you should never judge them. I also pray that her other child does not see some of the posts that are on here, I am sure she has enough to deal with already. God Bless you Candy and the sweet little girl you gave birth to. I want to make it clear that I do not in any way support her decision, but she has no idea what she has done.
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 10:24 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: Church Creek Person wrote: thinkfirst wrote: .....snip to this line......women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
YEAH the personal reasons are that these women/girls USE the killing as babies as BIRTH CONTROL...
SELFISH self centered pin cushions who will allow any one to stick it in them...
Yeah childish little tramps don't look good in bikinis...babies are a burden while in college....
Those are 2 interesting "personal reasons" and leading reasons for killing the helpless baby in the womb.
Again, if these are "babies" you go on down and stand out in front of an aborion clinic and ask these women and girls to hand the babies to you. Maybe you'll get some with genetic flaws because they were raped by a blood relative, or she's well over 40 and the eggs are defective, and who knows what else. Good luck with them.
So, These babies are less of a person, and worthless, their only value is to be discarded like a piece of trash? I am so glad that your mother chose life, or you would not be here.....think about it!
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 05:32 pm |
|
Church Creek Person wrote: thinkfirst wrote: .....snip to this line......women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
YEAH the personal reasons are that these women/girls USE the killing as babies as BIRTH CONTROL...
SELFISH self centered pin cushions who will allow any one to stick it in them...
Yeah childish little tramps don't look good in bikinis...babies are a burden while in college....
Those are 2 interesting "personal reasons" and leading reasons for killing the helpless baby in the womb.
Again, if these are "babies" you go on down and stand out in front of an aborion clinic and ask these women and girls to hand the babies to you. Maybe you'll get some with genetic flaws because they were raped by a blood relative, or she's well over 40 and the eggs are defective, and who knows what else. Good luck with them.
|
FlipFlop
Member
| Joined: | Thu Sep 13th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 145 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 05:26 pm |
|
| Lets just close this thread with prayers for her family.
|
Church Creek Person
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 2nd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1781 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 05:07 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: .....snip to this line......women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
YEAH the personal reasons are that these women/girls USE the killing as babies as BIRTH CONTROL...
SELFISH self centered pin cushions who will allow any one to stick it in them...
Yeah childish little tramps don't look good in bikinis...babies are a burden while in college....
Those are 2 interesting "personal reasons" and leading reasons for killing the helpless baby in the womb.
|
Church Creek Person
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 2nd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1781 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 04:58 pm |
|
4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
My point....if you kill it hours before it is born by pulling it half way out of the birth canal by its little legs...insert a tube into the babies skull the screaming muffled by still being in the birth canal and suck out the brain is "OK"...where as a few hours later an UNWANTED baby left in a porta can is some how more "sinister"...
THAT = "Liberal Logic" and the "FEIGNED OUTRAGE" of morons.
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 04:29 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: thinkfirst wrote: actually, a fetus or embryo is not 'a life' in the same sense as an innocent victim in war or a fleeing burglar, or a new born baby that breathes. you have a view of 'life' that does NOT value all life, you pick and choose as so many others that judge women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
I do not pick and choose. You misunderstand. Just because I say that a fleeing burglar being killed in self defense is not murder, does not mean that the life is valueless. All life (including an unborn Child) has value. I was only dealing with the terminology used, not the person.
Personal reasons or not, it is still murder, and should not be legal, and is definitely not moral. Where is the babies choice, or even the fathers?
I do not recall you piping in on MURDER when the forum about the fleeing burglar in Texas was shot. FLEEING means NOT in self defense. There is NO defense for shooting someone in the back. And if the fathers have a choice then why aren't they raising them, paying for them? Because they make a choice to ditch. Protecting your freedom by murdering innocents in war has always been okay, right? All I'm saying is, abortion is an issue separate and different, and a woman or girl that gets one is certainly not a murderer. It's a: Legal. And b: a fetus or embryo up to a certain point is not considered viable life. If it was, she could just hand the fetus to YOU to raise.
The girls should have thought about all of this before they "laid down" with the young man, and became pregnant. Abortion/murder, after their night of pleasure, is not the answer. Besides how can a father step up to the plate and raise a child if it is aborted? We will never agree, and neither will the Bible with the innocent slaughter of unborn children at any time during pregnancy. Abortion is only legal because a Liberal court says it is, the bible says differently. I decide to follow what God says and not what man thinks, He is the one I must please in the end.
