Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Mr. Ryan
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 22nd, 2008 04:26 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Maybe he is expecting a big fat check from town for the full balance of the settlement -- thus he feels no need to work -- as far as Ryan not returning calls (per newspaper) why would he, any he says to the reporters could be misconscrude or misquoted. I would not want to take that kind of chance if I was in his shoes.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 20th, 2008 03:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
ryan is waiting for his first payment , so maybe that is why he is parting ways. Oh wait  it's the gas prices


Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 19th, 2008 06:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Post Master General wrote: Just wanted to through this out there:

Milton town administrator tenders resignation via e-mail


"I think one of the reasons that he resigned was that he came to Milton with the idea that we had a town manager style of government, and he wanted that type of position. Milton does not have that type of government."

Gray explained a town manager runs the town, while the town administrator works at "the direction of the Board of Selectmen. Our expectations, and his expectations did not meet."


One might have expected that one who was actually qualified to be the town administrator would have figured out during pre-hire interviews that this may not be the position that was wanted.

oop!
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 10th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 720
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 19th, 2008 05:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Does this mean he couldn't run the town , or he couldn't find a sucker.

Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 19th, 2008 04:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just wanted to through this out there:

Milton town administrator tenders resignation via e-mail


By JOSH ROSENSON
jrosenson@fosters.com


Article Date: Friday, May 16, 2008

MILTON — Edward J. Ryan Jr. tendered his resignation as town administrator Thursday afternoon via e-mail.

The e-mail states: "I personally regret to inform you that I find it necessary to resign my position as Milton's Town Administrator. Thank you for all your friendships and kindnesses you have shown me during my stay here in Milton."

Ryan had been "ousted" as the town manager of Cheswold, Del., and he had filed a lawsuit, which was settled out of court, with Ryan to receive $300,000, according to an article posted on delawareonline.com, the online site for The News Journal of Wilmington, Del.

"There were some serious issues that he had in Cheswold, Del., but that had nothing to do with his resignation," Selectman Chair Tom Gray said. "I think one of the reasons that he resigned was that he came to Milton with the idea that we had a town manager style of government, and he wanted that type of position. Milton does not have that type of government."

Gray explained a town manager runs the town, while the town administrator works at "the direction of the Board of Selectmen. Our expectations, and his expectations did not meet."

Gray said Ryan began as town administrator Jan. 3.

"I'm sorry it didn't work out for him or us," Selectmen Leo Lessard said. "I wish the best for him."

Attempts to reach Ryan for comment were unsuccessful.

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 16th, 2008 05:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
That is so true; but then again -- Builders will promise you the world to get you to buy thier homes, then back out of the original plans. I sure some of us have seen this happen in other locations through out delaware etc. And I do feels sorry for those homeowners, who make it through this bad economical times. I seen in paper other day a home in Parkers Run is going up for sheriff sale.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 01:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Dear

That's the same old story they have been dishing to all of their residents . I think it time the home owners ask to check the HOA account and see how much you have paid in .

Just because there is a housing slump right now hasn't stop the HOA bill from coming  

I bet there will be some home buyers over there that will not be able to pay their  mortgage and any and all monies they have paid to the HOA ( in hopes that it will start soon ) will lose all of what they paid along with their homes.

That just doesn't seem fair. It may not be a promise that was broken on purpose  


Last edited on Thu May 15th, 2008 02:35 pm by Helen here

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 01:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
No, I am talking about the piece of property located inside parkers run right off of Jordan Drive. This is where they have thier sign up for the community center & playground yet to be built. (so Helen, if you know so much why don't you solve all of the town's problems & why didn't you run for mayor)

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 15th, 2008 01:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Are you talking about the Boggs property belonging to Parker's Runn?

Guess again , better  yet go see who is on the deed . The town still owns it as well as a promise from owners of Parker's Runn giving a few acres to the town  North on of town for the new town hall and police station over by Goo lagoon ( heh heh heh )

I would hope they wouldn't go back on that .

 

Last edited on Thu May 15th, 2008 01:25 pm by Helen here

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 12:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I know what the settlement was, I was at the meeting. and no the playground etc is not built yet and may not be for several years. But reguardless it belongs to Parkers Run.

