Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

THE SCRAMBLE FOR AMERICA
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
DesertHawk
Member
 

Joined: Thu Dec 6th, 2007
Location: Sun Lakes, Arizona USA
Posts: 39
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 5th, 2008 05:35 am
 Quote  Reply 
Can't wait for the Dems convention . . . . Shades of Chicago 1968.  I will just pull up a chair and put on some popcorn and watch the  *itch slug it out with Hussein!! 

ConnecticutKnight
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jan 6th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 65
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 5th, 2008 09:16 pm
 Quote  Reply 

Say What, Barrack?




By Paul R. Hollrah



“Tuning in to C-Span recently, I found myself listening to a speech by Senator Barrack Hussein Obama, Jr. He was standing in the pulpit of a black church in Selma , Alabama , and as I studied the body language of the dozen or so black ministers standing behind the senator, I couldn't help but be reminded of the little head-bobbing dolls that people used to place in the rear windows of their 1957 Chevrolets. If their reactions are any indication, the new "Schlickmeister" of the Democrat Party is actually a pretty accomplished public speaker.

However, as he spoke, I found my b.s. alarm going off, repeatedly. But I couldn't quite figure out why until I actually read excerpts of his speech several days later. Here's part of what he said:

"...something happened back here in Selma, Alabama. Something happened in Birmingham that sent out what Bobby Kennedy called, "ripples of hope all around the world." Something happened when a bunch of women decided they were going to walk instead of ride the bus after a long day of doing somebody else's laundry, looking after somebody else's children.

"When (black) men who had PhD's decided 'that's enough' and 'we're going to stand up for our dignity,' that sent a shout across o ceans so that my grandfather began to imagine something different for his son. His son, who grew up herding goats in a small village in Africa could suddenly set his sights a little higher and believe that maybe a black man in this world had a chance.

"So the Kennedy's decided we're going to do an airlift.  We're going to go to Africa and start bringing young Africans over to this country and give them scholarships to study so they can learn what a wonderful country America is.

"This young man named Barack Obama got one of those tickets and came over to this country. He met this woman whose great great-great-great- grandfather had owned slaves; but she had a good idea there was some craziness going on because they looked at each other and they decided that we know that, (in) the world as it has been, it might not be possible for us to get together and have a child. There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma , Alabama , bec ause some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. Was born. So don't tell me I don't have a claim on Selma , Alabama . Don't tell me I'm not coming home to Selma , Alabama ."

Okay, so what's wrong with that? It all sounds good. But is it?

Obama told his audience that, because some folks had the courage to "march across a bridge" in Selma , Alabama , his mother, a white woman from Kansas , and his father, a black Muslim from Africa, took heart. It gave them the courage to get married and have a child. The problem with that characterization is that Barrack Obama, Jr., was born on August 4, 1961, while the first of three marches across that bridge in Selma didn't occur until March 7, 1965, at least five years after Obama's parents met.


Obama went on to tell his audience that the Kennedys, Jack and Bobby, decided to do an airlift. They would bring some young Africans over so that they could be educated and learn all about America . His grandfather heard that call and sent his son, Barrack Obama, Sr., to America .

The problem w ith that scenario is that, having been born in August 1961, the future senator was not conceived until sometime in November 1960. So if this African grandfather heard words that ''sent a shout across oceans,'' inspiring him to send his goat-herder son to America , it was not a Democrat Jack Kennedy he heard, nor his brother Bobby, it was a Republican President, Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Obama's speech is reminiscent of Al Gore's claim of having invented the Internet, Hillary Clinton's claim of having been named after the first man to climb Mt. Everest, even though she was born five years and seven months before Sir Edmund climbed the mountain, and John Kerry's imaginary trip to Cambodia .

As one of my black friends, Eddie Huff, has said, "We need to ask some very serious questions of the senator from Illinois . It's not enough to be black, it's not enough to be articulate, and it's not enough to be eloquent and a media darling. The only question will be how deaf an ear, or how blind an eye, will people turn in order to turn a frog into a prince
."

bigwavedave
Member


Joined: Tue May 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 197
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 5th, 2008 07:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Spam.....bump.......spam

ConnecticutKnight
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jan 6th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 65
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 5th, 2008 05:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 

Say What, Barrack?




