Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
Newszap Forums > Delaware Public Forums > Smyrna/Clayton Public Issues Forum > Sarah "Shotgun" Palin - Heartless Killer

Sarah "Shotgun" Palin - Heartless Killer
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
They are all the same
Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 621
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 01:21 am
 Quote  Reply 
How about Obama's $5,000 fendy shoes or the $475 haircuts for the womanizing John Edward's. 

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 2053
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 12:48 am
 Quote  Reply 
I still like the quip that the Republicans are spending money to put clothes on a woman and the Democrats [Spitzer, Mahooney] are spending money to get clothes off a woman. Snicker, snicker, snortle....

cottoncandy
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 176
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 01:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hot Flash wrote: Well, just think, they spent $150,000. dressing her up.  :shock:
Sunday, October 26, 2008 3:21 PM
By: Ronald Kessler, chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com.

Barack Obama’s trips to Hawaii on a chartered Boeing 757 each cost more than twice the price of Sarah Palin’s new clothes.  Obama used the Boeing 757 for trips to Hawaii over the summer for a vacation and again last week to see his failing grandmother.

On the other hand, the media are highlighting the Republican National Committee’s purchase of $150,000 in clothes for Palin, even though the dresses will be donated to charities. The New York Times played the story on page one.

Ironically, it was Palin as governor who saved money for Alaskans by selling the state’s jet and instead flying commercial.

They are all the same
Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 621
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 08:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cobra, your ending comment is all too true.  However, there is still hope that maybe even Smyrna might attain the status of being pro-American. 

cottoncandy
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 176
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Don't worry -- I will be there -- voting early and often!
Product of ACORN's diligence?

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 05:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am sure TC

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 05:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Someone wrote: My, three cents shy of a nickel boy is there anything petty about PA post.  So both sides have things, it looks to me.  Again go mark your ballot, anyway you want.
Don't worry -- I will be there -- voting early and often!

Cobra
Member


Joined: Tue Oct 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 348
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Monday, October 20, 2008 MSM silent on Jon Stewart 's Palin expletive Mary Katharine Ham reports at the Weekly Standard’s The Blog - - -

Speaking to a college audience in Boston, Mass. Friday, "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart used his stand-up routine to respond to Sarah Palin's comments about "pro-America" parts of the country, shedding the profanity restrictions that govern his Comedy Central show.

"She said that small towns, that's the part of the country she really likes going to because that's the pro-America part of the country. You know, I just want to say to her, just very quickly: [expletive "F"] you," Stewart said to raucous applause.

Palin addressed a North Carolina fund-raiser Thursday night saying, "We believe that the best of America is not all in Washington, D.C. We believe...that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, very pro-America areas of this great nation."

The comment was quickly picked up by media outlets and the Obama campaign, whose spokesman Bill Burton asked in an e-mail to reporters, "What part of the country isn’t pro-America?"

Stewart didn't let his own harsh language stop him from criticizing John McCain and Palin for divisiveness.

"I can't take it anymore...After eight years of this divisiveness, we're back to this idea that only small-town America is the real America," he said.

The Manhattan native accused the Republicans of "writing off whole swaths of the country," saying "cities are just a lot of towns piled on top of each other in one place."

During the same routine, however, he seemed to write off Palin's rural swath of the country, referring to the governor's home not as Alaska, Wasilla, or Juneau, but as "the woods."

"McCain made an interesting vice presidential choice," he said. "I like the woods...I just don't know if I would pull my vice president out of the woods randomly."

Stewart also joked about Palin's recent statements on Barack Obama's links to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and Obama's abortion stances, distorting her statements[.]...

The media has devoted hundreds of stories of late to the tenor of audience comments at McCain-Palin rallies, fretting about "rage" and "incitement" by the campaign, but the only account of Stewart's appearance is a one-sentence mention in the Boston Globe, and his abusive Palin comments are not included.

Ham's entire post's here.

Comments:


You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive (F) you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week and the rest of the campaign.

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Someone wrote: mr blues, haven't said this is right or wrong, just very petty, if this is all you can come up with, looks desperate to me.

I wasn't questioning you or your viewpoint I was just expressing mine. I certainly have a problem with $21,000.00 in flights being billed.  That's a years salary for some employees in Delaware. No offense but if it doesn't concern you that would appear to be a bit on the elitist slant, IMHO.