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 03:01 pm |
|
4Godncountry wrote: thinkfirst wrote: actually, a fetus or embryo is not 'a life' in the same sense as an innocent victim in war or a fleeing burglar, or a new born baby that breathes. you have a view of 'life' that does NOT value all life, you pick and choose as so many others that judge women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
I do not pick and choose. You misunderstand. Just because I say that a fleeing burglar being killed in self defense is not murder, does not mean that the life is valueless. All life (including an unborn Child) has value. I was only dealing with the terminology used, not the person.
Personal reasons or not, it is still murder, and should not be legal, and is definitely not moral. Where is the babies choice, or even the fathers?
I do not recall you piping in on MURDER when the forum about the fleeing burglar in Texas was shot. FLEEING means NOT in self defense. There is NO defense for shooting someone in the back. And if the fathers have a choice then why aren't they raising them, paying for them? Because they make a choice to ditch. Protecting your freedom by murdering innocents in war has always been okay, right? All I'm saying is, abortion is an issue separate and different, and a woman or girl that gets one is certainly not a murderer. It's a: Legal. And b: a fetus or embryo up to a certain point is not considered viable life. If it was, she could just hand the fetus to YOU to raise.
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 05:13 am |
|
thinkfirst wrote: actually, a fetus or embryo is not 'a life' in the same sense as an innocent victim in war or a fleeing burglar, or a new born baby that breathes. you have a view of 'life' that does NOT value all life, you pick and choose as so many others that judge women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion.
I do not pick and choose. You misunderstand. Just because I say that a fleeing burglar being killed in self defense is not murder, does not mean that the life is valueless. All life (including an unborn Child) has value. I was only dealing with the terminology used, not the person.
Personal reasons or not, it is still murder, and should not be legal, and is definitely not moral. Where is the babies choice, or even the fathers?
|
Lurking Around
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 27th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1446 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 02:40 am |
|
I just hope that baby ends up in a home where it will be loved for the rest of its life .
It is times like these that I wish I were doing foster care ... and could take it in ......
|
xd2elantra
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 01:58 am |
|
How in the hell do you not know that you are pregnant? I swear some people should be lobotomized just because. Oh that's right, even they act better than this pathetic waste of fresh air. There are plenty of people that cannot have kids of their own and trash like this can get pregnant at the drop of a hat?
|
IsThatRight
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 01:52 am |
|
I am just so outraged at what this woman has done!!!
I don't even want to begin to say what I would like to do to her!!!
|
shillamus
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 01:15 am |
|
Agreed... The mothers behavior is imorral conduct
brett504 wrote:
I would like to stuff her in a portable toliet. She is one evil woman, who could have cared less about that baby. I am sure the police officers would have love to beat the crap out of her. And the nurses and DR in the hospital. And me too. But I would be arrested for it.
I hope they lock that b**ch up for ever. forgive my language but that is just how I feel about her.
I am so happy the baby is doing OK,and I know the baby will get a wonderful home.
|
brett504
Member
| Joined: | Thu Sep 28th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1122 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 01:09 am |
|
I would like to stuff her in a portable toliet. She is one evil woman, who could have cared less about that baby. I am sure the police officers would have love to beat the crap out of her. And the nurses and DR in the hospital. And me too. But I would be arrested for it.
I hope they lock that b**ch up for ever. forgive my language but that is just how I feel about her.
I am so happy the baby is doing OK,and I know the baby will get a wonderful home.
|
sugarpie82
Member
| Joined: | Thu Apr 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 28 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 11:16 pm |
|
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/02/maryland.toilet.birth/index.html
|
alostchild
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 11:11 pm |
|
Mama Bear wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
No I actually think that abortion is far worse. What is the difference between a 6-12 week old BABY, and this baby? nothing. Your rational is that the 6-12 week old is not a life, when it is. Again, remember S. Peterson? he got charged with 2 murders, his wife, and his Child's, not a "embryo/fetus. Again this story is sad, but so are the countless thousands of abortions each year.
