Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Nancy Wagner
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Old Dover guy
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 17th, 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 74
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 19th, 2008 12:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
Buckle Up wrote: I just learned that Nancy Wagner voted to double the marriage license fee to put more money in the State coffers. She should also consider returning to the State Treasury the illegal double dipping money she collected for more than a decade. Not a chance from Ms. Ethics!
Jesus Christ does this guy ever shut up!....or should I say BUCKLE UP!

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 18th, 2008 02:07 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I just learned that Nancy Wagner voted to double the marriage license fee to put more money in the State coffers. She should also consider returning to the State Treasury the illegal double dipping money she collected for more than a decade. Not a chance from Ms. Ethics!

curiousindover
Member
 

Joined: Tue Mar 28th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 356
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 5th, 2008 11:34 am
 Quote  Reply 
Well, I hate to admit it, but you may be right. In a sense, if what's said is true, she's done the same thing the House threatened to expell John Atkins for; using her influence for gain. Lots of good people make mistakes, but they pay the price for it. Isn't payment due on this one? Just curious. 

Observant
Member
 

Joined: Mon Dec 5th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 1653
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 4th, 2008 11:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
Curious -- that would not be a better way out.     A far better way out would be for the legislature to show its indignation at a member's abuse of their position, and expel her -- now!

curiousindover
Member
 

Joined: Tue Mar 28th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 356
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 09:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Seems, to me, Nancy should just retire rather than face humiliation in November. Wouldn't that be a better way out? Just curious.

Disgusted
Member
 

Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Dover
Posts: 476
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 09:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As a resident of Nancy's district, that she is doing these gatherings now after many years at Leg Hall evidences that she knows she's in trouble.  She's trying to build support.

So, I did not attend.  If I want to watch a dog and pony show, I'll watch a speech by one of the three Presidential wannabes.  If I want to play "let's pretend." I'll do the same for the Republican running for Governor - but only if they have a name on the ballot.



Last edited on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 09:13 pm by Disgusted

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 01:00 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What happened at Nancy Wagner's April Fool's Day Town Meeting? The Delaware State News played the meeting up big before it happened. Now there is silence from them. Was the meeting really a joke or did it serve the best interest of someone else besides Ms. Wagner? Surely someone reading this post must have attended. Speak up!

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 31st, 2008 11:18 am
 Quote  Reply 
Has anyone else noticed that Representative Donna Stone is missing in action from Wagner’s town meeting? Stone is one of the most respected members of her party. Wagner and Stone were a team in the past. They held town meetings together. They campaigned together. In the past they even appeared side by side on prominent billboards during election time. Could it be her own party has finally conceded the negative influence Representative Nancy Wagner has brought upon them? Perhaps they no longer fear her arrongant ways!

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Mar 27th, 2008 08:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I understand the trial date for Nancy Wagner's DOUBLE DIPPING lawsuit has been set. I will publish it as soon as I get my hands on it.

Observant
Member
 

Joined: Mon Dec 5th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 1653
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 26th, 2008 11:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
She is no April Fool --- more the year-round type.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 26th, 2008 10:43 am
 Quote  Reply 
Representative Nancy Wagner has scheduled a town meeting to be held on April 1, 2008 in the House Chambers at Legislative Hall -- APRIL FOOLS DAY! She has invited and/or blackmailed the following to support her efforts:
1. Delaware State Police
2. Dover Police
3. DMV
4. Attorney General's Office
5. Natural Resources
6. Dover City Council

I thought town meeting were for the purpose of asking elected officials questions? Like I already said -- she scheduled the meeting on APRIL FOOLS DAY!

Disgusted
Member
 

Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Dover
Posts: 476
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Mar 25th, 2008 01:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
It would be very difficult to be the supervisor in a public sector job of an employee who is known to be related to a member of the governing body.  Said body controls the finances and, by that authority, ultimately, who, what, when, where, how, and why. 

That is big-time true when the legislator or councilor is someone who's been re-elected, as has Nancy for 14 years.

Why?  That staffer is a mole...potentially and often actually, the legislator's eyes and ears in the area of work.   This means that everything that is done and said by everyone in the office may become known by the legislator and anyone he or she cares to tell.  And, the mole and the legislator will talk with their own, shall we say, "spin"  on the issue(s).

