| Author | Post |
|---|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24th, 2009 03:43 am |
|
Seek the truth:
http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 10:58 pm |
|
Actually, you are far more stupid than I originally thought.
I notice, of course, that you cannot offer a lick of proof for anything you say.
So I ask, again, please, give us all a good opportunity to laugh at you some more by sharing some examples of "inside" information provided by Michael Erickson. Prove he hasn't spoken at a board meeting, or at a legislative hearing. While you're at it you keep claiming "he" doesn't exist. Someone is contributing to that blog, and you claim to know who. Dazzle us with your knowledge (or, in your case, a complete lack of it).
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 03:45 am |
|
OUCHHHHH. Dana. You're really in a bad mood today. And - your alter ego Daddy posted just a few scant seconds after you on the other blog so now I know for sure we're dealing with a dual personality. Lots of Fun.
I'll continue to razzle dazzle you, Dana/Daddy. Just for the record- I'm nowhere near as stupid as you want me to be. Trust me on this one. (And---- you may want to get that chip off your shoulder Dana - can't we simply agree to disagree? Group hug?)
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 01:32 am |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Dana- you are correct. I do not know whether "Michael" has communicated directly with board members to share his/her ideas. However, what I do know is "Michael" has never communicated directly with the board DURING A GOVERNING BOARD MEETING. Have you checked the Board minutes, Dana? If so, you know I'm correct on this issue. And, I think you would also agree that someone who is as opinionated as "Michael" and who claims to have so many great ideas and solutions to solve this budget crisis, yet fails to come forward in person and share his/her ideas (with governing board and/or legislators) is just a little odd. He/she rambles on and on and on via his/her blog [favorite hiding spot], but fails to come forward in person. That's beyond odd. If you still believe "Michael" really exists, then let me introduce you to the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy.
If "Michael" has communicated privately (via e-mail or correspondence or phone calls) with board members, I do not believe I'm privy to that information (despite what your friend Mary may think about e-mails). And - if it's not obvious to you that "Michael" has inside information, then you really need to pull that wool off your eyes.
So, in other words, I'm right: you don't know what you're talking about.
Please, give us all a good opportunity to laugh at you some more by sharing some examples of "inside" information he provides. And, since you made the allegation, prove he hasn't spoken at a board meeting, or at a legislative hearing. While you're at it you keep claiming "he" doesn't exixt. Someone is contributing to that blog, and you claim to know who. Dazzle us with your knowledge.
Finally, you say it's odd that he doesn't speak in public. I don't see you doing that either. Are you odd, too? Or just stupid?
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 17th, 2009 02:37 pm |
|
DanaM wrote:
I know you have no answers to those questions. It is becoming more clear with each of your posts that you really don't know what you're talking about.
Nada
You just really ask the hard-hitting questions, don't you Nada?
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:20 pm |
|
rdg7359 wrote:
Unlike the rest I am glad to see you around. Regardless of what everyone else's opinion my be of you, at least you had the stones to get off your duff and try to make a difference. This website is full off armchair council members, school board members and city leaders. However, when it is time to put there money where there mouth, or should I say keyboard, is they log off. They are very very opinionated behind the anonymity of the computer.
I think the fact that Adam is only eighteen years old has given him a free pass with some members of the community regarding what his actions have been and done. I think his actions with the closed campuses and the signature problem have created nothing but division in the community, the very thing he rails about in this latest post. I don't give him a free pass at all. For him to dredge up the open campus issue during economic times such as these shows how really out of touch he is and how thankful I am he is not sitting on the board right now making the tough decisions these board members are being forced to make.Last edited on Fri Apr 17th, 2009 11:00 am by
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 06:36 pm |
|
Dana- you are correct. I do not know whether "Michael" has communicated directly with board members to share his/her ideas. However, what I do know is "Michael" has never communicated directly with the board DURING A GOVERNING BOARD MEETING. Have you checked the Board minutes, Dana? If so, you know I'm correct on this issue. And, I think you would also agree that someone who is as opinionated as "Michael" and who claims to have so many great ideas and solutions to solve this budget crisis, yet fails to come forward in person and share his/her ideas (with governing board and/or legislators) is just a little odd. He/she rambles on and on and on via his/her blog [favorite hiding spot], but fails to come forward in person. That's beyond odd. If you still believe "Michael" really exists, then let me introduce you to the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy.