IF the town could take that land then why not take the lot next to the church or the abandon house next to the rail road tracks Oh and what about the empty lots in and around school lane , and other parts of cheswold. Oh heck why not let the town sell our homes to raise the money for all the past trouble this town has gotten it's self into. & how much do we spend for a police department and the three or four cars for that. disolve the police dept. it is an unnecessary expense for such a small area.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 11:59 am
 Quote  Reply 
Number1

I just don't see the tots ages 11 and up playing in the tot  lot , and it ain't bult yet .

Doesn't look like will be there until all the homes are sold , and that will be a while too!

Last year I help with some yard sales for the town , and they did pertty good .

But the  town needs money now so the property is the only way with out having to raise the taxes.

 

Last edited on Thu May 15th, 2008 01:10 pm by Helen here

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 02:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
Number1mom -- are you aware that the town entered into an agreement to settle Ryan's lawsuit by agreeing to pay him $300,000 -- in a matter of just a few months, not years.    The town council has maybe 6 or 8 mponths in which to complete the payments to him.    Nobody could cook enough pancakes to pay that amount, nor have enough flea markets -- this is major expense, not penny ante stuff.

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 14th, 2008 01:46 am
 Quote  Reply 
Actually the development of parkers run already had plans for community center and a tot lot on that section of land & the owner's there already hefty HOA dues for the upkeep etc on that property. Thus as we were all told in the meeting when question about the closing of school lane - that the portion that will be closed off is private property owned by Fox Pointe.

But, The town could use the large parking area across from the fire hall and have weekend Flea markets every weekend charging a fee for the people to set up and sell their items. Simular to what Spencer's Bazaar does. Example charge X amount of dollars if pre-reserved space; and double X dollars for those who do not reserve ahead of time. This could raise much needed money.

Other ideals would be to hold fund raisers; have the fire hall donate the hall few different days per month and hold Pancake breakfast - or maybe spegetti dinners -- you get what I mean.

I am sure there are many citizens out there that could come up with creative ways for fund raisers.

Things like this could be done year around and would help keep our taxes down.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 13th, 2008 10:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Helen here wrote: It will be Cheswold tax payers that will have to pay the cost and that is just not fair. But there are ways to stop the taxes from being raised .

Helen -- how do you propose that Mr. Ryan's settlement be paid without raising the town taxes?

 



Town owns Boggs property , if there are no conditions on the sell of this property, sell it !

Now Parkers Runn needs a play area for residents , to keep their children off the street . The HOA that they have been paying into should have enough cash to buy it.

second  ideal is to lease it out ,  the town must already have insurance on it , I don't see any no trespassing signs ( who ever does lease it must also carry their own insurance too! ( lease to buy deal )


Property is still in town , town still has the right to decide what use , taxes are paid on it ,  have new buyer pay all fees

Last edited on Tue May 13th, 2008 10:50 pm by Helen here

gordo
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 11th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 285
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 13th, 2008 06:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Now even you MUST admit Pam Thornburg went out of her way to convince the Council to fire Ryan

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 13th, 2008 06:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Helen here wrote: It will be Cheswold tax payers that will have to pay the cost and that is just not fair. But there are ways to stop the taxes from being raised .

Helen -- how do you propose that Mr. Ryan's settlement be paid without raising the town taxes?

 

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 12th, 2008 10:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Get it straight it was not this council who made the contract !!!!!!!!!!!!!

You will find that Pam and Nancy got their information from the the Government's legal counsel .

So it was a wrong call ! as it was wrong call to allow ryan to be hired .

It will be Cheswold tax payers that will have to pay the cost and that is just not fair. But there are ways to stop the taxes from being raised .

It will take community efforts.  You are a whole town ,think like one.

Legal fees and pay out have mounted and you will find that the town will pull through

You remember my slogan

Surviving our past Striving for our future


Government divine intervention will take place




 


Last edited on Tue May 13th, 2008 01:59 pm by Helen here

gordo
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 11th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 285
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 12th, 2008 10:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Let's put to rest for good a statement that always is made.  The council thought Mr. Ryan's contract was invalid.  They NEVER thought that because it was their contract and iof it was invalid they made it, not Mr. Ryan. 

State Representative Pam Thornburg decided she could get some good publicity out of it and came up with a stupid plan for the council to get out of the contract and Mr. Ryan shot her down good.  It was Pam Thornburg who caused us to have this big bill.  If it wasn't for her convincing the council to fire Mr. Ryan he would still be our Town Manager and we would be rich instead of poor like we are now and will be for a long time.

