Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
Newszap Forums > Arizona Public Forums > Peoria Public Issues Forum > IS THERE TROUBLE IN THE RECALL

IS THERE TROUBLE IN THE RECALL
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
nodoginfight
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 30
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 12:54 pm
 Quote  Reply 
and pointless
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 03:04 am
 Quote  Reply 
Shameful
Adam Maras
Member
 

Joined: Wed Dec 5th, 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona USA
Posts: 178
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 01:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
I leave for three days and I have to come back to this?

Wonderful.
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
AnneR wrote:
Thanks for the entertainment boys, and remember: we're laughing at you, not with you.

When you say "we're laughing", you realize, AnneR, that it's only you inside that body of yours, right?? Norman Bates had his mother living inside, do you think that you might have this same mental disorder? It could explain your bizarre behavior, if you think it's bizarre, not that I'm saying you're bizarre.

I live in Delaware. I had relatives that lived in Peoria for a time, but they are all deceased. I only got involved in this because...it's a long story. My point is, please don't take any of this personally. You are just fine and normal, ApacheMom was right, you make perfect sense all the time, your scoreboard thing was so clever, and I'm sure you are a pleasure to know......

Last edited on Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:47 pm by justiceforall
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 


Thanks JamesT, you are always there for your girls, aren't you?

Last edited on Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:13 pm by justiceforall
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 03:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
Justice, you should consult a fashion expert.

But I digress: My, my, you boys just prove me right with each and every post.  P.T. Barnum couldn't find bigger suckers that Dadof3, Justice, Nodog and AREYOUKIDDING ME. Are any of you in the market for a bridge in Brooklyn?  A swamp in Florida? An adjustable rate mortgage?

Big Dave, none of these guys have the stones to take anyone on face-to-face.  Besides, they all know that I would best them in seconds! ;)

Thanks for the entertainment boys, and remember: we're laughing at you, not with you.

Last edited on Wed Apr 30th, 2008 03:13 am by AnneR
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 01:16 am
 Quote  Reply 
 .  Besides, they all know that I would best them in seconds!


Last edited on Wed Apr 30th, 2008 01:19 am by justiceforall
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 12:45 am
 Quote  Reply 
Emphasis on "little."

Sorry...couldn't resist.
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 12:42 am
 Quote  Reply 
After you little ... ummm ... man?
dadof3
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 12:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
Seriously, get some help.
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 12:38 am
 Quote  Reply 
My, my, you boys just prove me right with each and every post.  P.T. Barnum couldn't find bigger suckers that Dadof3, Justice, Nodog and AREYOUKIDDING ME. Are any of you in the market for a bridge in Brooklyn?  A swamp in Florida? An adjustable rate mortgage?

Big Dave, none of these guys have the stones to take anyone on face-to-face.  Besides, they all know that I would best them in seconds! ;)

Thanks for the entertainment boys, and remember: we're laughing at you, not with you.

Last edited on Wed Apr 30th, 2008 12:41 am by AnneR
bigwavedave
Member


Joined: Tue May 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 256
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 10:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I think everybody should just meet in the street and have a big pillow fight to settle the differences.  At least that would be entertaining.
nodoginfight
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 30
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 10:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
[walking over to the other side of the street now to avoid the crazy people]
dadof3
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 05:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Anne, you need to chill out before you blow a gasket. Your blood pressure must be through the roof. Seriously.
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 04:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 


OK ANNIE YOU WIN. WHATEVER YOU SAY, I SUDDENLY HAVE DECIDED TO AGREE WITH YOU.

Last edited on Tue Apr 29th, 2008 04:58 pm by justiceforall
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 03:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Dadof3, and especially Justice (3 a.m???), thank you for proving my point.
dadof3
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 12:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Anne four letter words and all, Please for the sake of anyone around you or anyone who might encounter you in a fit of road rage or cutting in the express line, there is therapy, anger management and happy pills for your many problems, which obviously go way beyond this forum.

Last edited on Tue Apr 29th, 2008 12:30 pm by dadof3
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 10:43 am
 Quote  Reply 
AnnieR COULDN'T BE MORE RIGHT. SHE IS A GENIUS.