By Paul R. Hollrah


“Tuning in to C-Span recently, I found myself listening to a speech by Senator Barrack Hussein Obama, Jr. He was standing in the pulpit of a black church in Selma , Alabama , and as I studied the body language of the dozen or so black ministers standing behind the senator, I couldn't help but be reminded of the little head-bobbing dolls that people used to place in the rear windows of their 1957 Chevrolets. If their reactions are any indication, the new "Schlickmeister" of the Democrat Party is actually a pretty accomplished public speaker.

However, as he spoke, I found my b.s. alarm going off, repeatedly. But I couldn't quite figure out why until I actually read excerpts of his speech several days later. Here's part of what he said:

"...something happened back here in Selma, Alabama. Something happened in Birmingham that sent out what Bobby Kennedy called, "ripples of hope all around the world." Something happened when a bunch of women decided they were going to walk instead of ride the bus after a long day of doing somebody else's laundry, looking after somebody else's children.

"When (black) men who had PhD's decided 'that's enough' and 'we're going to stand up for our dignity,' that sent a shout across o ceans so that my grandfather began to imagine something different for his son. His son, who grew up herding goats in a small village in Africa could suddenly set his sights a little higher and believe that maybe a black man in this world had a chance.

"So the Kennedy's decided we're going to do an airlift.  We're going to go to Africa and start bringing young Africans over to this country and give them scholarships to study so they can learn what a wonderful country America is.

"This young man named Barack Obama got one of those tickets and came over to this country. He met this woman whose great great-great-great- grandfather had owned slaves; but she had a good idea there was some craziness going on because they looked at each other and they decided that we know that, (in) the world as it has been, it might not be possible for us to get together and have a child. There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma , Alabama , bec ause some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. Was born. So don't tell me I don't have a claim on Selma , Alabama . Don't tell me I'm not coming home to Selma , Alabama ."

Okay, so what's wrong with that? It all sounds good. But is it?

Obama told his audience that, because some folks had the courage to "march across a bridge" in Selma , Alabama , his mother, a white woman from Kansas , and his father, a black Muslim from Africa, took heart. It gave them the courage to get married and have a child. The problem with that characterization is that Barrack Obama, Jr., was born on August 4, 1961, while the first of three marches across that bridge in Selma didn't occur until March 7, 1965, at least five years after Obama's parents met.


Obama went on to tell his audience that the Kennedys, Jack and Bobby, decided to do an airlift. They would bring some young Africans over so that they could be educated and learn all about America . His grandfather heard that call and sent his son, Barrack Obama, Sr., to America .

The problem w ith that scenario is that, having been born in August 1961, the future senator was not conceived until sometime in November 1960. So if this African grandfather heard words that ''sent a shout across oceans,'' inspiring him to send his goat-herder son to America , it was not a Democrat Jack Kennedy he heard, nor his brother Bobby, it was a Republican President, Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Obama's speech is reminiscent of Al Gore's claim of having invented the Internet, Hillary Clinton's claim of having been named after the first man to climb Mt. Everest, even though she was born five years and seven months before Sir Edmund climbed the mountain, and John Kerry's imaginary trip to Cambodia .

As one of my black friends, Eddie Huff, has said, "We need to ask some very serious questions of the senator from Illinois . It's not enough to be black, it's not enough to be articulate, and it's not enough to be eloquent and a media darling. The only question will be how deaf an ear, or how blind an eye, will people turn in order to turn a frog into a prince
."


bigwavedave
Member


Joined: Tue May 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 197
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 5th, 2008 03:04 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Ah, religion and politics.  Truly two things we can all disagree on.  If it were not for these, we might have a government which could actually do some good, for everyone!

ConnecticutKnight
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jan 6th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 65
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 2nd, 2008 03:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
CottonwoodZonie wrote: Now just who will us Potheads support to get us legal marijuana?


http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/Mike1633/16870


 Ron Paul: His Revolution Will Not Be Televised 


 

Anti-war candidate and master of the oversimplification, Ron Paul -- the guy who brings plenty of pork to his district even as he decries runaway government spending -- has apparently, quietly, stopped his campaign.

 

In a letter posted on his site, he says that with Romney out, there is now no chance of a brokered convention, so he's cutting staff for a "leaner and tighter" campaign.   Paul was another internet invention, another Howard Dean -- propelled by True Believers showering money on him, Paul was given a seat at the table.  And in caucuses, he can still pull a good number -- 21% in races over the weekend.  But in primaries, he's  been at or near the bottom in the recent ones, sometimes earning as little as 2% of the vote, Duncan Hunter territory. 