Furthermore, office discussions being what they are (not always work related), there is the potential for personal matters to reach the ears of folks for which they're not intended, and which influence subsequent events.  This can be good or bad.

Anyone who thinks that there aren't some state, county, and municipal employees at ALL pay levels who have their jobs because of a friend among the elected representatives of the people is incredibly naive.  Somewhat on the level of buying some of that great Southeast Asian desert property.

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2008 09:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Old Dover guy – you are my hero. I can just see you now telling State Employee Bud Wagner (husband of Nancy) he couldn’t leave work early. Of course, you would lose your state job the next day but I’m would still be proud of you for standing up to the Wagners. Just calling it like I hear it!

Old Dover guy
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 17th, 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 74
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2008 02:12 am
 Quote  Reply 
truth dude wrote: Just came across an interesting quote referencing Bud Wagner from the recent News Journal article on “Nepotism”.

“Wagner's paperwork was sometimes sloppy, Nissley said, and he often left early, claiming he had business with the Capital School District board, where he served a five-year term ending in 2005. He wasn't setting the world on fire, Nissley said.”

Nissley was Bud Wagner’s immediate supervisor. I wonder how many of us mere mortals could tell our boss “OFTEN”
we had to leave work early because we had to attend a meeting that had nothing to do with our work.

That was taxpayers’ money Bud Wagner was skipping out on. Then again since he was married to Ms. Nancy he really didn’t have anything to worry about – until now!

Apparently, Nissley was WEAK and could not control his own show!!! He sure was not setting the world on fire...call it as I hear it.


 

 

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 522
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 23rd, 2008 06:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You folks just don't get it, do you?  The Wagners are very special people ... he can slide stuff past his supervisor, and she can violate the public trust and the legislature that she is part of lacks the fortitude to do the right thing, which would be to expel her from the body on the basis of abuse of the public trust.   It should be just that easy and needs to be addressed promptly.   The legislature should take action, or let the members all stand up and admit that the reason they refuse to do so has everything to do with their own inappropriate actions as legislators.

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 23rd, 2008 05:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just came across an interesting quote referencing Bud Wagner from the recent News Journal article on “Nepotism”.

“Wagner's paperwork was sometimes sloppy, Nissley said, and he often left early, claiming he had business with the Capital School District board, where he served a five-year term ending in 2005. He wasn't setting the world on fire, Nissley said.”

Nissley was Bud Wagner’s immediate supervisor. I wonder how many of us mere mortals could tell our boss “OFTEN”
we had to leave work early because we had to attend a meeting that had nothing to do with our work.

That was taxpayers’ money Bud Wagner was skipping out on. Then again since he was married to Ms. Nancy he really didn’t have anything to worry about – until now!

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Mar 20th, 2008 02:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Let's not forget Ms. Nancy Wagner is still facing her "dsouble dipping" lawsuit. A few months back she told the Delaware State News that the Attorney General cleared her of "double dipping". That statement was an absolute lie. The lawsuit is still working its way through the court system. "Ethics" and "double dipping" may be too high a hurdle for even Nancy Wagner to overcome. However, since she sits on the Joint Finance Committee which funds the Courts she might be able to slip out the back door. Not a chance. Nancy Wagner would never use her political position to gain an advantage -- RIGHT!

Poltergeist
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 26th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Mar 20th, 2008 12:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
What you guys (or gals) don't get is that Nancy is exactly what her constituents want.  They love the arrogance.  She will not only beat her opponent but she will beat him handily!!

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Mar 19th, 2008 05:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote:
She will not resign -- clearly too arrogant for that.

I agree with Two Cents. Wagner is far too arrogant to resign. She needs to get a good whoopin at the polls. I sure hope this Scott guy is as good as the Democracts think he is.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 522
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 17th, 2008 02:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
She will not resign -- clearly too arrogant for that.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 17th, 2008 01:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
March 17, 2008 New Journal Editorial: “Rep. Nancy Wagner, R-Dover, who besides a legislator is also a full-time employee at Delaware State University, insists she did nothing wrong and did not secure a job for her husband. This despite the observation of witnesses that she personally lobbied the Joint Finance Committee for her husband’s job. She says for the record its all a matter of the wrong public perception.”

First Wagner called us cynical and now she claims we are stupid. Resignation would be a blessing to us stupid/cynical people.