Last edited on Mon May 12th, 2008 10:24 pm by gordo

Another Opinion
Member
 

Joined: Thu Oct 4th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 38
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun May 11th, 2008 03:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am very concerned for the residents of the town.  Right now the town council should be in the midst of preparing a budget for the next fiscal year.  Why is it that the mayor sees only an increase in property taxes as a solution to making good on a settlement with Mr. Ryan?  Why not, for example effect a significant reduction in the town's expenses for the coming year in order to be able to make the required payments?  For example, I would guess that one police officer's salary and benefits would cover the cost of payments on the proposed loan.  So, why not lay-off one town officer?  For that matter, why not eliminate the entire police dept because the town doesn't need a police dept, and just write Mr. Ryan a check? 

It bothers me that the town council or at least the mayor, who seems to be running the town and dictating policy to the council, only looks to increase taxes when many people are already not doing so well financially.  High gasoline and heating fuel costs, rising grocery costs, everything else is rising so the mayor believes that it is appropriate to increase taxes, too.  The people need some relief from this thinking.  The town needs to reduce its spending elsewhere in order to be able to afford the payments on a loan without increasing taxes.

Observant
Member
 

Joined: Mon Dec 5th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 1652
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun May 11th, 2008 02:23 am
 Quote  Reply 
Every voter in the town needs to reserve June 3 on their calendar to go and vote against the town obtaining a loan to pay off the settlement agreement.   You do notice, I take it, that your opinion was not solicited on whether or not to settle that lawsuit with the former town manager, but now you are being asked to pay the bill that arose from that settlement.   Let mayor tinari find a way to get the money from the people who created that problem.    Vote NO!

Last edited on Sun May 11th, 2008 02:24 am by Observant

Olive
Member


Joined: Mon Nov 6th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 144
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 10th, 2008 01:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I do not need for the town to be raising my property tax bill.  I am just able to make ends meet now and I do not want to pay a higher tax bill to the town that provides no service for the tax that we do pay now.  I will be there to vote no about a loan.

Last edited on Sat May 10th, 2008 01:03 pm by Olive

Another Opinion
Member
 

Joined: Thu Oct 4th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 38
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 11:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I was not able to get to the town meeting. When the mayor says raise taxes by $30.00 does he mean a $30.00 surcharge on every property tax bill or does he mean a higher tax rate that would cause an average property tas bill to increase by $30.00? It does make a difference. He probably is not smart enough to realize that. Yet.

in the knome
Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 28th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 41
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 05:22 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Midol,  Tylenol and or alcohol are my suggestions.


 

Zymergy
Member


Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Middletown, Delaware USA
Posts: 1164
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 05:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Good gracious look at the size of that font....

Attachment: maxine9.jpg (Downloaded 173 times)

Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 04:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mayor Donald Tinari is proposing the town raise taxes by $30 a year for two years to generate enough cash for the loan payments. He believes a rebound in the housing market will boost town revenue after two years.

 

***Guess he has a crystal ball that can look into the future now...***




Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 04:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cheswold looks at borrowing money needed to pay Ryan

CHESWOLD, Del. (AP) Town officials in Cheswold are asking voters for the authority to borrow the $250,000 owed to former Town Manager Edward Ryan in a breach of contract settlement.

Town attorney Ron Poliquin says the town must either borrow the money to pay Ryan in full, or pay him in installments that would carry a 17 percent interest rate.

Mayor Donald Tinari is proposing the town raise taxes by $30 a year for two years to generate enough cash for the loan payments. He believes a rebound in the housing market will boost town revenue after two years.

Citizens will vote on the borrowing authority question in a referendum June 3.

Information from: Delaware State News, http://www.newszap.com

OnlyMe
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: Tuvalu
Posts: 439
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 03:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Technically, according to this public forum's rules of Free Civil Speech, people are allowed to express their opinions on LOCAL ISSUES. Town employees sex lives can in no way be considered a local issue and any comments regarding this should not be put forth here. Personal attacks and bullying are not permitted. What I have observed are personal attacks against others for no other reason that to bully them or shame them. This is high-tech grade school note passing gone wrong and should not be tolerated.

Zymergy
Member


Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Middletown, Delaware USA
Posts: 1164
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 02:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
OnlyMe wrote: This blog is rife with slander, defamation and libelous statements. ...
That can only be true if those statemets are false, correct?

