Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
> Delaware Public Forums > Dover Public Issues Forum > Furloughs in future for Dover? City’s union workers reportedly facing one unpaid day off per month

Furloughs in future for Dover? City’s union workers reportedly facing one unpaid day off per month
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Sep 17th, 2009 04:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Financial issues top council’s workload

Police grant, pension plans debated


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Financial woes continued to dominate the work of City Council this week.


Even the prospect of gaining an additional police officer at no cost for salary or benefits proved worrisome during council’s Monday night meeting. The problem: While the federal stimulus program would pay for the salary and benefits for three years, the city would have to pick up the tab afterward and keep the officer on the payroll for at least one more year.


Earlier Monday in a separate financial matter, the Dover Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee called for a major adjustment in the city’s underfunded pension program. The move would limit spending by eliminating the possibility of a traditional, "defined benefits" city pension for future employees.


Council voted 7-2 to accept the police grant and the accompanying financial commitment. It will deal with the pension recommendation at a future session.


One more officer


Police Chief Jeffrey Horvath said his department is authorized to include 93 officers but planned on not filling three vacancies during the fiscal year that began July 1 — until federal grants for law enforcement became available through the Cops Hiring Recovery Program.


Dover qualified for one federally funded officer, and the chief on Monday sought council authorization to proceed with the hiring. But he emphasized that rules of the federal program preclude the city from accepting the grant for a new officer then laying off an existing one just to save money.


Layoffs, he noted, have been mentioned as a possible means of balancing the police budget, though he said they were not anticipated when the city applied for the federal assistance.


In July, council rejected a tentative contract agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents Dover officers, after City Manager Anthony J. DePrima said implementing the deal might result in cutting some jobs. A later contract proposal was approved Sept. 1.


"We have no layoff plans for this year," Mr. DePrima told council Monday, "but this is a three-year grant."


He said other city departments could be adversely affected if the police department’s manpower level must be maintained over three years to comply with federal rules.


But rejecting the grant at this point, Chief Horvath indicated, could be awkward.


"I’m not thrilled with the idea of calling the federal government to say we don’t want the money we fought so hard for," he said, adding that Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who championed the police-hiring program, probably would not be happy, either.


Council approved the chief’s request after City Controller Donna Mitchell said she had been advised by an attorney that the city could conduct police layoffs within the rules of the grant if it showed its financial picture had worsened. Chief Horvath said that would mean that any job cuts would have to spread across the city government, rather than focused on the police department.


Even under those conditions, Ms. Mitchell said, laying off an officer could undermine the city’s chances of winning similar funding in the future.


Council members William P. McGlumphy and Eugene B. Ruane voted against accepting the grant.


One less benefit


If council follows the advice of the Legislative, Finance & Administration Committee, the defined-benefit retirement plan will be closed to all employees except those currently enrolled in it.


The plan guarantees workers a pension based on a formula the city must follow regardless of market conditions. Partly because of tumbling stock prices, the Dover plan’s assets now total less than half of the city’s roughly $44 million pension liability, according to a report Ms. Mitchell presented in July.


All but 82 of Dover’s approximately 400 employees are enrolled in the plan. The others chose self-directed 401(a) plans, instead. The 401(a) is a government equivalent of the 401(k) plan common in private industry. Those plans may deliver higher or lower retirement earnings than a traditional pension, depending on the results of the investments chosen by the worker.


Seeing their 401a assets plummet along with stock prices, some Dover employees have requested the right to transfer into the traditional plan. But their doing so would be costly to them as well as to the city, Ms. Mitchell said.


According to a consultant’s analysis involving five employees from that group, workers would have to make a one-time catch-up payment averaging $126,000 and the city’s annual pension cost would rise by $10,200 for each employee who switched to the traditional plan.


The onetime payments for the five employees ranged from $50,000 to $212,000.


"As an employee, I’d look at that number and laugh — ‘Forget that stuff,’" said Councilman Kenneth L. Hogan, who is not on the committee but sat in on its meeting.


The committee voted 4-1 to endorse Ms. Mitchell’s recommendation that neither future workers nor any more current ones be admitted to the traditional programs. Future employees would be eligible for 401(a) accounts.


Councilman Reuben Salters dissented in the committee’s 4-1 decision, saying city employees should have been better informed of the consultant’s findings.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.


 

 

I vote
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Sep 3rd, 2009 11:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
If I am reading the paper correctly, the agreement between the City and the Fraternal Order of Police is at a minimum 5% over the next two years.  Isn't this the same agreement the FOP had agreed to before and council rejected?  What is the difference and why did City Council reject it last time?

Oh wait a minute, these incredibly smart people wanted to give the officers an additional nine daysoff throughout the year and increase costs to the taxpayer.  How is this saving money?  The prior agreement had the FOP taking a 2.5% pay raise on the last day of the fiscal year and a 2.5% pay raise on the first day of the new fiscal year for a total of 5% on July 1, 2010.  This agreement cost the City no additional money this year and avoided furloughs for police officers and maintained a strong police presence in all aspects of public safety. 

Under this new agreement however, the City is giving the officers a 3.5% pay raise immediately and at a minimum, a 1.5% on July 1, 2010, but furloughing them nine days. If I am correct, and I think I am, this roughly equals a 0% pay raise for the year (same as previous agreement) because the furlough days will negate the pay raise, but now we lose each officer for nine days.  What idiots approved this plan.  Let me guess, the 3.5% pay raise applies to their overtime that will obviously increase with the lack of manpower?  Nice job Mr. DePrima! 

Whatever this agreement costs the City in overtime can it be taken out of the City Managers salary or that of City Council's.  Can we also include the cost of the new attorney we hired to negotiate this contract.  Amazing! 

 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Sep 3rd, 2009 04:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

New Dover police labor contract approved


Pact includes raise, unpaid furloughs


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Council has approved a labor contract with its police officers that provides them with an immediate raise while requiring unpaid furloughs like those imposed on other city employees.


The three-year pact does not rule out the possibility of layoffs, but both city officials and the local head of the officers’ union, the Fraternal Order of Police, said they do not foresee the elimination of any of the police department’s 93 jobs.


"Given the economy, I think it’s a fair contract," FOP president David Spicer said.


The city’s previous work agreement with police expired June 30.


FOP members and supporters outspokenly opposed the possibility of furloughs or layoffs, even picketing City Hall June 22 prior to council’s approval of an annual budget that included furloughs for nearly all city workers, including police. The budget does not anticipate layoffs.


Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr. cited the potential police furloughs as he vetoed the budget a few days later. His veto was overridden in mid-July, but the FOP still insisted that its next contract contain a no-furlough clause.


A tentative deal containing such a clause was shot down by council later in July on a 5-4 vote. Some council members said that it would be unfair to furlough most workers but not police.


Bargaining talks resumed last week, with mediator Sean Rogers of Leonardtown, Md., guiding the two sides toward the final deal. Mr. Spicer said union members ratified it Friday with no dissenting votes. Council backed it 8-0 in a special session Tuesday.


The contract reflects council’s stated desire to avoid any job cuts during the fiscal year that began July 1. Furloughs are serving as a cost-cutting alternative to layoffs.


"Layoffs are still a management right," Kim Hawkins, the city’s human resources director, said Wednesday. "We do not foresee or plan for any reduction in force through layoffs."


Some positions may be left unfilled following retirements or other departures.


Mr. Spicer, who is a police detective, said furloughs remain a threat to the safety of the public and to that of the officers themselves, who could have too little backup in some emergencies. He pointed to the Tuesday shooting death of a Georgetown officer as proof of the danger of police work.


"It’s definitely a concern of mine to take officers off the street," he said, but he noted the contract specifies the furloughs will occur only during the first year of the three-year agreement.


