| Author | Post |
|---|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:56 am |
|
You should be aware of all of this so you won’t be surprised when one of the programs you child participates in suddenly disappears for lack of money.
And you’ll also know who to blame.
Posted by Michael Erickson at 6:45 PM  
Labels: Diane Douglas, Jack Erb, Kathy Knecht, Peoria Unified School District, Rick Murphy
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:25 am |
|
areyounotkidding me wrote: Joe McCord wrote
Because I, too, was curious I checked into it. The cost is NOT covered by the PUSD insurance plan since it involved the cancellation of a contract and that is specifically excluded under the insurance terms. The money will have to come from the M & O budget and that's a real shame.
I will make certain that something like that never happens when I am on the board.
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:24 am |
|
Peoria Dad wrote: You never proved your point at all. You're not right about this, and you never have been.
But you are clearly seeking validation that will never come. You are pathetic and to be pitied.
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:23 am |
|
gadfly wrote: That's all you're going to respond?
Just to be clear, this is not a falsehood, you're standing by this and that the district is not paying this 1.25 million out of M&O?
And, to answer another of your inane questions: yes, PUSD is self-insured, but like all self-insured agencies carries and pays for liablity insurance from an independent provider. The very reason for carrying this insurance is, in fact, to pay off law suits.
This information comes straight from the district administrator in charge of insurance.
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:21 am |
|
Apache Mom wrote: Got proof, gadfly? I actually have screen photos of the blog from months and months ago, and it says the same thing it said today.
You're just not a good liar.
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:18 am |
|
 Anonymous said...
"You left out one important fact - Douglas was on the board at that time, too. Funny how you leave that part out when you look to lay blame...."
"During a discussion at the Aug. 12 school board meeting, all three took shots at the former school board for its unanimous approval of a rental contract to ease overcrowding at Sunrise Mountain High School. We’ve come to expect that of Murphy, of course, because that’s the sole reason he ran for the school board. Douglas, naturally, forgot to remind everyone that she was one of five board members who voted to approve the contract in the first place."
"In May 2003, we subleased to the Unified School District No. 11, of Maricopa
County, Arizona, the premises at which we had previously operated our Fletcher
Heights Charter Elementary School, and in August 2003, we sold to Partnership
With Parents, Inc. (an Arizona non-profit corporation) the premises at which we
had previously owned and operated our Desert Heights Charter Elementary School.
As a result of these two transactions in 2003, we exited both the Arizona market
and our direct ownership of charter schools."
I know I keep say I'm going to leave, but just like Columbo, just one more thing I'm having a problem with...
There are three quotes above. One from a poster on this site, the second one from Michael Erickson, and the third from the 10K of Nobel Learning Centers. My question is: how did Diane Douglas "approve the contract in the first place"? The contract was approved in May 2003, Douglas was elected in November of 2004 (please coorect me if I'm wrong), how did she have any hand in approving this contract?
While we're at it, here is another post from Michael Erickson regarding Nobel that I'm having a problem with:
"Who does she think she’s kidding? Not a penny of that settlement will come at the come from the classroom or any other part of the school district’s maintenance and operations budget. I will come from the district’s insurance carrier".
Please "educate" me again here. If the Peoria School District is self-insured (again correct me if I'm wrong if it is not), doesn't that mean that PUSD does not have an insurance carrier to pay this and that is the reason there was discussion from the board about budgeting for the future for this $1.25 million?
I'm surprised none of you asked these same questions.
Well, a big day today. Off to the monster truck show.
September 1, 2008 8:10:00 AM MST
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17th, 2008 12:12 am |
|
Who Are They Trying to Kid?
I’ll say this for Kathy Knecht, Rick Murphy and Diane Douglas: they all think we’re stupid.
During a discussion at the Aug. 12 school board meeting, all three took shots at the former school board for its unanimous approval of a rental contract to ease overcrowding at Sunrise Mountain High School. We’ve come to expect that of Murphy, of course, because that’s the sole reason he ran for the school board. Douglas, naturally, forgot to remind everyone that she was one of five board members who voted to cancel the contract in the first place.
The worst of them, though, was Knecht, who indignantly waxed: “It is indeed a sickening compromise that we have to make, because of the dollars that come out of our classrooms, (which benefit) our kids. The only thing I can think of that would be worse than that would be having to take even more from them.”
Who does she think she’s kidding? Not a penny of that settlement will come at the come from the classroom or any other part of the school district’s maintenance and operations budget. I will come from the district’s insurance carrier.
So that leaves Knecht with one of two explanations: she was either lying, or she didn’t know. Either way, Knecht stuck her foot in her mouth . . . again.
Posted by Michael Erickson at 5:23 PM 3 comments Links to this post
Labels: Diane Douglas, Kathy Knecht, Peoria Unified School District, Rick Murphy
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 11:42 pm |
|
| They have no one on the board that agrees with their views. Shouldn't that tell them something?
