Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Kent County Taxes
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Sep 1st, 2009 03:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to teh Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Despite the recent property tax increase (that three commissioners opposed) Kent County Levy Court remains the best dollar value of our various governments.


I must admit that the paramedic service alone justifies the county portion of my tax bill — school tax is a separate issue. However, our stat government is an absolute mess and our national government is a disaster.


We are building one bridge after another to socialistic globalism.


Fred Allen Bass


Dover

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 01:48 am
 Quote  Reply 
M, do you have a problem with fiscally responsible or common sense government?  Or an elected person who is willing to do the job using common sense rather than being "politically correct" to stay in office?  Do you have a problem with an elected official that stood up for what was right and who was willing to speak out against what was wrong? - even if the elected person would have benefited by being silent?  Some people take the oath of office seriously and try to do the right thing.  I don't really understand your comments about being bitter - afterall, the Levy Court now realizes the wisdom of the suggestions and has implemented most of them.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 6th, 2009 01:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
mishl wrote: taxpayertoo wrote: Yes, the Comptroller raised those issues and many more with the Commissioners, County Administrator and other department heads.  The Levy Court was well aware of all the issues mentioned.  Commissioners Buckson and Edmunson showed support and concern only to be out -voted or not to have the issues presented for vote at all.  The county employees were aware of the issues and fought hard against the changes. Still bitter over that one, Peg?

Not sure if  'Peg' is unhappy about that but I sure am, and anyone else who pay taxes in this county should be, too.

mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 114
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 6th, 2009 03:46 am
 Quote  Reply 
taxpayertoo wrote: Yes, the Comptroller raised those issues and many more with the Commissioners, County Administrator and other department heads.  The Levy Court was well aware of all the issues mentioned.  Commissioners Buckson and Edmunson showed support and concern only to be out -voted or not to have the issues presented for vote at all.  The county employees were aware of the issues and fought hard against the changes. Still bitter over that one, Peg?

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 5th, 2009 09:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
taxpayertoo wrote: Yes, the Comptroller raised those issues and many more with the Commissioners, County Administrator and other department heads.  The Levy Court was well aware of all the issues mentioned.  Commissioners Buckson and Edmunson showed support and concern only to be out -voted or not to have the issues presented for vote at all.  The county employees were aware of the issues and fought hard against the changes. 

Since we have about 3-400 county employees and 150,000 County residents, it seems our Commissioners feel pretty comfortable that the voters won't care about things like that. Hopefully, that changed after this last round of ducking behind some flimsy excuses when they voted not to deal with the excesses in the current pension plan.

I'd be surprised if that didn't become a campaign issue in the next election.

Last edited on Fri Jun 5th, 2009 09:49 pm by Hartlyboy

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 5th, 2009 11:44 am
 Quote  Reply 
Yes, the Comptroller raised those issues and many more with the Commissioners, County Administrator and other department heads.  The Levy Court was well aware of all the issues mentioned.  Commissioners Buckson and Edmunson showed support and concern only to be out -voted or not to have the issues presented for vote at all.  The county employees were aware of the issues and fought hard against the changes. 

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 5th, 2009 04:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
Taxpayer, my apologies in advance for not understanding the last post about who asks the questions or raises the concerns...

Were you suggesting that someone [the Comptroller?] actually did raise those issues of pensions and costs and was ignored or are you saying those are the questions that should have been raised? I certainly believe those questions should have been raised loudly and maybe more publicly and should have been addressed. I still think it took guts for Jody to break with the rest of his party to join Eric Buckson in voting to actually do something about it.

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 4th, 2009 11:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Yes, there are CPA's employed by the county.  Although the Comptroller works closely with the Finance Department it is an independent office from the Finance Department for a reason.  The Comptroller reviews all the expenses of the county and is the one person that can speak out to the administration, commissioners and the public without suffering repercussions. 