FOP members will receive a 3.5-percent raise retroactive to July 1. They will get a raise of 1.5 percent to 3 percent next July 1, with the size depending on the inflation rate. The two sides will return to negotiations on a possible 2011 raise, and those talks will also include an attempt to overhaul the police wage scale.


The furloughs will consist of nine days off for each officer by the end of next June. That is slightly less than the day-per-month furloughs required of other Dover workers.


The effect of the furloughs on officers’ pay will be virtually offset by the 3.5-percent pay raise, according to Ms. Hawkins.


Other new elements in the contract include:


• The FOP will be represented in discussions on how to reduce health insurance costs. The contract may be adjusted to accommodate recommendations from those discussions, but such a step can occur only if both sides agree.


• FOP members can "sell back" as many as 80 hours of unused vacation, twice as many as previously allowed.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

Poltergeist
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 26th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 169
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Aug 11th, 2009 12:28 am
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. Ruane -  your courage to speak your mind is admirable.  As a voter I say you need to go!   

knightm01
Member
 

Joined: Mon Aug 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Aug 10th, 2009 04:54 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. Ruane if making money was my priority when I decided to become a Dover Police Officer I would have signed on with the Delaware State Police.  I didn't because the Dover Police Dept is in my opinion the best police department in the State and City of Dover employees were treated fairly.  This is not the case at this current time.

Mr. Ruane I would love to speak to the "1000" visistors of the Dover Public Library and poll them to see how many are actually Dover City Residents, attending the library with a legitimate purpose (not to just local transients getting out of the weather to surf the internet and read magazines).

I believe after speaking to the "1000" daily visitors we would find we are providing a service to many non-City residents.  I would then like you to speak with the 30,000 plus City of Dover Residents and see which they would prefer. A quality police department that is in full force and adequately supported by their government or a $20 million library project that will be able to support the "1000" visitors from all over Kent County.  

Kent County Government backed out of the library project for a reason. 

In closing, according to your statement "And the City should and will allocate enough financial resources for a reasonbable  and fair contract with the FOP".  I look forward to seeing the City of Dover make good on your statement. 

I vote
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Aug 7th, 2009 12:24 am
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. Ruane,

I looked back at the recent FOP Articles and while they claim the library is not needed at this time, they also claim the city has the money to still provide a raise without touching the funds set aside for a new library.  Your statement is not accurate, much like the numbers of people who visit the library.  Do you really expect me to believe that over one thousand people a day visit this facility? 

If the library project is such a great idea, why did Levy Court pull their money from the project.  By the way, is Kent County furloughing any of their employees.  If you honestly believe the library is what the citizens of Dover want, then why don't we put it to a referendum.  Lets hear from the voters.  Would you agree to this? 

In closing Councilman, I am sure the FOP would be more than willing to attend any meeting you can set up with the Downtown Dover Partnership.  Can it it be done in conjunction with a Council Meeting - this way the partnership can ask questions of you and the other council members, along with the FOP? 

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Aug 6th, 2009 06:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. Ruane, I question your priorities. I understand that you feel a need for a 23 million dollar library, because parking and a computer at times are hard to find and the poor innocent children have story hour in the basement. I know the horrors of squeezing into that windowless basement because several times I’ve read to those children at story time.  I myself want a 23 million dollar library. But… I would suggest you read in the paper the crimes that are being committed in Dover. Murder, Rape, Robbery, Molestation, Burglary… just to name a few. I think you will find recently an assault on a lady who was walking home from the library. What point is a 23 million dollar library if you can’t safely walk from it or to it? I’m afraid that public safety is a need and a 23 million dollar library is a want. I agree we should have both. However, your council’s plan of lessening ambulance services and policing while banking millions of tax dollars into this library fund is wrong.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Aug 6th, 2009 04:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Dover is fortunate to have a fully accredited and quality Police Department. Its men and women daily "protect and serve" all our residents under some very challenging; and, even life-threatening conditions. I honor and respect them.


However, I take exception to members of FOP Police Lodge No. 15 and their hired "economist" when they repeatedly suggest that the City of Dover "use funds set aside for a new Dover Public Library" to meet their own contract demands for salary increases and additional benefits.


This "false" choice was most recently thrown out during an FOP Press Conference in front of the City Hall.


If the FOP is going to continue to refer to the city’s proposal to build a much needed Dover library, as part of their "negotiations", I suggest that they hold their next Press Conference in front of that facility on State Street.


There they could speak directly with the more than one thousand daily visitors to this grossly over-crowded and out-dated facility; and, tell them why the funds that have been set aside for a new library over a period of years by the state, the county and the city; and, the money donated by library users and pledged by the Friends of the Dover Library, would be better spent on additional salaries and benefits for Dover Police Officers.


I would like them to explain to the children who have to squeeze into a small and windowless basement room for Story Hour (and to their parents) that they should continue to wait even longer to have the opportunity of meeting in a safer and healthier environment.


While they are holding their press conference, I would also like the Police Union members to try to find an open parking place; or, come into the library reading or computer area and try to find a seat or a free computer. And, while there, they can read the names of hundreds and hundreds of library users who have signed petitions in support of a new facility.


I would also like them to explain to their fellow city employees, who are providing quality services under very difficult conditions, why their poor working conditions should continue so that police salaries and benefits might be increased.


Or maybe, the next FOP press conference should be held in front of the Downtown Dover Partnership so that they can explain to the business community why their increased salaries and additional benefits are more important than the construction of a new library that the business community believes will greatly help to revitalize the central business corridor where the new library will be built.


But enough of this "apple of discord" which the FOP and its hired "economist" have repeatedly thrown to the citizens of Dover as part of their "negotiations".


The real issue here is that the City must have both a quality Police Department and a new quality public library. And, I think we can and should have both.


The money that has been set aside for a new library, without in any way jeopardizing the City’s past or present obligations to the FOP and all the other City Unions, should stay for that good, worthy and necessary purpose. And the City should and will allocate enough financial resources for a reasonable and fair contract with the FOP.


So, let’s not divide the Dover community with any more of these false choices.


Eugene Ruane


Dover City Council, Second District

I vote
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2009 10:57 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. McGlumphy it sounds as though you belive Mr. DePrima is being less than honest regarding police negotiations.  If this is the case what actions are being taken against him.  Who does he answer to?  I assume council answers to him based on what has been written. 

I vote
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2009 10:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Are you kidding me Mr. DePrima.  The city just lost nearly one million in state aid and you decide to suspend furloughs.  I would think this is all the more reason to keep the furloughs in place.  This makes me wonder, are the furloughs really necessary?

Here is an idea, use the funds for the library to replace the missing state aid money and the rest to balance the budget instead of the furloughs. 

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2009 07:54 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Better than expected cost savings in the recent months????  Are we to believe that this is the reason no Dover City employee will be furloughed in August????  And this… just days after the police union states that their economist found that the City has an excess of money????  hhmmmm …

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2009 04:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Dover won’t issue furloughs this month


Recent cost savings allows city government to spare employees


Delaware State News


DOVER — Better-than-expected cost savings in recent months will allow the Dover government to forego employee furloughs this month, City Manager Anthony J. DePrima said Tuesday.


He emphasized that the savings will accommodate only a one-month reprieve from the mandatory one-day-per-month furloughs without pay that began in July. All employees were subject to them, with the exception of emergency communications personnel and police. Police may yet be ordered to undergo furloughs, but initially were spared while they were in contract negotiations with the city.


In a move related to those negotiations, City Council on Monday night selected the Wilmington law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor to represent the city before a mediator who will try to end a bargaining impasse between Dover and the union representing the police.