 

So the Ron  Paul Revolution has fizzled.  Unless, of course, Paul decides to use his still considerable war chest to run an independent campaign.  Which, if Hillary Clinton were the nominee, would help her in a close race against John McCain.  Meanwhile, Paul now focuses on his reelection, serving as he notes in his letter, his constituents, making sure he bring the bucks to his Texas district. 
Bump!

Arizonette
Member
 

Joined: Tue Feb 19th, 2008
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 15
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 11:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Maybe Ron Paul can get legislation past in his home state for making pot legal.  The the granola crowd (you know, nuts and flakes) from the bay area can have a place to move to!

CottonwoodZonie
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 276
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2008 09:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Bump!

CottonwoodZonie
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 276
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 11th, 2008 05:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Now just who will us Potheads support to get us legal marijuana?


http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/Mike1633/16870

 Ron Paul: His Revolution Will Not Be Televised 


 

Anti-war candidate and master of the oversimplification, Ron Paul -- the guy who brings plenty of pork to his district even as he decries runaway government spending -- has apparently, quietly, stopped his campaign.

 

In a letter posted on his site, he says that with Romney out, there is now no chance of a brokered convention, so he's cutting staff for a "leaner and tighter" campaign.   Paul was another internet invention, another Howard Dean -- propelled by True Believers showering money on him, Paul was given a seat at the table.  And in caucuses, he can still pull a good number -- 21% in races over the weekend.  But in primaries, he's  been at or near the bottom in the recent ones, sometimes earning as little as 2% of the vote, Duncan Hunter territory. 

 

So the Ron  Paul Revolution has fizzled.  Unless, of course, Paul decides to use his still considerable war chest to run an independent campaign.  Which, if Hillary Clinton were the nominee, would help her in a close race against John McCain.  Meanwhile, Paul now focuses on his reelection, serving as he notes in his letter, his constituents, making sure he bring the bucks to his Texas district. 

CottonwoodZonie
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 276
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jan 25th, 2008 09:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Regardless of what Barack Hussein Obama 's health care position is, you need to go to the Trinity United Church of Christ 's website.  Notice that they pledge allegiance to Africa and nowhere is America mentioned. 

Read their ten points and ask yourself this, if everywhere the term "black" or "African" was present and it was replaced by the term "white", and this was released by a interracial church . . .What would be the chances that they would be called racist?  Do you think a white candidate attending such a theoretical church would be branded a racist?

Supposedly their membership is restricted to those of black ancestry, I wouldn't know . . The first time I visited their website "membership" was the only link that was inoperable.  The last time I visited the membership link was removed.

While his middle name "Hussein" is bothersome, it is the religious beliefs of his congregation that scares me more.  I do not trust him, not for the color of his skin but for the color of his heart!  Go . . . read everything on this church, and remember, Barack Hussein Obama stands behind each and every principal and mission.

gk
Member


Joined: Mon Jan 9th, 2006
Location: Tonga
Posts: 1708
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jan 25th, 2008 06:21 pm
 Quote  Reply 
THE ANSWER !!!

http://www.seektress.com/infobomb.htm

CottonwoodZonie
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 276
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 03:42 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Go to the Trinity United Church of Christ 's website.  Notice that they pledge allegiance to Africa and nowhere is America mentioned. 

Read their ten points and ask yourself this, if everywhere the term "black" or "African" was present and it was replaced by the term "white", and this was released by a interracial church . . .What would be the chances that they would be called racist?  Do you think a white candidate attending such a theoretical church would be branded a racist?

Supposedly their membership is restricted to those of black ancestry, I wouldn't know . . The first time I visited their website "membership" was the only link that was inoperable.  The last time I visited the membership link was removed.

While his middle name "Hussein" is bothersome, it is the religious beliefs of his congregation that scares me more.  I do not trust him, not for the color of his skin but for the color of his heart!

Renegade
Guest
 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 1st, 2008 04:15 am
 Quote  Reply 
 
ORANGE COUNTY ( CALIFORNIA ) NEWSPAPER


 
This is a very good letter to the editor. This woman made some good points. For some reason, people have difficulty structuring their arguments when arguing against supporting the currently proposed immigration revisions. This lady made the argument pretty simple. NOT printed in the Orange County Pape r..... ...............  