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 11:35 pm |
|
| And, for that matter, I don't think it is now a secret who Apache Mom is. Apache Mom has been less than truthful on this forum, there can be no dispute. It seems the house of cards has tumbled.
|
unhappyinpusd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 11:31 pm |
|
Yep- Cheerleader - they prefer not to be put to the task such as responding to legitimate questions. Here's one: Does Michael Erickson really exist? Does Frank Rohrig really exist? Will the real Michael Erickson please step forward? How about the real Frank Rohrig? I challenge both Michael and Frank to attend the next governing board meeting, and introduce themselves during the "call to public" and explain their take on this Nobel lease situation. I will be waiting (patiently) to finally have a chance to put face(s) with name(s). This is your chance, gentlemen, to introduce yourselves to everyone because, as far as I know, you have never once stepped forward and spoken at a meeting (at least not under the guise of "Michael" or "Frank") See you on the 25th.
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 11:23 pm |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Adam Maras responds on behalf of Peoria Dad? or on behalf of Michael Erickson? Or, are they all one in the same? It's long been known that someone is feeding Adam information, and we all know the source of that information. It's also widely known (or believed) that Michael and Frank don't even exist in the real world.
Does it really matter who they are? Haven't they been exposed as hacks and with little credibilty remaining if they had any in the first place?
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 10:02 pm |
|
Adam Maras wrote: I think we got the point, folks.
And that point is we have no answer to this Nobel lease situation and please quit asking as it is very uncomfortable when you do....Last edited on Sun Nov 16th, 2008 10:08 pm by cheerleaderforclosers
|
unhappyinpusd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 09:48 pm |
|
| Adam Maras responds on behalf of Peoria Dad? or on behalf of Michael Erickson? Or, are they all one in the same? It's long been known that someone is feeding Adam information, and we all know the source of that information. It's also widely known (or believed) that Michael and Frank don't even exist in the real world.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 06:08 pm |
|
| Peoria Dad?
|
Adam Maras
Member
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 04:52 pm |
|
I think we got the point, folks.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16th, 2008 02:15 pm |
|
| Peoria Dad?
|
areyoujoshingme
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14th, 2008 11:57 pm |
|
| Peoria Dad?
|
cheerleaderforclosers
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14th, 2008 02:41 pm |
|
| Peoria Dad - Are you going to respond to this? Is this the proof you were looking for?
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13th, 2008 05:52 pm |
|
Joe McCord wrote
Because I, too, was curious I checked into it. The cost is NOT covered by the PUSD insurance plan since it involved the cancellation of a contract and that is specifically excluded under the insurance terms. The money will have to come from the M & O budget and that's a real shame.
I will make certain that something like that never happens when I am on the board.
Now Peoria Dad, Apache Mom, Michael Erickson, etc......An apology is in order and a promise never to fib again
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12th, 2008 05:55 pm |
|
gadfly wrote: St. Michael has a problem telling the truth.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could actually prove that?
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 8th, 2008 02:18 am |
|
| St. Michael has a problem telling the truth. Last edited on Sat Nov 8th, 2008 02:30 am by gadfly
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:34 pm |
|
areyounotkidding me wrote: I think St. Michael may be a bit angry at me though.
No. He's taken pity on you, too.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:28 pm |
|
| I think St. Michael may be a bit angry at me though.
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:27 pm |
|
| And P.S. -- St. Joseph is the patron saint of the wretched. You might want to pray to him, too.
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:26 pm |
|
| You should.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:25 pm |
|
| I'll pray to St. Michael tonight and ask for forgiveness for the wretched life I have led.
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 10:21 pm |
|
| I really do pity you.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 08:27 pm |
|
| I'm just happy for you that you spelled intellectual correctly.
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 07:27 pm |
|
That's so sweet. Clearly you cannot engage in an intellectual discussion, so you resort to insults. I'd say that says a whole lot more about you intellectual capacity than mine.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 06:52 pm |
|
| Have you been told today you just aren't very intelligent??? If not, let me be the first.. Last edited on Fri Nov 7th, 2008 07:23 pm by areyounotkidding me
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 06:36 pm |
|
You never proved your point at all. You're not right about this, and you never have been.
But you are clearly seeking validation that will never come. You are pathetic and to be pitied.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 04:01 am |
|
Peoria Dad
Were you watching the school board meeting when this lease was all discussed??? Did you catch on to the fact there was never a mention that the insurance carrier was going to pay for this $1.25 million??? Did you catch on to the discussion that the district would have to budget for this??? Did you catch on to the discussion what a hardship this will be for the district? Did you catch on to the fact that Raeder would have rather been anywhere but there that night and she didn't say a word about the insurance company paying for this? Did you catch on to the fact that she would have stated no doubt the insurance company would have paid if that were the case? Did you catch on to the fact this is an attorney error in the wording of the contract? Did you catch on to the fact this is the very same attorney who wrote Erb's retirement package? And , finally, are you aware you are the only one who has attempted to refute this (as lame as your argument is, in fact I don't even know what your argument is)? Did you catch on to the fact there are many, including Erickson and Frank, who would love to shut me up?