Observant
Member
 

Joined: Mon Dec 5th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 1653
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 16th, 2008 03:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Poltergeist wrote: If she runs and wins, the criticisms and attacks should be levied at her district not at Nancy. 
If the legislature does not expel her prior to the elections this fall, the entire House deserves to be sent home by the electorate, and their replacements seated.

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 16th, 2008 02:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The radio station that first announced the ethics complaint against Nancy Wagner is WDEL 1150 AM. There was also an article in Saturday's Delaware State News about the ethics complaint.

Poltergeist
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 26th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 15th, 2008 11:28 am
 Quote  Reply 
If she runs and wins, the criticisms and attacks should be levied at her district not at Nancy. 

Old Dover guy
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 17th, 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 74
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 15th, 2008 03:32 am
 Quote  Reply 
truth dude wrote: SHE’S BACK! Ethics charges have now been filed with the House Ethics Committee against Rep. Nancy Wagner. It was announced on talk radio today that Rep. Schooley of Newark delivered to the House Ethics Committee a formal complaint sworn under oath by Robert Reeder also of Newark. Ironically, the allegations of wrong doing by Ms. Nancy are not about getting her husband Bud Wagner a State Government job. Instead the complaint seems to focus on Nancy Wagner getting herself a better job at Dover High School and some extra cash to boot through the legislative process.

Incidentally, Wagner did a great job of defending herself in today’s newspapers. She call us all “cynical”.

whats the talk radio channel you speak of?

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Mar 14th, 2008 09:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
SHE’S BACK! Ethics charges have now been filed with the House Ethics Committee against Rep. Nancy Wagner. It was announced on talk radio today that Rep. Schooley of Newark delivered to the House Ethics Committee a formal complaint sworn under oath by Robert Reeder also of Newark. Ironically, the allegations of wrong doing by Ms. Nancy are not about getting her husband Bud Wagner a State Government job. Instead the complaint seems to focus on Nancy Wagner getting herself a better job at Dover High School and some extra cash to boot through the legislative process.

Incidentally, Wagner did a great job of defending herself in today’s newspapers. She call us all “cynical”.

Observant
Member
 

Joined: Mon Dec 5th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 1653
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 8th, 2008 11:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Right.    All these self-righteous Republican House members advocate that the majority leader act swiftly and forcefully to do what?    Ensure that they not be turned out of office at the polls in November?   

There was no mention as to what specific action they would recommend that Mr. Cathcart should actually take.    In the absence of such a recommendation, how about this one:  Expel Mrs. Wagner from the legislature for her blatant abuse of the public trust, and terminate Mr. Wagner's employment with the state in that it was ill-gotten.   

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 8th, 2008 11:04 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It looks like the Republicans are about to throw Nancy Wagner under the bus. Read the following letter to Majority Leader Cathcart by some high powered Republicans.

The Honorable Richard C. Cathcart
Delaware House of Representatives, Dover, Del. 19903

Dear Majority Leader Cathcart:

As Delawareans and as Republicans, we write to express our grave concern with the inclusion in the State Budget’s Epilogue of language that in effect guarantees a state employment position for a close relative of a member of the House. This practice raises the appearance of an “…effort to realize personal financial gain through public office...” as prohibited by Delaware Code (Title 29 Chapter 10 Section 1001).

We respectfully suggest that the Republican House Caucus act now to prevent further erosion of public confidence in the State Government, the General Assembly and the House Republican Majority by reaffirming (perhaps through a House Resolution) that members have not and will not use their public office to secure or influence others to secure employment in state government for themselves or for a close relative. This would not, of course, prohibit a public officeholder or a close relative from seeking employment with a public entity based on individual merit.

This type of anti-nepotism stand by the House is overdue and will send a clear message to Delaware voters that the Republican Majority is focused on serving the people, rather than any self-interest. It would also complement Republicans’ ongoing efforts to make government in Dover more open and accountable to the taxpayer.

Our Republican majority in the House is in jeopardy. Yet we can make no claim to retain that leadership unless we are prepared to earn the people’s trust. We urgeyou to act quickly and forcefully in taking a public stand against nepotism, cronyism and corruption. It is simply the right thing to do.

We hope that you will look favorably upon our proposal. Thank you for your time and all of your efforts on behalf of the citizens of Delaware.

