| Author | Post |
|---|
Hartlyboy
Member
|
Posted: Thu Oct 9th, 2008 06:03 am |
|
| Golly, Bix, that sounds ominous.
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 9th, 2008 04:17 am |
|
Bixby wrote: Catbird, besides lacking any substance at all in any of your postings, you make absolutely no sense at all.
OUR PATHS WILL SURELY CROSS AT SOME JUNCTURE RAINBOW BOY, "CHOW"
|
Cobra
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 24th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 348 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 8th, 2008 11:34 pm |
|
Nice post as usual, Bixby.
ajwatchdog2008 wrote: Obama's goal is to make the low class the new middle class at the expense of what's left of the current middle class, who will then become the low class. (Arizona forums)
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 7th, 2008 06:00 pm |
|
Back in 1987, Ronald Reagan commented on the term useful idiots: “How do you tell a Communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.” Now you have to look at Barack Obama and his cadre of elitists. Both understand and advocate socialist doctrine, their populist support across the nation is not from academic, intellectual or philosophical equals. Their adoring masses can’t begin to articulate why our nation was founded, what our Constitution sets forth, what citizenship entails, or why free enterprise is superior to socialism. They are, by and large, good people who have been dumbed down by government schools and the left-wing media. They are not in possession of an ethic that inspires them to put “Country First,” as John McCain and a long list of American Patriots have done. Instead, they follow Obama’s example, asking not what they can do for their country, but what their country can do for them. What they do is to feel rather than think their way through political issues, and the consequences for future generations of Americans are dire. Those of us who remember Communism under the former Soviet Union may recall that former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev observed that America’s transition from liberty to serfdom would have to be incremental: “We can’t expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism.”
Obama’s constituents are checkers players being led by chess masters, and the Democrat brew they have been drinking has been incrementally spiked with socialist booze such that they are completely intoxicated, and don’t know it. Will they sober up before the dawn? One example is on this past Thursday night, after Joe Biden demonstrated his outstanding credentials as a “useful idiot” while debating Sarah Palin, who demonstrated that she is a citizen, not a Beltway politico, Biden closed with this remark: “This election is the most important of your entire life.” On this point, and only this point, do I unreservedly concur with Joe.
|
Footloose
Member
| Joined: | Tue Nov 22nd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 327 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 6th, 2008 03:00 am |
|
Smyrna on South Street wrote: Rightwinger wrote: Catbird wrote: STATE OF DEL. POSTS IS WHERE YOU NEED TO GO" BIFF" ALONG WITH OTHER PLACES, IT'S TO TOUGH OUT HERE FOR YOU AS YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND PLAIN TALK, WHAT THE HELL YOUR FROM NEW YORK , I REST MY CASE. Bixby is entitled to his opinions and his posts are intelligent and informative.
You are acting like an uneducated bully with this type of remark.
Right you don't know just how right you are. Something that runs in her blood. It comes from the genes from down the way. I think it has something to do with the scrapple. So Catbird is a female? Terrible the way she spouts vicious, vile, and contemptuous comments. You people are right about the Bix because he posts some of the best facts I see anywhere, like him or not. Catbird responds with zero so therefore has zero credibility. You can't reasonably respond to such ignorance. Keep posting, Bixby.
|
Vindicator
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 465 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 6th, 2008 02:49 am |
|
Vatican Attacks Democrats as ‘a Party of Death’
An outspoken Vatican authority has issued a sharp rebuke of Democrats in the U.S., and party leaders Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, over the abortion issue. [size=]
Former St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke, who was named prefect of the Vatican’s Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature in June, told the Italian newspaper Avvenire that the Democratic Party risked “transforming itself definitively into a party of death for its decisions on bioethical issues.”
He said House Speaker Pelosi and Sen. Biden “while presenting themselves as good Catholics have presented Church doctrine on abortion in a false and tendentious way.”