OnlyMe
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: Tuvalu
Posts: 439
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 01:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog#Defamation_or_liability

Defamation or liability
Several cases have been brought before the national courts against bloggers concerning issues of defamation or liability. The courts have returned with mixed verdicts. Internet Service Providers (ISPs), in general, are immune from liability for information that originates with Third Parties (U.S. Communications Decency Act and the EU Directive 2000/31/EC).

In John Doe v. Patrick Cahill, the Delaware Supreme Court held that stringent standards had to be met to unmask anonymous bloggers, and also took the unusual step of dismissing the libel case itself (as unfounded under American libel law) rather than referring it back to the trial court for reconsideration. In a bizarre twist, the Cahills were able to obtain the identity of John Doe, who turned out to be the person they suspected: the town's mayor, Councilman Cahill's political rival. The Cahills amended their original complaint, and the mayor settled the case rather than going to trial.[13]

In 2004, eight Royal Dutch Shell Group companies collectively obtained an "Interim Injunction and Restraining Order" in Malaysia against a Shell whistleblower and former employee, Dr John Huong, a Malaysian geologist. Dr Huong had allegedly posted defamatory material on a weblog hosted in North America, royaldutchshellplc.com. The weblog site was owned and operated by British national and long-term Shell critic, Alfred Donovan. Additional legal actions were initiated against Dr Huong in 2006 in response to publications on Donovan's weblog sites in 2005 and 2006. Those actions included a "Notice to Show Cause" relating to a "contempt of court," which was potentially punishable by imprisonment.[citation needed]

In January 2007, two prominent Malaysian political bloggers, Jeff Ooi and Ahiruddin Attan were sued by pro-government newspaper, The New Straits Times Press (Malaysia) Berhad, Kalimullah bin Masheerul Hassan, Hishamuddin bin Aun and Brenden John a/l John Pereira over an alleged defamation. The plaintiff was supported by the Malaysian government. [14] Following the suit, the Malaysian government proposed to "register" all bloggers in Malaysia in order to better control parties against their interest. [15] This is the first such legal case against bloggers in the country.

In Britain, a college lecturer contributed to a blog in which she referred to a politician (who had also expressed his views in the same blog) using various uncomplimentary names, including referring to him as a "Nazi". The politician found out the real name of the lecturer (she wrote under a pseudonym) via the ISP and successfully sued her for £10,000 in damages and £7,200 costs.[16]

In the United States blogger Aaron Wall was sued by Traffic Power for defamation and publication of trade secrets in 2005.[17] According to Wired Magazine, Traffic Power had been "banned from Google for allegedly rigging search engine results."[18] Wall and other "white hat" search engine optimization consultants had exposed Traffic Power in what they claim was an effort to protect the public. The case was watched by many bloggers because it addressed the murky legal question of who's liable for comments posted on blogs.[19]

OnlyMe
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: Tuvalu
Posts: 439
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 01:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
This blog is rife with slander, defamation and libelous statements. The person being slandered is NOT an elected official and has every right to sue the anonymous coward poster/s for such slander. In case anyone forgot, the mayor of a neighboring town was successfully sued for similar postings leveled against his next door neighbor.

You have absolutely no rights when it comes to smearing other people on the internet. You are NOT anonymous and hopefully will be sued for spreading disgusting rumors; not to mention how spiteful, juvenile, vengeful and immature you look doing so.

tell all
Member
 

Joined: Wed Apr 12th, 2006
Location: Past Council I Am
Posts: 248
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 12:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Post Master General wrote: Stress Free: 

You are entitled to your opinion as am I.   

did I mention that she also had a loaded gun at her side and children were present.....

 

If  you were present , and acting the way you have in the past , it was probably a good thing to have it handy.

Last edited on Fri May 9th, 2008 12:41 pm by tell all

in the knome
Member
 

Joined: Mon Apr 28th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 41
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 05:59 am
 Quote  Reply 
I wonder if 'Sleeping with  the enemy" applies in the matter between these two ?

SF I agree with you .

As Judge Judy would say .

You made your choice , now deal with it.

If you are trying to wake up a sleeping dog , it will be your fault when you get bit .

Last edited on Fri May 9th, 2008 05:18 pm by in the knome

Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 02:48 am
 Quote  Reply 
Stress Free: 

You are entitled to your opinion as am I.  