Please feel free to contact Jim Ursomarso or Michael Fleming to discuss any ways we might support you.
Erin Boggs John Bonk
Dave Burris John Clatworthy Tom Conaty
David Dietz Ben du Pont AimeenElson Michael Fleming
Donna Ianire Roger Kirtley Alan Levin Jon Layton
Chris Long Ernie Lopez Scott Malfitano
Bill Manning John Moore Beth Moore Lisa Stone
Matt Swanson Jim Taylor Joseph Toner
Jim Ursomarso Dana Walker Rod Ward

NANCY WAGNER’S RESPONSE
"I don't know if they just wanted to spout about good government and use me as a scapegoat," Wagner said. "These are not my constituents. All I know is, I work for my folks, and I'm going to keep working for them, and I'm going to run for re-election, and I'm going to get re-elected."

Wagner noted the letter took no issue with officeholders or their family members with the qualifications to get onto the public payroll -- which she asserted gave clearance to Bud, who has a background in the cable industry.

curiousindover
Member
 

Joined: Tue Mar 28th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 356
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 10:07 am
 Quote  Reply 
Amen!

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 2nd, 2008 02:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Interesting quote from another blog site: "She gets herself hired at Del. State and her hubby at the prison system. Memo to Wagner. It's a legisture not a job fair."

Number1
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 2nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 54
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Mar 2nd, 2008 12:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Not my words.  But it cetainly takes the conversation out of the gutter you put it in.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 1st, 2008 09:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Poltergeist, I didn't call Rep. Nancy Wagner a "piece of crap". It was the State News article I was referencing. However, nice job on your discription of English Teacher Nancy Wagner. You sure didn't do her any favors.

Poltergeist
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 26th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Mar 1st, 2008 09:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Buckleup...Your description of Ms. Wagner as a"piece of crap" is all posters here need know about you!  If your intent is to write something that matters then read what Disgusted posted two years ago:

Nancy Wagner isn't the only person who is or was a public school employee who simultaneously sat in the State Legislature.  I believe either the DSN or the News-Journal ran a story several years ago in which it was shown that about 1/4 of those elected to the State Senate and House had full-time jobs in Delawate public education.  This was statewide, not just the CSD.

As for her teaching abilities, I was one of her DHS English students when she commenced teaching there in the late 1960s.  She knew her stuff and graded fairly, but was quite tempermental, lashing out at several students who had not given her any reason to do so (I was the target of one of her tirades).  In short, she was too young to be teaching high schoolers.

(For that matter, anyone under age 30 is too young to be teaching grades 7-12 in any school, public or private.  I know that's age discrimination.  So what?)

She left the district, but returned with her husband in the 1980s getting her old job back.  One of my children had her as an English teacher at DHS, and, honestly, her knowledge and deportment were not what I would want in a teacher.  While the temper had been harnessed, well, there was something missing.  (The same can be said of several other instructors there in the 1990s who were there 30 years earlier.  The burnout was quite obvious to me when I attended the Open Houses.)

It seems to me that she's cared more for what she does at Leg Hall than what she does for the farce that we, the people, have made of the Capital School District.   By that I mean that too few of us vote on Election Day, and too many who do know nothing except glitzy ads, campaign literature, and who serves best their personal agenda.   That is why the public school system in this country is largely in the hands of folks who are not of the belief that the US of A is the best and freest country that God gave man and woman.

I don't measure a lawmaker by how many pieces of legislation he or she has their name on.  The best barometers are whether they have properly acted in line with their oath of office, and have conducted their public and private life in a responsible manner.  Nobody's perfect, and we have no business expecting that in any public official, but we do expect decency and adult conduct.

And, not making a career out of elective public office.  Myself, I'm all for one term and out at all levels - city, county, state, and federal.  That would enncourage more folks to give it a try, and cut the cost of doing so.



Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Feb 29th, 2008 04:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just got a chance to read the Delaware State News article (Wagners deny any influence with jobs). What a piece of crap. I'm still trying to figure out if the State News is in Wagner's pocket or is it just Volturo their reporter. If I recall Wagner refused to talk to the News Journal reporter Barrish. I wonder why! I guess she really had no defense with him but she knew she could spin Mr. Volturo.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 591
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 25th, 2008 04:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:  Wagners deny any influence with jobs


Report alleging intercession called ‘an insult’



By Drew Volturo



Delaware State News



DOVER — A Dover lawmaker and her husband have come under fire in recent weeks, facing allegations that she has used her influence in Legislative Hall to secure state employment for him.