And who do you think tried for years to get the commissioners to have the employees contribute to their pension, to review and make changes to the generous medical plan for people retiring after only 5 years, to rethink the longevity pay the county pays which was initially set up to offset the low salaries?  Who tried to get the commissioners to look at the current pension beneficiary policy where an employee can designate ANYONE to be the beneficiary, who questioned the commissioners changing the employees hours from 35 to 40 overnight without looking at the impact and costing the county a huge increase in salary and pension costs, who questioned the employees using county vehicles for personal use, who questioned per diem payment for in-state seminars?  Who warned the commissioners time and time again of the snowballing increase of county payment to the pension fund and post retirement benefit funds and the need for employee contribution?   Who questioned the Rule of 70?  Not until the budget showed a huge shortfall did the commissioners take the advice and make changes.  The county taxpayers need someone to watch out for them - and speak up to the commissioners.  So an effective Comptroller is a good thing, but only if the Comptroller is doing his/her job. Funny how the changes that have been made weren't made until after November's election.  Obviously the commissioners were more concerned about getting re-elected than making business decisions.


Last edited on Thu Jun 4th, 2009 11:21 pm by taxpayertoo

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 10:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
We're talking Kent County, not the State.

mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 114
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 09:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
taxpayertoo wrote: The Comptroller's office audits the receipts monthly.  Someone would have to do that as well as reconcile the bank statements.  An outside auditor would do that for a fee.  The outside audit costs were kept down because the internal audits were conducted monthy - catching errors or irregularities quickly before anything would become a major problem.  Everything has a price.
With all the CPAs now in the Finance Department, I'm sure someone in there could handle it.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 07:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Do you really think the Comptroller reconciles the check book?

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 03:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The Comptroller's office audits the receipts monthly.  Someone would have to do that as well as reconcile the bank statements.  An outside auditor would do that for a fee.  The outside audit costs were kept down because the internal audits were conducted monthy - catching errors or irregularities quickly before anything would become a major problem.  Everything has a price.

mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 114
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 03:05 pm
 Quote  Reply 
taxpayertoo wrote: Jody.Sweeney wrote: I don't see how that would save double the money.
 An auditor position would have to be created since you need someone to audit the books.


The county already has yearly audits done by an outside firm.

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 01:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Jody.Sweeney wrote: I don't see how that would save double the money.
I find it funny that you would comment on the double savings and not on the merit of saving at least 2 more salaries and benefits.  After all, on March 2nd you said the county would realize a savings of $300,000. for the elimination of 11 positions after the retirement incentive and the DSN said the county would realize $750,000 to a million?  So who is pulling numbers out of the sky?  What is the real savings?

The Comptroller and Receiver of Taxes earn the same as the Commissioners.  But you got me - the deputies would also be eliminated.  The staffs would be added to the Finance Department.  An auditor position would have to be created since you need someone to audit the books.

Eliminating 2 of the commissioners would mean eliminating not only their salaries but all the travel (which we know will come back), cell phones, dinners and lunches paid for by the county for different events, etc.  I would say the county spends more on the commissioners than they do on row officerholders.  And maybe you wouldn't need as large a support staff in the Levy Court. 

 

Last edited on Tue May 26th, 2009 01:53 pm by taxpayertoo

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 12:22 am
 Quote  Reply 
Why do we need an at-large commissioner?.  That position is pure pandering and we can't afford it.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 25th, 2009 11:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I think if you wanted to reduce the size of Levy Court, you'd just make however many slots there would be, say 5, as "At Large" positions. You could make the argument that each commissioner now has the responsibility to 'his' constituents to either fight for or against changes in his district and they have some sense of ownership for what happens. If that argument is valid , then you could make a good case for eliminating the position held now by Ennis which is the only "At Large "seat.

Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Camden-Wyoming, Delaware USA
Posts: 516
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 25th, 2009 09:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I don't see how that would save double the money.

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 25th, 2009 09:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Some of the Levy Court commissioners want to eliminate the Receiver of Taxes and Comptroller offices to save money.  How about eliminating 2 of the districts and have 5 instead of 7 commissioners?  That would save double the money - probably even more!

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 10:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The mosst silent tax increase this year is the elimination of the School Tax break for senior citizens.  Let's see who gets re-elected in Delaware next year if that gets signed by Markell and his Merry Men.