If "Michael" has communicated privately (via e-mail or correspondence or phone calls) with board members, I do not believe I'm privy to that information (despite what your friend Mary may think about e-mails). And - if it's not obvious to you that "Michael" has inside information, then you really need to pull that wool off your eyes.
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 05:09 pm |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Hey Dana-- I may be unhappy, but I'm not stupid. At least I figured it out that you and Daddy are one in the same.
Well, now you've built your straw man, severely flawed as it may be. The questions is, will you ever have the courage to answer the questions put to you?
Last edited on Wed Apr 15th, 2009 05:10 pm by DanaM
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 08:50 pm |
|
Hey Dana-- I may be unhappy, but I'm not stupid. At least I figured it out that you and Daddy are one in the same.
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 08:34 pm |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Dana: I have yet to see any board meeting minutes which indicate that "Michael Erickson" spoke to the board [on an agenda item or during public comment]. Do I have to "prove" that he/she has not appeared at a governing board meeting? I'll leave it to you to "prove" that I'm wrong.
Michael Erickson has a lot to say on his/her blog, and seems to have a lot of inside information about PUSD, and considering how passionate he/she seems to be about the problems in PUSD, I would think that he/she would want to share those concerns directly with the governing board. That said, I do not believe Michael Erickson exists in the real world. He/she may exist in your mind. All I can say to that is DREAM ON.
You're not only unhappy, you are not very bright. Apparently you have never heard that you cannot prove a negative.
And, I'm curious, exactly what kind of "inside" information do you mean? And you never did answer a question I asked before: how do you know he doesn't communicate directly with board members to share his ideas?
I know you have no answers to those questions. It is becoming more clear with each of your posts that you really don't know what you're talking about.
I think you want him to not exists because he makes you uncomfortable. Heaven forbid someone know more about the school district than you, right?
And to RDG and Adam -- well put.
Last edited on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 08:37 pm by DanaM
|
rdg7359 Member

| Joined: | Sun Feb 12th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 244 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13th, 2009 11:22 pm |
|
Adam Maras wrote: Wow... this is really quite entertaining!
Take a look at what's going on in this forum thread; at the beginning, it was a discussion relating to the state budget and education. However, it's degraded into a battle of bickering and rather pointless exchanges of personal attacks. Does that remind you of something? Because it certainly reminds me of d**n near every education-related issue brought up at the school board meetings. Think about the classic battle of off-campus lunches; first, it started out as statistics and facts being thrown out. Then, it turned into a quite clearly two-sided battle between the "openers" and the "closers," most of which were amusing themselves and others by simply bickering at each other and using "no, we're right!" as their primary argument.
It's a shame this community, whether at the school board meetings or on a more informal level like this forum, simply cannot grasp the idea that everything does not need to become a war! Problems will never be solved this way... why not try to take care of these issues with reason and intelligence instead of mindless exchanges that only make people angry?
I was hoping and wishing that I could visit this forum for the first time in a long while and see a little bit of peace and harmony... oh well.
Adam, I couldn't agree with you more about most of the commentary with this and many others posted on this website.
Regardless of the topic it always seems to get very personal and it always seems to be the same people who bring the topic off it's objective.