The allegations, printed in The (Wilmington) News Journal two weeks ago, purport that Rep. Nancy H. Wagner, R-Dover, interceded on behalf of husband C.C. "Bud" Wagner II through the state’s budget-writing process.



The article details Mr. Wagner’s 17 years in state government, which began in 1991 when he left a career of more than 20 years in the cable-television industry to work at the Department of Transportation.



Rep. Wagner won her House seat in 1992 and sits on the legislative Joint Finance Committee, which crafts the state’s $3 billion-plus budget each year.



It’s in the state’s budget that hundreds of paragraphs detail exactly how certain funds are spent, duties of employees, objectives for agencies and other directives from the General Assembly.



Since 2003, a paragraph inserted each year in the budget epilogue has moved Mr. Wagner from the public defender’s office, where he had been employed since 1995, to the Department of Correction.



He is paid $68,104 annually.



Both Wagners deny that any inappropriate action took place in securing Mr. Wagner’s job or in moving him to DOC.



"I never pushed for anything," said Rep. Wagner, noting that she did not become a member of JFC until last year, serving as an alternate in 2005-06.



"In the entire time she’s been in the legislature, neither she nor I have asked for anything," Mr. Wagner said Thursday. "It’s an insult to me professionally."



Mr. Wagner said he spent more than 20 years "building cable systems, selling subscriptions" in various locations throughout the country, but mostly on the East Coast.



He joined DelDOT "to get off the fast track," and worked in support services.



While at DelDOT, Mr. Wagner said state Public Defender Lawrence W. Sullivan started talking with him about expanding a videophone system for processing defendants in the judicial system remotely, greatly cutting down on transporting suspects to court.



Rep. Wagner said she played no role in securing her husband’s job in the public defender’s office, that he applied on his own.



"The videophone was something that was close to my heart," Mr. Wagner said.



Mr. Sullivan said Mr. Wagner’s job was to administer and expand the digital audio-video telecommunications system, analyze current videophone systems, and plan and coordinate the development, maintenance and enhancement of the statewide criminal justice videophone system.



"Bud Wagner has made a substantial contribution to the success of Delaware’s statewide videophone system," Mr. Sullivan said.



"I hired Bud Wagner in September 1995. I did so because of his extensive experience in the cable-TV industry. In 1995, we were beginning to extend our videophone network to sites throughout the state. Today, we have almost 100 sites. Bud has been a key player in that expansion effort."



In 2003, the Joint Finance Committee inserted epilogue language into the budget to transfer Mr. Wagner’s position to the Department of Correction to implement a distance-learning program for prisoners.



Rep. Wagner said she had nothing to do with that language being added.



"I didn’t know about what they wanted to do at DOC until after the fact," said Rep. Wagner, adding that she didn’t see the paragraph until the budget was finished.



She abstained from voting on the fiscal 2004 budget.



Commissioner of Corrections Carl C. Danberg said Mr. Wagner developed a low-frequency television channel at Delaware Correctional Center near Smyrna to bring educational and treatment programs to prisoners isolated from the general prison population.



"Maximum security prisoners can’t move to a group educational setting, but we can pump the material to them on television," said Mr. Danberg, adding that DOC is looking to expand the program to all department institutions.



Mr. Danberg said Mr. Wagner also has developed:



•a DVD distributed to correctional emergency services personnel on the use of force;



•a multimedia classroom for training correction officers;



•a defibrillator training program that has been electronically distributed;



•a DVD on sexual harassment for regional training.



But Mr. Wagner’s biggest project, Mr. Danberg said, is establishing DOC’s telemedicine pilot program, which began last month.



The program connects patients with medical providers through videoconferencing, which Mr. Danberg said allows the department to maximize its medical resources throughout its multiple institutions.



"It does not replace conventional treatment, but it does supplement it," Mr. Danberg said.



"(Mr. Wagner) is responsible for the pilot. It had its bugs, but it’s a brand new program and it has worked well. We are working out the bugs before we implement it (statewide).