Jack the Ripper..........................

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 03:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just because people don't show up at Levy Court meetings doesn't mean they haven't spoken with directly or called or emailed the Commissioners.  Many people may have a conflicting schedule not to mention that not many people want to sit through meetings that can last hours and hours.  Most people have to get up and go to work.   I'm sure the commissioners read the public forums or the DSN.  There are many ways the commissioners can find out what the people want.  Unfortuately, some of the commissioners are unwilling to keep an open mind on issues. 

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 02:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I don't think the number of people who showed up at Levy Court to complain about a foregone conclusion invalidates the comment that the last increase will not be as traumatic as the one associated with a revaluation. That last increase was semi-accepted by many of us predicated on the idea the Commissioners were going to take some forward looking actions on pensions and other benefits that would affect county costs in the future. The tax increase went through and then the Commissioners voted not to follow through on the cost cuts. Hopefully, that will be remembered in the next election.

mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 114
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 02:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy wrote:
If you think you saw unhappy campers over the county tax increase we just saw, wait till they re-evaluate the older native Delawareans' property and set their new taxes. You see, it's not only county property taxes that jump, it is also school taxes.

So many in fact, that only 6 of them showed up at the meeting to speak against the tax increase.  Instead of posting it here, maybe some of you should have shown up -- might have made a difference.  But I guess you'll never know.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 05:08 am
 Quote  Reply 
Last time I looked re-assesment is a win-lose depending on how long you've lived in the State and how far out of balance your current assesment is with current market values. House prices have remained high in our area despite the slow down [you can still sell them to Jersey folks].

Doing a re-assesment is an expensive proposition and gains for the first few years are a wash for the County because there is a statutory limit on how much increase each homeowner will have to pay annually until they get up to the full tax cost. The tax rates are adjusted to the new values to raise essentially the same revenue -after that, of course you can get rate increases as we've just seen.

If you think you saw unhappy campers over the county tax increase we just saw, wait till they re-evaluate the older native Delawareans' property and set their new taxes. You see, it's not only county property taxes that jump, it is also school taxes.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 12:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
Being reassesed is not bad.  Raising the amount of tax collected now lets the Levy Court say OK here is how much we need now and they set the total sum needed based on the increased tax rate.

Reassess next year and base the total to be collected on the new higher tax rate and let the masses be happy with their new rates.

Politics at its finest.

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun May 17th, 2009 09:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
davidlanderson wrote: It is official. My prediction came to pass. The Democrat led Levy court voted to raise the property tax. Congratulations to Commissioner Buckson for his staunch advocacy for the taxpayer along with votes from fellow Commissioners Angel and Ennis the vote was 4 in favor and 3 opposed. Losing Commissioner Edmanson cost. It is a shame.

http://stoptaxing.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/a-better-way-than-raising-taxes-for-kent-county Commissioner Buckson has a better solution by my way of thinking.

I think Angel is more concerned about reassessment - then many property owner's will have not only county taxes increase but school taxes as well.  Glad it didn't happened when property values were inflated.  And a reassessment will be coming.  Let's hope the commissioners will lower the tax rate when its done.

Last edited on Sun May 17th, 2009 09:39 pm by taxpayertoo

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 9th, 2009 02:18 am
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy wrote: Actually, I believe the developers would try to annex land in Hell [not equating Harrington and Felton with that] so they could throw up vinyl boxes on less land and make more profit . No town is immune from that attempt -some of them even worked on Kenton and are still trying to get the town to let them in. The builders figure the refugees from NJ and PA don't know squat about any of these places down here, just that the taxes are [were] less than where they came from. They'll buy anything if you put a cute name on the development and give them some closing cost money to sweeten the pot.
You are exactly correct.   Parkers Run in cheswold comes to mind immediately, at $300k or so each!   Even the Wawa store, cheswold's only viable retail store, has closed!   All that remains is the vibrant tourist industry in the town.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 9th, 2009 02:01 am
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Hartlyboy do you believe that Felton and Harrington have to beat developers away with a stick and refuse to annex land or do you believe, as I do, that nobody wants to go to those communities anyway, so there is no need or push for annexation to build more homes?
Actually, I believe the developers would try to annex land in Hell [not equating Harrington and Felton with that] so they could throw up vinyl boxes on less land and make more profit . No town is immune from that attempt -some of them even worked on Kenton and are still trying to get the town to let them in. The builders figure the refugees from NJ and PA don't know squat about any of these places down here, just that the taxes are [were] less than where they came from. They'll buy anything if you put a cute name on the development and give them some closing cost money to sweeten the pot.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 10:50 pm
 Quote  Reply 
That's OK David, Sweeney is toast in the next election for his tax and spend attitude.  WG lost the race because he was more "important" than the people in his district.  Hopefully we will get some new young Republican blood in the district.