Last edited on Tue Apr 29th, 2008 05:39 pm by justiceforall
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 29th, 2008 05:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
You don't scare me Gadfly.  I've read your junk in the past and you're as weak as AREYOUKIDDING ME.  In a battle of wits my friend, you are unarmed.

As for Apache Mom, No Dog, I wouldn't know her if I ran over her.

AREYOUKIDDING ME is the fool here.  Always was, always will be.   Apache Mom blasted him, provided backup, and he threw a tantrum . . . three days later.  Three days.  Now there's a cracker jack and astute intellect (hint clowns, that's sarcasm).

What I find funny is that Apache Mom presents solid evidence, and rather than go after that, or try to argue intelligently, you clowns resort to personal attacks.  Always.  It's your MO.  And you wonder why I love to **** with you so much?  You're all sooooooo self important, but when presented with an intelligent argument, one backed up with plenty of proof, you go coward.

Apache Mom not only wiped the floor with AREYOUKIDDING ME, she did the same to Gadfly before, and would do the same to Justice, No Dog and Dadof3 if they had the stones to stick around.  But they don't.

Last edited on Tue Apr 29th, 2008 05:31 am by AnneR
AREYOUKIDDING ME
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 28th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 355
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 27th, 2008 11:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
RDG Message received loud and clear
rdg7359
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 12th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 135
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 27th, 2008 05:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
JamesT, AnneR, Dadof3, Justiceforall and Areyoukiddingme,

It is very apparent that the five of you have entirely to much time on your hands as one can see through your responses and petty bickering back and forth.

I would like you to focus your attention on becoming a Mentor for children that are in CPS group homes across the valley. It is very rewarding and a perfect fit for people like yourselves with a lot of free time on your hands.

I am providing you with a link to Parenting Arizona so you can sign up - http://www.parentingaz.org/SpecialFriends.asp 

 
gadfly
Member
 

Joined: Thu Oct 18th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 170
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 27th, 2008 03:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
AnneR wrote: And Gadfly, if you can find better, more accurate information than Apache Mom, please present it. Just like AREYOUKIDDING ME and the buffoon Justice, you tactic is to attack the messenger.

That not only makes you makes all three of you intellectual lightweights, it also makes you cowards.

 


AnneR

I refuse to get in this war of words you all are waging. So, if this is a game of last words, you will win because I'm not going to play. I would crucify you if I chose to play, but I will not, thank you. My prime objective of my post was to display the very thoughtful post of Mr. Coury many months ago. The district needs someone like him.

However, since you did include me here, I will respond in a small way. Because I have another view than you do, I don't understand why that makes me an intellectual lightweight or a coward.

I'm not sure about the "more accurate information" you are searching for. ApacheMom made some very foolish assertions and she was called on it. There is nothing more to say about it. Read it for yourself without the blinders this time.

Last edited on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 04:14 pm by gadfly
dadof3
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 27th, 2008 12:45 am
 Quote  Reply 
and married to James.
nodoginfight
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 15th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 30
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 27th, 2008 12:15 am
 Quote  Reply 
Just an observation, but it seems like AnneR and ApacheMom are the same person, just different online alter egos.  A little split personality disorder?  Very amusing. 

 
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 26th, 2008 03:00 pm
 Quote  Reply 
AnneR wrote:  Just like AREYOUKIDDING ME and the buffoon Justice, you tactic is to attack the messenger.


 


AnnieR

I am glad you are finally including me in your salient comments. I am hoping I can be included in your scoreboard gig you do. Any chance we could start that up again and include me this time?

Even though we disagree - or do we, I can't remember if you presented an opinion on anything - please keep salienting, it's what you're good at doing.

....And you may want to try again with back peddle. Peddle means to sells something. If that's what you meant, okay, I just missed your salient point. :D
AnneR
Member
 

Joined: Sat Mar 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 40
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 26th, 2008 01:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
AREYOUKIDDING ME, don't even start.  No matter how many times your sorry rear end tries to back peddle, you've already admitted on this forum that you didn't have a clue as to who you were voting for.

And Gadfly, if you can find better, more accurate information than Apache Mom, please present it. Just like AREYOUKIDDING ME and the buffoon Justice, you tactic is to attack the messenger.