 

I did however ask you several serious questions I had hoped you would answer perhaps you missed or just chose to ignore.

http://www.newszapforums.com/forum47/69456.html

Oldguy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 139
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 
That just goes to show how many media outlets are LIBERAL and support OBAMA/JOEBAMA. Rather than report unbias news, they slant their reporting toward the liberal left.

cottoncandy
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 176
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 03:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hot Flash wrote: Well, just think, they spent $150,000. dressing her up.  I believe that is much more than most of us make in a year.  Now tell me that she is a Hockey Mom!  :shock:
The fact that they needed to dress her up proves that she had the clothes of an ordinary person or Hockey Mom.  The press has had a field day with Gov. Palin, but I can imagine their ridicule if she campaigned in Hockey Mom clothes.  I am amused by the size of the columns in this morning's local paper: several about Gov. Palin's clothes, which has nothing to do with her capabilities, and just a couple about Senator Obama's remarks that he wants to "spread the wealth around". :?  I want to keep what I have and voluntarily support the charitable organizations of my choice rather than surrender to the government's confiscation of my hard-earned money for them to squander (redistribute).

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 02:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
My, three cents shy of a nickel boy is there anything petty about PA post.  So both sides have things, it looks to me.  Again go mark your ballot, anyway you want.

Pay Attention
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 10th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 128
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 01:57 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Public Allies is a Barack Obama Racist Socialist ArmyPosted on September 5, 2008 at 7:47 pm (PST)




Public Allies is a Chicago organization of tax payer funded protesters. Barack Obama founded Public Allies in Chicago in 1992, and Michelle Obama became the executive director. The group uses tax payer dollars to pay people who sign up. The Public Allies paid members spend most of their time protesting. Public Allies teaches the young adults that work for them that America is a racist, oppressive place in need of "social change." Public Allies said in a tax filing:

"Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to engage in protest activities."
A graduate of the 2005 Los Angeles Public Allies class, Nelly Nieblas, says it’s just a lot of talk about race. It’s a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, a lot of talk about isms and phobias. One of those isms is heterosexism, heterosexism, which a Public Allies training seminar in Chicago remember, founding member, Barack Obama. Executive director, Michelle Obama, in Chicago. That’s their chapter. A Public Allies training seminar in Chicago describes heterosexism as a negative byproduct of capital quoting of capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male dominated privilege, end quote. By the way, your tax dollars now fund about half of Public Allies’ expenses, through Bill Clinton’s AmeriCorps. Obama wants to fully fund it and expand it to a national program some say will cost $500 billion.

The information above is just a taste of what the radical socialist teachings that Public Allies promotes. Investor’s Business Daily wrote a much more complete article on the topic. Click here to read it.

After 19 months of Obama running for President, you’d think the mainstream media could have dug this information up, and they probably did, but didn’t share it with anyone else. With Sarah Palin, they dumped an avalanche of rumors, lies, and scandal over her head in only 5 days, and she’s still standing with her head held high. Sarah isn’t making the same excuses that Obama did when he got a few questions he didn’t like. Sarah has answered every question with honesty, and hasn’t tried to hide anything. Obama could learn something from her.

When Obama, Biden, McCain, and Palin square off for the Presidential debates, I’m hoping someone has the guts to ask Obama about his Public Allies organization.

Click here to read the Boot Camp for Radicals article by IBD.

In the video above, Obama says his “community organizing” tells people about where he is coming from, and who he represents. Obama represents Public Allies, a group of racist socialists, who are paid by American taxpayers to protest. If that is the accomplishment he is so proud of, what will he do as President of the United States? The answer is in Public Allies. The video above came out on September 4, which is the same day that Investor’s Business Daily published the truth about Public Allies. What Obama claims Public Allies does in the video, is completely untrue. Obama never mentions what Public Allies really does, because if he did, most people would see him as a radical socialist who wants to start a bloody revolution.


addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fhttp://www.hollywoodgrind.com%2Fpublic-allies-is-a-barack-obama-racist-socialist-army%2F';
addthis_title = 'Public+Allies+is+a+Barack+Obama+Racist+Socialist+Army';
addthis_pub = '';