There is only one problem...I am right....
And you want validation...how about this..I'll use St. Michael's words:
You should be aware of all of this so you won’t be surprised when one of the programs you child participates in suddenly disappears for lack of money.
And you’ll also know who to blame.
That will be bitter validation, won't it Peoria Dad?
Last edited on Fri Nov 7th, 2008 05:09 am by gadfly
|
Peoria Dad
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 270 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 03:21 am |
|
Still searching for validation that will never come I see.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 7th, 2008 12:59 am |
|
gadfly wrote: By the way, Apache Mom, you have screen photos of Erickson's blog? What are you, a blog groupie? I find that more than a bit strange...
Look it up on Frank's blog, it's right there...before you call him and ask him to change it....
So, why is the district budgeting for this $1.25 million, Apache Mommy?
As I predicted, Apache Mom, Frank has deleted all the evidence tonight - deleted the whole post.......
You are free to answer this last question at any time...
Last edited on Fri Nov 7th, 2008 12:59 am by gadfly
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 07:16 pm |
|
| Thanks for the suggestion gymsocks dude
|
Gymsocks
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 27th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 05:25 pm |
|
areyounotkidding me wrote: Apache Mom bringing out the heavy hitters in an attempt to strike back at the charges she and Michael are free and easy with the facts.
Thanks.........Dude, good post Wow. Your level of hostility is a little over the top, don't you think? I don't know any of you. I just moved here and was surfing this site to get an idea of what's going on and made a comment. I didn't realize that you two are the only ones who could post anything. I'll go away now, but I might suggest you both cut back on the caffine.
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 01:37 pm |
|
Gymsocks wrote:
Dude, you've gone WAY around the bend. You seriously need to get a life.
Apache Mom bringing out the heavy hitters in an attempt to strike back at the charges she and Michael are free and easy with the facts.
Thanks.........Dude, good post
|
Gymsocks
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 27th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 07:01 am |
|
gadfly wrote: Since you left, I have been trying to goad you into responding to me through Frank's blog. To no avail.
Dude, you've gone WAY around the bend. You seriously need to get a life.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 05:42 am |
|
| It is a cult....and no, I don't know who Michael Erickson is or who Apache Mom is...nor do I particularly care...I just know they both have taken liberties with the truth..... Last edited on Wed Oct 29th, 2008 05:51 am by gadfly
|
unhappyinpusd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 05:20 am |
|
Gadfly - you're on the right track. Everyone has always known the true identity of "Apache Mom". The facts are the facts, and there's no denying the previous board pulled the wool over everyone's eyes (including Apache Mom's eyes). Michael Erickson (and I think we knw the true identity of this character, too) will crawl back into his hole where he will continue to spin the truth and simply expect everyone to believe whatever he says is accurate. Sorry, "Michael," your game is over.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 04:08 am |
|
| If no one wants to argue with me, I guess I'll take all my marbles and adios.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 03:40 am |
|
| Apache Mom?????
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 07:59 pm |
|
That's all you're going to respond?
Just to be clear, this is not a falsehood, you're standing by this and that the district is not paying this 1.25 million out of M&O?
And, to answer another of your inane questions: yes, PUSD is self-insured, but like all self-insured agencies carries and pays for liablity insurance from an independent provider. The very reason for carrying this insurance is, in fact, to pay off law suits.
This information comes straight from the district administrator in charge of insurance.
Last edited on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 08:56 pm by gadfly
|
Apache Mom
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 95 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 07:13 pm |
|
| My, my, you too are very busy re-writing history. I'll leave you two to your alternate reality.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:52 am |
|
Last edited on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:56 am by gadfly
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:10 am |
|
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.
Mark Twain
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:09 am |
|
Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!
Sir Walter Scott
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:07 am |
|
Mary, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
Homer SimpsonLast edited on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:13 am by areyounotkidding me
|
areyounotkidding me
Member
| Joined: | Tue Aug 12th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 04:58 am |
|
If a lie is repeated often enough all the dumb jackasses in the world not only get to believe it, they even swear by it.
|
gadfly
Member
| Joined: | Thu Oct 18th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 12:00 am |
|
Apache Mom
You live and breathe PUSD. You knew this all along, didn't you, you knew Erickson screwed up big-time here. You were just hoping this would not get out to the other sheep, weren't you? Shame on you!
Last edited on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 12:02 am by gadfly
|
Current time is 11:03 pm | Page:   1 2 3   |
|