"Over the last year, Bud has been productive, and I intend to make good use of him (his position is tentatively slated to remain on loan to DOC) over the next year on the telemedicine project."



Post your opinions in the public issues forum at newszap.com.


Staff writer Drew Volturo can be reached at 741-8296 or dvolturo@newszap.com.

MomInDEof3
Member
 

Joined: Sun Feb 24th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 1
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 24th, 2008 04:27 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I know Darryl Scott personally..as a mom in Capital School District and I also know Nancy Wagner. I WELCOME Darryl into the race and pray that the "good ol boy" network will not win out here.

It is time that we be represented by someone who is really a great person with integrity. Darryl and his wife both are well respected, they do not place themselves on a pedestal..instead they will make conversation with everyone.

 They have two boys who are just as normal as my own. Darryl and his wife want the best for their family and their community that is the attitude we need to have and that we need to support.

Darryl has made CSD accountable on many financial issues...I would love to see the two of them go head to head about financial accountability! We all know Nancy's past, I welcome this change and ask anyone who wants to know more to check out his website.
http://www.darrylscott.org 

He is a great guy and I hope there are enough strong people in our community that are ready and willing to have a positive change.

Good luck Darryl!

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 11:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I thought character and integrity was Nancy Wagner's strong suit. At least that is what the Delaware State News seems to think. Then again maybe she has something on them. Sorry, that was uncalled for. Nancy Wagner would never try to influence anyone! Especially her fellow legislators!!

curiousindover
Member
 

Joined: Tue Mar 28th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 356
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 05:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
My guess is that Darryl Scott will give up his seat on the Board of Education rather than have a conflict. I hear he has tons of support in the district and is viewed very highly for his character and integrity. Wonder why we can't have more candidates like him. Just curious.

Old Dover guy
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 17th, 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 74
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Feb 21st, 2008 12:10 am
 Quote  Reply 
So does this guy have to give up his board seat if he wins? Just curious..

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 591
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Feb 20th, 2008 02:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:  Wagner has foe in 31st


Capital school board member Scott seeks seat



By Drew Volturo



Delaware State News



DOVER — Education almost certainly will be the centerpiece of the race for the 31st District House of Representative seat, with the incumbent a retired high-school teacher and the challenger a school-board member.



Dover resident Darryl Scott formally announced his candidacy Tuesday, a Democrat trying to knock off 16-year incumbent Rep. Nancy H. Wagner, R-Dover.



"We are going to need to seriously look at how we fund school construction and maintenance," said Mr. Scott, who has served on the Capital School District board of education since May 2005.



"The state has $350 million in deferred maintenance for schools and only sets aside $7 million a year. School districts end up going to referendum to fund those minor capital improvements."



The referendum process, Mr. Scott said, can be quite tedious and detract from schools’ primary function, which is to educate.



And even after a referendum passes, the financially strapped state has had to put off funding for some districts because there are more approved referendums than money available.



That, Mr. Scott said, can lead to project costs escalating through inflation and possibly exceeding any contingencies built into the referendum.



Mr. Scott, 43, is director of account operations for Milford-based business outsourcing company Sitel. The 31st District Democratic Committee endorsed the six-year Dover resident last year.



He has been involved with the parent teacher organization at his son’s schools, participated on numerous school committees, coached with the Central Delaware Soccer Association and held a seat on the board of directors for the Elizabeth W. Murphey School in Dover.



"I have a healthy respect for the challenge I’m taking on," Mr. Scott said of running against Rep. Wagner, a former Dover High teacher.



"She’s well-known in the community, she’s an incumbent and she’s starting with more money than me."



According to Department of Elections year-end campaign finance reports, Mr. Scott reported having $10,900 on hand as of Dec. 31, while Rep. Wagner had $21,700 in her campaign treasury.



Mr. Scott said he also wants to focus on health care, noting that 20,000 Kent County residents, including 4,000 children, are uninsured.



"Half of those children qualify for various programs (such as Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program) but are not enrolled," he said.



Mr. Scott said his campaign represents an opportunity to restore "integrity and accountability" to the district.



He questioned how effective Rep. Wagner has been able to be in the legislature after facing criticism in recent years regarding questions about dual compensation as a teacher and legislator, her current job with Delaware State University and her husband’s state job.



Rep. Wagner, who sits on the powerful budget-writing Joint Finance Committee, said she intends to file for a ninth two-year term.



