Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

pay cuts for teachers
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 08:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Well, no. They certainly are not uneducated.  You could question their wisdom, perhaps, but sometimes personal wants have to be sacrificed, and this is one of them.

However...what do you think a Republican governor would have done....or, better yet, what will the next Republican candidate going to say about the pay cut? That they would have raised taxes? That they would have cut specifically cut something else?

And, if so....why aren't we hearing from them right now?  I'd LOVE to hear alternatives that won't create more problems then the current resolution.  Like the bailout, there are times when you have to support something you don't like because it is the best, or only feasible solution.

laughingoutloud
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 21st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 17
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 02:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Strike?  Are you kidding? How exactly would that benefit the students?  Thats right kids, today's lesson is that 2 wrongs do indeed make a right! We have been telling you wrong all along.  Let's break the rules because they did. What kind of example would that show the kids?

YEAH STRIKE, thats the answer then we won't get paid at all!  Much better than a pay cut!

If they were such intellegent people then they should have done their due diligence before becoming Democrats and supporting a moron like Markell. Perhaps they are the uneducated ones and should not be allowed to educate our children!

Last edited on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 02:42 pm by laughingoutloud

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 01:00 am
 Quote  Reply 
No............ All State employees are created equal in the payroll system.  From the Governor and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on down to the lowest pay grade on the totem pole.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 07:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Playing the Game wrote: Cut 8% of the waste, that equates to administration and duplication of services among local districts.


If such consoldiation (which would include loss of some administrative positions and the elimination of duplication services) saved, oh say 15%...would you exclude the teachers from the pay cut?

Number1
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 2nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 137
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 11:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
Colin Bonini's approach seems better for the long haul.  We need to shrink government not just because of this fiscal emergency but so that we don't get in this predicament again!!

http://www.delawaresbadhabit.com

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 03:56 am
 Quote  Reply 
Cut 8% of the waste, that equates to administration and duplication of services among local districts.

Fred wrote:
I'm not sure how they "police themselves" anymore then any other profession. Sure, some rely on external groups to review conduct, but that is mostly those who generally work independently.  I'm a professional, I'm a manager, but I still have a boss who will follow established procedures to get rid of me if I fail at my job.

That being said....do you really think that teachers are somehow special in being excluded from the salary cut?  I don't think it is right, either, but I tend to prefer that rather then cutting 5 or 6 percent of the teaching staff (I'm swagging the number, but if you have to cut 8% of the salary, I would guess it wouldn't equate to 8% of the workforce due to the amount saved through health care, pension, and retirement costs.

 

Allan
Member
 

Joined: Sat Feb 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 122
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 03:51 am
 Quote  Reply 
How do teachers police themselves?  They could start with their union.  Actually, it's not a union, it's an association.  The association will defend any and all levels of incompetent and behavior.  The association's membership (teachers) support this by allowing it to happen.   As far as the association is concerned, if they don't represent a teacher regardless of their ability or infraction, they may loose association membership dues.  And trust me, they don't want that to happen. The salaries of some DSEA employees puts teachers salaries to shame.

No, I don't think teachers are somehow special in being excluded from the salary cut.

Fred wrote: I'm not sure how they "police themselves" anymore then any other profession. Sure, some rely on external groups to review conduct, but that is mostly those who generally work independently.  I'm a professional, I'm a manager, but I still have a boss who will follow established procedures to get rid of me if I fail at my job.

That being said....do you really think that teachers are somehow special in being excluded from the salary cut?  I don't think it is right, either, but I tend to prefer that rather then cutting 5 or 6 percent of the teaching staff (I'm swagging the number, but if you have to cut 8% of the salary, I would guess it wouldn't equate to 8% of the workforce due to the amount saved through health care, pension, and retirement costs.

 

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 03:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
I'm not sure how they "police themselves" anymore then any other profession. Sure, some rely on external groups to review conduct, but that is mostly those who generally work independently.  I'm a professional, I'm a manager, but I still have a boss who will follow established procedures to get rid of me if I fail at my job.

That being said....do you really think that teachers are somehow special in being excluded from the salary cut?  I don't think it is right, either, but I tend to prefer that rather then cutting 5 or 6 percent of the teaching staff (I'm swagging the number, but if you have to cut 8% of the salary, I would guess it wouldn't equate to 8% of the workforce due to the amount saved through health care, pension, and retirement costs.