That not only makes you makes all three of you intellectual lightweights, it also makes you cowards.

 

Last edited on Sat Apr 26th, 2008 01:26 pm by AnneR
AREYOUKIDDING ME
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 28th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 355
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 26th, 2008 02:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
gadfly wrote: Nick Coury,  Where are you? This district needs your wisdom. If your mom runs this time, I will vote for her simply because she produced such a wise kid. RUK, although I agree with you that most of what Apache Mom stated was not credible (especially that the information was not out regarding candidates' views before the election), what Nick Coury states here regarding why Murphy and Knecht were elected is very credible and you should read it.

You might say that because the board members ran on a platform of closing the campuses and won, they did follow the will of the people.  Honestly, this does present a bit of a challenge to my stance initially, because I do believe in elected officials running on platforms of what they intend to do.  But there is a last piece of information about our democratic system to keep in mind.  Although I do love the idea of democracy and would have a hard time finding a better system, there are inherent flaws in it that bring about some potential problems.  Two of these are voter apathy and a lack of information.  Many voters in the PUSD boundaries don't have kids in school, or do not know anything about the school board.  Because of this, even though they vote, they don't research the candidates and may vote arbitrarily for candidates based on criteria unrelated to the people running.  For example, I strongly believe Rick Murphy won by such a strong margin because the school board election is nonpartisan (no candidate had a party affiliation on the ballot) but since he was running for the legislature with the (R) next to his name, voters saw he was a Republican.  Certainly he may have won without this, but it did get him Republican voters that didn't know any candidates.



Gadfly

Don't buy Nick Coury's argument in the least. In the first place, he is arguing why his mom lost the election. This is not the most independent opinion here.

Second, he is arguing because there are a bunch of AnnieR idiots out there voting that somehow the AnnieR idiots voted more for the closed campus candidates? If you have 100 AnnieR idiots who know absolutely nothing about anything, why wouldn't there be 50 AnnieRs for one side and 50 AnnieRs for the other. Isn't that the law of averages, statistics, common sense?
gadfly
Member
 

Joined: Thu Oct 18th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 170
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 09:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Nick Coury,  Where are you? This district needs your wisdom. If your mom runs this time, I will vote for her simply because she produced such a wise kid. RUK, although I agree with you that most of what Apache Mom stated was not credible (especially that the information was not out regarding candidates' views before the election), what Nick Coury states here regarding why Murphy and Knecht were elected is very credible and you should read it. Hi Gadfly,

I have been following a couple of these threads in small bits and pieces, and I've heard you say a couple times that once we vote the board members in, we must wait until the next election to give our input into the decisions of the school board.

I know these forums can bring about a lot of argument because of the nature of these issues, but I also think it can be a place where we can learn about views we don't understand.  I haven't read many of the posts lately so please forgive me if I missed something and correct me if I'm off the mark, but I don't agree that this is correct.  Please allow me to explain:

We live in a democratic society and a large part of this is voting for our representatives to make decisions for us.  This is a great and powerful thing because it allows every person to have a part in the ultimate decisions of our governmental process.  I believe this is a large part of where you are coming from and I agree about this much.  The part I disagree with is that this is the only time we have a say.

Many times we do not fully agree with what candidates say.  I may support one candidate over another, but still not fully agree with what the second has to say.  A candidate may never address some issues that they face later in office.  And they may change their stance after being elected.  All of these together present a problem with why voting alone is an imperfect measure of the will of the people.  One solution to this is often proposed with respect to national issues.  I often hear people say that if you have a problem with what the legislature is going to do, write a letter to your congressman.  This is one form of voicing an opinion.  Similar to the school board, many citizens will speak at city council meetings to voice complaints about urban development, city codes and policies, and other local issues.  These channels are made available so that we as citizens can tell our elected officials that we disagree (or agree) with what they intend to do.  It is useful if we like a candidate but not a specific decision they are going to make, or if we dislike a candidate and want them to hear our voice.

To imply that once we elect an official into office, that person is allowed to make decisions unchecked until the next election is an unfortunate view.  If we did allow this to happen, it would be a dangerous thing.  Conceivably, someone could run on one platform to get elected, then turn around and do the exact opposite and we couldn't do a thing about it.