Staff writer Drew Volturo can be reached at 741-8296 or dvolturo@newszap.com.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Feb 20th, 2008 01:16 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Today's Delaware State News: Wagner now has an opponent in the 31st District. Democrat Darryl Scott will have a good chance of sending Wagner out to pasture. It will be interesting to see if she runs again:
1. double dipping lawsuit
2. Delaware State University
3. hubby Bud

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 18th, 2008 05:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Right on Fred. In order for Republican Ms. Nancy to pull the husband Bud maneuver she needed help. It just so happens the co-chair of the Joint Finance Committee is also named Nancy. Senator Nancy Cook as in Democrat Nancy Cook. According to the news media both Nancy’s have been consistently telling those who come before the Joint finance Committee there is no money in the coffer. Does that mean Bud won't get a raise this year? Don't count on it.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 6217
Status:  Online
 Posted: Mon Feb 18th, 2008 05:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
No, Disgusted, virtue does not make one a Republican, or a Democrat, for that matter. There are scoundrels in both parties, and there are honest, forthright people of both, as well.

I'm not a fan of her any more, but I, one of the most non-Republicans here, refuse to blame her actions on being a Republican, nor do I accept that guy from downstate who wants to switch parties can attribute any of his weaknesses to either party.

Her actions stand by themselves.

Disgusted
Member
 

Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Dover
Posts: 476
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 18th, 2008 03:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As far as this Republican resident of the 31st District is concerned, Nancy Wagner is a RINO - Republican in Name Only.  She's made it quite obvious that she's out for her personal benefit, and has sufficient chips on others to prevent being called to account - to date.

What to do?  The answer initially is a change in the seat.  Prameela Kaza has been before the voters two or three times, and has not been elected.  I don't think she is the person. 

But, there are folks here in the 31st who aren't too happy with how Nancy has conducted herself in recent years.  Making sure her hubby has a job?  Bud has talent.  Let him earn one on his professional merits. 

Some of us here remember Nancy as a DHS English teacher.  She demonstrated good subject knowledge, but tempermentally, left much to be desired even in her better students - and their parents, many of whom were her constituents. 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 591
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 18th, 2008 02:54 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News: Wagner’s husband to keep state job


Associated Press



WILMINGTON — A Republican lawmaker’s husband will be allowed to keep a $68,000 state job that was created by the General Assembly five years ago, the head of a legislative budget committee said.



Bud Wagner, husband of Rep. Nancy H. Wagner, R-Dover, works on video education and medical projects for the Department of Correction, although his $68,100 salary is paid by Delaware Public Defender Larry Sullivan’s office.



Mr. Sullivan proposed that the Department of Correction pay Mr. Wagner, freeing up Mr. Sullivan to hire someone else to help with the state’s videophone system, which links attorneys, police, court officials and prisoners through nearly 100 sites statewide.



But Sen. Nancy W. Cook, D-Kenton, co-chair of the legislative Joint Finance Committee, which created Mr. Wagner’s job with language inserted into a budget bill in 2003, said that won’t happen.



"Not in this budget climate, where every job is precious,’’ said Sen. Cook after Thursday’s fiscal 2009 budget hearing for corrections.



Sen. Cook said that even if Mr. Wagner’s job was moved into the prison budget, Mr. Sullivan wouldn’t get a new position in the public defenders office.



"There is nothing I can do,’’ said Mr. Sullivan, a fellow Republican who first hired Mr. Wagner from a midlevel administrative post in the transit system in 1995 without posting the job or interviewing any other candidates. "It’s not that big in the overall scheme of things.’’



The General Assembly’s use of budget "epilogue’’ language to guarantee Mr. Wagner a job without identifying him was detailed in a recent newspaper article about Rep. Wagner’s intervention on behalf of her husband in a succession of state jobs since she was elected in 1992.



Delaware’s official misconduct law forbids public officials, including legislators, from obtaining a personal benefit through unauthorized actions outside official duties. The legislature’s separate conflict-of-interest law stipulates that "any effort to realize personal financial gain through public office’’ violates the public trust.



Sen. Bruce C. Ennis, D-Clayton, a veteran lawmaker but new member of the JFC, said the epilogue, often used to tuck legislators’ pet projects into the budget at the last minute, should not be used to give anyone a job. Sen. Ennis, who served with Rep. Wagner in the House until his election to the Senate last year, said he knew nothing of the unusual job arrangement until he read the article.