Unlike the rest I am glad to see you around. Regardless of what everyone else's opinion my be of you, at least you had the stones to get off your duff and try to make a difference. This website is full off armchair council members, school board members and city leaders. However, when it is time to put there money where there mouth, or should I say keyboard, is they log off. They are very very opinionated behind the anonymity of the computer.
|
gad fly Member

| Joined: | Sat Apr 11th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 82 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11th, 2009 07:42 pm |
|
| Adam are we kind of forgetting about the stupid 3 minute speeches you and others participated in at the school board meetings? And you have the nerve to lecture now?????????
|
johnjohn Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11th, 2009 07:36 pm |
|
Adam Maras wrote:
It's a shame this community, whether at the school board meetings or on a more informal level like this forum, simply cannot grasp the idea that everything does not need to become a war! Problems will never be solved this way... why not try to take care of these issues with reason and intelligence instead of mindless exchanges that only make people angry?
Adam
Is this a joke?? You who causes the whole signature fiasco? Seriously, go away!
|
Grenolia Gruntz Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11th, 2009 04:39 pm |
|
| Yes Sonny you need to go out and get a life and leave this lunch business behind you.
|
cheerleaderforclosers Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 52 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11th, 2009 04:03 pm |
|
Adam Maras back talking about lunch.....
All I can say is, thank you, Diane Douglas.....
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 10:10 pm |
|
Good points, Adam.
I'm glad we're providing entertainment for you.
Are you still fretting over closed campuses? I thought we had moved well beyond that non-issue. With the current state of finances (or lack thereof) in PUSD, the last thing they need is a lawsuit resulting from a lunchtime accident, so it's a good thing they had the good sense to close the campuses. And, the kiddos seem to have adjusted just fine to eating tacos at lunch.
|
Adam Maras Member
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 05:34 pm |
|
Wow... this is really quite entertaining!
Take a look at what's going on in this forum thread; at the beginning, it was a discussion relating to the state budget and education. However, it's degraded into a battle of bickering and rather pointless exchanges of personal attacks. Does that remind you of something? Because it certainly reminds me of d**n near every education-related issue brought up at the school board meetings. Think about the classic battle of off-campus lunches; first, it started out as statistics and facts being thrown out. Then, it turned into a quite clearly two-sided battle between the "openers" and the "closers," most of which were amusing themselves and others by simply bickering at each other and using "no, we're right!" as their primary argument.
It's a shame this community, whether at the school board meetings or on a more informal level like this forum, simply cannot grasp the idea that everything does not need to become a war! Problems will never be solved this way... why not try to take care of these issues with reason and intelligence instead of mindless exchanges that only make people angry?
I was hoping and wishing that I could visit this forum for the first time in a long while and see a little bit of peace and harmony... oh well.
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 05:26 pm |
|
Dana: I have yet to see any board meeting minutes which indicate that "Michael Erickson" spoke to the board [on an agenda item or during public comment]. Do I have to "prove" that he/she has not appeared at a governing board meeting? I'll leave it to you to "prove" that I'm wrong.
Michael Erickson has a lot to say on his/her blog, and seems to have a lot of inside information about PUSD, and considering how passionate he/she seems to be about the problems in PUSD, I would think that he/she would want to share those concerns directly with the governing board. That said, I do not believe Michael Erickson exists in the real world. He/she may exist in your mind. All I can say to that is DREAM ON.
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 12:34 am |
|
Oh Nada, there you are being mean again. Don't you know when you say things like that it hurts my feelings???....I'm not a doctor like Dr Gymsocks Dude, but referring back to Psychology 101 classes, I think there is some sort of repressed anger that is also being suppressed. When you get the suppression, along with the repression, you get regression, and THERE you have it - repressed suppressive regression...Dr Gymsocks Dude, Nada is crying out for your help..... SHE NEEDS SOME INTERCESSION, PROBABLY SOME DEFORSTATION OF DELUSIONS.....please post that 800 number for her again.
Last edited on Fri Apr 10th, 2009 02:54 am by
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 11:58 pm |
|
Not really, dear. I just think it's funny that this person gets on these boards and makes accusations that they cannot prove. At least you try. You fail, but you try.
Besides, we all know the rocks in our neighborhood are in your head.