Mr. DePrima said Scott A. Holt will be the attorney assigned to the mediation by Young Conaway. According to the firm’s web site, Mr. Holt specializes in representing management in labor and employment cases.


The city and the Fraternal Order of Police are scheduled for mediation Aug. 25-27.


Dover police have worked without a contract since their last one expired July 1.


A tentative contract agreement between the FOP and the city was rejected July 27 by City Council.

emsrescue41
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 29th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 8
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Aug 4th, 2009 08:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What about the ambulance shift they cut to save $122,000. You now have to rely on Camden or Cheswold to come help you (if they are not busy) when the main dover ambulance is out on a run. You are covered by 2 Dover ambulances from 7am - 3pm the just 1 from 3pm till 7am.

I vote
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Aug 1st, 2009 02:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. McGlumphy,

You speak of the budget shortfalls, but fail to speak of the excess money in reserves.  Twenty Nine percent in reserve seems like alot to me.  It is very obvious that someone is not being truthful with the public, either the members of Council or the City Manager. 

The Fraternal Order of Police bring up a very good point, why are we building this library during these times.  What sense does this make?  Council members, along with the City Manager continue to side step this issue.  If we can't afford both city employee salaries and a new library should we be going forward with this project.

In closing, Mr. DePrima is obviously speaking out of both sides of his mouth.  It would appear from his recent response to the police that he is telling you one thing and telling the police the opposite.  He reached a tentative agreement with police, all the while knowing he could not fund it.  This does sound like "Bad Faith Bargainning".

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 31st, 2009 08:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr.  McGlumpy,

You speak of a 1.3 million dollar budgetary shortfall in this budget.  Could you please inform the taxpaying citizens how much was budgeted for the new library capital fund? Can you then justify it in these economic times?

I've heard the rhetoric of the State of Delaware matching funds dollar for dollar, but this is the same state that has an 800 million dollar budgetary shortfall. 

Now tell us again… Why must you furlough all city employees for a savings of $866,000.00?

Please Mr. McGlumpy explain this to us.




 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 31st, 2009 07:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a guest commentary submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

On May 21, 2009, Council voted 8–1 to pass the "draft" budget dependent upon all City Employees, including the FOP, taking one day per month furlough. All employees except dispatchers were to be subject to furloughs. The City Manager was charged with bringing forward a reasonable budget without tax increases, unreasonable fees, no increase in the electric rate, and, most importantly, no layoffs!


In the beginning of May, the City Manager advised Council of a budget shortfall and said that the budget could only be balanced with furloughs. By doing so, a savings of approximately $866,000 would be realized and the budget would be balanced. $282,000 of this savings was attributed to FOP furloughs.


In addition, 17 Capital Investment Projects were deferred due to budget constraints. Many of these projects were also deferred the year before. City wide vehicle and equipment replacements were also deferred. Approximately $500,000 in Other Post Retirement Benefits (OPEB) were deferred due to the current downturn in revenue.


In order to balance this budget, dramatic measures were taken. $1.8 million dollars in capital projects were deferred, $200,000 was not transferred to the capital asset reserve, specific budget line items were further reduced ($121,229), and terminal leave was not budgeted for retirees unless their position was deemed mission critical ($155,777).


Council was requested to treat the non‐bargaining employees like the bargaining unit employees to boost morale in very difficult financial times.


However, this balanced budget was short lived. The Mayor vetoed the budget thus causing losses in revenue due to the delay of implementation on July 1, 2009. Council voted 7-0 on July 13, 2009 to override the Mayor’s veto and implement the budget which included furloughs for all employees. Since then, the City was notified that the State cut $775,000 from the Municipal Street Aid and approximately $177,000 of Delaware’s payment in lieu of taxes. This money ($952,000) combined with the loss of $282,000 increased the budget shortfall to 1.3 million dollars.


Now, we find ourselves deadlocked in contract negotiations with the FOP. Recent news articles indicate that the City Manager made the Council and FOP aware of reductions in force language in the Conract. The FOP, however, expressed surprise about a potential reduction in force and disappointment with City negotiating tactics saying the FOP would ever have tentatively agreed to that. I agree.


I voted against the proposed contract because I don’t support a reduction in force. There is no specific plan to fund the FOP proposal. There are no specifics to make up the $282,000 loss for these furloughs. Most importantly, it clearly abandons 75% of our employee workforce who accepted the City Manager’s original proposal with the understanding that all employees would be treated equally (furloughs).


William P. McGlumphy


Councilman 2nd District


Chairman, Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee City of Dover




 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 31st, 2009 06:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

City manager, police union differ on layoffs

Dover’s DePrima says fair warning given; FOP president disagrees


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Manager Anthony J. DePrima and members of the union representing Dover police disagreed sharply Thursday over whether officers received fair warning that some in their ranks might have been laid off if a tentative labor agreement had been approved by City Council.


The tentative deal was rejected Monday by council. Some council members have said they opposed it partly because it would have led to police layoffs, which Mr. DePrima told them shortly before their vote he would recommend.


Members of the Fraternal Order of Police, the officers’ bargaining unit, insist they were flabbergasted by Mr. DePrima’s comment to council. They allege that he had told union representatives during negotiations on July 13 — the day the agreement was reached — that he would do practically the opposite.


In a Thursday morning press conference, FOP President David Spicer said the city manager told them "he would amend the police department budget and avoid any reduction in force — layoffs — to meet the requirements of the tentative agreement."


"That," Mr. DePrima said shortly afterward, "is absolutely not true."


He pointed to notes taken during the July 13 talks that showed him and the city’s human resources director, Kim Hawkins, saying several times that layoffs were a possibility.


The notes, written in longhand by Elaine Edwards of the city human resources department, summarize — sometimes in sentence fragments — the discussion. They quote FOP member Aaron Dickinson, for example, as saying, "We feel that layoff is coming" — to which Ms. Hawkins responded, "We want you to know that could happen."


Earlier, Ms. Hawkins said no one wanted layoffs and Mr. DePrima said the city had no plans for layoffs, according to the notes. But Ms. Edwards, the note-taker, said that at no time did Mr. DePrima say he would prevent layoffs from occurring. "He did not promise that — that he would avoid" layoffs, she said.


Mr. DePrima said Thursday that during the negotiations he "didn’t have a plan" for offsetting the financial effects of a provision in the tentative agreement that would have spared officers from the one-day-per-month unpaid leave that has been imposed on nearly all other city workers as a cost-cutting measure. Not until the following week, he said, did he decide to recommend layoffs as a way to make up for the savings that would be lost if police were not furloughed without pay.


The layoffs, Mr. DePrima said Thursday, would not have been permanent; laid-off officers would have been called back as others retired.


Union representatives maintained they never would have accepted the tentative deal if they had known layoffs were likely. Said Detective Robert E. "Ernie" Roswell, "We asked about every way we could" whether layoffs would occur and were assured "that wasn’t their intention."


FOP President Spicer charged that Mr. DePrima has "intentionally misrepresented" the contents of the July 13 discussion. Mr. DePrima responded that FOP leaders may be trying to keep the union rank and file from knowing that layoffs were indeed part of the talks.


The next round of talks will take place in front of a mediator, who is to meet with both sides for three days beginning Aug. 25.


The FOP’s last contract expired June 30.


On Monday, council will meet in executive session to discuss the situation. One possibility is to order police to begin the day-a-month furloughs that would have been barred if council had accepted the tentative agreement.


The deal was squelched by council on a vote of 5-4.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 02:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

As a resident of the city of Dover I find it unbelievable that the city would reject the police contract. These police officers’ put their lives on the line every single day. I have the highest respect for each officer and am grateful for the service they provide. During this economic crisis we have seen a rise in crime and need the Dover Police Department to be available to its citizens when needed.