Pelosi was criticized by Catholic leaders last month for saying the Church itself had long debated when human life begins. Biden also supports abortion rights. [size=]
Burke said pro-life Democrats are “rare” and complained that the party that helped “our immigrant parents and grandparents” prosper in the U.S. had changed so much over the years, Reuters reported.
Burke created a stir during the 2004 presidential campaign when he said Democratic nominee John Kerry, a Catholic, should be denied Communion because of his views on abortion. Last edited on Mon Oct 6th, 2008 02:50 am by Vindicator
|
Smyrna on South Street
Member
| Joined: | Sun Sep 21st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 5th, 2008 07:44 pm |
|
Rightwinger wrote: Catbird wrote: STATE OF DEL. POSTS IS WHERE YOU NEED TO GO" BIFF" ALONG WITH OTHER PLACES, IT'S TO TOUGH OUT HERE FOR YOU AS YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND PLAIN TALK, WHAT THE HELL YOUR FROM NEW YORK , I REST MY CASE.
Bixby is entitled to his opinions and his posts are intelligent and informative.
You are acting like an uneducated bully with this type of remark.
Right you don't know just how right you are. Something that runs in her blood. It comes from the genes from down the way. I think it has something to do with the scrapple.
|
Rightwinger
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 415 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 5th, 2008 05:59 pm |
|
Catbird wrote: STATE OF DEL. POSTS IS WHERE YOU NEED TO GO" BIFF" ALONG WITH OTHER PLACES, IT'S TO TOUGH OUT HERE FOR YOU AS YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND PLAIN TALK, WHAT THE HELL YOUR FROM NEW YORK , I REST MY CASE.
Bixby is entitled to his opinions and his posts are intelligent and informative.
You are acting like an uneducated bully with this type of remark.
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 5th, 2008 05:08 am |
|
Bixby wrote: Catbird, besides lacking any substance at all in any of your postings, you make absolutely no sense at all.
STATE OF DEL. POSTS IS WHERE YOU NEED TO GO" BIFF" ALONG WITH OTHER PLACES, IT'S TO TOUGH OUT HERE FOR YOU AS YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND PLAIN TALK, WHAT THE HELL YOUR FROM NEW YORK , I REST MY CASE.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 05:15 am |
|
OnlyMe wrote: On Tuesday, it was reported that Sarah Palin's favorability ratings, which peaked shortly after the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, were starting to slip. Between Sept. 13 and Sept. 17, the Alaska governor's unfavorables had climbed in the Diageo/Hotline poll from 30 percent to 37 percent; her favorables, meanwhile, had fallen from 52 percent to 47 percent. All in all, she'd gone from the most to least popular White House hopeful over the course of five short days.
The reason? "I suspect that we're starting to see Palin's considerable novelty wear off," I wrote. "Between now and Nov. 4, voters will stop seeing Palin as a fascinating story and starting taking her measure as an actual candidate for office. Some will approve; some won't... But it's hard to argue that the journey from intriguing new superstar to earthbound politician--a necessary part of the process--doesn't involve a loss of altitude. Just ask Barack Obama."
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/18/more-on-palin-s-declining-favorability-rating.aspx Please re-read my entire post on Palin's favorability and take note of the highlighted portion.
The poll comes just two weeks after a separate poll taken by Dittman Research gave Palin a 93 percent approval rating. While political polling numbers can fluctuate week to week, Palin's numbers have consistently been extremely high, putting her near or at the top among the nation's governors, according to Jennifer Duffy, an analyst at the Cook Political Report, a Washington, D.C.-based research group that closely follows state politics.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 05:09 am |
|
Catbird, besides lacking any substance at all in any of your postings, you make absolutely no sense at all.