davidlanderson
Member


Joined: Sun Mar 5th, 2006
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 576
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 06:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It is official. My prediction came to pass. The Democrat led Levy court voted to raise the property tax. Congratulations to Commissioner Buckson for his staunch advocacy for the taxpayer along with votes from fellow Commissioners Angel and Ennis the vote was 4 in favor and 3 opposed. Losing Commissioner Edmanson cost. It is a shame.

http://stoptaxing.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/a-better-way-than-raising-taxes-for-kent-county Commissioner Buckson has a better solution by my way of thinking.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 03:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I wasn't being rude.   In an earlier post you stated that since you have been on the town council, you have annexed land only three times.   During that same period, how many bona fide applications for land annexation has the town rejected?

rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 03:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
There is no need to be rude. 

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 12:54 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy do you believe that Felton and Harrington have to beat developers away with a stick and refuse to annex land or do you believe, as I do, that nobody wants to go to those communities anyway, so there is no need or push for annexation to build more homes?

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 04:04 am
 Quote  Reply 
rescue48 wrote: You missed my point sir.  We have had no input.  We are a small town.  We like our small town.  We're not land hungry like some other towns.  I will not drop names to be rude, but we all know there are land hungry towns.  We are not one of them.  The council is very much in tune with its citizens.  When we have a concern, we work with the folks.  No one has had a bad word to say about it yet.  If they did, it would definitely affect the way the council decides what happens.
If you have caged the beast of annexation in your town, I congratulate you and wish you continued success. You mention you had 3 annexations since you've been a councilman so I assume then you are long serving in that capacity and have managed your town for the residents and not the developers. Would that others up north here saw that as a virtue.

Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Camden-Wyoming, Delaware USA
Posts: 516
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 03:41 am
 Quote  Reply 
Rescue48, Felton, Viola, Woodside, and Magnolia all need to be commended for that attitude.  "What we got is what we want!"  Congratulations.

Jody Sweeney, 5th Levy Court District Commissioner

rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 6th, 2009 09:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You missed my point sir.  We have had no input.  We are a small town.  We like our small town.  We're not land hungry like some other towns.  I will not drop names to be rude, but we all know there are land hungry towns.  We are not one of them.  The council is very much in tune with its citizens.  When we have a concern, we work with the folks.  No one has had a bad word to say about it yet.  If they did, it would definitely affect the way the council decides what happens.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 6th, 2009 08:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
rescue48 wrote: Oh, and another thing; we also have a public hearing before council votes to annex.  If people have concerns, they are addressed.  So far since I've been on council we have annexed property three times, and have not had one person speak at the hearing.  Yes, they are always advertised, that's the law and it's followed.  So folks either don't care, or they don't have a problem with it. 
Maybe if you put those annexations to a referendum instead of your Council vote, you would get people involved. The ones up here are cut and dried and input against it doesn't mean diddly.

Last edited on Wed May 6th, 2009 08:46 pm by Hartlyboy

rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 6th, 2009 08:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Oh, and another thing; we also have a public hearing before council votes to annex.  If people have concerns, they are addressed.  So far since I've been on council we have annexed property three times, and have not had one person speak at the hearing.  Yes, they are always advertised, that's the law and it's followed.  So folks either don't care, or they don't have a problem with it. 