 

Allan
Member
 

Joined: Sat Feb 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 122
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 02:00 am
 Quote  Reply 
LOL ... no, in lala land, it doesn't.

You're correct, the overall mentality of teachers, as a whole, is more blue collar than white collar.  Heck, if they would police themselves and weed out the incompetents in their profession, similar to attorneys and doctors, they could reduce there numbers and increase the demand and then the price of their services.  They'll never get it.  I know a lot of teachers and respect what they do as individuals.  But as an organization, I can't say the same.

Playing the Game wrote: I guess my MBA from Washington University in St. Louis doesn't count here in lala land.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:46 am
 Quote  Reply 
I guess my MBA from Washington University in St. Louis doesn't count here in lala land.

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:43 am
 Quote  Reply 
You don't have to attend, they want educated people there.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
No thank you, sounds like an AFSCME Union rally.

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:37 am
 Quote  Reply 
Rally at Legislative Mall, in May 6 - This is for ALL STATE EMPLOYEES. Begin gathering at 3:00. Speeches begin at 5:00pm. Legislative Mall, west side of Legislative Hall, Dover. Wear your association t-shirts, or something red. Bring signs. Families, neighbors and supportive friends are welcome

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:33 am
 Quote  Reply 
Maybe a teacher's strike right now would be a good thing.  Save a lot of $$ in salaries that would not have to be paid, and cause some parents to really scurry for babysitters, etc.   Yeah -- why don't you all do that??   Evidently everybody has forgotten the fate of the air traffic controllers when they called a strike in the early 1980's.

Number1
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 2nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 137
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:32 am
 Quote  Reply 
The NEA is a Democratic party tool...Strike...yeah right

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 01:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
No it makes a breach of contract by the state a bad idea. 

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 27th, 2009 10:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Oh goody a teachers strike.  That makes you plumbers and auto workers.

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 27th, 2009 10:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Gov. Markell, a question to you.  Did the DSEA back you for your election?  Aren't they the largest union in the state of Delaware?  So if they didn't support you would you be in office?  This is the way you thank them by cutting the pay of those who supported you and put you in your position.  I hope you can sleep well at night knowing what you are doing to your supporters.  You are a typical politician, say one thing and do another just to get what you want. 

The contract the teachers have says they are not allowed to strike.  It also says what they will be paid, it doesn't say that the salary they receive will be cut.  So if the state of Delaware can be in breach of contract without any repercussions than so I guess the teachers can be also. 

STRIKE NOW TEACHERS!!!!!!

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 13th, 2009 09:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
How many levels of administration are there, really?

What does a  teacher make....60 or 70K?  I think there are some "department heads" in some area, but in any case, you still have assistant principals. I tend to think that there responsibility should be equated to higher salary....so they make something like 90K?

My high school had 5 Vice Principals...and the Principal was probably paid in relation to what they got paid, which is to say he got more.  Probably in the 110s by today standards....

Now, given as there probably should be some (probably not as many as there are, but there are still some needed) assistant superintendents, they should get paid more than the principals, right?  And at the top level, he or she should make a bit more, correct?

I am all for consolidation,  I am all for cutting positions, but realize that salary structure is built from the bottom up.  I make more than the people who work for me, and my boss makes more than me.  I don't see why public education should be any different.

The dock of the bay
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 31
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 05:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Fred wrote: Two Cents wrote: The dock of the bay wrote: I was listening to the news and they posted the salary for Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary.  He makes $193,000 per year, and look at the responsibilites he has during this economic downturn.  Cape's Superintendent makes approx $156,000.  Seems like someone is overpaid.

Or underpaid...look at the salaries that our top workers give up to come to work for the federal government. Not my favorite guy, but ol' Dick brought the mangement and ethical experience of running Halliburton to the VP...was he "underpaid"?  As much as I think he was the source of much of what ailed the Bush Administration, he certainly could have been worth a lot more than that.

Interesting proposal, CR....but I am not sure how far you take that, or should.  Each of the pensions earned is from a seperate source, and is already accounted for..the only thing it would do is discourage these experienced people from working for other government entities.

For example...if McCain had been elected, should he have given up his military pension?

Fred.  I was not suggesting that Geithner was overpaid.  I was comparing his salary of $190,000+ for all of the responsibilities he has as compared to the $156000 salary of a superintendent of Cape School District.  Geithner, no doubt, took a VERY considerable cut in salary in order to become Treasurey Secretary.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 8th, 2009 09:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: The dock of the bay wrote: I was listening to the news and they posted the salary for Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary.  He makes $193,000 per year, and look at the responsibilites he has during this economic downturn.  Cape's Superintendent makes approx $156,000.  Seems like someone is overpaid.