Last edited on Fri Apr 10th, 2009 12:00 am by DanaM
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 11:31 pm |
|
DanaM wrote: We all know you would if you could, but you can't.
Nada - Do you have the proverbial rock in the pocket again?
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 06:02 pm |
|
I'm not the one making the accusation. All I'm asking is for you to back up what you're saying. We all know you would if you could, but you can't.
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 05:07 pm |
|
You're very grouchy and angry this morning, Dana.
Please refer me to the minutes of one single governing board meeting where MICHAEL ERICKSON spoke directly to the board.
And, by the way, I'll continue my ramblings as much as I want, and I know I can expect the same from you. Doesn't mean I have to read yours, and I know you won't be reading mine. That's settled.
Let's get back to the governing board meeting minutes, okay?
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 04:26 pm |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Michael never showed up when the meetings were at 7:00; and I doubt he would show up if they were at 8:00 or 9:00 or whenever. He will continue to find one reason after another to gripe and complain. Since he has so many issues to complain about, his time would be better served if he simply showed up at one of the board meetings and speak to the board directly rather than rant and rave on his blog.
First we're supposed to believe you know who he is, and you don't.
Now we're supposed to believe that he has never gotten up at a governing board meeting. How do you know? Again, you don't.
And how do you know he does not communicate to board members directly? Again, you don't.
In the future, please be good enough to at least back up your ramblings with some sort of proof. Otherwise, spare us from your complete lack of knowledge.
|
Apache Mom Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 324 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 04:22 pm |
|
areyounotkidding me wrote: By the way, Apache Mom, I read that Kathy Knecht is now president of Leadership West. That is quite a feather in her hat, don't you think??? Maybe you should enroll again....you could learn a thing or two...do they teach ethics there?? They do, and Kathy violates those ethics at every turn.
By the way, my husband is amused that I'm now married to someone else.
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 9th, 2009 05:08 am |
|
DanaM wrote: As far as my attitude, I'm just reflecting what I receive.
Nada
You do have a most nasty attitude. I'll say it again, Dr Gymsocks Dude could do wonders for you. You need to be nicer.
And Unhappy, I think unless Peoria Dad is a great actor, there is no way Peoria Dad is Erickson. Trust me on that...I've put up with Peoria Dad long enough to know. Also, trust me that Peoria Dad is married to Apache Mom and they do have a life-size bronzed statue in their front foyer of Erickson. I have an excellent source on this one.
And Apache Mom....Apache Mom and emails.....By the way, Apache Mom, I read that Kathy Knecht is now president of Leadership West. That is quite a feather in her hat, don't you think??? Maybe you should enroll again....you could learn a thing or two...do they teach ethics there??
Last edited on Thu Apr 9th, 2009 05:47 am by
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 10:42 pm |
|
Gymsocks:
Michael never showed up when the meetings were at 7:00; and I doubt he would show up if they were at 8:00 or 9:00 or whenever. He will continue to find one reason after another to gripe and complain. Since he has so many issues to complain about, his time would be better served if he simply showed up at one of the board meetings and speak to the board directly rather than rant and rave on his blog.
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 10:22 pm |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
Gymsocks Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 27th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 10:02 pm |
|
Not all of us have the time or can get to governing board meetings, especially since they changed the starting time. That seems to be Erickson's beef: http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com/2009/01/bad-timing.html
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 09:58 pm |
|
Then who is he? You act like you know, but you don't.
As far as my attitude, I'm just reflecting what I receive.
And for the record, Dana is my real name. Why don't you grow a little backbone and tell us who you are, too.
Last edited on Wed Apr 8th, 2009 09:59 pm by DanaM
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 07:44 pm |
|
Dana: please take the wool off your eyes.
When you refer to "HE" - I assume you're referring to the almighty Michael Erickson. Have you ever met him? Has anyone ever met him? Have you ever seen him? Has anyone ever seen him? (ooopppps --- I forgot: Peoria Daddy and Michael are chummy neighbors; however, I think they might be living under the same roof, in the same body, but that's another story.)