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 6th, 2009 02:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Eric Buckson's letter to the Editor yesterday makes me think that the County is finally getting it.  Too bad they let things get to the point where it did.  It's not because they didn't know what was going on over the years they were well aware of everything.  The majority just chose to ignore the information they received and did what they wanted.   It is good to have new people on the Levy Court - many of the former commissioners in my opinion were feathering their own nests, so to speak, with benefits.  Do the right thing, Commissioners, and most likely you will be re-elected.  Those that won't do the right thing, hopefully will not.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 4th, 2009 10:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Your town may use or follow county inspection codes, but the town allows for greater density because of the availability of central water supply and county or town sewage collection and disposal.  Therefore, a developer can build probably 4 times as many houses on a given acreage in town as opposed to being outside the town.
You're correct. County building codes aren't the same thing as planning rules and the density is the issue as far as the developers. Smyrna had some 1/8 acre lots and another annexation proposal in another jurisdiction had 3X the density the county would allow.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 4th, 2009 02:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Your town may use or follow county inspection codes, but the town allows for greater density because of the availability of central water supply and county or town sewage collection and disposal.  Therefore, a developer can build probably 4 times as many houses on a given acreage in town as opposed to being outside the town.

rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 4th, 2009 01:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Not necessarily.  We follow county inspection codes. 

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 30th, 2009 06:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
rescue48 wrote: I can only speak for my town here but... we do not annex any land unless the owner petitions the town to be annexed.  Just thought I'd throw that out here.  If the builder wants to come into town, they have to get council approval.  We always look at utilities and follow the guidelines set out by the planning and zoning committee to have adequate infrastructure.
Of course the owner petitions the town for annexation. The developer has told him his land is worth more to him if he can get the builder out from under County planners and play by town rules. You town councilmen know that full well, but see the new taxes and bragging rights about being a 'big town' as reason to bring them in. At least thats the way it seems to work up north here. Of course after about 5 years or so of such 'growth' the town finds they need more cops, schools, etc., and then the taxpayers aren't so happy.

rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 30th, 2009 01:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I can only speak for my town here but... we do not annex any land unless the owner petitions the town to be annexed.  Just thought I'd throw that out here.  If the builder wants to come into town, they have to get council approval.  We always look at utilities and follow the guidelines set out by the planning and zoning committee to have adequate infrastructure.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 11:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Hartlyboy -- the fire that effectively totally destroyed the almost-completed hotel in Milford a few days ago proves that the width of the streets for fire trucks is of little importance if there is no reliable water supply.  I do understand that its location is within the city limits and therefore presumably beyond the jurisdiction of the county planners, but ...
 You got that right. It was a town thing and that will be more commonplace IMHO as the rate of annexation by these dinky towns continues to gobble up County ruled land. The fervor which those town councils exhibit to grab another piece of land for their developer buddies is nothing short of amazing. Eventually the few acres of remaining county land will not need county planners since the developers will already have their own town planners looking out for them.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 08:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy -- the fire that effectively totally destroyed the almost-completed hotel in Milford a few days ago proves that the width of the streets for fire trucks is of little importance if there is no reliable water supply.  I do understand that its location is within the city limits and therefore presumably beyond the jurisdiction of the county planners, but ...

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 07:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You make an interesting point about the staffing for planners and inspectors. If you have ever gone through the hoops the County puts you through to get a certificate of occupancy you know the fees and permits and redo's you have to go through are many and IMHO, not worth a darn.  Even the Kent Conservation District gets in the act and charges you $150 bucks for a temporary permit to not have your lawn seeded and it's $150 a month after that until you satisfy that bunch of bureaucrats.

What makes it even more galling is hearing from the people who have left Delaware tell about their experiences with other county juridictions. Permit? What permit? You own it? Gonna live in it? Call me when you're done and we'll come out and re -assess it for you. It's a money making scheme in Delaware and just another level nanny state government that we have to endure here.

 
Given all the %$#@& developers we have hovering around the County, I do have some value for the planning staff . They at least keep the mugwumps from putting houses in the middle of a swamp and making them lay out the lots so firetrucks can at least get to the vinyl boxes the builders throw up.