"I would prefer not to see the position, or any position, handled through the epilogue,’’ Sen. Ennis said. "I’d prefer to see it handled through the regular budget, which is the normal and proper process.’’



Sen. David McBride, D-New Castle, another member of the finance committee, also questioned the process, even though he was on the JFC in 2003.



"I have questions about it,’’ he said. "Let’s leave it at that.’’



Rep. Wagner, who has been on the panel since last year, left immediately after the meeting and could not be reached for comment. She has not made any public statements about helping her husband find employment, and Mr. Wagner has not returned newspaper calls seeking comment.



During Thursday’s budget hearing, DOC commissioner Carl Danberg apologized to lawmakers because the mandatory annual reports detailing Mr. Wagner’s work previously had not been filed. After the newspaper’s inquiries, a report for 2007 was filed.


Mr. Danberg has said that the work of Mr. Wagner and others has allowed inmates to view educational programs on math, history and other subjects from their cells, and employees to watch training videos.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 17th, 2008 12:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Old Dover Guy - thanks for correcting the typo. Ms. Nancy's Legislative District is the 31st. Where are all the Democrats hiding.

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 17th, 2008 12:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Old Dover Guy thanks for correcting the typo. Ms. Nancy's Legislative District is the 31st.

Old Dover guy
Member


Joined: Sun Feb 17th, 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 74
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 17th, 2008 04:37 am
 Quote  Reply 
Buckle Up wrote: GREAT WORK TRUTH DUDE! If Wagner has a single moral fiber in her she would resign immediate. Oh well! So much for moral fiber and politics. I sure hope someone runs against her in November. What a travesty if she is unopposed and the 31th gets two more years of her and Bud.
31th?  hmmm try 31st

truth dude
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Feb 16th, 2008 08:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
#1 -- Not only is the complaint on the site but I copied a comment Bob Reeder made about his posting. ENJOY

Bob Reeder says:

Ironically, Nancy Wagner is not the issue in this complaint. However, her published corrupt behavior has given us an opportunity to challenge the “good old boys/gals” strangle hold on our right to demand ethical behavior by those we gave the right to serve us.

POINT #1: The ethics law states: “Each Committee (House/Senate) shall investigate allegations of violations of this chapter by the members of the respective House…” There are some elected officials who claim that phrase means the allegations must be made by a member. I don’t read it that way and neither should you. We have the right according to the ethics law to make allegation and the House “shall investigate”.

POINT #2: However, the House in a maneuver to quite possibly protect itself from the mean public who elected them made a rule. It states: “A complaint alleging a violation of a Rule of Legislative Conduct shall be filed in writing by a member with the ethics Committee for investigation…” BINGO! If we the people win on Point #1 then they can roll out Point #2 and say we the people lose because no House Member will voluntarily pass on the complaint.

POINT #3: We win! Notice the rule states “shall be filed”. It doesn’t give them an option. Just in case you are still not sure. The following statement also appears in that same House Rule: “A complaint must be accompanied by a written statement by any person, sworn under oath…” The last time I checked you and I fit the category of “any person”.

John Flaherty and Gerry Fulcher filed a written complaint with the House Ethics Committee in the Atkins case. The problem is it wasn’t a “sworn under oath” complaint so it was ignored.

It just so happens that Representative Schooley is my Representative in the 23rd District. She will have the honor/duty to represent we the people by filing the “any person sworn under oath” complaint, or she might choose to protect her fellow elected colleague – a colleague who has already been exposed as corrupt.

I hope this explanation helps. I close by repeating my opening statement. “Ironically, Nancy Wagner is not the issue in this complaint. However, her published corrupt behavior has given us an opportunity to challenge the “good old boys/gals” strangle hold on our right to demand ethical behavior by those we gave the right to serve us.”

Buckle Up
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Feb 16th, 2008 08:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Number1 wrote:
The complaint is not posted Mr. Reeder!

Thanks for the compliment. I only wish I had the B___S that Reeder has. I can't help it if you can't find the complaint on that Blog Site. It's right there.


 Current time is 07:11 pm
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.5585 seconds (42% database + 58% PHP). 24 queries executed.