I can not fathom how the city council can put money aside to finance the build of a new library and show such little regard to the safety of the citizens they are sworn to serve. A possible reduction in force and furloughs is simply unacceptable and inexcusable. Every effort should be made to put holds on any unnecessary projects to ensure that the safety of both the citizen’s of Dover and the police officers are not compromised.


The stress of the police contract has to affect the morale of every officer in department. This situation should be remedied as quickly as possible.


Every officer must be in a good mindset in order to perform their job to the best of their abilities. I know I do not want an officer on duty to have to worry about where his/her next paycheck will come from.


The city council should take a step back and think of the ramifications of their decisions. A reduction in force or furloughs could lead to some very serious consequences. Less officers on the job may lead to the worst case scenario and no back up.


Maureen P. Bauer


Dover

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jul 29th, 2009 04:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Furloughs possible for Dover police


Topic will be brought up in City Council executive session next week


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City police may yet be subjected to the furloughs they have vigorously opposed.


A day after City Council rejected a tentative contract agreement that would have spared officers from the unpaid leaves imposed on nearly all other city workers, City Manager Anthony J. DePrima said possible police furloughs will be discussed during an executive session of council next week.


Mr. DePrima was part of a negotiating team that agreed with representatives of the Fraternal Order of Police on a three-year proposal that met the FOP’s no-furlough demand but guaranteed officers only one raise during the length of the deal. But council on Monday voted 5-4 against adopting that agreement.


"From a monetary standpoint, I didn’t think it was a good deal for the taxpayer," Councilman Thomas J. Leary said Tuesday.


Parties on both sides declined to discuss details such as the amount of the raise police would have gotten. The pay hike would have come during the second year of the contract, and the contract would have allowed negotiations over a possible third-year raise.


But Councilman William P. McGlumphy, who voted against the agreement, noted that Dover’s other workers have experienced a net pay cut because raises they received this month do not offset the impact of taking a day of mandatory unpaid leave each month. FOP members, whose last contract expired June 30, have gotten no raise but were exempted from furloughs while awaiting council’s vote on the tentative agreement. The exemption has continued this week.


Councilman McGlumphy said workers outside the police department are "losing money. The FOP is not." To treat employees unequally, he said, "could threaten stability."


He and Councilman Eugene B. Ruane said another factor in their opposition to the agreement was the possibility that once it was implemented, some officers could lose their jobs. Mr. DePrima said shortly before Monday night’s vote that he would recommend reducing the police force to save money.


"The reduction in force would be far more harmful (to law enforcement) than the furloughs," Councilman McGlumphy said. "Who knows where it ends up?"


He said the elimination of jobs would have violated a direction council decided on months ago as it faced declining revenues amid the recession and an abysmal real estate market: Spend less and avoid tax hikes and layoffs.


Monday’s vote occurred in the wake of Dover officials learning the city had lost nearly $1 million in expected state aid: $775,000 for street repairs and $177,000 in lieu of the property taxes the state need not pay on its ample real estate in Dover. "We’re in a whole different financial condition" than just a few weeks ago, Mr. Ruane said.


Councilman James G. McGiffin, who voted for the agreement, said, "I thought the police union had come a good distance to be reasonable under the current economic conditions."


Now, the city and the FOP await a meeting with a mediator and — if that fails — possible arbitration. Mr. McGiffin said the agreement, while "imperfect," was preferable to "rolling the dice" in arbitration.


The possible reduction of the police force, Mr. McGiffin said, "wasn’t an issue for me. That’s not a contract issue as much as a management issue. It wasn’t, in my mind, a given that we’d have a reduction in force."


The tentative agreement contained a provision allowing such a reduction, as did the contract with the FOP that expired June 30.


Detective David Spicer, president of the Dover FOP lodge, said the provision is standard in his unit’s contracts, but officers assumed there was little possibility it would be used. Mr. DePrima, however, said city representatives emphasized its existence during negotiations.


"We made it doubly clear the reduction-in-force language was in the contract," Mr. DePrima said.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jul 28th, 2009 04:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Dover council rejects police contract

Talks to resume with mediator in August


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Council on Monday night narrowly rejected a tentative labor contract with the union representing Dover police.


Council voted 5-4 against ratifying an agreement reached in negotiations between representatives of the city and the Fraternal Order of Police. Detective David Spicer, president of the Dover FOP lodge, said the deal would have spared officers from furloughs they strongly opposed, while guaranteeing them raises in only one of the next three years.


Prior to the vote, Councilman Eugene B. Ruane pressed City Manager Anthony J. DePrima on whether adoption of the proposed contract would lead to a reduction in the size of the police department. Mr. DePrima said he would recommend such a cut in the force — which consists of 91 officers and two vacant positions — but council’s approval would be necessary to carry it out.


Detective Spicer said officers — whose general membership had earlier voted in favor of the agreement — were unaware that a reduction in force was a possibility. "We were never told," he said. "Otherwise, we would never have agreed to it."


But Mr. DePrima said the agreement was written in a way that opened the door to such a cut.


Voting to reject the proposal were Councilman Ruane, Council President Beverly C. Williams and council members Thomas J. Leary, Sophia R. Russell and William P. McGlumphy.


Voting in the minority were council members Timothy A. Slavin, James G. McGiffin, Kenneth L. Hogan and Reuben Salters.


Detective Spicer said contract talks would resume — this time in front of a mediator — next month. He said mediation already had been scheduled in case contract talks were not successfully concluded by August.


He said the deal rejected Monday would have covered three years, with officers definitely receiving a raise only in the second year. A possible raise for the third year would have been subject to further negotiations.


But furloughs, which the FOP vigorously opposed, were not part of the agreement.


The threat of police furloughs helped spark picketing by officers June 22 as council members arrived at City Hall to vote on an annual budget that night. But council approved a budget that included furloughs for nearly all city workers, including police — only to see it vetoed a few days later by Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr., who sided with the police on the furlough question.


Council responded July 13 by overriding the veto.


Mayor Carey said he probably would have voted in favor of the proposed contract. "We need to get this behind us," he said.


In other business:


• Council eliminated a benefit for future city retirees, adopting a committee recommendation that Dover no longer reimburse retirees who pay for Medicare Part B coverage. The coverage, which costs most retirees about $100 monthly, supplements service available under the federally administered Medicare program.


Council’s action does not affect existing retirees, who will remain eligible for the reimbursement.


• City finance director Donna Mitchell recommended a new, less costly pension plan be launched for future employees. Existing employees would not be affected.


In a presentation to the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee prior the council meeting, Ms. Mitchell called for starting a plan that requires future employees to contribute more toward pensions than do existing employees. Additionally, the proposed new plan would include no early-retirement provision.


The committee issued no recommendation on the proposal.


• Council formally reduced its own pay for the coming year by 10 percent, leaving each member with an annual salary of $6,674, except for the council president, who will earn $7,787. The cuts are included in the new budget, but had to be separately approved.


At Mayor Carey’s request, they cut his pay 2 percent, to $44,100. His salary had not been changed in the budget.


• Council, as expected, formally approved a much-ballyhooed contract with LS Energy that is to result in the creation of solar fields at the city’s Garrison Oak Technology Park on White Oak Road. The plan may be online as early as late 2010.


• Council, in another formality, accepted the withdrawal of a controversial application for annexation of Dover Golf Center on Artis Drive. The center’s owner said last week he would not buck opposition to his request for his property to be added to the city and rezoned for housing. Neighbors had contended new homes would generate too much traffic.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jul 14th, 2009 04:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Dover council overrides budget veto


Tentative agreement reached between city, police union


By Al Kemp


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Council voted to override Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr.’s veto of the city’s recently adopted budget Monday night.