Last edited on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 07:10 pm by Hartlyboy

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 06:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
tspong wrote: DOVER — Kent County Levy Court stuck to its plan for coping with the recession.

Commissioners voted Tuesday night to raise taxes, take a bigger bite from county workers’ checks and adopt a $22 million general operating budget that maintains a variety of cost-cutting measures undertaken last year after county revenues plummeted amid a severe downtown in real-estate sales and construction.


With county revenue plumeting amid a severe downturn in real estate sales and construction, I wonder how many staff positions in the planning and inspections areas were eliminated?   Recorder of Deeds office?   Probably none, even though there is far less work for them to perform.

 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 02:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Kent County tax increase approved


Levy Court also OKs employee pay cut


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Kent County Levy Court stuck to its plan for coping with the recession.


Commissioners voted Tuesday night to raise taxes, take a bigger bite from county workers’ checks and adopt a $22 million general operating budget that maintains a variety of cost-cutting measures undertaken last year after county revenues plummeted amid a severe downtown in real-estate sales and construction.


Levy Court’s decisions were not unexpected. They had been informally endorsed by a majority of commissioners. But a property-tax increase and the general budget won approval with bare-majority, 4-3 votes as Commissioner Richard E. Ennis joined outspoken tax-hike foes Allan F. Angel and Eric L. Buckson in opposition.


"People out there are hurting," Commissioner Ennis said, arguing homeowners should be spared higher taxes while sufficient funds remain in reserve to ensure a balanced budget. "Now is not the time to implement a tax increase for those type of individuals. They’ve helped us build those reserve funds. Now we’re going to tax them for helping us."


But others said drawing more from reserves could leave the county vulnerable if the General Assembly imposes greater financial burdens on counties, the economy does not recover in the next year or a catastrophe occurs.


Nearly $1 million in reserves will be transferred to the general fund.


Another $1.9 million is to come from the property-tax hike, which will cost the average homeowner an estimated $28 annually. The first increase in the county property-tax rate in more than a decade, it moves the levy from the current 25 cents per $100 in assessed value to 31 cents per $100.


Kent still will have one of the lower property tax rates in the East.


Tuesday’s decision does not affect school taxes, which are collected by the county but set by individual school districts.


For county employees, already facing a wage freeze, the fiscal year that starts July 1 will bring an additional 1-percent deduction from their paychecks to help pay for their pensions. Currently, they do not contribute toward their defined-benefit retirement plan.


That change was approved on a 6-1 vote, with Commissioner Angel dissenting. He said he would prefer to save on retirement costs by lengthening the period an employee must be on the job before becoming eligible for a pension. The currently required period is five years. A majority of commissioners last week balked at moving it to eight years.


Approved weeks ago were increases in the amount employees will pay for prescription drugs and dental care.


The county will maintain a number of spending limitations already in effect, such as reducing energy consumption and the use of county motor vehicles. It is to save further from the retirement of at least 24 veteran employees who accepted offers that boost their pensions.


Leaving some of their jobs vacant and filling the remaining jobs with lower-paid personnel will save the county an estimated $552,000 next year.


Levy Court’s newest member, Commissioner George "Jody" Sweeney, expressed dismay at the financial situation, but noted that other governments in Delaware — from the state to the city of Dover — also are looking at new ways of balancing budgets.


"As a freshman commissioner, I detest the fact I am supporting a tax increase," he said.


But supporters of the increase expressed hope that a tax reduction will be feasible next year.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

taxpayertoo
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 159
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 12:04 am
 Quote  Reply 
If the employees are contributing to a pension I don't think 5 years is too early to be vested.  The pension is based on years of service and income.  It's when you play with the pensions giving extra years to encourage earlier retirement that you run into the bigger expense.  With the employees contributing to the pension things like that won't be able to happen, unless I believe, it is funded outside of the pension fund.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:44 am
 Quote  Reply 
The DSN only reports what they are given.  They have no reporters.  We have to start somewhere.  Nice to see you have come around in your thinking.


 Current time is 11:11 am
Page:    1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.4208 seconds (27% database + 73% PHP). 35 queries executed.