According to Dana, since "Michael" uses his "real name" we need to believe everything "he/she" says is accurate. Well--- gosh darn it -- I should have figured that out long ago. I can use any name I want [as long as it sounds like a "real name") and then my opinions on this blog will hold some sort of credibility simply because I said so (rules according to Dana). Okay. I get it. From this point forward, my new name is "Michelle Erickson". Now Dana will believe everything I say and support me. This is a good thing.
News Flash for Dana: we all know "Michael" does not exist because if he did, he would be in the front of the line to speak at governing board meetings to rant and rave as he does on his "honeymoon" blog. Isn't it interesting that he uses his "real" name on the blog, but has yet to come forward and speak directly to the board? He sure has a lot to say on the "nohoneymoon" blog, but somehow refrains himself from speaking directly to the board.
Figure it out for yourself Dana. And, by the way, who the hell are you and why the nasty attitude?
Signing off for now -- Michelle Erickson
|
DanaM Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 12th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 63 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 06:16 pm |
|
unhappyinpusd wrote: Peoria Dad -- We get the point. The honeymoon is over and it's time for "Michael Erickson" to come out of his/her shell and speak directly to the governing board (you know - like during the board meetings when there is an opportunity for the public to speak) rather than hiding out there in cyberspace.
There is another opportunity (possibly) for "Michael" to present his/her ideas to the AZ legislators tomorrow at a forum hosted by the Greater Phoenix Economic Council at the Tempe Center for the Arts (9a.m. - 11 a.m.) Really, dad (oooopppss... I meant to say "Michael"), it's time to get out there and speak up rather than just posting your ideas (and Michael's -- wink, wink) on this blog. Hope to see you tomorrow. I'll be there.
Unlike you, at least he has the guts to put his real name out there. Who the hell are you?
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 06:12 pm |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
unhappyinpusd Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 37 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 05:44 pm |
|
Peoria Dad -- We get the point. The honeymoon is over and it's time for "Michael Erickson" to come out of his/her shell and speak directly to the governing board (you know - like during the board meetings when there is an opportunity for the public to speak) rather than hiding out there in cyberspace.
There is another opportunity (possibly) for "Michael" to present his/her ideas to the AZ legislators tomorrow at a forum hosted by the Greater Phoenix Economic Council at the Tempe Center for the Arts (9a.m. - 11 a.m.) Really, dad (oooopppss... I meant to say "Michael"), it's time to get out there and speak up rather than just posting your ideas (and Michael's -- wink, wink) on this blog. Hope to see you tomorrow. I'll be there.
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 7th, 2009 04:07 pm |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 7th, 2009 07:33 am |
|
| Are we twelve or just turned thirteeN? Last edited on Tue Apr 7th, 2009 07:33 am by
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 6th, 2009 04:00 pm |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 5th, 2009 05:30 am |
|
No_mood wrote: Peoria Dad wrote: http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
Do you have the capability of creating a single thought of your own?
The answer to that question is obviously nyet.....
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 5th, 2009 01:37 am |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
No_mood Member

| Joined: | Fri Jun 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 177 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 5th, 2009 12:32 am |
|
Peoria Dad wrote: http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
Do you have the capability of creating a single thought of your own? I wonder if you can come up with any fresh ideas of your own without referencing any part of your beloved, almighty blogspot.
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 4th, 2009 11:24 pm |
|
| http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 4th, 2009 12:28 am |
|
| Is your only purpose on these forums to be annoying??? Well, you're good at it....
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 4th, 2009 12:23 am |
|
Good.
http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com
|
areyounotkidding me Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 07:50 am |
|
Peoria Dad
Can I just say that the 17th reference to Erickson's site became very annoying on about the 5th reference?