People get laughed at daily and to be honest with you I am fine with it.  But I will tell you this E. Rosario is not the only complaint that has been handled by the AGs office about out little lady officer.  Yes that is correct there is another one involving herself and I that took place at my home while she was both on duty and in uniform oh and did I mention that she also had a loaded gun at her side and children were present.....Never once was she put on leave or was any action taken while the DSP Domestic Violence Unit was investigating the matter, which took place for almost 2 months........I have the letter from the AGs office clearing both of us from this matter, but the point is that she feels as though she is above the law and that chief and one or two members of council have her back no matter what she does.   And yet she still has the nerve to spread rumors about me being the guilty party and that because of her, charges were not pressed against me.  I guess the AGs office sends out different letters to each party involved telling them what they want to hear.........

How many years did people trash her on this here blog speaking untruths and yet when I have but only truths to say about her they get deleted off by the Forum Supervisor, Come On.......

 

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 9th, 2008 01:21 am
 Quote  Reply 
I also have heard all of the rumors about this person showing explicit material of herself with another to one of the individual's now sueing the town. I believe the person could push for sexual harrassment suit if they wanted too.

I am not the POST MASTER GENERAL, but I will not keep my mouth shut when I feel we are all being treated in rudely & talked down to like we have no brains. IF I had my way the town would be desolved.

You all run around in your little clicks, sent your little spys around after the meeting to see what different groups of people were discussing.

Half the time the council members would not even look up when talking, and when someone from the back said they could not hear what the mayor was saying when reading off the minutes, etc. Did any one of you bother to pick up the mic and use it when reading off this information from the last meeting. NO!!!
You guys are all just a bunch of puppets for the mayor & seem to forget it is not him that you all work for but the TOWN'S CITIZENS. The mayor may think he knows everything, but he does not.

Oh, and about the guy checking up on zoning and permits etc, maybe town hall should be check for all of it's violations, that building needs to be condemned.

What is with all the crap dumped behind the town hall and the fire house, you all should be ashamed of yourselves. Is that cheswold's new trash dump?


stress free
Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 9th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 182
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 11:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
PMG

You are acting like a woman scorned.

Many on here know about the personal life of you and the lady officer.

Though I do believe and know there is a" Blue Wall " where police protect their own, you are crossing a line.

You are making yourself look like laughing stock, Your comment can't be taken with out proof. If this officer is doing as you say you need to to find  different avenues of proving your points.

I;m not saying you are being untruthful , but you must understand if you knew of things that were going on behind the scenes about this officer's that were not appropriate ( causing harm to the town and it's residents ) along with other people then if it was that bad now and must have been  having the same affect then.

You as an adult and council member during your relationship with the officer should have not kept it to your self.

Then was the time , unless you can prove your allegations suck it up and go on with your personal life.





 

Last edited on Fri May 9th, 2008 01:07 am by stress free

Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 11:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
See what did I tell you about "Knowing the right person" gets you what you want.

 

 

jwolfe
Administrator
 

Joined: Sun Dec 11th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 352
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 10:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
COMMENT REMOVED
 
From the webmaster: Based on a report from a forum member, we have deleted a comment that violated our guidelines. Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
 
We believe that the public forum gives everyone a chance to express their opinions on local issues. If citizens disagree, we expect them to disagree without being disagreeable.
 
Each registered member has agreed to keep his or her comments within the bounds of fair play. Controversial opinions are acceptable, but personal attacks on private individuals, name-calling and profanity are not welcome here.
 
We hope individuals will speak to issues and not engage in personal attacks or “bullying” of other members. If the latter occurs and a complaint is sent to webmaster@newszap.com, members may have their registrations immediately withdrawn and be asked to seek out a different website to express themselves. (In each case, please identify the forum, the topic and the time and date of the posting that you feel violate the guidelines.)
 
While this action might be considered drastic, we believe the step is necessary to preserve our “free speech with civility” mission.

Post Master General
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 392
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 08:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Guess those walls in Town Hall really are Paper Thin........Funny how people will say one thing to ones face and than another behind there backs.......

All I have to say is this town is rounding the bend to complete the 360 - Since I'm not a member of the "Group" anymore, I believe that gives me the right to say what I want when I want, That must be what gets under Mr. T's skin anytime I talk in front of the Town. Funny how others are saying the same thing that I said and yet I am still getting accused of posting on here under different names.

Number1mom, I don't even know who you are but people seem to think that I am you. Just thought that I should clear the air, I have no reason to post under other names. Trust me, when I have things to say, I want people to know who it came from. I believe this post will confirm that statement.