The mayor objected to budget provisions that would furlough police officers and reduce ambulance service.


Meanwhile Monday, the city and the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 15 reached a tentative agreement on a contract.


The pact must be approved by the full FOP membership as well as Dover City Council, but during the interim period there will be no furloughs, said City Manager Tony DePrima.


"I was very pleased to see that," the mayor said of the tentative agreement.


The mayor said he was "really disappointed" that council overrode his veto of a budget provision that cuts ambulance service in the city, especially in a time of rising demand for service.


"I’ll be back," he vowed. "I’ll go back to square one, and bring the issue before the Safety Advisory Committee."


In other business, council approved first readings of procedural ordinances concerning property taxes, as well as an ordinance that cuts council members’ compensation by 10 percent.


Second readings of the ordinances will be July 27.


Panel: Let current retirees keep Part B reimbursements


Earlier Monday, the city’s Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee on Monday agreed that reimbursements of Medicare Part B premiums should be continued to current city retirees but not to new hires.


The committee voted unanimously to accept and send to City Council the first of four alternatives proposed by Finance Director Donna Mitchell, and table three other options.


Committee chairman William McGlumphy opened the meeting to members of the public who crowded into council chambers.


Fran Hettinger asked the committee to consider the needs of those already retired and receiving the reimbursement.


"I have no problem with taking the benefit away from new hires," she said.


"I think it sends the wrong message to retirees, that their benefits are under attack," said Tim Mullaney, who retired from the Dover Police Department in 1992.


City retiree Les Blake reminded the committee that there are two classes of retirees: those represented by a union contract and those who are not.


He said there are 70 retirees who are not represented by bargaining units.


To take away their reimbursement amounts to what Mr. Blake called "a 3.4-percent, permanent, ongoing cost-of-living reduction."


He called taking away any benefit "a really disastrous thing to do."


"This is part of what makes the city’s retirement package so attractive to the people to stay with the city," Mr. Blake said.


The committee also voted to recommend the hiring of a consultant to coordinate benefits for retirees.


"I don’t know that we have the time to do this ourselves or the expertise to do this ourselves," said Miss Mitchell.


Staff writer Al Kemp may be reached at 741-8296 or akemp@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jul 13th, 2009 07:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a guest commentary submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

Dover police must do part in cutting costs


Beverly C. Williams


As I sit here pondering the 2009-2010 budget, the economic crisis that is going on affects all of us, whether you are looking at it from the level of the overall budget for our country, county or even the city of Dover.


Cost-saving ideas race through my mind on what can be done that will have the least impact to our constituents. We need to try to maintain the services that are provided by the city with the least amount of impact to you. Union and non-union employees have voiced both acceptance and resistance of mandatory furloughs and their willingness to forgo any sort of pay increases.


While I am aware that it will have some impact on what is provided to the community, it is the most conservative way I know of to make ends meet on this budget, without raising taxes and fees to our community. Will you notice that it may take a little longer to pay a bill, or get a plan approved? Absolutely. However the employees are dedicated and many are willing to make sacrifices in order to keep their jobs which support their families.


Recently individuals, predominantly police officers, rallied, wanting the community to know that they do not agree with the proposed furloughs. In further research I have found that the Dover Police are currently paid at a higher rate than those in the Wilmington and Newark area.


A hiring freeze has been put in place for some surrounding areas, and any of their positions that have opened up remain unfilled, reducing the overall size of their force. I am sure they are still providing their community with a viable level of protection.


The Delaware State Police are getting a 2.5 percent reduction in their pay. Currently the city of Dover is in contract negotiations with the police department and some of the protesting may have to do with negotiations vs. the furloughs


As a member of council, I voted to reduce my compensation by 10 percent. I personally felt that I had to give something to aid in being part of the solution to our budget problems. Not that my council stipend is much, it was truly the principal of the fact to make the sacrifice. The last thing I want to see happen is for individuals to lose their jobs.


While it may not be enough to cover everything with the furloughs, and lack of raises, it is a step in the right direction. It does not minimize the level of respect I have for the police department or any other city employee. I feel proud to be council president of a place where employees are willing to make sacrifices for the better of our community As a member of council it is always important that we consider what is in the best interest of our citizens, in order to make Dover a place where people want to live.


Editor’s note: Beverly C. Williams is a member of Dover City Council.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jul 7th, 2009 04:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Dover council override vote looms on Carey budget veto


Solar power proposal, health care plan also on busy Monday agenda


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Next Monday could be one of the more momentous days this year for the city government.


The Dover Utility Committee is to consider details of a proposed agreement to generate solar power on city land on White Oak Road. The project not only could add to the city’s supply of clean energy, but also serve as a magnet to environmentally conscious companies interested in settling near such a facility.


The Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee will hear city employees’ ideas for reducing spending. It also will hear about a cost-cutting idea employees might not like: eliminating the city’s reimbursement of retirees’ payments for Medicare Part B, a program that supplements the basic health care available through the federally administered Medicare program.


While those issues could get officials and spectators hot and excited, the Parks, Recreation and Community Enhancement Committee will discuss one that could cool people off — little people, especially. That committee is to learn about "spray parks," which enable kids to play in water without encountering the dangers of a swimming pool.


But all those meetings are just preliminaries to the City Council session that evening, when council will vote on whether to override Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr.’s veto of Dover’s recently adopted budget. The mayor objects to budget provisions that would furlough police officers and reduce ambulance service.


Some council members say they are willing to consider Mayor Carey’s arguments — later, when there should be a clearer picture of finances in the fiscal year that began last week. They must muster six votes from the nine-member council to shoot down the veto.


"It’s going to be a lively night," Councilman William P. McGlumphy predicted.


City utilities director Ronald H. Lunt confirmed that a proposed deal with a solar energy firm will be presented for a review by the Utility Committee. He declined to elaborate before details are available to council as part of the packet of information it receives before each meeting.


Information provided to council also is available to the public in the agenda section of the city web site, cityofdover.com. That information is to be online today.


The solar facility would be located in the still-to-be-developed Garrison Oak Technology Park on White Oak Road at Del. 1. A gas-fired power plant also is a possibility there.


Councilman McGlumphy said the Legislative, Finance panel, which he chairs, already has 30 suggestions from employees on how to save money. "Who better to point out savings than the employees?" he said. "They know where the waste is."


The ideas were generated as workers argued that Dover has many ways to save money other than furloughs. The furloughs ultimately were imposed — on all but a handful of the city’s 400 employees — but the ideas will be aired in coming meetings.


Details on possible new approaches to Medicare Part B, like those on the solar project, were not immediately available but may be online today.


Most retirees pay $96.40 per month for the supplemental coverage, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The city reimburses its retirees who purchase that coverage. That, said Councilman McGlumphy, is a benefit most employers do not provide.


The parks committee will hear about a trendy way to keep kids cool in the summer.


City recreation director Zachery C. Carter is to discuss "spray parks," where water shoots from various, often colorful devices onto children playing beneath or beside them. A number of communities are turning to spray parks as safer, more economical alternatives to swimming pools, Mr. Carter said.


Dover has no municipal pool. It offers swimming at Silver Lake Park, but water quality sometimes is an issue there.


With the city scraping for funds during the current budget year, which began last week, construction of a spray park in Dover would begin next year at the earliest, Mr. Carter said.


He has calculated that the cost of construction — not including water and electrical connections — would range from $195,000 to $326,000, depending upon the type of system employed, whether a building is provided, and where the project is located. He has studied two possible sites, Schutte Park and Silver Lake Park.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 04:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Carey’s veto delays furloughs — for now


Dover council will reconsider $157M budget at July 13 meeting


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr.’s veto of the budget passed last week by City Council has — at least temporarily — thwarted plans to furlough city police officers and other employees one day each month.


The furlough program, which the mayor cited as one of his two reasons for rejecting the financial plan that was to become effective Wednesday with the start of the city’s next fiscal year, will be postponed while the budget picture remains unclear, City Manager Anthony J. DePrima said Monday.


The council is to reconsider the $157 million budget July 13. If six of the nine council members vote to override the veto, the furloughs and other budget measures can be implemented immediately.


Mr. DePrima said he would delay starting the furloughs to avoid a situation in which the program is rescinded after some employees have experienced an unpaid day off but others have not.


In addition, he said, raises scheduled for nonunion employees will be delayed, as will the deadline for paying property taxes. He said tax bills, which ordinarily would be mailed this week, will not be distributed until it is certain that the tax rate adopted for the next fiscal year will not be changed.


City Council last week voted to keep the rate the same as adopted last year. A higher rate could provide the funds necessary to keep employees on their regular schedules.


Mayor Carey has not called for a tax hike, saying council should reallocate projected revenue to avoid police furloughs and the other budget provision he finds objectionable, a planned reduction in ambulance service.


"I would hope we would be able to work something out" at the July 13 council meeting, the mayor said. "It is most important we have enough police officers on the street to protect our citizens adequately and provide adequate police backup."


But Councilman James G. McGiffin said the budget, while making nobody particularly happy, was the product of serious deliberation, and he questioned why it should be changed


"This is not a decision we arrived at lightly. We’d been preparing to make hard decisions for the past six or eight months," Councilman McGiffin said. "Given that we passed the budget with sufficient votes to override the veto, there’s not a real strong need for compromise" — especially since Mayor Carey has not specified how council should shift funds to respond to his objections.


The mayor said he would leave that to council and Mr. DePrima.


The budget, approved by a vote of 6-2, would impose a one-day monthly furlough on all of Dover’s approximately 400 workers except those who dispatch firefighters, police and electric crews. It also would eliminate one of the two ambulance crews now on duty during the evening.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.



 

Poltergeist
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 26th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 169
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 27th, 2009 05:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 

"Council can override the veto by approving the budget in a second vote, as long as at least six of the nine council members vote to do so. Six members voted in favor of it Monday, meaning an override may be certain unless one of those members changes his position."


"Councilman Thomas J. Leary, who voted for the budget, called the mayor’s action 'unfortunate.'"


Can someone publish the names of the other five Councilmen who voted to override.  I think we need to call them out by name...Let them know what we think

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 25th, 2009 06:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?


From the Delaware State News:
Carey vetoes council’s budget plan

Dover mayor says public safety at risk with police furloughs


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr. has vetoed the budget approved Monday by City Council, saying the spending plan endangers public safety by reducing police and ambulance services.


In a letter delivered late Tuesday afternoon, the mayor objected to budget provisions that furlough each police officer one day a month — the same is in store for nearly all 400 Dover employees — and cut funding for emergency ambulance service.


Council can override the veto by approving the budget in a second vote, as long as at least six of the nine council members vote to do so. Six members voted in favor of it Monday, meaning an override may be certain unless one of those members changes his position.


"Furloughs would cause a serious problem providing adequate staffing to man the shifts to provide protection for our citizens" and for the officers themselves, Mayor Carey said in his letter. And the planned reduction in ambulance service, he said, comes as demand for that service is rising.


"I know the budget is tight, but we need to provide enough police and ambulance services to adequately protect our citizens," he wrote. "In my opinion, this budget does not do that and I would like the City Council to consider finding the money elsewhere in the budget to cover these two very important items."


The $157 million budget reflects economic conditions that plague governments across the nation as businesses falter and the real estate, construction and development industries remain stalled. Unlike many governments, Dover has avoided employee layoffs, though it has instituted a hiring freeze.


The budget contains no tax increase, but raises water rates slightly.


Savings are to total $865,000 from the furloughs and $122,500 from the elimination of an eight-hour daily ambulance crew shift.


Two ambulance crews will work on the day shift, but only one on the second and third shifts. Currently, only the third (overnight) shift has just one crew.


The mayor’s veto was good news to the Fraternal Order of Police, the union representing city officers, which picketed City Hall Monday prior to the budget adoption.


"We were pretty delighted to hear that," Detective David Spicer, who heads the union local, said Wednesday. "We can only hope the mayor gets support."


Councilman Thomas J. Leary, who voted for the budget, called the mayor’s action "unfortunate."


"He kept rather mum during the whole process," never strongly objecting to the provisions he criticized in his veto letter, Councilman Leary said. "I know I’m not going to change my vote."


Mayor Carey said Wednesday night that he pointed out the ambulance situation in a council meeting May 19.


"I hope citizens will contact the council members and some council members will have a change of heart," he said.


The last such veto came in 2006, when then-mayor Stephen R. Speed charged that council had dedicated too little money to paying down a pension shortfall. Council failed to override the veto and eventually compromised with Mr. Speed.


Councilman Leary said there is a possibility a compromise on Mayor Carey’s issues can occur "later, maybe."


"To do it right up front, in my opinion, would be fiscally irresponsible," he said, noting that questions remain about the next state budget’s effect on Dover. The Delaware legislature, struggling to overcome an $800 million budget shortfall, faces a Tuesday deadline to pass a budget.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 24th, 2009 12:04 am
 Quote  Reply 
Good for the council members.

 A real sacrifice would be if the legislators, the governor, and all the assistants, and the overpaid school admin. would be forced to take a MINIMUM 10%, and depending on your salaries (esp. school) take at least 40%.:)

Last edited on Wed Jun 24th, 2009 05:54 pm by dover-diva

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 05:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Dover council approves furlough plan


City workers protest; panel votes to slice its own pay 10 percent


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Council voted Monday night to furlough city workers one day each month.


First, though, the council — in a surprise move — voted to cut its own pay 10 percent.


The decisions followed a rare public protest by city workers, in which some 100 people — mainly police officers, their family members and other supporters — walked the brick oval in front of City Hall, many carrying "No Furlough" signs.


"I’d rather see my taxes be raised a little than to see" furloughs, commented Kent County Sheriff Jim Higdon, a city resident, who said he joined the protesters because of his respect for Dover police. "No good can come from this."


Council members, who had emphasized in recent weeks that no worker would be laid off, approved the monthly day of unpaid leave as part of a proposed $157 million budget that will take effect July 1.


The lone amendment to the budget was the salary reduction for the council. Councilman Timothy A. Slavin, noting the council was exempt from the financial burdens of the furloughs, moved for a 5-percent cut, which Councilman Reuben Salters criticized as too little. The council settled on 10 percent.


Council members earn roughly $7,500 a year.


Moving on to the budget as a whole, the council suspended its rules to allow the president of the police union to speak. Fraternal Order of Police leader David Spicer, a city detective, warned that safety would be at risk if furloughs were implemented.


"Nobody knows how dangerous this city can be except me and other officers injured on the job," said Detective Spicer, who was shot in 2001 as he attempted to subdue a suspect in a suspected drug deal.


He recommended that council avoid furloughs by paying workers from some of the funds set aside to replace Dover Public Library. "Don’t build this library on the backs of your employees," he said.


The furloughs, which will save an estimated $865,000, will be required of all employees except those involved in dispatching emergency vehicles.


The financial effect on workers of the unpaid leave will be partly offset by raises due to all of them except police. Police officers, too, may receive raises, but they still are negotiating a contract to replace their current agreement with the city, which expires at the end of this month.


Detective Spicer said before the meeting that contract talks have stalled and representatives of the police and the city are to meet with a mediator in August.


Furloughs originally were proposed only for Dover’s roughly 300 unionized workers, including some 200 in bargaining units whose contracts include automatic raises. The city’s approximately 100 nonunion employees were to be spared furloughs while getting no raise, but they objected to that arrangement.


A hiring freeze will remain in effect.


The property tax rate will remain as is, as will electricity rates. But the cost of water will rise, by $21 a year for a family using 7,000 gallons monthly. Such a household will pay an additional $5.16 per year beginning in July 2010.


Council members Slavin and Sophia R. Russell dissented in the 6-2 budget approval. Councilman Eugene B. Ruane was absent.


Councilwoman Russell also voted against the salary reduction for council members. She said later that it was too drastic. She said her vote against the budget as a whole stemmed from her sympathy toward city workers.


Councilman Slavin called the budget "difficult and dangerous," saying costs avoided in the coming fiscal year will have to be met the following year. He said the financial plan has "no safety net" to deal with additional financial burdens Dover may face because of decisions made by the state legislature, which is to pass its own budget in the next week.


"We may be back here in a few short weeks to plug holes in a (Dover) budget that’s already thin," he said.


He stressed, however, that he was not criticizing his colleagues and conceded that he had no "better budget proposal at this time."


The police protest, which lasted for more than an hour before the meeting, was orderly, with some officers’ spouses and children joining in.


Said Detective Spicer, "I can’t remember the last time we picketed — well before I came on (the police force). I’ve been on 13 years."


Patrolman First Class Scott Davis said the action was needed to emphasize that crime could worsen if police are on duty fewer hours.


"Right now, with the manpower we have, we’re just keeping our thumb on it," he said.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 07:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 
3boysmom, I'm sorry to hear of the sacrifice you've had to make.  

3boysmom
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 30th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 06:42 pm
 Quote  Reply 
BadAngus, I understand your problem.  However, at my job we have been told to take 8 hours of unpaid leave time EACH WEEK.  That's right.  52 furlough days per year.  I also have 3 young children at home, but sacrifices have to be made.  We all have options in life.  I had the option of taking a day off each week (basically taking a 20 percent paycut) or finding a new job.  I am sure if you decide to change jobs, there will be a long line of people waiting to fill your slot who wouldn't mind taking one day a month off.  Nobody is forcing you to remain in your job.  You have options.

Courtdog
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 4th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 261
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 09:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Isn't amazing how Delaware's favorite son who was appointed to oversee the stimulus money succeeded in making sure the UAW people are protected from all angles but yet his own Delaware state union employees somehow wind up in the lower end of the food chain. Well, there are a lot more votes in the auto producing states than here. But wait!!! We had some auto manufacturers here too. Well, they did get laid off but their still going to receive a portion of their pay and benefits anyhow.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 03:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Bill protects pensions from furlough impact


House panel to debate proposed legislation on Wednesday


Delaware State News


DOVER — Legislation preventing furloughs from decreasing police officers’ and firefighters’ pensions has been introduced in the House of Representatives and will be heard in committee on Wednesday.


House Bill 218, sponsored by Rep. E. Bradford "Brad" Bennett, D-Dover South, would allow county and municipal governments to ensure that the calculation of their police officers’ and paid firefighters’ pensions would not take into account any salary reductions from furloughs. The bill is co-sponsored by Rep. Darryl M. Scott, D-Dover, and Sen. Brian J. Bushweller, D-Dover, and Sen. Bruce C. Ennis, D-Smyrna.


"This bill would preserve their pensions at their current pay level regardless of any furloughs, and it won’t cost the state any money," Rep. Bennett said. "We owe it to our police officers and firefighters who have worked all their lives to protect all of us and are getting ready to retire."


The issue was raised because the city of Dover’s fiscal 2010 budget includes 12 furlough days for employees, including police officers, which would decrease their salaries. Since many pensions are calculated based on their three highest-paid consecutive years, the loss of pay due to the furlough would decrease the pension of workers who are within a couple years of retirement.


Because county and municipal police officers’ pensions are regulated through state law, the legislation is necessary to allow local governments to preserve officers’ pensions.


"Usually, your highest-paid years are the last years before you retire," Rep. Bennett said. "We don’t want good officers to be forced to choose between retiring now to preserve a higher pension or be penalized for staying on the force."


Dover Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr. said the city approached the legislature about the issue to find a solution that allowed the capital city to address its budget shortfall without negatively impacting police officers’ pensions.


Several of the authorized force of 93 sworn officers would be eligible for retirement within the next two or three years. The city, he added, is looking to preserve the pensions of all of its nearly 400 employees, but only the officers’ pensions are impacted by state law.


"We are trying to reduce our spending to get through this economic situation, but we also don’t want to affect someone’s pension," Mayor Carey said. "Police officers put their lives on the line and are among the most dedicated employees we have. We want to make sure their pensions are kept intact."


While the bill was prompted by the issue raised in Dover, Rep. Bennett noted that it would preserve the pensions for all county and municipal police officers and paid firefighters throughout the state.


HB 218 has been assigned to House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee and is scheduled for a committee hearing on Wednesday at 2:30 p.m.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1463
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 01:22 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Bad Angus -- the referendum on the issues you raise is being held at the next city council election.    Do go and vote.

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 01:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am a city employee and a resident of the City of Dover. The proposed eight hour furloughs or unpaid vacations a month to city employees will have a drastic affect on my family.  I have three young children and my wife works part time because I can not afford daycare.  We live in a modest home in the City of Dover. Like most families in these economic times we struggle to make ends meet.  Because of the rising prices of groceries, fuel, city water and most necessities in general, it has increasingly become more difficult.  My family depends on my pay and our family budget is already stretched.  The furloughs that have been proposed would make it extremely difficult for me to make my bills.

 I’ve read in the news papers that the 2009/2010 City of Dover budget includes the eight hour a month furloughs to all city employees.  The budget also included $8.9 million for the Dover Public Library, which is already in reserves.  It was written that the furloughs on union employees would translate in to a total savings of approximately $791,000.00. I ask you, is it prudent to build a new library at such cost, when the City is cutting back so much in the budget that it has even went into the payroll of it’s employees?  It seems that by tabling the new Library until better economic times the city could adequately pay its employees and have a surplus of moneys in the event that the economy was slow to recover.

The furloughs and hiring freezes would affect the services the residents of Dover have come to expect and deserve.  Morale of the City employees will be at an all time low. Residents will have to wait longer to get needed permits, the grass on City property will not be cut in a timely manner making it unsightly and other services won’t be tended to in the usual manner.  With the economy suffering the crime rate will rise.  Do we want to have less police officers on the streets?  That’s exactly what the furloughs will do.  Special police units that were created to enhance the quality of life for Dover residents will be disbanded in order to supplement the patrol division which will be hardest hit by the furloughs and hiring freezes.

 In light of all which I previously stated, how can you justify a new Public Library in such times? Why can’t it wait?  How can the Library take priority over the residents and employees of this great City? Why isn’t such a large and expensive project put up for a referendum?  The tax payers should have a say. 

 In closing, I request that the Dover City Council table the new library project and use those reserved moneys to pay city employees.  I am certain there are many other residents and employees that share my concerns. 

BadAngus
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 7
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 01:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am a city employee and a resident of the City of Dover. The proposed eight hour furloughs or unpaid vacations a month to city employees will have a drastic affect on my family.  I have three young children and my wife works part time because I can not afford daycare.  We live in a modest home in the City of Dover. Like most families in these economic times we struggle to make ends meet.  Because of the rising prices of groceries, fuel, city water and most necessities in general, it has increasingly become more difficult.  My family depends on my pay and our family budget is already stretched.  The furloughs that have been proposed would make it extremely difficult for me to make my bills.

 I’ve read in the news papers that the 2009/2010 City of Dover budget includes the eight hour a month furloughs to all city employees.  The budget also included $8.9 million for the Dover Public Library, which is already in reserves.  It was written that the furloughs on union employees would translate in to a total savings of approximately $791,000.00. I ask you, is it prudent to build a new library at such cost, when the City is cutting back so much in the budget that it has even went into the payroll of it’s employees?  It seems that by tabling the new Library until better economic times the city could adequately pay its employees and have a surplus of moneys in the event that the economy was slow to recover.

The furloughs and hiring freezes would affect the services the residents of Dover have come to expect and deserve.  Morale of the City employees will be at an all time low. Residents will have to wait longer to get needed permits, the grass on City property will not be cut in a timely manner making it unsightly and other services won’t be tended to in the usual manner.  With the economy suffering the crime rate will rise.  Do we want to have less police officers on the streets?  That’s exactly what the furloughs will do.  Special police units that were created to enhance the quality of life for Dover residents will be disbanded in order to supplement the patrol division which will be hardest hit by the furloughs and hiring freezes.

 In light of all which I previously stated, how can you justify a new Public Library in such times? Why can’t it wait?  How can the Library take priority over the residents and employees of this great City? Why isn’t such a large and expensive project put up for a referendum?  The tax payers should have a say. 

 In closing, I request that the Dover City Council table the new library project and use those reserved moneys to pay city employees.  I am certain there are many other residents and employees that share my concerns. 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 13th, 2009 03:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Furloughs included in budget plan


No property-tax hike in lean Dover proposal


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City Manager Anthony J. DePrima on Tuesday unveiled a proposed annual budget that calls for no property-tax increase but responds to tight economic times by recommending unpaid furloughs for most city workers, no pay hikes for others, and few prominent projects other than a continuing effort to develop a new library.


Mr. DePrima said the draft proposal responds to the desires of City Council, which has final say over financial plans for the fiscal year that will begin July 1. He said council made clear that it wanted to avoid layoffs and hold the line on taxes and electricity bills.


"This is the leanest (budget) I’ve seen," Councilman Reuben Salters, a 20-year council veteran, said later. "As we review this budget, we may have to make additional cuts."


Mr. DePrima acknowledged that council may question his proposals to furlough the city’s approximately 300 unionized workers one day a month without pay and deny raises to its approximately 100 nonunion workers. The nonunion personnel would not be furloughed.


The potential furloughs helped draw about two dozen employees to Mr. DePrima’s annual budget presentation to the news media, which usually attracts a handful of reporters and few others.


"We have an extra-large crowd this year," he said as he opened the afternoon meeting. "We have a lot of guests from various unions and some management folks."


One of the managers, Police Chief Jeffrey Horvath, said afterward that losing each of his officers for a day each month is bound to affect police response to complaints.


"People are going to wait a little longer to get a cop there, unfortunately," he said, adding that he will try to minimize problems by scheduling furloughs for times when demand for services ordinarily is relatively low.


"That could be very challenging to get all those (furlough) hours in."


Among nonunion workers, the absence of an annual raise might be a first for many. Senior City Administrator Teresa Tieman said the last year without a pay hike was 1992, but employees at that time received a one-time payment in lieu of a raise. No such payment is proposed this year.


The budget also includes no contribution toward future health care costs for retirees — for which $500,000 was budgeted in the current fiscal year — and little money for new vehicles or equipment. A hiring freeze would continue.


Councilman Salters said council is in general agreement with Mr. DePrima’s approach.


But a union leader said Mr. DePrima may be optimistic in expecting aid from the state government to help with street repairs and continued work on the proposed library. Noting the state, like the city, faces diminished revenues as construction and business as a whole continue to falter, David Spicer, president of the city’s Fraternal Order of Police lodge, asked, "How are they going to afford to chip in?"


Mr. Spicer, a police detective, reiterated his contention that residents’ quality of life may suffer if city workers spend less time on the job. "You can only rob Peter to pay Paul so much," he said.


Mr. DePrima said he has directed department heads to try to limit the furloughs’ effects on residents. "We hope there will be little or no impact," he said.


His proposed water-rate increase would be spread over two years, with most of it implemented July 1. It would cost a household an additional $21 a year in the next fiscal year and $5.16 atop that in the following 12 months, assuming the use of 7,000 gallons of water per month.


"That’s a high-end user," Mr. DePrima said. "That’s got to be a family of four or five."


Even at the new rate, Dover residents would pay less for water than do people in most jurisdictions cited by the University of Delaware in a December report on Delaware and neighboring states.


The added revenue from the rate change would help pay for additional efforts to eliminate so-called "brown water."


"We’re finally starting to see success in that area," Mr. DePrima said.


Mr. Spicer suggested water revenue also be spent on keeping city workers working their current schedules. "I think it’s time to turn on the spigot," he said.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.


Budget highlights


City Manager Anthony J. DePrima’s
proposed budget for Dover includes:


• $157 million in revenue


• No change in property-tax rate


• One day per month of unpaid leave for the city’s approximately 300 unionized employees


• No pay increase for its approximately 100 nonunion workers


• Continued progress toward a new library


• Water-rate hike, but no change in sewer or electricity charges


• Hiring freeze


• No contribution toward future costs of retirees’ health care


The full proposal can be accessed at cityofdover.com.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 12th, 2009 03:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Same issue as the state, but on a smaller scale.

You've got a few options...tax increases, pay cuts, layoffs, or furloughs.  Personally, I think the furloughs are the best option as they preserve, especially in terms of public safety, what the service level SHOULD be. It preserves the rate of pay, it preserves what the hours and number of cops should be...it just says we can't afford that level right now.

 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 12th, 2009 03:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Furloughs in future for Dover?


City’s union workers reportedly facing one unpaid day off per month


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — City employees who belong to labor unions could face furloughs after July 1.


Detective David Spicer, president of the Fraternal Order of Police lodge representing Dover police officers, said he and other union leaders were told last week by City Manager Anthony J. DePrima that furloughs are a possibility in the next budget year.


Mr. DePrima declined Monday to confirm or deny Detective Spicer’s report, saying he would reserve comment until a press conference today in which he is to present a detailed budget proposal for City Council’s consideration.


Mr. DePrima will unveil his plan amid economic turmoil that already has led to a proposal by Gov. Jack A. Markell to reduce state workers’ pay by 8 percent and a decision by Kent County Levy Court to make employees pay more for benefits. Other governments and many private employers have imposed similar measures, as well as layoffs.


Detective Spicer said Mr. DePrima informed the union leaders that the city’s nonunion employees would be spared furloughs but get no raise.


Workers represented by the FOP, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the IUE — officially, the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers-Communication Workers of America — could be furloughed one day each month, according to Detective Spicer’s account of the union leaders’ meeting with Mr. DePrima.


Representatives of the IBEW and the IUE could not be reached for comment.


Each one-day furlough would reduce monthly pay by between 4 and 5 percent, Detective Spicer said.


In the case of police, he said, furloughs also could undermine public safety.


"I think it would affect the quality of life of people in Dover, having fewer officers on the street," he said.


Dover has been recognized for clearing criminal cases at a far higher rate than the average U.S. police department, but he said that distinction could be threatened if each of the city’s 93 officers is forced to take an additional day off each month. Officer safety also could be at risk, he said.


"We’re sympathetic" to the city’s desire to cut spending while revenues are down, Detective Spicer said, but reducing police presence would be an extreme response.


And it might not prove to be much of a money saver, he said, if some officers had to work overtime because others were unavailable.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.


 


 Current time is 12:08 am



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.4264 seconds (30% database + 70% PHP). 17 queries executed.