It is just a matter of convenience. It is legal, and ok for a woman to "chose" to kill her baby in the womb, but it is illegal, and everyone is upset when a woman "choose" to kill their baby outside the womb? Terminology does not change the fact that both are wrong, and both are murder. Thankfully, thus far this child has a chance, this is more than the aborted child has.
Not to Burst you Bubble but Scott Peterson was charged with double homicide because the fetus was viable( which means if left to natural cause of nature would be a living breathing body) .I do believe and I am not 100% that a new law was passed a couple of years ago that basically said if you kill a pregnant women who at a certain time in her pregnancy or gestational period you could and would be charged with 2 counts of murder. This is based on the principle that after a certain stage of pregnancy a child could survive outside of the womb of the mother( i.e premature babies).
That is my point exactly. If it can not survive on the outside of the womb why is it considered murder? I don't agree with late term abortions, but when it is not a viable creature why can a woman not choose?
|
Mama Bear
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 21st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 7 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 10:42 pm |
|
4Godncountry wrote: thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
No I actually think that abortion is far worse. What is the difference between a 6-12 week old BABY, and this baby? nothing. Your rational is that the 6-12 week old is not a life, when it is. Again, remember S. Peterson? he got charged with 2 murders, his wife, and his Child's, not a "embryo/fetus. Again this story is sad, but so are the countless thousands of abortions each year.
It is just a matter of convenience. It is legal, and ok for a woman to "chose" to kill her baby in the womb, but it is illegal, and everyone is upset when a woman "choose" to kill their baby outside the womb? Terminology does not change the fact that both are wrong, and both are murder. Thankfully, thus far this child has a chance, this is more than the aborted child has.
Not to Burst you Bubble but Scott Peterson was charged with double homicide because the fetus was viable( which means if left to natural cause of nature would be a living breathing body) .I do believe and I am not 100% that a new law was passed a couple of years ago that basically said if you kill a pregnant women who at a certain time in her pregnancy or gestational period you could and would be charged with 2 counts of murder. This is based on the principle that after a certain stage of pregnancy a child could survive outside of the womb of the mother( i.e premature babies).
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 08:00 pm |
|
| actually, a fetus or embryo is not 'a life' in the same sense as an innocent victim in war or a fleeing burglar, or a new born baby that breathes. you have a view of 'life' that does NOT value all life, you pick and choose as so many others that judge women and girls that have very personal reasons for getting an abortion. Last edited on Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 08:01 pm by thinkfirst
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 06:41 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
AGAIN, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE OTHER "MURDERS" THEN????
Self defense is not cold blooded murder. Killing people as an act of War, if those opposing you are also involved in the War, Is not murder. Killing millions of innocent unborn children by "choice" is cold blooded murder. My point is, if this woman left the child there in the port-a pot to die (this was her "choice"), she would be charged with murder..rightfully so. But isn't this exactly what every woman who "chooses" an abortion does? One dies in saline solution, the other child would have died in sanitation chemicals. There is no difference, yet everyone wants to get all up in arms over what this woman did, but turn a blind eye to abortion. The same thing is played out thousands of times daily in this country, and the woman is never charged. This make no sense, and is wrong, plain and simple.
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 06:24 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
AGAIN, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE OTHER "MURDERS" THEN????
|
Jlivin
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 17th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 733 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:56 pm |
|
| This Cambridge mother is obviously mentally ill.
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:28 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: 4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
No I actually think that abortion is far worse. What is the difference between a 6-12 week old BABY, and this baby? nothing. Your rational is that the 6-12 week old is not a life, when it is. Again, remember S. Peterson? he got charged with 2 murders, his wife, and his Child's, not a "embryo/fetus. Again this story is sad, but so are the countless thousands of abortions each year.
It is just a matter of convenience. It is legal, and ok for a woman to "chose" to kill her baby in the womb, but it is illegal, and everyone is upset when a woman "choose" to kill their baby outside the womb? Terminology does not change the fact that both are wrong, and both are murder. Thankfully, thus far this child has a chance, this is more than the aborted child has.
Last edited on Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:30 pm by 4Godncountry
|
Lurking Around
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 27th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1446 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:16 pm |
|
alostchild wrote: Lurking Around wrote: I find this story very sad . There are so many people that would love to have a baby to hold ........and this WOMAN .... 44 years old , has it and just leaves it for dead.....