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 04:22 am |
|
| WELL AS USUAL DICKIE BOY YOU HAVE MANAGED TO AVOID ANY PART OF MY POST ASIDE OF THE SLANTED WINGNUT RESPONSE THAT YOU CLING TO. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU DO FOR A LIVELIHOOD, BUT I BET ANYONE NEAR YOU MUST BE OF THE SAME COMMON DENOMINATOR OR THERE IS HELL TO PAY. DOES THE TYPE OF POSTING YOU PUT FORTH HERE HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU EXITING THE HELL HOLE OF "NEW YORK CITY" OR WERE YOU ASKED TO LEAVE!!
|
OnlyMe
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | Tuvalu |
| Posts: | 439 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:05 pm |
|
On Tuesday, it was reported that Sarah Palin's favorability ratings, which peaked shortly after the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, were starting to slip. Between Sept. 13 and Sept. 17, the Alaska governor's unfavorables had climbed in the Diageo/Hotline poll from 30 percent to 37 percent; her favorables, meanwhile, had fallen from 52 percent to 47 percent. All in all, she'd gone from the most to least popular White House hopeful over the course of five short days.
The reason? "I suspect that we're starting to see Palin's considerable novelty wear off," I wrote. "Between now and Nov. 4, voters will stop seeing Palin as a fascinating story and starting taking her measure as an actual candidate for office. Some will approve; some won't... But it's hard to argue that the journey from intriguing new superstar to earthbound politician--a necessary part of the process--doesn't involve a loss of altitude. Just ask Barack Obama."
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/18/more-on-palin-s-declining-favorability-rating.aspx
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 10:08 pm |
|
Vindicator wrote: Bixby wrote: So sorry, Catbird. Your post totally lacks substance and accuracy. To begin with, the latest poll shows Palin at a 93% approval rating, an improvement over my initially stated 85%. This poll was done by Ivan Moore Research and it showed both Republicans and Democrats in favor of the Palin. The poll comes just two weeks after a separate poll taken by Dittman Research gave Palin a 93 percent approval rating. While political polling numbers can fluctuate week to week, Palin's numbers have consistently been extremely high, putting her near or at the top among the nation's governors, according to Jennifer Duffy, an analyst at the Cook Political Report, a Washington, D.C.-based research group that closely follows state politics.
She is only the 14th person in the nation to take out an incumbent governor in a primary. That's about the hardest thing you can do in politics, so she was starting from a good point.
Now for a few corrections on your baseless assertions.
To quote you, “Yes, there are Govs. that have-had that % rating, lets try your boy Rudy Guliani ( don't know the spelling) had that plus, O Mally is another one, How about Rendell from Pa.”
To begin with, Giuliani was a mayor and not a governor. O’Mally enjoys a rating of “Excellent” at only 8% and has a disapproval rating of 29%. Rendell has a 25% disapproval rating and his “excellent” rating just slightly edges out O’Mally at 9%. Just to add some more popular governors, Corzine of NJ has even less of an “excellent” rating at only 5%. His disapproval rating stands at 33%. Just to be fair, Palin’s lowest disapproval rating was at 14%. (Source: Rasmussen Reports)
There were a few other governors that had high general approval ratings but not as high as Sarah Palin. They are: Hoeven (ND) @ 71%; Rounds (SD) @ 70%
The average rating for all governors is 48%. Gotta correct you my friend. Gov. Bobby Jindall (R-LA) has a 53% excellent rating compared to Palin's 51% excellent rating. His disapproval rating is at 3%.
A look at Minner shows that she has a 5% excellent rating with 22% rating her as good, 34% rating her fair, and a big 37% disapproval rating.
In any event, I rate your post "excellent" and Catbird's as "minus zero."
Thank you for the correction. Yes, Jindall edged slightly better. The data was updated after I compiled the original. Thanks too for the kudos.
|
Vindicator
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 465 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 05:18 pm |
|
Bixby wrote: So sorry, Catbird. Your post totally lacks substance and accuracy. To begin with, the latest poll shows Palin at a 93% approval rating, an improvement over my initially stated 85%. This poll was done by Ivan Moore Research and it showed both Republicans and Democrats in favor of the Palin. The poll comes just two weeks after a separate poll taken by Dittman Research gave Palin a 93 percent approval rating. While political polling numbers can fluctuate week to week, Palin's numbers have consistently been extremely high, putting her near or at the top among the nation's governors, according to Jennifer Duffy, an analyst at the Cook Political Report, a Washington, D.C.-based research group that closely follows state politics.