Newspapers simply won't publish letters to the e editor which they either deem politically incorrect (read below) or which does not agree with the philosophy they're pushing on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been published; but, with your help it will get published via cyberspace!

 [size=]
New Immigrants
 
From: "David LaBonte"
 
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which, o f course, was not printed. So, I decided to "print" it myself by sending it out on the Internet. Pass it along if you u feel so inclined.

Dave LaBonte (signed)

 
Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Ora nge County Register:
 < /B>
Dear Editor:
  < /STRONG>
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.
 
Maybe we should t urn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States , people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
 
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assi milate into one culture.
<
Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had  were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity. Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people. When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
[size=2 c olor="black"] 
And here we are in 2006 with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I belie ve that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising futu re generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life . I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
 
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty, it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.

(signed) Rosemary LaBonte
 

I hope this letter gets read by millions of people all across the na tion!!

circa
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 154
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Nov 15th, 2007 11:49 am
 Quote  Reply 
The Scramble for America
 
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted: 10/09/2007



What is it that distinguishes Bush Republicanism from the Coolidge, Taft, Eisenhower and Reagan varieties? Four major issues come to mind.

Bush is a "Big Government conservative" who repudiated the "government-is-the-problem" philosophy of Reagan. His No Child Left Behind program, doubling the size of the Department of Education, and his vast expansion of Medicare to cover prescription drugs so testify.

Second, Bush believes in Wilsonian interventionism, including the use of military force, to advance a "global democratic revolution" and "end tyranny on earth."


Third, Bush believes in open borders, amnesty and "a path to citizenship" for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens, and smoothing the way for untold millions more to come and "do the work Americans will not do."

Fourth, Bush is a NAFTA-CAFTA man who believes in throwing America's doors open to goods from all over the world, regardless of the protectionist practices of our trade partners. To Bush, free trade is an article of faith and faithful observance its own reward.

For seven years now, consistent with these beliefs, Bush has crafted national policy to conform to his convictions. Thus, any verdict on the Bush presidency must also render judgment upon his philosophy.

With his own and his party's approval at the lowest levels since Watergate, one may conclude then that America is not only rejecting Bush the man and his record, but the philosophy behind both.

This should be a matter of grave concern to a Republican Party that has lately embraced all four pillars of the Bush-Republican philosophy.

For consider the fruits.

Interventionism gave us Iraq, the worst strategic blunder in U.S. history. Big Government conservatism wiped out the surplus, fattened the federal bureaucracy and enlarged its share of GDP, and destroyed the Republican reputation as America's bastion of fiscal prudence.

The Bush immigration philosophy was repudiated by Middle America, which rose in righteous wrath against his amnesty plan and demanded he enforce the law and secure the border. Americans are unreconciled to the idea that the America they grew up in will be morphed into some mammoth multicultural Mall of Mankind.

Now, the returns have come in from the Bush policy of free-trade globalism. According to a lead story in The Wall Street Journal -- whose editorial page still champions Iraq, the Bush Doctrine, open borders, NAFTA-CAFTA and the WTO --- Republicans, by two to one, believe free trade has done more harm than good to America.

"With voters provoked for years by such figures as Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot," writes the Journal's John Harwood, citing Romney adviser and former Rep. Vin Weber, "there's been a steady erosion in Republican support for free trade."

While one appreciates Harwood's compliment, it is undeserved. What killed the free-trade consensus in the GOP was not provocateurs, but proven failure.

Since 2002, America has run five consecutive world record trade deficits. Three million manufacturing jobs have disappeared. The euro has almost doubled in value against the dollar. The Canadian dollar has reached parity. Plants have been shutting down across this country for years. The wages of Middle Americans have stagnated. The trade deficit with China last year reached $233 billion, a world record between any two nations.

Where Alexander Hamilton's economic patriotism, pursued by Washington, Madison, Clay, Jackson, Lincoln, McKinley, T.R. and Coolidge, created the greatest manufacturing power the world had ever seen, producing 42 percent of all of the world's goods when Silent Cal went home, America's industrial plant has been ravaged by free trade.

And we are only beginning to see the damage done by the "trade-deficits-don't-matter!" Republicans.

The trade deficits America has run up in recent decades have helped give rival nations $5 trillion in cash reserves. They have now begun to transfer this enormous cash hoard into sovereign wealth funds -- to buy up America.


 Current time is 05:49 pm



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez