Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

The peacefull village
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 05:29 am
 Quote  Reply 
For United Conservative Knowhow wrote: So, what is the result, are the houses going to be built or not?
Oh, sure. Just because no one wants it and it's a bad idea doesn't stop development in this state. The developers just keep going higher and higher up the court ladder until someone finds a law that covers them and the bulldozers roll.... The last one similar to this that Ashburn got involved with was out at Kenton which ended up in the State Supreme Court before they got a ruling they could use to force the County to back down on.

For United Conservative Knowhow
Member
 

Joined: Sun Oct 4th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 26
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 05:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
So, what is the result, are the houses going to be built or not?

Leipsicer
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 12:58 am
 Quote  Reply 
Thought I would correct the record.  There were two members of Leipsic Town Council present at the Levy Court Committee Meeting.  Both spoke.  In addition the Chairman of the Leipsic Planning Commission was present.  He spoke.  Three other Local residents were also present.  They spoke.  There were another half dozen or so Leipsic residents present but they did not speak.  It is hard to tell what is going on at the committee meetings because the audio is not good in the chamber and you have to listen closely and be close up in the audience to hear what is going on.  This is not a regular Levy Court meeting, only a committee meeting of Levy Court.  I was there and it looked to me like both Mr. Jordan Ashburn and Mr. Antoine Ashburn were present. They did not speak.  There was also a member of the Leipsic Volunteer Fire Company present, the former Treasurer I believe, who spoke.  Senator Ennis was also present and he spoke, rather eloquently, in my opinion.  His presence and his speach was greatly appreciated by all the Townspeople ,Town Officials, and Local Residents.  We here in Leipsic appreciate the support  everyone in Kent County has given us in this  David vs Goliath fight of ours against this ill conceived potentially disasterous devlopment planned for our doorstoop.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 02:48 am
 Quote  Reply 
I will give senator Ennis that.    My point is that if the state planning office stands in opposition to the proposed project, one might believe that it would be represented at the Levy Court meeting to be able to address any questions regarding that opposition and that Mr. Ennis should not have to speak for that entity.    The residents of the town who were opposed should have been in attendance as well, as a show of their position to Levy Court.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 08:42 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I would have thought, given the interest from the townspeople on this issue at previous meetings I've attended, they would have been there en masse to encourage the Levy Court to do what it did. Maybe it was just a matter of miscommunication or lack of sustained organization, but there should have been more people from the affected area there. I dion't think the attendance reflected the level of opposition from the town, though.

Give Ennis his due, he did stand up and put out the State's concern and maybe helped stop this attempt by Ashburn to develop in that area. That effort by Ennis is worth some attaboys, regardless of your political affiliation.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 04:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Does anybody else wonder why senator Ennis had to be the voice of the state planning office to express its opposition to this development?   And the town council evidently also had nobody sufficiently interested to address the Levy Court on the matter.    Interesting.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 04:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Sewer plan rejected for Leipsic site


Levy Court won’t extend service to proposed development


By Al Kemp


Delaware State News


DOVER — Kent County Levy Court on Tuesday night dealt what may have been a death blow to a proposed residential development on 342 acres west of the bucolic bayside village of Leipsic.


The latest setback came when the commissioners firmly rejected a proposed public-private partnership to extend county sewer service to the proposed development, called the Landings at Leipsic.


Denying sewer service to the development means Tony Ashburn & Sons must explore other avenues on wastewater disposal if the long-contested project is to proceed.


Levy Court President P. Brooks Banta said he was "appalled" at the application.


Mr. Banta also questioned the priorities of the state officials — including three legislators and the secretary of state — who vehemently opposed the county’s plans for a library last week but who apparently had no concern about an environmentally sensitive issue such as the Landings.


"It absolutely amazes me tonight that there are a handful of people in the audience, and last week there were 175 to 200," he said. "It seems to me that this room should be filled tonight with people decrying this," Mr. Banta said.


"My concern is, what’s more important — the health, welfare and safety of the people we serve, or a library?"


The Kent County Regional Planning Commission voted to table the application during its July 9 meeting, then voted to recommend preliminary approval with numerous conditions on Sept. 10.


Sen. Bruce Ennis, D-Clayton, attended Tuesday’s business meeting to voice his opposition to the application.


"The State Planning Office has continued to oppose this project," Sen. Ennis said.


Fred Allen Bass, who lives on Fast Landing Road, told Levy Court that "everybody knows this project shouldn’t have been approved."


Nancy Goodfellow, head of the Leipsic Planning & Zoning Commission, described Leipsic as "a small town with big issues."


"What amazes me is that you gentlemen have to make decisions like you did tonight," she said.


In other business, Levy Court voted to sign an agreement for a one-time Community Development Block Grant of $209,056.


The grant, which comes through the American Recovery and Rehabilitation Act, will be used for scattered-site housing rehabilitation throughout the county.


Staff writer Al Kemp may be reached at 741-8296 or akemp@newszap.com.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 9th, 2009 04:57 am
 Quote  Reply 
Annexation is a double-edged sword. Usually, it is done to accomodate developers rather than discourage them. Look at the mess in Smyrna nad Clayton to see how that has worked. Any landowner willing to sell to a developer knows the area is going to be downgraded and former neighbors are going to be impacted but the dollar rules. It would be unlikely that seller would be motivated to accept annexation if it were going to keep the town a 'peaceful village' instead of another developer's profit center for which he [the developer] is willing to pay more money than a farmer to keep tilling the land.

DE1
Member
 

Joined: Tue Nov 20th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 47
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Oct 3rd, 2009 02:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Leipsic, as does all local governments have the ability to protect it's self from developers as well as faulty County and State laws. Leipsic decided to place it's head in the sand and trust the Counties as well as the States elected officials to protect them. Many of the residents believed what they wanted to hear rather than facing the truth and chose to place their faith in the above governments. All townships should learn a very bitter lesson that Leipsic has now hopefully learned. Hire your own planners. Come up with a comprehensive/annexation plan that fits your area and protect what is dear to you. As much as you can.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Sep 15th, 2009 03:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

The continuing story of the peaceful little village by the marsh that had withstood centuries of storms and floods because it was founded on solid land 9 miles west of the bay and was protected by the marsh that absorbed the flood waters:


Alas, the village was unable to withstand the onslaught of money, greed, corruption, perverted law and special interest representation and now found itself soon to be swallowed up by the same destructive forces that have overrun Kent County to the dismay and disbelief of the people.


By one single vote the Regional Planning Commission threw the little village to the dogs.


Ah, but, boys and girls, the fairy tale does not end here.


One of the commissioners who stood with the people said, "I trust the watermen who have lived their entire lives on the water more than I trust the engineers.


You see, the marsh that absorbs the flood becomes open shallow water when full, and thereby, part of the bay itself, so that when the perfect storm strikes, the flood waters of the storm surge will rush around the little village and continue on to the back of the marsh, where the only thing to stop it will be the new development to be built in a bowl at back of the marsh by those with rocks in their heads and dollar signs in their eyes.


Then, all of those responsible will cry and say, "Gee, what a shame. We didn’t know."


But everyone will know that’s a lie — they can’t say they didn’t know because we told them so.


Fred Allen Bass


Dover

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Sep 11th, 2009 05:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
So, did the RPC ignore all the angst over this new development and approve it anyway last night? We need to change the 'by-right' laws in this state if we ever want to control the developers.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jul 6th, 2009 03:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Development near Leipsic worries some


Town officials, residents concerned about 130-home, 342-acre proposal


By Al Kemp


Delaware State News


LEIPSIC — A bitter battle that’s long been brewing between a builder and this bucolic bayside village may be headed for Kent County Levy Court for resolution.


The Kent County Regional Planning Commission will decide at its business meeting Thursday night whether to approve and send to Levy Court an application for a proposed housing development called The Landings west of Leipsic.


Tension between representatives for the builder and residents of the town grew visibly during a prolonged public hearing of the planning commission last Thursday night.


If given the go-ahead, Tony Ashburn and Sons will build more than 130 houses on a 342-acre tract bounded by the Leipsic River and Dyke Branch, and divided by Fast Landing Road (Del. 42) west of incorporated Leipsic. The builder’s legal counsel, John Paradee, urged the seven-member planning commission to send the application to Levy Court for approval.


"The commission’s decision must be based on the preliminary planning stage," said Mr. Paradee. "This application meets all the code requirements for preliminary plan approval."


Much of the opposition to the development stems from its proposed location in the midst of the vast and ecologically sensitive tidal marshlands of the upper Delaware Bay. Concerns include the proposed on-site septic system, road maintenance, pollution and the loss of fertile farmland.


Although the development lies west of incorporated Leipsic, the town’s government has insisted on participating in the process in accordance with the Leipsic Comprehensive Plan.


That plan, adopted in November 2006, institutes a one-mile area of influence or "Intergovernmental Coordination Area," said Nancy Goodfellow, a member of Leipsic Town Council.


Because of concern over the project’s environmental impact and its impact on the health and welfare of town residents, the Leipsic Planning & Zoning Commission voted on June 30 to oppose The Landings.


The commission is chaired by Nancy Goodfellow’s husband, Jay Goodfellow.


"The Leipsic Planning and Zoning Commission has held at least six meetings in the past year, and not once has a representative of Mr. Ashburn been present," Jay Goodfellow wrote in a letter to the county planning commission last week.


At the public hearing on Thursday, Commissioner Paul Davis asked whether the project’s engineers took into account recent studies on global warming and rising water in tributaries.


"The boundary lines on your site plan are going to change drastically with the rise of water," Mr. Davis told Mr. Paradee.


"It’s speculative to think about what global warming might mean to this project," Mr. Paradee responded.


Mr. Paradee reminded the commissioners of the December 2008 ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court that the Kent County Regional Planning Commission doesn’t have authority to deny applications outright.


Charles Hopkins, who lives on Fast Landing Road, was among those who spoke against The Landings at the public hearing.


"This is contrary to where the state and Kent County have been trying to go," he told the commissioners.


William Jacobson, also of Fast Landing Road, called the proposal "the opposite of smart growth," and asked whether the site plan’s 100-foot buffers allow for the rising sea level.


Mr. Jacobson showed slides of the tidal surge that swamped the Leipsic area during the floods of May 2008, and wondered whether Leipsic would join flood-ravaged Kitts Hummock and Bowers Beach, which he called "taxpayer burdens."


Leipsic is "a waterman’s town" with a character the residents want to maintain, Nancy Goodfellow said on Friday. She noted that 40 residents — from a population of about 220 — hold commercial fishing licenses. That would all change if The Landings project is approved.


"The town has no official record of what the developer is planning on doing," she said. "He knows we’re here. He’s just ignoring us."


Mr. Paradee maintained Thursday night that "we stand prepared to meet with the town."


He knows how to get there. He used to be the town solicitor.


Staff writer Al Kemp can be reached at 741-8296 or akemp@newszap.com.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 4th, 2009 05:54 am
 Quote  Reply 
Ah, Mr. Bass, this lawyer in your letter wouldn't be the esteemed John Paradee, would it? He worked as the County lawyer for a while then went into private practice and got a lot of developer clients, including Ashburn who is pushing to stick that Landings development out in the swamp [my definition] there by your town. I don't care much for John's clients but I have to admit the guy does represent them well. He's filed a lot of suits in their behalf and won some because our own county lawyer[s] didn't do their homework and dot the i's and cross the t's. The real damage was done by the Supreme Court decison on the Johnson Farm case where the judges said it didn't matter what problems a development caused, if the developer [Ashburn in that case] filled out the paperwork right, you had to let him screw up the countryside. That's how I read it anyway. Ole John didn't litigate that one before the State Supreme Court but he sure used the ruling to rub the noses of the Planning Commissioners Tuesday night in the Landings public hearing, didn't he? 

I know the townspeople who testified , some for the third time on this case, hope the Planning Commission finds a way to tell Ashburn and Paradee to stuff it, but I'm not taking even money on it The problem is the opposition to the developers is too sporadic and unorganized. The hue and cry goes up when a development lands in someones back yard and the enraged people troop to the public hearings and make the same arguments the commissioners have heard a hundred times before. The citizens of the County have only the Levy Court to stand between them and the overdevelopment disaster that has hit us and will start up again when the economy bounces back in 2015. Organized , ongoing resistence is what is needed to keep the developers such as your current nemisis in check. They make a lot of money from sticking vinyl boxes up in fields and can afford expensive help and lobbying. If you don't have a counterpart in a cadre of outspoken opponents willing to buttonhole legislators and research weak points on a development proposal, you'll always end up with those guys winning and that dream of a peaceful village will always be just a dream in Delaware.

Last edited on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 06:03 am by Hartlyboy

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 10:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 Once apon a time there was a peacefull little village nestled by the marsh between a river and a stream.

All went well for centuries untill one day the county in which the village was located hired a lawyer who, would, in his possition, write or help write laws that would benefit the special interest that he would latter represent at the dismay and detrement of the people for his own personal gain.


Rebuffed, he would go on to file dozens of lawsuits against the county, and thereby the people, in order to bull doze his way around zoneing laws that had been inacted to protect the people.


The little peacefull village which was located in ann area clearly zoned agriculture-conservation and never intended to be an over populated area, suddenly found its self in the sights of the developers who sought to distroy the way of life they had enjoyed for so many years.


Their only recourse was to go before the county and implore them to save their village and way of life.


To be continued ...


Fred Allen Bass

Dover

Last edited on Mon Jul 6th, 2009 02:51 pm by tspong


 Current time is 03:27 am



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.2340 seconds (18% database + 82% PHP). 18 queries executed.