She is only the 14th person in the nation to take out an incumbent governor in a primary. That's about the hardest thing you can do in politics, so she was starting from a good point.
Now for a few corrections on your baseless assertions.
To quote you, “Yes, there are Govs. that have-had that % rating, lets try your boy Rudy Guliani ( don't know the spelling) had that plus, O Mally is another one, How about Rendell from Pa.”
To begin with, Giuliani was a mayor and not a governor. O’Mally enjoys a rating of “Excellent” at only 8% and has a disapproval rating of 29%. Rendell has a 25% disapproval rating and his “excellent” rating just slightly edges out O’Mally at 9%. Just to add some more popular governors, Corzine of NJ has even less of an “excellent” rating at only 5%. His disapproval rating stands at 33%. Just to be fair, Palin’s lowest disapproval rating was at 14%. (Source: Rasmussen Reports)
There were a few other governors that had high general approval ratings but not as high as Sarah Palin. They are: Hoeven (ND) @ 71%; Rounds (SD) @ 70%
The average rating for all governors is 48%. Gotta correct you my friend. Gov. Bobby Jindall (R-LA) has a 53% excellent rating compared to Palin's 51% excellent rating. His disapproval rating is at 3%.
A look at Minner shows that she has a 5% excellent rating with 22% rating her as good, 34% rating her fair, and a big 37% disapproval rating.
In any event, I rate your post "excellent" and Catbird's as "minus zero."
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 03:01 pm |
|
So sorry, Catbird. Your post totally lacks substance and accuracy. To begin with, the latest poll shows Palin at a 93% approval rating, an improvement over my initially stated 85%. This poll was done by Ivan Moore Research and it showed both Republicans and Democrats in favor of the Palin. The poll comes just two weeks after a separate poll taken by Dittman Research gave Palin a 93 percent approval rating. While political polling numbers can fluctuate week to week, Palin's numbers have consistently been extremely high, putting her near or at the top among the nation's governors, according to Jennifer Duffy, an analyst at the Cook Political Report, a Washington, D.C.-based research group that closely follows state politics.
She is only the 14th person in the nation to take out an incumbent governor in a primary. That's about the hardest thing you can do in politics, so she was starting from a good point.
Now for a few corrections on your baseless assertions.
To quote you, “Yes, there are Govs. that have-had that % rating, lets try your boy Rudy Guliani ( don't know the spelling) had that plus, O Mally is another one, How about Rendell from Pa.”
To begin with, Giuliani was a mayor and not a governor. O’Mally enjoys a rating of “Excellent” at only 8% and has a disapproval rating of 29%. Rendell has a 25% disapproval rating and his “excellent” rating just slightly edges out O’Mally at 9%. Just to add some more popular governors, Corzine of NJ has even less of an “excellent” rating at only 5%. His disapproval rating stands at 33%. Just to be fair, Palin’s lowest disapproval rating was at 14%. (Source: Rasmussen Reports)
There were a few other governors that had high approval ratings but not as high as Sarah Palin. They are: Hoeven (ND) @ 71%; Rounds (SD) @ 70%
The average rating for all governors is 48%. Last edited on Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 03:04 pm by Bixby
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 02:07 pm |
|
OK, Catbird. Lets go to the facts. Transcripts of the hearings in which the Democrats were warned about a forthcoming housing/banking/credit crisis and covered it up. As they say, "in their own words."
http://www.llsdc.org/quick-links/
http://www.llsdc.org/quick-links/#hfin
http://www.house.gov/Welcome.shtml
http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&q=House+Banking+Committee+Hearings&as_ldate=2004&as_hdate=2004&um=1&scoring=t&sa=X&oi=archive&ct=title
And you want these guys to retain power and control? Again, try to come up with a factual rebuttal sans the insults because it indicates that you have nothing of substance to say.
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 05:38 am |
|
| Dickie boy, 85% approval ?? is that your pole or Mc Nutts pole! or BOO_WHOS pole. Yes, there are Govs. that have-had that % rating, lets try your boy Rudy Guliani ( don't know the spelling) had that plus, O Mally is another one, How about Rendell from Pa. You can't be sober if you think that ol'e MOOSE LIPS would make a good president of this great country. you state , the left spends so much time talking about her, she deserves every bit of it and then some . How come you and your rainbow friends have so much HATE for the dems BIXBY? you have proved that you can copy & paste mucho amounts of spam, So tell me what does it do for you to post everyday about how wrong the left is and how great the right is, and so in so wrote this and that.and what ever. I blame you as a invester in the oil futures for the mess this country is in but you will say that is not so because Mc Nutt said so. Don't be so dam Naive Bix. I bet you don't even have a beer with anyone who is not of your beliefs ,or party affiliation. SAD , SAD.
|
Boo
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 481 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 04:26 am |
|
Bixby wrote: Catbird wrote: DICK TRACY, LOOKS LIKE YOU SHOULD BE STANDING BY YOUR MAILBOX WAITING FOR YOUR "FOIA" INFORMATION RATHER THAN TRYING TO DUPE THE FOLKS ON THIS BLOG. YOU ARE ONE DISTURBED RADICAL RIGHT WINGNUT DUDE, YOU SHOULD TRY SEX, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WILL HELP YOU!! OK, Catbird. Please tell me what information do you consider that which is "duping" anyone? Please supply factual evidence. What is radical about wanting to have someone who may very well lead this nation from being fully vetted? At the same time please explain why a VP candidate is occupying so much time by the radical left trying every which way to dig up something detrimental to malign or smear her. Recall that she is a governor who has a better than 85% approval rating from her constituency. Can you name another governor who enjoys such support? Try to answer without any insults.
Wheeedoggie! Looks like the cat done got catbird's tongue. Catbird aint got no credible answer so he/she is stuck like a treed coon.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008 04:37 pm |
|
Catbird wrote: DICK TRACY, LOOKS LIKE YOU SHOULD BE STANDING BY YOUR MAILBOX WAITING FOR YOUR "FOIA" INFORMATION RATHER THAN TRYING TO DUPE THE FOLKS ON THIS BLOG. YOU ARE ONE DISTURBED RADICAL RIGHT WINGNUT DUDE, YOU SHOULD TRY SEX, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WILL HELP YOU!! OK, Catbird. Please tell me what information do you consider that which is "duping" anyone? Please supply factual evidence. What is radical about wanting to have someone who may very well lead this nation from being fully vetted? At the same time please explain why a VP candidate is occupying so much time by the radical left trying every which way to dig up something detrimental to malign or smear her. Recall that she is a governor who has a better than 85% approval rating from her constituency. Can you name another governor who enjoys such support? Try to answer without any insults.
Last edited on Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 12:04 am by Bixby
|
Passing Time
Member
| Joined: | Tue Sep 16th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 9 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 1st, 2008 07:32 pm |
|
| Trying to stay on the topic...do you believe that because one has a law degree that makes one qualified to be President? Many (not all) folks with law degrees or PHD's or pick a degree...do not have the common sense needed to run their house, or a town let alone the country. Think about it...sure they worked hard to get where they are...some paid their own way and deserve it...others were "sent" there appointed and such...Because you are an engineer doesn't mean you have a lick of common sense...look at the new construction in our towns which have been designed by "smart" people...look at the sad state this wonderful country is falling into because of "smart" people...who on the Hill has common sense? Who on the Hill worked two jobs, raised their kids alone, and had to decide which bill to pay and which not to pay and survived...not many...who on the Hill said - take some of my salary back...look at all the poverty in this country - yes it's true some people chose to stay that way and milk the system but our candidates spend BILLIONS on their election while the little boy two doors down from me has holes in his shoes and mama really can't afford TV...that's because most politicians come from money - figured a way to make money and money gets them elected....just a thought
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30th, 2008 01:31 am |
|
Rightwinger wrote: Catbird wrote: TRYING TO DUPE THE FOLKS ON THIS BLOG. YOU ARE ONE DISTURBED RADICAL RIGHT WINGNUT DUDE, YOU SHOULD TRY SEX, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WILL HELP YOU!!
That remark was way out of line.
Okay, you don't agree with the post, fine, but please refrain from the
nasty insults.
Yea Right, The pot calling the kettle black, you need to go back and review some of your posts on the Dover & Kent County blogs, not exactly sunday school material ace!!! You have done a real bangup job on the Rehobeth Forum (HATE OBAMA) THAT BLOG IS OWNED BY YOU ACE I think you are much more comfortable blogin down there it suits you "CLOSET DRINKERS " TO A TEE!!!Last edited on Tue Sep 30th, 2008 02:13 am by Catbird
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2574 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27th, 2008 11:28 pm |
|
| Why do the Smyrna Forums attract such downright nasty people?
|
Rightwinger
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 415 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27th, 2008 11:08 pm |
|
Catbird wrote: TRYING TO DUPE THE FOLKS ON THIS BLOG. YOU ARE ONE DISTURBED RADICAL RIGHT WINGNUT DUDE, YOU SHOULD TRY SEX, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WILL HELP YOU!!
That remark was way out of line.
Okay, you don't agree with the post, fine, but please refrain from the
nasty insults.
|
Catbird
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27th, 2008 08:10 pm |
|
Bixby wrote: Where Judicial Watch's investigations into the Obama allegations now stand:
1. Sweetheart Mortgage Loan
We (JW) filed a complaint with the FEC asking them to investigate whether the preferential treatment that Senator Obama received when he was given a below-market interest rate on the $1.32 million mortgage he obtained from Northern Trust in 2005, which saved him approximately $125,000 over what other borrowers would have paid at the same time, constitutes an illegal campaign contribution. At the same time we filed our complaint with the FEC, we also filed a complaint over the mortgage with the Senate Ethics Committee, demanding the Committee investigate whether the below-market interest rate goiven to Senator Obama constitutes a "gift" that violates Senate ethics rules.
2. Congressional Travel Junket
We have filed a FOIA request with the Defense Department requesting important information about the highly publicized taxpayer funded congressional delegation trip Senator Obama took to Iraq in July. We want to know the facts surrounding this controversial trip.
3. Preferential Property Tax Assessment
A serious allegation was made this summer to Judicial Watch that Senator Obama received an improper property tax assessment worth tens of thousands of dollars to him. We immediately filed a FOIA request seeking the relevant assessment records from the Cook County, Illinois Tax Assessment Office to get to the truth of this explosive allegation. DICK TRACY, LOOKS LIKE YOU SHOULD BE STANDING BY YOUR MAILBOX WAITING FOR YOUR "FOIA" INFORMATION RATHER THAN TRYING TO DUPE THE FOLKS ON THIS BLOG. YOU ARE ONE DISTURBED RADICAL RIGHT WINGNUT DUDE, YOU SHOULD TRY SEX, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WILL HELP YOU!!
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26th, 2008 04:48 pm |
|
Take the Obama Test. See where you stand. For each question you agree with, give yourself one point. For each you disagree with, subtract one point. If you have more points, then vote Obama. Less, vote McCain.
http://barackobamatest.com/
|
Rightwinger
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 415 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26th, 2008 12:37 am |
|
fuzzy wrote: Ron Smith is the lawyer with heavy ties to developers - he was a Kent county commissioner - who was ousted by Allen Angel.
Don't waste your time.. this person probably doesn't know what Levy Court IS.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1625 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24th, 2008 07:28 pm |
|
Where Judicial Watch's investigations into the Obama allegations now stand:
1. Sweetheart Mortgage Loan
We (JW) filed a complaint with the FEC asking them to investigate whether the preferential treatment that Senator Obama received when he was given a below-market interest rate on the $1.32 million mortgage he obtained from Northern Trust in 2005, which saved him approximately $125,000 over what other borrowers would have paid at the same time, constitutes an illegal campaign contribution. At the same time we filed our complaint with the FEC, we also filed a complaint over the mortgage with the Senate Ethics Committee, demanding the Committee investigate whether the below-market interest rate goiven to Senator Obama constitutes a "gift" that violates Senate ethics rules.