With that being said.....I want people to see what really goes on and how one problem leads into another by the actions of employees in this town and yet they expect the Towns People to pay for there mistakes with money out of our pockets. One of the reasons the town is being sued by a former employee is because of a complaint that he made about this same person using the computer for "other things" not related to the job. I am not here saying that any of those remarks were true but the point of the matter is that the town is paying money to fight this suit and yet she is still making comments that are not appropriate and using the town computer for personal use while on duty. And yet nothing is done.....Can someone please try and figure this out or is it going to be referred to as "Knowing the Right Person in the Right Place" ???? Hasn't there been a new law recently put into effect about employees of the town persuading voters.......Maybe that was just Smyrna.

number1mom
Member


Joined: Wed May 7th, 2008
Location: Cheswold, Delaware USA
Posts: 21
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 02:35 am
 Quote  Reply 
PLEASE do not forget to mention about the other suits still out there, are we going to be settling them also then asked to vote on a larger loan. All I see coming is more money coming out of our citizens pockets at a very bad economical time -- People are being layed off and senior citizens and the disabled all live on fixed incomes-- Some of us are barely keeping the lights on and a town that does nothing for us wants more money from our pockets.............

We should have the option to vote for the town to file for bankruptcy, not just for a loan.

and I am not surprised at how people were treated last night, Tell your nieghbors to vote NO to the loan.....

I have a feeling more people will be attending more of these meetings including the so called secret weekly meetings, (heard through the grapevine),

I believe everything should be done within full citizens view and input.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 729
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 06:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News: Cheswold to vote June 3 on loan

By Ali Cheeseman


Delaware State News


CHESWOLD — Cheswold residents will vote June 3 on whether the town can take out a commercial loan for $250,000 to pay a legal settlement with the former town manager.


In March the town settled with Edward J. Ryan after the state Supreme Court ruled there was a breach of contract between the two parties.


During a public hearing Tuesday, town council provided the crowd of about 40 residents with information on the loan that has to be voted on in June, according to the town’s charter's "long term borrowing" section.


"If the town is allowed to borrow the money, then it can pay the full settlement without any interest," town attorney Ron Poliquin said. "If it’s paid up front, then it eliminates a large sum of money."


According to the court’s ruling the town must pay the entire settlement by June 27 or pay three installment by Jan. 2, 2009, with a 17-percent interest rate added.


"They’re going to get it out of our hide one way or another," Cheswold Mayor Donald Tinari said.


The town is considering a 10-year loan with a fixed 6.5-percent interest rate for the first five years, he said, which would work out to a $36,000 payment each year for the town.


However, the town is currently not taking in enough money to pay the additional expense, with $542,000 in income and an expected $586,000 per year in operating expenses with the addition of the loan payment.


Mayor Tinari proposed a solution.


"Raising taxes $30 a year, then drop it back off in two years when the houses start selling again," Mayor Tinari said. "It would work out to 60 cents a week to keep the town on track."


Some residents were skeptical of relying on the housing market, but the mayor asserted his confidence in the economy.


"As managers we have to forecast and know that this country always bounces back," he said.


If town residents decide to vote against borrowing the money, then the town will have to figure out another way to pay off the settlement.


"Believe me, no one wanted to give (Mr. Ryan) money," Councilwoman Jamie Basler said. "It was agonizing for everyone involved.


"No matter what is decided it will come out of the taxes."


Mr. Ryan served on council before signing a five-year contract to work as the town’s manager full-time, but sued the town when he was fired by a majority vote of council.


Council contended that his contract was illegal, since a charter change to eliminate a one-year waiting period for a council member to assume a paid position had not been signed by Gov. Ruth Ann Minner before he took the job, although it had already passed the General Assembly.


"The basic premise the judge took was that our action was what we were going to do in the first place," said Councilman Robert Sine, the only council member still in office from when Mr. Ryan was manager.


He also was the only council member to vote against Mr. Ryan’s termination in the 3-1 vote, with one member abstaining.


"This town and this community inherited these problems," Mr. Poliquin said. "Now we’re just trying to address these problems. We want to give the town of Cheswold a clear slate to go forward with, but we have to deal with the consequences of the past."


Post your opinions in the public issues forum at newszap.com.


Staff writer Ali Cheeseman can be reached at 741-8250 or acheeseman@newszap.com.

gordo
Member
 

Joined: Sat Aug 11th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 285
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 6th, 2008 09:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Heh, Heh, Heh!!!!!