I think I might be going a little far with this explanation, because I believe the big issue you have isn't the speaking out, but instead the continual speaking out on the same issue.  I would personally not like to see so much time spent on this issue every meeting when there are far more important issues to address (high school modernization, perhaps the most important issue last meeting, was the only one skipped).  But I do believe that allowing this is an important balance against candidates going against their electorate.  I have been involved with this issue since it came up two years ago, and I have spoken at a couple of the meetings, and I will tell you why I believe this.

When the issue first came up, it was the same situation from the other side of the argument.  A couple parents came to several meetings voicing their opposition to an open campus until the issue was reviewed.  The issue was finally reviewed, and there was a split between open and closed campus.  The school board chose a compromise between the two options with a partial closure.  After the election, the newly elected school board decided to close the campuses completely, despite evidence that showed that the majority of parents did not want the campuses completely closed.  The new parents are fighting against these board members who ignore the will of their electorate.

You might say that because the board members ran on a platform of closing the campuses and won, they did follow the will of the people.  Honestly, this does present a bit of a challenge to my stance initially, because I do believe in elected officials running on platforms of what they intend to do.  But there is a last piece of information about our democratic system to keep in mind.  Although I do love the idea of democracy and would have a hard time finding a better system, there are inherent flaws in it that bring about some potential problems.  Two of these are voter apathy and a lack of information.  Many voters in the PUSD boundaries don't have kids in school, or do not know anything about the school board.  Because of this, even though they vote, they don't research the candidates and may vote arbitrarily for candidates based on criteria unrelated to the people running.  For example, I strongly believe Rick Murphy won by such a strong margin because the school board election is nonpartisan (no candidate had a party affiliation on the ballot) but since he was running for the legislature with the (R) next to his name, voters saw he was a Republican.  Certainly he may have won without this, but it did get him Republican voters that didn't know any candidates.

In this case particularly, the election of Kathy Knecht and Rick Murphy does not mean that the parents of PUSD want the campuses closed.  The only two statistically valid surveys about the opinion of parents both show that between a half and two thirds of parents do not want campuses completely closed.  (I think I saw some argument about these statistics - I am a math major and if you'd like links and an explanation of what I mean by "valid", just ask).

I appologize for the length of this but I felt that with any less I wouldn't be able to be clear.  If you can respond, I'm interested to hear if I understood your view correctly and if you can agree with what I am saying.

Last edited on Fri Apr 25th, 2008 10:08 pm by gadfly
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 09:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Adam Maras wrote:
I've already commented on the fact that my views and ways of going about things regarding Board politics have changed since the days of the "bi-weekly sermons." I'm curious as to when you last heard a member of the community participate in Call to the Public for the sole purpose of complaining about closed campuses.



Adam

To tell you the truth, I do not track such useless information. I remember one of the last was when Preston was talking about the weather conditions during lunch time and I almost crawled through the television. I don't understand the point of your curiosity.

I know you are always trying to appear above the fray here, but those speeches raised the temperature between the two sides fivefold, in my opinion.
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 09:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
JamesT wrote: Oh my Justice, can you tell us what we can expect next from your rapier-like wit?  I’m betting it’s an “I am rubber and you are glue reference.”  Or is that too advanced for you?

And, please us know if your friend RUK is able to sit without pain yet.  He seems to be avoiding the question (as he so often does).




Really JamesT, you need to stop. I am almost embarrassed for you......almost.
Adam Maras
Member
 

Joined: Wed Dec 5th, 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona USA
Posts: 178
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 09:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
justiceforall wrote: As far as your Adam Maras comment, I also respectfully disagree. You obviously did not have to suffer through his bi-weekly sermons on lunch. I did. He did not stand above the fray. He was right smack in the middle of it.
I've already commented on the fact that my views and ways of going about things regarding Board politics have changed since the days of the "bi-weekly sermons." I'm curious as to when you last heard a member of the community participate in Call to the Public for the sole purpose of complaining about closed campuses.