2. Congressional Travel Junket
We have filed a FOIA request with the Defense Department requesting important information about the highly publicized taxpayer funded congressional delegation trip Senator Obama took to Iraq in July. We want to know the facts surrounding this controversial trip.
3. Preferential Property Tax Assessment
A serious allegation was made this summer to Judicial Watch that Senator Obama received an improper property tax assessment worth tens of thousands of dollars to him. We immediately filed a FOIA request seeking the relevant assessment records from the Cook County, Illinois Tax Assessment Office to get to the truth of this explosive allegation.
|
fuzzy
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 509 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22nd, 2008 12:38 pm |
|
Ron Smith is the lawyer with heavy ties to developers - he was a Kent county commissioner - who was ousted by Allen Angel.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2574 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22nd, 2008 12:03 pm |
|
| Guess that means you're not from around here.
|
GreyPoupon
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jul 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 178 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22nd, 2008 02:23 am |
|
Who the hell is Ron Smith?
Playing the Game wrote: Ron Smith has a law degree, so do many ambulance chasers. I even know a Harvard Law grad who works for a magazine making sure they don't get in trouble too often.
GreyPoupon wrote:
He CAN and WILL be president. He has a REAL college degree..and a LAW degree!! Not an honorary masters from the Church of Eternal Damnation, like your redneck moose hunter VP pick. What are all you idiot republican sycophants going to do when "Walnuts" doesn't win?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2574 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22nd, 2008 01:08 am |
|
Ron Smith has a law degree, so do many ambulance chasers. I even know a Harvard Law grad who works for a magazine making sure they don't get in trouble too often.
GreyPoupon wrote:
He CAN and WILL be president. He has a REAL college degree..and a LAW degree!! Not an honorary masters from the Church of Eternal Damnation, like your redneck moose hunter VP pick. What are all you idiot republican sycophants going to do when "Walnuts" doesn't win?
|
DUImonitor
Member
| Joined: | Sat Apr 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 7 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22nd, 2008 12:05 am |
|
| not impressed with obama. now with s. palin i'm impressed. mccain not only has good judgement he has a good eye. wow.
|
Hartlyboy
Member
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21st, 2008 11:18 pm |
|
| Impressed by your man's law degree , are you? Everyone needs a hero to worship, I suppose, so I'm hoping November and the next 4 years won't be too difficult for you. Really, I mean that.
|
GreyPoupon
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jul 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 178 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21st, 2008 02:42 am |
|
He CAN and WILL be president. He has a REAL college degree..and a LAW degree!! Not an honorary masters from the Church of Eternal Damnation, like your redneck moose hunter VP pick. What are all you idiot republican sycophants going to do when "Walnuts" doesn't win?
|
Hartlyboy
Member
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20th, 2008 04:22 am |
|
| You can more successfully argue that he isn't qualified to be president for any number of reasons but his citizenship qualifications won't be challenged in this election.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2574 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 10:20 pm |
|
| Save your breath and your anger. If he wasn't eligible, even the idiots in the Democrat party wouldn't run him for prsident.
|
jmatty2
Member
| Joined: | Sun Sep 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 10:18 pm |
|
I wonder. It seems he is not qualified to be president after all for the following reason
He is not a legally a "natural born" citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between " December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986." Presidential office requires a natural born citizen if the child was not born to two U. S. citizens, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. U.. law very clearly stipulates: "If only one parent was a U.S/. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. Obama's father was not a U. S. citizen and Obama's mother was only 18 when he was born, which means though she had been a U.S. citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years prior to Barack Obama's birth. In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. citizenship. (Article 11, section 1 U.S. Constitution.)
Was submitted to the News Journal Tuesday, 26 August 2008. Not printed.
PERHAPS THIS IS NOT "POLITICALLY CORRECT?"
|
Current time is 12:22 pm | |
|