What is wrong with people ......
I am glad she was charged , she could have gone to the hospital , had the baby and given it up for adoption with all the people here that want children to love ....
She also already has at least a daughter (who is an adult) and a son who I believe is around 9 or so. She should have been under managed care long ago. She's very sick.
Sad ...........
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:02 pm |
|
4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
You actually think that leaving a living breathing baby in a chemical toilet is the same as aborting a 6-12 week or less embryo/fetus? By your logic, as I've said 1000 times, is it any different than killing a fleeing burglar? Killing innocents during war? Either it's ALL murder or there are differences. Which one is it?
|
alostchild
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 03:10 am |
|
Lurking Around wrote: I find this story very sad . There are so many people that would love to have a baby to hold ........and this WOMAN .... 44 years old , has it and just leaves it for dead.....
What is wrong with people ......
I am glad she was charged , she could have gone to the hospital , had the baby and given it up for adoption with all the people here that want children to love ....
She also already has at least a daughter (who is an adult) and a son who I believe is around 9 or so. She should have been under managed care long ago. She's very sick.
|
Lurking Around
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 27th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1446 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 02:15 am |
|
I find this story very sad . There are so many people that would love to have a baby to hold ........and this WOMAN .... 44 years old , has it and just leaves it for dead.....
What is wrong with people ......
I am glad she was charged , she could have gone to the hospital , had the baby and given it up for adoption with all the people here that want children to love ....
|
pooh_b_21632
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 02:11 am |
|
4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
As I understand it she did have a choice. She had a choice to abort before the fetus became "viable" meaning it could survive outside of the womb. She also had a choice to take the baby to a hospital and leave it with a responsible person. She made a choice to have a baby that was "viable" outside of the womb and endanger its life. Maybe these charges will make others realize that they can leave a baby at a hospital and not face charges. If it saves one baby's life charging her is worth it in my opinion.
|
alostchild
Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 02:06 am |
|
4Godncountry wrote: I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
This baby was brought into this world and then abandoned. She had the right to choose, she could have chosen to go to the hospital and she could have chosen to leave it there. With most abortions the baby has no chance of surviving outside the womb, and so it is not considered neglect and/or abuse. Those babies were never brought into this world. I'll say again that I do not support abortion in the late term, or women who have abortions "willy-nilly," but as a medical necessity they must be allowed. A woman should have the right to choose what happens to her.
|
4Godncountry
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jul 11th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2183 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 01:58 am |
|
| I still don't get this country. I think that this story is sad, but I just don't understand. This lady gives birth, and it survives, and she is charged. Women have abortion's everyday, and the Baby almost always NEVER lives, and no charges. Didn't this woman have the right to chose? It is her body. Why should she be charged and countless thousands...get nothing? Does anyone else see the double standard?
|
Nature Lover
Member
| Joined: | Fri Sep 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | Hartly |
| Posts: | 995 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 10:03 pm |
|
Here's the link to the WBOC story
http://www.wboc.com/global/story.asp?s=10626747
Last edited on Wed Jul 1st, 2009 10:04 pm by Nature Lover
|
Nature Lover
Member
| Joined: | Fri Sep 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | Hartly |
| Posts: | 995 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 10:02 pm |
|
| The story was just on WBOC 1st at Five.
|
blogreader
Member
| Joined: | Fri Mar 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | Maryland USA |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 02:02 am |
|
HarveyC wrote: snowbabe wrote: What's this about a newborn in a porto potty down long wharf? Just caught the tail-end of it. Poor baby!
So whats so unusual about that? People from Taylor's Island, Church Creek and the Neck District have been having babies on the dumper for centuries and a lot of them post here.