Senator Jim Waring has introduced a bill in the Senate and Representative Biggs in the House to permanently repeal the state equalization tax rate, despite havaing to cut over $350 million dollars from public education the second week of the session and facing at $3 billion dollar deficit in FY 2010.
http://www.arizonaea.org/politics.php?page=354
harper has sponsored these bills
Bill Number
Sponsor Type
Short Title
HB2126
C
tax refund checkoff boxes
HB2142
C
county water authority; Colorado river
HB2174
C
firearms; game refuges
HB2237
C
AHCCCS; verification of eligibility
HB2238
C
AHCCCS; DES; fraud reduction
HB2249
C
city elections; nonpartisan primaries; districts.
HB2314
P
property valuation; telecommunications companies
HB2340
C
consumer reporting agencies; account information
HB2400
P
partial-birth abortions; definition
HB2401
C
administrative rules oversight committee
HB2418
C
concealed weapons; federal firearms licensee
HB2426
C
enhanced driver licenses; prohibition
HB2432
C
school board membership; family members
HB2434
C
homeowners' associations; document amendments
HB2439
C
concealed weapons permit; safety course
HB2466
C
school districts; maximum tax rate
HB2487
C
county hotel tax; tourism distribution
HB2564
C
abortion
HB2616
C
living wills; health care directives
HB2629
C
license plate obstruction; wheelchair holders
HCM2004
P
secret ballots; protecting fundamental right
HCM2009
P
opposing federal firearms legislation
HCR2024
C
sovereignty; tenth amendment.
SB1005
P
rabies vaccination certificate; county enforcement
SB1007
P
state equalization property tax repeal.
SB1012
P
veteran special plates; fees
SB1013
P
AHCCCS; ambulance services
SB1014
P
AHCCCS; long-term care; eligibility
SB1053
P
political candidates; proof of citizenship
SB1054
P
emergency planning; technical correction
SB1055
P
military justice; technical correction
SB1056
P
technical correction; veterans; conservatorship
SB1057
P
technical correction; veterans
SB1058
P
technical correction; military affairs
SB1107
P
state equalization property tax repeal
SB1109
P
voter registrations; death notices
SB1113
P
handguns; restaurants; posting
SB1119
C
restricted driver licenses; DUI
SB1138
P
partial-birth abortions; definition.
SB1142
C
public expenditure transparency database
SB1146
C
expenditure limitation; penalty waiver; Pima
SB1147
C
greenhouse emissions; regulations; fuel economy
SB1158
C
presidential candidates; proof of citizenship
SB1159
C
trespassing; illegal aliens
SB1160
C
vehicle title; registration; legal presence
SB1161
C
PSPRS; reemployment
SB1162
P
GIITEM appropriation; multijurisdictional task force
SB1163
C
loan applications; taxpayer identification numbers
SB1166
C
valid identification; consular cards; prohibition
SB1169
C
vehicle impoundment; administrative towing fund
SB1172
C
schools; data; noncitizen students
SB1175
C
illegal aliens; enforcement; trespassing.
SB1178
C
homeland security councils; coordinating; advisory
SB1181
P
fuel tax repeal; sales tax
SB1206
C
dissolution of marriage
SB1211
P
commissions on court appointments
SB1242
C
weapons; peace officers; posse; reserves
SB1243
P
justification; defensive display of firearm
SB1322
C
license plates; state name
SB1324
C
corporate income tax rate
SB1325
C
individual health insurance; coverage exemptions
SB1334
C
workers' compensation; unauthorized aliens
SB1335
C
unauthorized aliens; licensing
SB1337
C
driver license violations
SB1339
C
business expenses; unauthorized aliens
SB1342
C
continuation; department of environmental quality
SB1346
C
seat belt exemption; newspaper delivery
SB1356
C
venture trucks; regulation
SB1373
C
income tax returns; penalties
SB1386
P
charter schools; charter renewal period
SB1388
C
graduation requirement; college entrance exam
SB1393
C
public education; students' religious liberties.
