| Author | Post |
|---|
ajBookchin Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 170 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 07:39 pm |
|
Which do you think makes better PR - will look better on someone's website - an attractively renovated building or asphalt???
|
Bambi Member

| Joined: | Tue Sep 19th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 03:47 pm |
|
2 cents wrote: http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/116362
Good question! All I can make comment on is what I read in the paper and what I can find as a matter of public record (County website).
I think the above link is the latest comment from the County.
2
Can that $60 million reserved for a "face lift" of the County buildings be transferred to assist in building Hunt Hiway? Why let it "sit" there? Use it.
|
2 cents Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 100 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 03:42 pm |
|
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/116362
Good question! All I can make comment on is what I read in the paper and what I can find as a matter of public record (County website).
I think the above link is the latest comment from the County.
2
|
ajBookchin Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 170 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 01:54 pm |
|
2 cents wrote: Just says that the impact fees are to be used for public safety, streets and parks.
I hope the link worked for others.
2
Right - so why is the operating budget suffering so much from a loss of revenue due to a downturn in construction???
The operating budget should have no relationship with development.
|
2 cents Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 100 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 03:54 am |
|
Just says that the impact fees are to be used for public safety, streets and parks.
I hope the link worked for others.
2
|
Bambi Member

| Joined: | Tue Sep 19th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 01:50 am |
|
2 cents wrote: http://pinalcountyaz.gov/Departments/DevelopmentServices/Documents/Downloads/Impact%20Fees/2ImpactFeeCIP.pdf
Everything you wanted to know about the County Impact Fees.
2
maybe it's my computer, but I can't bring anything up from the website.
|
2 cents Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 100 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 10:25 pm |
|
http://pinalcountyaz.gov/Departments/DevelopmentServices/Documents/Downloads/Impact%20Fees/2ImpactFeeCIP.pdf
Everything you wanted to know about the County Impact Fees.
2
|
Bambi Member

| Joined: | Tue Sep 19th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 09:16 pm |
|
| Why hasn't Pinal County reduced their workforce, as other governments have done as a cost saving device? http://oursantanfoothills.org/forum/showthread.php?p=867#post867 With the reduction in revenue, where are they getting the money to keep on the same number of people they keep on during busy times? What are they tapping into? Last edited on Wed May 14th, 2008 09:19 pm by Bambi
|
ajBookchin Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 170 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 01:45 pm |
|
The county, along with most other local governing bodies, is seeing a decrease in building permits, leading to lower revenues, but Mr. Doolittle is hopeful and says it does not seem resident fees will need to increase.
“At this time we’re not looking at any fee increases,” he said. “ These downturns run in cycles. We believe through the necessary cutbacks we’ll be able to not look at increasing any fees.”
Does anyone know if the county funds any portion of the operating budget from impact fees???
If so, this practice should stop. The operating budget should be funded through property taxes and sales taxes, along with any convoluted schemes sharing revenue among other levels of government.
Development (impact) fees should only be utilized to fund new capital projects required to support growth. If our county government were properly limited, such projects would be limited to improvement of trunk roads and additional law enforcement facilities.
The county Board of Supervisors also approved a 180-day hiring delay, according to Mr. Doolittle.
If the county can function without these positions after 180 days, consideration should be given to permanently eliminate these positions.
“We’re currently going through meetings with various departments and elected offices. We have requested those areas submit both a 5 percent and a 10 percent reduction from their current budget,” Mr. Doolittle.
Those budget scenarios will be considered and will be used to create a tentative budget that will be presented to the board of supervisors June 18. In July the final budget will be presented and considered by the board for final approval.
I would support immediately targeting the 10-percent reductions.
|
QCVillager Member

|
Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:32 pm |
|
Capital improvement projects throughout the county will be restricted to only what is critical, Mr. Doolittle said.
He did note improvements to Hunt Highway will not be impacted.
“ The expansion of Hunt Highway is still on schedule,” he said.
|
QCVillager Member

|
Posted: Wed Apr 30th, 2008 02:32 pm |
|
Pinal drafts budget
By Angela De Welles - Independent Newspapers
As Pinal County heads into the 2008-09 fiscal year, officials are facing the realities of a tough economic outlook.
“ We are projecting it’s going to be a lean budget year,” Pinal County spokeswoman Heather Murphy said.
County Manager Terry Doolittle agrees.
Actions were taken this year to help cut back, he said. More measures are being looked at now as the county works to finalize the budget by the end of June.
“In the current year’s budget the board took several actions, including a 2 percent (cut to departmental budgets),” Mr. Doolittle said.
The county Board of Supervisors also approved a 180-day hiring delay, according to Mr. Doolittle.
“In addition several capital projects were suspended in the current fiscal year,” he said.
Money that was set aside for a new county administrative facility had to be used to address the county’s $13 million revenue shortfall.
That shortfall will rollover to the upcoming fiscal year and Mr. Doolittle said all departments are being asked to cut back.
“ We’re currently going through meetings with various departments and elected offices. We have requested those areas submit both a 5 percent and a 10 percent reduction from their current budget,” Mr. Doolittle.
Those budget scenarios will be considered and will be used to create a tentative budget that will be presented to the board of supervisors June 18. In July the final budget will be presented and considered by the board for final approval.
Both presentations are public hearings, which will play a part in the creation of a budget, Mr. Doolittle said.
“Public input is an ongoing process throughout the year,” he said.
The county, along with most other local governing bodies, is seeing a decrease in building permits, leading to lower revenues, but Mr. Doolittle is hopeful and says it does not seem resident fees will need to increase.
“At this time we’re not looking at any fee increases,” he said. “ These downturns run in cycles. We believe through the necessary cutbacks we’ll be able to not look at increasing any fees.”
Some of those cutbacks Mr. Doolittle is recommending include no cost of living adjustments for employees and not filling vacant positions.
“As building inspectors have left, we have not filled those positions,” said Mr. Doolittle said, adding there are currently 15-20 vacant positions in the county’s development services department. Mr. Doolittle believes layoffs will not be necessary.
Capital improvement projects throughout the county will be restricted to only what is critical, Mr. Doolittle said.
He did note improvements to Hunt Highway will not be impacted.
“ The expansion of Hunt Highway is still on schedule,” he said.
Much of the county’s budget will depend on the state’s final budget, Mr. Doolittle said. However, it is known where costs will increase.
The county’s contributions for the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System and long-term care will increase $3 million over last year.
“ We also know we have an increase in the public safety retirement system, along with the correctional officer retirement program,” he said. Ms. Murphy said the cuts will not affect services.
“ We have to keep pace with the growth pressures that we face,” she said.
Even though the housing market has slowed, the county is still seeing retail and some residential growth and has to be ready for more growth.
|
 Current time is 07:29 pm | |
|