Bigwavedave, thank you for your kind words :)
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 08:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
bigwavedave wrote: Good morning everyone.  For the record, I have no vested interest in the PUSD recall, lunch issue, or any other issue discussed on this topic.  I have however watched the topic since it started and have seen it go from issue oriented to completely absurd.  I do however find it interesting that only after the recall attempt failed, some of you Johnny-come-lately posters found your way to this topic to input your gloating.  The only poster on this topic who ever maintained his dignity was Adam Maras.  Congrats Adam for standing above the fray.

Now I would like to apologize for sticking my nose in your business, but from an outsider looking in, you all need to bury this horse, because he was beaten to death months ago and really stinks.  Continued name calling only reflects badly on the posters. 

Regards to all.....Bigwavedave


Bigwavedave

Although I can appreciate what you are trying to say, I must disagree with you. I am one of the Johnny-come-later posters you are referring to, but I have kept up with this from the beginning.

This has never been an "issue oriented" discussion. This has always been a completely absurd subject. This has been about whether kids eat in a cafeteria for lunch, period. The problem has been these people then decided to do anything and everything to get the policy changed and look what good it's done. It is not a dead horse as we will soon find out. If anybody thinks this is all going to go away now, it's not. It will be the number one issue for the fall election - lunch. That is absurd.

As far as your Adam Maras comment, I also respectfully disagree. You obviously did not have to suffer through his bi-weekly sermons on lunch. I did. He did not stand above the fray. He was right smack in the middle of it.
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 08:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Oh my Justice, can you tell us what we can expect next from your rapier-like wit?  I’m betting it’s an “I am rubber and you are glue reference.”  Or is that too advanced for you?

And, please us know if your friend RUK is able to sit without pain yet.  He seems to be avoiding the question (as he so often does).



Last edited on Fri Apr 25th, 2008 08:25 pm by JamesT
bigwavedave
Member


Joined: Tue May 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 256
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 04:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Good morning everyone.  For the record, I have no vested interest in the PUSD recall, lunch issue, or any other issue discussed on this topic.  I have however watched the topic since it started and have seen it go from issue oriented to completely absurd.  I do however find it interesting that only after the recall attempt failed, some of you Johnny-come-lately posters found your way to this topic to input your gloating.  The only poster on this topic who ever maintained his dignity was Adam Maras.  Congrats Adam for standing above the fray.

Now I would like to apologize for sticking my nose in your business, but from an outsider looking in, you all need to bury this horse, because he was beaten to death months ago and really stinks.  Continued name calling only reflects badly on the posters. 

Regards to all.....Bigwavedave
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 03:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
JamesT

You may want to quit while you're behind

Hey, what's fifty years?:shock:

:cool:
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 12:39 am
 Quote  Reply 
AREYOUKIDDING ME wrote: Eddie has always had salient points.
Well, that's  just another advantage he has over you.

Really, are you able to sit without pain yet?

JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 25th, 2008 12:37 am
 Quote  Reply 
Well RUK, if I'm suffering from the disease, you're likely to die by it.
AREYOUKIDDING ME
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 28th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 355
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 24th, 2008 02:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
JamesT You seem to be suffering from a bad case of foot-in-mouth disease. I hope you get better. Maybe Ward Cleaver has a cure for it. Perhaps Eddie Haskell, too, you might try him, Eddie has always had salient points.

Last edited on Thu Apr 24th, 2008 08:08 pm by AREYOUKIDDING ME
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 11:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
justiceforall wrote: Frank, there I go again, sorry JamesT, I forgot who I was talking to today. Let me slow it down for you.

 

You               see,      I      was      commenting      on           your                 IQ                because            you              indicated           that               AnnieR               had                made                   a                     salient                       point                          and                         then                           you          made                  it                             much                              worse               by                     making                                        that                        sexist                     remark                about                         "girls"       


Actually, you didn't answer my question at all, you dolt.

Who is Frank?  What the hell are you talking about?

Welcome back, RUK.  Are you able to sit without pain yet?
AREYOUKIDDING ME
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 28th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 355
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I agree Adam Maras.
Adam Maras
Member
 

Joined: Wed Dec 5th, 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona USA
Posts: 178
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 07:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You should all be ashamed of yourselves :)
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 05:57 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Frank, there I go again, sorry JamesT, I forgot who I was talking to today. Let me slow it down for you.