SB1407
P
health spa contracts; military members
SB1428
C
online defensive driving schools
SB1434
C
publicity pamphlet; judicial performance; comment
SB1464
C
state financial condition; state treasurer
SB1465
C
occupational licensing regulatory study commission
SB1466
C
council on efficient government
SB1467
C
county elected officials; authority
SCM1003
C
states; withdrawal; federal highway system
SCR1004
P
technical correction; military personnel
SCR1005
P
technical correction; national guard
SCR1007
P
justices and judges; senate confirmation
SCR1008
C
schools; classroom instruction expenditures
SCR1009
P
voter-protection; temporary budgetary suspension
SCR1010
P
illegal aliens; enforcement; trespassing
SCR1011
P
taxpayer bill of rights
SCR1012
C
spending accountability and transparency act
SCR1020
P
senate confirmation; justices and judges
SCR1026
P
secret ballot; fundamental right
SCR1031
C
discrimination; preferential treatment; prohibition
SCR1032
C
Vietnam Veterans' Memorial Day
SCR1035
C
property tax; valuation increase limit
SJR1001
P
state border auxiliary reserve units
top
privacy statment
Last edited on Sat Apr 4th, 2009 12:27 am by
|
Peoria Dad Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 5th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 278 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 2nd, 2009 09:05 pm |
|
He won't, but your points are well-taken.
My question is, why won't Harper and the legislature open revenue streams like they should? Seems to me now is not the time to cut them off, yet that is exactly what the legislature is doing. Harper himself sponsored the repeal of the County Equalization Tax. All of those dollars, approximately $250 million, went directly to education.
Harper, and his republican friends, are determined to destroy our education system.
Here are more ideas on how to generate revenue:
http://nohoneymoon.blogspot.com/2009/03/you-want-ideas-i-have-ideas.html
|
JulieAnne Member

| Joined: | Tue Jan 9th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 475 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31st, 2009 08:25 pm |
|
Editor's note: Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Peoria Independent. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
In his guest commentary in the Peoria Independent March 18, 2009, Jack Harper (R-Surprise) wrote: "Together, we will restore our manufacturing base and compete with the rest of the world for jobs that produce goods. We will educate the next generation with a goal of have college-educated producers. We will streamline government to do the things for you that you could not do for yourself."
While I agree that these are noble goals, I have to point out that actions speak louder than words. I find it laughable that Mr. Harper thinks that by cutting education funding to K-12 programs so that our school districts have no choice but to increase class sizes, reduce books & supplies, and eliminate "extras" like music and arts programs that Arizona will produce more "college-educated producers."
And, let’s ask Mr. Harper which colleges those "producers" will attend – certainly not the universities in Arizona. Programs and teachers are being cut in an effort to keep those schools alive – but what about quality?
I do not think providing a high quality education system is a socialistic strategy. Very few families in Arizona can afford private schools, especially now that jobs are being lost and companies are closing down. Mr. Harper wants Arizona to compete to bring companies with good jobs here.
I must ask what company wants to move here when our education system is under attack by our State Legislature? What kind of employers does he intend to attract – those who rely on unskilled labor?
Our children are our future. Their taxes will pay for our social security (as long as it exists) and will pay for services to keep the State of Arizona running. Mr. Harper and his like-minded peers will put this state in a downward spiral that it will take a long time to recover from.
I am pleased that Gov. Brewer understands that there are some things that are worth paying more for – like our children. I am all for cutting out wasteful spending whether it is in our schools or in our state administration and programs. I think people do need to do things for themselves as much as possible. But when we, the current voting and tax paying generation, get older, it sure will be important to have doctors and medical services available, for example.
If our state services are cut, then we had better have decent jobs with benefits and retirement plans available to help support us when we are no longer able to work. Educating the young people who live in this state is the foundation of our future. Extremes are useful when you are in a debate. Compromise is necessary when you are living in the real world. Glad to hear your opinion, Mr. Harper. Sure hope you will listen to mine.
Suzanne Berger
Glendale
|
 Current time is 07:31 am | |
|