Whats so unusual is the fact she left the baby in the porta potty. Had it not been for eyewitnesses this baby would had no chance at all. The baby still may not make it . Women in those rural areas did have babies on the 'dumper' as you say but how many do you know LEFT them in the 'dumper'?
|
blogreader
Member
| Joined: | Fri Mar 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | Maryland USA |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 07:19 am |
|
| This woman is mentally ill. Has had numerous hospitalizations yet still allowed to walk the streets freely. She does need serious psychiatric help but for long term not just a few days like she has had in the past. Maybe now someone will step up and take notice on how ill this particular woman really is and has been for some time.
|
snowbabe
Member
| Joined: | Mon Feb 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 52 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 06:54 am |
|
| I haven't seen it anywhere yet.
|
oldmarylander
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 21st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1823 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 04:36 am |
|
Has this been on the news anywhere?
|
snowbabe
Member
| Joined: | Mon Feb 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 52 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 03:46 am |
|
| Well now you can add Cambridge into your group. Gee, I can't remember any dumpings being made in "crab country" lately.
|
HarveyC
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 11th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 191 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:36 am |
|
snowbabe wrote: What's this about a newborn in a porto potty down long wharf? Just caught the tail-end of it. Poor baby!
So whats so unusual about that? People from Taylor's Island, Church Creek and the Neck District have been having babies on the dumper for centuries and a lot of them post here.
|
cedarcreek
Member
| Joined: | Sun Nov 9th, 2008 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1525 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:29 am |
|
I would pray for both the baby and the mom. Postpartum depression can do pretty weird things. She may have been out of her mind. I'm not saying it justifies what was done, only that I try to not sit in judgment whenever possible. So sad for that baby.
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 10:34 pm |
|
Church Creek Person wrote:
FEIGNED outrage from the left... I'll bet thinkfirst thinks all of it is OK...it's the "mommy's right" to be selfish and live her life unencumbered.
**typo
Some dumbXXX that doesn't have a clue can still learn something and contribute by opening the door to some pregnant female (oh and your wallet too)
Incest, rape, no child support, birth defects, birth control failure... many of the things that leave a girl or woman so helpless and "encumbered" unlike the seed planter, you have no solutions to those problems. So, good luck. Open your door, and maybe some poor kid will let you help them.
|
pooh_b_21632
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 09:47 pm |
|
This story is so sad. If I am reading correctly she has other kids as well. If anyone comes across a wboc story or it makes the paper I hope its posted.
|
Church Creek Person
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 2nd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1781 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:56 pm |
|
thinkfirst wrote: Great- social services send all your abortion referrals to CCP's house... it oughta fill up pretty quick
No...I think the porta can will do...everyone STOP pretending to be outraged...what is the difference if the "mom" allows a healthy baby to be pulled half way out of the birth canal and killed ANY different than a crappy ass mom throwing a baby over board?
FEIGNED outrage from the left... I'll bet thinkfirst thinks all of it is OK...it's the "mommy's right" to be selfish and live her life unencumbered.
**typoLast edited on Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:56 pm by Church Creek Person
|
thinkfirst
Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:48 pm |
|
| Great- social services send all your abortion referrals to CCP's house... it oughta fill up pretty quick
|
Church Creek Person
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 2nd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1781 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:45 pm |
|
however if the baby was pulled half way out of the bith canal and then killed...that would have been legal and O.K.
seems the mom had the steps messed up...have the kill baby BEFORE it is born before it is tossed....
WAIT...wasn't there a baby who survived a botched abortion and thrown away to die...????
half born and killed..."A-OK"...survived a botched abortion...just left to die..."A-OK" tossing ababy few hours after birth into the water or port a can...???
ALL babies have rights...why should we draw lines like the ones mentioned above?
|
itsme
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 26th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 332 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:41 pm |
|
you know--I seriously hope that her trying to throw the baby overboard or even in the port-a-pot was not the case. There are so many people in this world who would LOVE to have a child! And further more--if you dont want any kids (or anymore as I have heard the case was here) THERE ARE METHODS TO STOP IT!! Come on!
Stories like this really tick me off!!
You're right SC--I pray the baby will be ok and ends up with a family that will respect the gift of a child--and the mother--I pray she gets some seriously needed psychiatric help.
|
whattheha
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 27th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 233 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:19 pm |
|
SueCarol wrote: Will pray for the baby....the mother needs to be locked up.
I agree SueCarol, isn't there a law that states if you leave a baby or child at a hospital or fire company no charges can be pressed.
She was 100 yards from a hospital??????????
|
Lurking Around
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 27th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1446 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:16 pm |
|
| so sad .............
|
SueCarol
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1079 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 08:00 pm |
|
| Will pray for the baby....the mother needs to be locked up.
|
Current time is 10:31 am | Page: 1 2   |
|