 

You               see,      I      was      commenting      on           your                 IQ                because            you              indicated           that               AnnieR               had                made                   a                     salient                       point                          and                         then                           you          made                  it                             much                              worse               by                     making                                        that                        sexist                     remark                about                         "girls"       

JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 05:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Well now, isn't his an odd turn of events.

First, dadof3 suddenly becomes politically correct.  You know, you might be a little more credible had you corrected your hero RUK while was busy blasting us with well below PC speech.  You know, like referring to Apache Mom as "Apache Mommy" as if "Mommy" was a term for weakness.  I think you should correct your hero first before correcting me.

As for you Justice, this time you got me.  Who is Frank?  And what the hell are you talking about?
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 03:05 pm
 Quote  Reply 
:shock:Frank (whoops I mean JamesT)

Sexist = -25 points

AnnieR comments = -50 points

______________________

Results are:

IQ still high enough to be a copycat blogmeister....

 

 

Last edited on Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 03:13 pm by justiceforall
dadof3
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 01:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
James, whether anyone agrees or disagrees with your rationale, you are insulting "girls" everywhere by your sexist remarks, which I don't think it's the first time you've used that comment. Do you have daughters or sisters or a wife? Do you want them to be ridiculed by using "girls" as a stereotype? LIke that's some "weak" tormenting remark? "Oh, you're like a GIRL, how weak, and to be pitied"???? Talk about right out ofthe 1950's type of comment.
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 05:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
Wow, Justice, is your intent to be an equal opportunity idiot by insulting my intelligence?

RUK is nothing more than a blowhard and a bully.  Apache Mom comported herself quite well, provided research and brought quite a bit of reason and logic to the discussion.  I think the person who learned here was RUK, and what he learned is that he couldn't keep up, especially with Apache Mom.  Her's is clearly a superior intellect.  To make matters worse, his last post is nothing more than a temper tantrum not befitting a four-year-old, let a lone a parent and man of 52.

And now that the bully has had his nose bloodied by a girl, he leaves to sulk in self pity.  He will not be missed, because he never brought much to the conversation to begin with.  And you're likely right about traffic on this forum slowing down. Like a car accident, it was hard not to slow down and watch RUK as RUK made a fool of himself daily.
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 02:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
JamesT wrote: Tsk, tsk Justice.  Name calling?  That is the last vestige of the desperate.  Like it or not, the wise guy AnneR makes a salient point.


JamesT

I must say anyone who uses AnneR and salient point in the same sentence puts into question that person's intelligence quotient. I see now why you didn't understand what RUK was saying.

There is an idiot with a message and just an idiot. This has been RUK's forum and there is a reason that there have been 9,000+ hits on it. RUK is an idiot, but he sure makes people think and he makes you defend your position, as Apache discovered. RUK says he's leaving for a while. I think you will find this forum will now dry up. Unless, of course, you want to continue to tune in for AnneK's inane scoreboard. :D

Last edited on Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 07:53 pm by justiceforall
justiceforall
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 04:32 am
 Quote  Reply 
I guess it's easy to say that, but what exactly didn't you understand and how was he proven wrong?
Adam Maras
Member
 

Joined: Wed Dec 5th, 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona USA
Posts: 178
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 04:29 am
 Quote  Reply 
Wow. I think I can honestly say that I'm ashamed of the behavior of most of the people that have contributed to this discussion.
JamesT
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 17th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 04:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
Tsk, tsk Justice.  Name calling?  That is the last vestige of the desperate.  Like it or not, the wise guy AnneR makes a salient point.

What I understand is this:  our friend AREYOUKIDDING ME threw a temper tantrum three days after being intellectually trounced on this forum.  His last post is a weak, verbose attempt to get in the last word in the hopes that people won't read the previous posts.  After all, he would rather be seen as a raving lunatic than to have people see how he was bested.

In short, he is the schoolyard bully who got his nose bloodied by a girl.

As Apache Mom projected earlier, this is all about AREYOUKIDDING ME winning, even when he knows he has been proven wrong.

He is a weak man with a weak intellect and should be pitied.


 Current time is 01:27 am		Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.4213 seconds (12% database + 88% PHP). 28 queries executed.