Or underpaid...look at the salaries that our top workers give up to come to work for the federal government. Not my favorite guy, but ol' Dick brought the mangement and ethical experience of running Halliburton to the VP...was he "underpaid"?  As much as I think he was the source of much of what ailed the Bush Administration, he certainly could have been worth a lot more than that.

Interesting proposal, CR....but I am not sure how far you take that, or should.  Each of the pensions earned is from a seperate source, and is already accounted for..the only thing it would do is discourage these experienced people from working for other government entities.

For example...if McCain had been elected, should he have given up his military pension?

Last edited on Wed Apr 8th, 2009 09:22 pm by Fred

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 6th, 2009 11:58 am
 Quote  Reply 
I said pension, not pay.

Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Camden-Wyoming, Delaware USA
Posts: 516
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 6th, 2009 04:05 am
 Quote  Reply 
By that reasoning, every person who works a second job should give up their second pay.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 5th, 2009 01:09 am
 Quote  Reply 
Maybe Levy Court Commissioners should reduce their pay and give up their County pensions if they are State Employees too.  Goose, Gander.

Last edited on Sun Apr 5th, 2009 01:09 am by Playing the Game

Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Camden-Wyoming, Delaware USA
Posts: 516
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 5th, 2009 01:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bixby, Bryon Short submitted a resolution to the House that pretty much says that whatever happens to State employees will happen to Legislators too.  There were actually two very vocal objections saying that it is illegal for Ligislators to set their own pay.  THAT IS A COPOUT if the resolution does not pass because of that.

Old Spice
Guest
 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 4th, 2009 09:50 pm
 Quote  Reply 
llort

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 10:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Come on now Superintendents pay is for the children.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 09:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The dock of the bay wrote: I was listening to the news and they posted the salary for Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary.  He makes $193,000 per year, and look at the responsibilites he has during this economic downturn.  Cape's Superintendent makes approx $156,000.  Seems like someone is overpaid.
Well, one of the differences is that we know Mr. Geithner doesn't pay taxes and presumably the Cape super does.   That tends to widen the gap.

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 2357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 09:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I have yet to see any proposals for the entire State Legislature to cut their pay an equal percentage as they propose for other state employees.  Likewise the US Congress.  It's the old case of do as I say and not as I Do. The elected elite should lead by example, or would that be too painful?

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 08:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I hear what you are saying.  Why is it fair to take from the people on the low end of the pay scale and expect them to be financially okay but not for these people you mention?  Go to http://php.delawareonline.com/state/paycheck/stateSalaries2010.php for a list of state employees and salaries.  There are a lot more made up positions that I originally thought.

The dock of the bay
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 31
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 08:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I was listening to the news and they posted the salary for Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary.  He makes $193,000 per year, and look at the responsibilites he has during this economic downturn.  Cape's Superintendent makes approx $156,000.  Seems like someone is overpaid.

a little help here
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 18th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 63
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 08:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just when we thought the grass would be greener on the other side the wonderful state of Delaware put Gov. Jack Markell into office.  Has this guy lost his sight on reality? 

As if we don't ask enough from our state teachers by making them teach our kids that bring guns to school, make threats and have no respect for authority.  Now the Governor is proposing an 8% pay cut on top of cuts for benefits the state had funded.  Has he not noticed that the prices for everything from paper towels to gas has risen?  It cost the average family more money now just to pay for the necessities and now he wants to take money away from them.  A pay cut might help the budget but it will hurt the state employees.  On top of that it pretty much guarantees he will not be the Governor after the next election. 


How many administrative people does the State of Delaware have working for them?  How many made up jobs are in the state budget?  Maybe lets take a look at them and remove a few of the useless jobs.  In 2007 the Gov of Delaware was earning $132.5K annually according to stateline.org.  I’m sure this has gone up since then.   Maybe the Governor should take a pay cut?  As a taxpayer in the state I am willing to do my part.  I would be for a 1% sales tax in the state if it would help not only the budget but also keep teachers pay the way it is. 

Teachers of these little disrespectful punks deserve a pay raise, not a reduction in pay!  Wake up Gov. Jack Markell!


 Current time is 08:12 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.3280 seconds (31% database + 69% PHP). 28 queries executed.