[url=http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=12&winname=addthis&pub=&s=&url=http%253A%252F%252Fhttp://www.hollywoodgrind.com%252Fpublic-allies-is-a-barack-obama-racist-socialist-army%252F&title=Public%2BAllies%2Bis%2Ba%2BBarack%2BObama%2BRacist%2BSocialist%2BArmy][/url]










window.google_render_ad();

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 12:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
hello, dude, taking about cloths, very petty.  Never said who i am voting for, still not sure, so don't assume.  And by all means on election day go to the polls and vote for who YOU feel is the best person, this is America we have that right.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 12:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Someone -- there is nothing petty about billing the public treasury for $21,000 worth of unnecessary, private travel expense for one's children while occupying the governor's office.   Shows a huge character and honesty deficiency.    She might be your vice presidential pick, but not mine.

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 11:55 am
 Quote  Reply 
mr blues, haven't said this is right or wrong, just very petty, if this is all you can come up with, looks desperate to me.

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 11:35 am
 Quote  Reply 
how about her billing the state of alaska  for her childrens flights.

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 11:00 am
 Quote  Reply 
HF credibility has really hit bottom.  If this is all you can come up with, I think you might need help. It's called hate, something we all don't need.

Hot Flash
Member


Joined: Thu Jan 12th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1369
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 05:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
Well, just think, they spent $150,000. dressing her up.  I believe that is much more than most of us make in a year.  Now tell me that she is a Hockey Mom!  :shock:

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 22nd, 2008 04:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Smyrna Mom,

I grew up in Massachusetts and I have never voted for Ted Kennedy nor do I respect him. With that being said however I must correct you on your misconception,and please do not misconstrue my post as defense for what happened on Martha's Vineyard. 

The "official" cause of death was drowning but many believe it was from suffocation, when the air pocket ran out inside the car. A few island officials believed she could have been saved had the accident been reported right away. He pled guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, and was given a suspended sentence of two months.  However, since Kopechne's parents' lawyer, Joseph Flanagan, filed a petition barring an autopsy the cause of death was never medically confirmed. The next thing papers and others then printed stories of how she was pregnant which she wasn't, nor was Ted Kennedy having an affair with her, they were unsubstantiated rumors.

Mary Jo was one of 5 women in the Robert Kennedy entourage who were Robert Kennedy's secretaries.  

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 2053
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 22nd, 2008 04:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Not saying the media is in the bag for Obama , are we? If not, we should be....

Smyrna Mom
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 43
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 22nd, 2008 01:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 






This writer also makes a very good point. 

                                                       

                                                 [size=









Here's an interesting post from a Chron.com] <http://chron.com/> reader:  'Listening to the mainstream media these last few days I've learned a  few things about the GOP's VP nominee but also had to learn a few things on my own. To wit:  
 
1. From the media I learned Sarah Palin's husband has a DUI conviction from 22 years ago. * On my own I learned that Ted Kennedy (hero of last week's tribute at  the DNC) was drunk while driving a car off a bridge in Chappaquiddick.  That same crash killed a young campaign volunteer with whom he was having an affair. Oh, and that woman was pregnant with his child.  * Mr. Palin's (who is not running for office) DUI came a mere 4 years  after Barack Obama (who is running for president) stopped using cocaine  and marijuana (by his own admission in his autobiography).  Shocking - it's OK for the presidential candidate to use drugs or the  party patriarch to kill someone while driving drunk yet the husband of a  VP candidate should be demonized for something done 22 years ago.  
 
2. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant.  * On my own I learned that Joe Biden's (the other VP candidate) son was  paid a large amount of money as a consultant to credit card company  MBNA. That same company had business before Senator Joe Biden concerning  regulation of consumer credit practices. After the compa ny paid a hefty  sum to Mr. Biden's son, he voted in favor of legislation to help that  company.  * That same son, Hunter, is also engaged in a legal investigation and  suit for defrauding a former business partner  Shocking - it's a crime for the republican VP candidate to have a child  who's pregnant even though it's irrelevant to how she performs her job.  It's OK, however, for the democrat VP candidate while a senator to vote  in favor of a company who paid his son over a quarter of a million  dollars.  
 
3. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin should be considered  'selfish' for agreeing to run for VP knowing about her daughter's  condition. Knowing that her public role would bring extr a scrutiny on  the family is selfish and she should have declined to protect her child (actually heard this on ABC this weekend).  Strange - the same people who said Sarah is selfish for running for VP  did not seem to care about any impact on Chelsea when Bill Clinton had his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky. That was a private, personal matter  you see.  
 
4. From the media I have learned to be 'concerned' that Sarah Palin  probably won't be able to manage her family and do an effective job of  being VP at the same time.  Funny - I never heard anything about Hillary's ability to support  Chelsea while re-doing healthcare or any of the other feminist icons who  say you can balance work and family. They also nev er mention that Barack  will have to balance time with his children while meeting with heads of  rogue nations or how Joe Biden's kids don't even have a mom and will be  fighting for his time while he hosts white house coffee fundraisers and  sells nights in the Lincoln bedroom.  
 
5. From the media I have learned that Sarah Palin is 'too inexperienced'  to be a heartbeat-away from the presidency.  * Apparently taking on corruption in your own party and running a state  that's the same size people-wise as delaware (hint hint: that's where  Joe Biden is from) is not really experience.  * However, time spent as a 'community organizer' and less than 180 days  in the senate where you've authored no significant legislation is just  the type of 'change' we're looking for from the top of the ticket.  Funny - inexperience at the top of the ticket is a mantra for 'change'  and 'hope' while strong practical everyday experience as the #2 is cause  for concern.  
 
6. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin's husband once got a ticket  for fishing without a license.  * I haven't heard much about the fact that if he were still a practicing  attorney, the VP candidate Joe Biden would be disbarred for plagiarism  not once but multiple times.  It's ok to break the rules if you're a democ rat candidate but not Ok if  you are the spouse of a republican candidate.  
 
7. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin doesn't know much about  Iraq ; in fact we wonder if she even knows where it is.  * Sarah's son volunteered into the US military and is now deployed in  Iraq . I guess that doesn't count.  Sarah has spent more time with troops in Iraq (as commander of the  Alaska National Guard she visited Iraq last year) than Obama has even  while running for president. In fact, when Sarah went to Iraq she spent  time with the troops.  When Obama went there, he skipped a base visit to instead go work out at  the Ritz Carlton.  
 
8. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin is a 'lightweight' and she  better be a 'quick study' to keep up with this team.  Funny, nobody is talking about how, after Barack Obama had 'visited 57  states' according to him he only had '5 more to go' or e ndless other  stupid gaffes that expose who he really is. 


9. From the media I have learned that (gasp!), Sarah Palin's husband was  once a registered member of a 3rd party that favored states' rights (man, this is really bad stuff).  * That same media has been silent to the story that when Barack Obama  announced his first senate run, he did so in the home of William Ayers.  Mr. Ayers is an un-repentant terrorist convicted for bombing the  pentagon. This same Mr. Ayers said on 9/11 that he and his group did not  do enough to harm our military and he wished he had done more.  During the same time as that comment, he was serving on a board with  Barack Obama. All notes and information about their serving together is  now locked up by the corrupt Chicago machine and reporter access to  those records are being blocked by the Obama campaign.  If we've had any doubts about the bias of the media, it's pretty clear  now where they stand. Pass this on to some of your friends who are on  the fence and who get all their information from Katie Couric, Wolf  Blitzer, Tom Brokaw and the gang. This is egregious and corrupt. The  only way to stop it is to spread information using other outlets and  make these guys irrelevant.'
 
Posted to Houston Chronicle by: Luis Morales at September 27, 2008 08:25 AM  

 








 

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 11:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Only is a party girl, kind of like HF.  Only see's one thing.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 2053
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 11:26 pm
 Quote  Reply 
They are suing the Gov't about the phony endangered species tag they gave to polar bears because 1] they aren't endangered as the people up there who count them know, and 2] that environmental designation was a political act to control Alaska's oil producing activity. Since oil production is an important part of Alaska's economy , they are pushing back, -but it not a Sarah Palain thing against the polar bears. That's just typical enviroweenie  spin.

Boo
Member


Joined: Sat Nov 19th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 481
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 10:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Maybe its cause them thar polar bars is gittin too overpopulated.  Them herds is at their doggone biggest in recent memory.  Mebee its like deer.  When there is too many of em they compete fer food.  Any backwoods dummy like me kin figger it out. And nuther thing, son.  Stop fallen fer that enviro whacko propaganda.  Even mah looney cuzin Lulu know thet and she aint all there cause she is teched in the head.

OnlyMe
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: Tuvalu
Posts: 439
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 10:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Did you know that vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin is suing the federal government to eliminate protections for threatened polar bears? It’s a move that could lead to more polar bears dying of starvation, drowning and being killed by wealthy trophy hunters.
According to the Anchorage Daily News, she covered up evidence from her own scientists showing the need for polar bear protections. Now she’s doing the bidding of the oil companies and trophy hunters, suing the federal government to stop the listing of polar bears as a threatened species.
As governor, Sarah Palin has been a disaster for polar bears, wolves and other wildlife. A heartbeat away from the presidency, she could do even worse.
Please watch this powerful video by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, and then share it with everyone you know with a heart:

http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinpolarbears

Vindicator
Member


Joined: Mon Jan 2nd, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 465
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 06:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
cottoncandy wrote: Mendavor wrote: NOW is at the forefront of progressive women who are striving for change to a new and greater society.  Hot Flash should be proud to align herself with this group.  Keep it up, Hot Flash, and dopn't be daunted by nazis and fascists.  They will be eliminated in due time.

I hope you are correct that nazis and fascists will be eliminated in due time.  Since they embrace "national socialism", they seem to be alive and well in the far-left wing of the Democrat Party, IMO.
Astute observation.  Glad you brought that up.  Many mistakenly believe that nazis are on the right.  The theoretically belong on the left with the communists and socialists.

cottoncandy
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 176
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 06:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mendavor wrote: NOW is at the forefront of progressive women who are striving for change to a new and greater society.  Hot Flash should be proud to align herself with this group.  Keep it up, Hot Flash, and dopn't be daunted by nazis and fascists.  They will be eliminated in due time.

I hope you are correct that nazis and fascists will be eliminated in due time.  Since they embrace "national socialism", they seem to be alive and well in the far-left wing of the Democrat Party, IMO.

What a Crock
Member
 

Joined: Sun Oct 19th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 29
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 05:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mendavor wrote: NOW is at the forefront of progressive women who are striving for change to a new and greater society.  Hot Flash should be proud to align herself with this group. In the Obama administration NOW will be among the authorative groups who will help shape the destiny of our women citizens.  They have succeeded to utilize the power of the government to effect new and liberal abortion policies that may have otherwise been suppressed by religious fanatics.  People should realize that religion, of all kinds, is on the decline. NOW is only one such group, and there will be many more, in advancing the new and greater glory of the state.  Keep it up, Hot Flash, and dopn't be daunted by nazis and fascists.  They will be eliminated in due time.

why don't you go slither back to your tomb

Mendavor
Member


Joined: Mon Jan 8th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 298
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 04:16 pm
 Quote  Reply 
NOW is at the forefront of progressive women who are striving for change to a new and greater society.  Hot Flash should be proud to align herself with this group. In the Obama administration NOW will be among the authorative groups who will help shape the destiny of our women citizens.  They have succeeded to utilize the power of the government to effect new and liberal abortion policies that may have otherwise been suppressed by religious fanatics.  People should realize that religion, of all kinds, is on the decline. NOW is only one such group, and there will be many more, in advancing the new and greater glory of the state.  Keep it up, Hot Flash, and dopn't be daunted by nazis and fascists.  They will be eliminated in due time.

Smyrna Mom
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 43
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 03:42 pm
 Quote  Reply 
cottoncandy wrote: Unfortunately, NOW does not recognize intelligent women, who think for themselves.
I concur.

cottoncandy
Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 176
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 02:21 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Unfortunately, NOW does not recognize intelligent women, who think for themselves.

Hot Flash
Member


Joined: Thu Jan 12th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1369
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 05:22 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bixby wrote: They are all the same wrote: Bix, don't waste your time.  Not much going on upstairs.  BB (blankly blonde).I notice that Hot Flash would occasionally toss a rock at the crowd and disappear.  She never offers a specific and never answers a question on anything she may post.  She will never justify any of her posts or cut-and-pastes.  She never does any research but will always take and post a liberal view talking point.  Ready to embrace socialism without realizing what it is, but that goes for many people. The epitome of ignorance.

This is called cut and paste!


Check out this:

Subject: NOW and Palin

The National Organization for Women has endorsed the Obamba-Biden ticket for
just the reasons listed below. They usually do not endorse, but in this case
believed it was absolutely necessary to take a stand. If you agree, please
pass this on.

Subject: Women and Sarah Palin

Friends:

We are writing to you because of the fury and dread we have felt since  the
announcement of Sarah Palin as the Vice-Presidential candidate for  the
Republican Party. We believe that this terrible (?) decision has  surpassed
mere partisanship, and that it is a dangerous farce on the  part of a
pandering and rudderless Presidential candidate that has a  real possibility
of becoming fact.

Perhaps like us, as American women, you share the fear of what Ms.
Palin and her professed beliefs and proven record could lead to for
ourselves and for our present or future daughters. To date, she is  against
sex education, birth control, the pro-choice platform,  environmental
protection, alternative energy development, freedom of  speech, gun control,
the separation of church and state, and polar  bears -- to say nothing of
her complete lack of real preparation to become  the second-(and possibly
first)-most-powerful person on the planet.

We want to clarify that we are not against Sarah Palin as a woman, a
mother, or, for that matter, a parent of a pregnant teenager, but  solely as
a rash, incompetent, and altogether devastating choice for  Vice President.
Ms. Palin's political views are in every way a slap in  the face to the
accomplishments that our mothers and grandmothers and  great-grandmothers so
fiercely fought for, and from which we've so  demonstrably benefited.

First and foremost, Ms. Palin does not represent us. She does not
demonstrate or uphold our interests as American women. It is presumed  that
the inclusion of a woman on the Republican ticket could win over  women
voters.

We want to disagree, publicly. If you agree that Palin is an
irresponsible, even dangerous, choice for VP, please consider  participating
in this drive. Gentlemen, send this to the women you  know and care for. I
know it's tough to understand the way this choice  is impacting women, but
I
have never seen so many women so outraged,  angry and distraught in my
entire life. We'd like our voices heard.

If you agree, PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY! If you send this to 20 women in  the
next hour, you could be blessed with a country that takes your  concerns
seriously. Stranger things have happened.


Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 21st, 2008 01:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bix come on man how many politicians ever give a straight answer or facts. How can we expect the average Joe to be any different, when we accept what the politicans do on a daily basis. I'm not saying it's right but it's a fact of life accountability responsibility, morality and consequences for any actions are virues long gone. They are all but a passing rememberance of the way we were raised years ago.

Last edited on Tue Oct 21st, 2008 01:22 am by Bluesman

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1625
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 08:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I agree with you, Bill.  However, it was Hot Flash who chose to single out and illustrate one side and it was my intent to show that it is not exclusive to Republicans.  So my response to her coincides with what you say.  They all do it.

The rest of my post remains.  She will never respond with facts nor will she ever justify a question regarding her posts.

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 08:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Bixby wrote: Yes, Hot Flash, the Republicans are good at negative campaigning but the Democrats have perfected it into an art form. You must take the time to come out of your politically induced coma.

Perhaps you should heed your own advice as well instead of pointing fingers at each other, saying your republicans do it, your democrats do it just agree all politicians do it from all sides.  Then maybe a solution can arise.

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1625
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 08:26 pm
 Quote  Reply 
They are all the same wrote: Bix, don't waste your time.  Not much going on upstairs.  BB (blankly blonde).I notice that Hot Flash would occasionally toss a rock at the crowd and disappear.  She never offers a specific and never answers a question on anything she may post.  She will never justify any of her posts or cut-and-pastes.  She never does any research but will always take and post a liberal view talking point.  Ready to embrace socialism without realizing what it is, but that goes for many people. The epitome of ignorance.

They are all the same
Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 621
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 06:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Bix, don't waste your time.  Not much going on upstairs.  BB (blankly blonde).

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1625
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 06:05 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hot Flash wrote: According to the polls that have been taken the republicans are losing.  That is why they have come out trashing the democrats.  As I said people don't like hearing the dirty campaining.  Why can't they stick to the issues????????:shock:

Yes, Republicans are losing in many areas which may very well cost them the election.  But speaking of dirty campaigns, have you seen the T-shirts being promoted by Obama supporters describing Sarah Palin in terms of a female genital?  How about the blatantly pro-Obama NY Times (Jody Kantor NY Times) surfing the My-Space pages for teenagers who are acquainted with Cindy McCain's daughter asking for "dirt" on Cindy?  How about NBC's blatant lies about Joe the Plumber in order to suppress his honest question to Obama and Obama's response?  Do you approve of the MSM posting satellite trucks outside Joe's home  hounding him daily?  Perhaps you better like the vitriol about Sarah palin like ardent Obama supporter Larry Flynt (Playboy Magazine) producing a porn movie with a Palin look-alike? 

How many news trucks were posted at Bill Ayer's house?  How much "investigation" into Michelle Obama has the MSM given? How many negative T-shirts, or other "humorous" paraphernalia have you seen regarding Michelle Obama? 

Yes, Hot Flash, the Republicans are good at negative campaigning but the Democrats have perfected it into an art form. You must take the time to come out of your politically induced coma.

Last edited on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 06:06 pm by Bixby

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 02:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Well, Welcome to the group Mr Blues.

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Someone wrote: My Blues, did you write that?  Now that wasn't an attack was it?
Of course not.....it  has been told to me by you this is  the way everyday folks like you express their opinions.   I'm just tryin' mighty damn hard to assimilate myself to the way you do things...:dude:

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
My Blues, did you write that?  Now that wasn't an attack was it?

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 12:57 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Someone wrote: You lost me Blues, I was talking about HF.
Maybe you need to come out of that Big Cave and get away from all the bat guano you're inhaling. Or is this the secret big cave where the ambiguously gay duo of batman and robin keep their batmobile.

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 11:42 am
 Quote  Reply 
You lost me Blues, I was talking about HF.

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 02:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
Someone,

It has nothing to do with having a new friend.  A blatant outright lie was posted in regard to a post I made, period.   Don't try to make it into anything else that it clearly isn't. 

Hot Flash
Member


Joined: Thu Jan 12th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1369
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 02:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
Someone,

According to the polls that have been taken the republicans are losing.  That is why they have come out trashing the democrats.  As I said people don't like hearing the dirty campaining.  Why can't they stick to the issues????????:shock:

Someone
Member


Joined: Thu Dec 29th, 2005
Location: Big Cave
Posts: 1874
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
HF, I can't believe you said that, maybe you better read some of yours.  Got another new friend blues. 

Also Party Girl, I think they are both losing but what we have to choose from.

Last edited on Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:48 am by Someone

Hot Flash
Member


Joined: Thu Jan 12th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1369
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
This is how the republicans act when they know they are losing.  I haven't seen one yet that ran a decent campaign on the issues.  Delaware Republicans are especially good at running dirty campaigns.  They just don't get it that people don't like it.  :shock:

Bluesman
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 1st, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 3189
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 01:12 am
 Quote  Reply 
Pay Attention wrote: Bluesman wrote: Bluesman is Repeatedly documented as the most unreliable source for information, sort of calling the kettle black, when trying to debate a point.



And you have proven you are a liar:

Pay Attention wrote: Bluesman wrote: What proof do either of you have that Obama knows the source of all these contributions?
Bluesman wrote this in another topic: if he "Obama" doesn't know what his campaign people are doing...... how the hell is he going to lead this country.


I did oh really. The post made doesn't lie but you clearly do.


 What I wrote was in direct comment to your question to me asking if I had proof McCain endorsed the phone calls being made. 

Pay Attention wrote:
Do you have proof that McCain endorsed the phone calls?
Bluesman wrote:

Do you have proof that he didn't ?

I only posted a summary of a news article that broke.
Pay Attention wrote: Not fair Blue, I asked you first.
Bluesman wrote:
Life ain't fair,  deal with it. 

 But I'll go along with you..if he doesn't know what his campaign people are doing...... how the hell is he going to lead this country. 
Here's the link to the thread   Sun Oct 19th, 2008 05:48 pm

http://www.newszapforums.com/view_topic.php?id=69405&forum_id=47&jump_to=385806#p385806

Pay Attention
Member
 

Joined: Fri Oct 10th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 128
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 12:06 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bluesman wrote: Bluesman is Repeatedly documented as the most unreliable source for information, sort of calling the kettle black, when trying to debate a point.


 Current time is 03:34 pm
Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.7666 seconds (43% database + 57% PHP). 41 queries executed.