Gringo Honeymooner
Member


Joined: Thu Jun 7th, 2007
Location: Las Nalgas Grandes
Posts: 66
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 16th, 2008 02:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 


I don't see no smile yet

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 3762
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 16th, 2008 02:04 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Now ryan have the cash?

oop!
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 10th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 720
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 08:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Ryanville ?  Ryanwold ? Chesryan ? Edville ? Edwold ?

Maybe they can sell that piece of land next to Shore Stop ,

Then they could have one of those 300, 000.00 homes in Parker Run donated to them and sell it.

Or there is the option of laying off two of the  town's paid employees .

Maybe sell the spin on dime lawn mower .

Hell have a yard sale and cake bake.

Put on a show


 


Runnerman
Member


Joined: Sun Dec 4th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 560
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 05:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Observant wrote: gordo wrote: You still keep embarrasing yourself by making statments without fact.  The trial is going on because Ryan wants it to go on.  It is a well known fact Ryan will not settle out of courtr because his case is so strong.  He wants a jujry to decide his  case.  Why don't you understand that - pehaps you are one still sticking theire head in the dsand.
An article in today's Dover Post indicated that Mr. Ryan's attorney Mr. Neuberger had submitted their "fianl offer" of settlement for $350,000 to the town council   In a remark attributed to Mr. Ryan's other attorney, Mr. LaRossa, he expects that a jury trial would produce an award of some $1,500,000.    Certainly makes one wonder why a $350k settlement offer would be submitted ahead of a $1.5 Million jury award.    I will have to buy a ticket to this trial.

Appears that Ryan didn't have the courage of his convictions. He probably would have won zero in a court trial.

Somehow even if a jury trial resulted in a large reward, the town does not have the ability to pay it without breaking the poor taxpaying residents of this pathetic little hamlet.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 655
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 1st, 2008 05:07 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Observant wrote: gordo wrote: You still keep embarrasing yourself by making statments without fact.  The trial is going on because Ryan wants it to go on.  It is a well known fact Ryan will not settle out of courtr because his case is so strong.  He wants a jujry to decide his  case.  Why don't you understand that - pehaps you are one still sticking theire head in the dsand.
An article in today's Dover Post indicated that Mr. Ryan's attorney Mr. Neuberger had submitted their "fianl offer" of settlement for $350,000 to the town council   In a remark attributed to Mr. Ryan's other attorney, Mr. LaRossa, he expects that a jury trial would produce an award of some $1,500,000.    Certainly makes one wonder why a $350k settlement offer would be submitted ahead of a $1.5 Million jury award.    I will have to buy a ticket to this trial.

Appears that Ryan didn't have the courage of his convictions. He probably would have won zero in a court trial.

Last edited on Tue Apr 1st, 2008 05:08 pm by Two Cents

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 729
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 1st, 2008 04:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:  Town settles suit for $300K

Cheswold’s ex-manager claimed breach of contract


By Ali Cheeseman


Delaware State News


CHESWOLD — Cheswold recently settled a two-year-old lawsuit with former Town Manager Edward J. Ryan for a six-figure sum after the Delaware Supreme Court ruled there were grounds for a civil trial.


The lawsuit was settled out of court a couple of weeks ago, Mr. Ryan’s attorney, Thomas S. Neuberger of Wilmington, said Monday, with the town agreeing to pay $300,000.


"The case was settled to the mutual satisfaction of all parties," Mr. Neuberger said.


Another of Mr. Ryan’s attorneys, John LaRosa, said town officials admitted no wrongdoing and settled the claim to avoid further expense and cost.


He said Mr. Ryan looks forward to continuing his career in public service in Milton, N.H.


Mr. Ryan, who had served as a councilman before signing a five-year contract to work as the town’s manager, sued the town and three council members who voted to fire him.


The General Assembly approved a town charter change on Jan. 27, 2005, eliminating a one-year waiting period before a resigning Cheswold council member could be hired as town manager.


But council contended Mr. Ryan had assumed the job 13 days before Gov. Ruth Ann Minner signed the bill into law on Feb. 9, making it an illegal contract.


Mr. Ryan filed a suit in May 2006 that he later dropped, only to refile seven months later


The Delaware Supreme Court ruled in February that the case could go to trial, allowing both Mr. Ryan’s breach-of-contract and his retaliation claims to be presented to a jury. That trial that was scheduled for March 24.


But the case was settled before the set date.


Once all the paperwork is signed by both parties, Mr. Neuberger said, the town will have 10 business days to make a down payment of $50,000 to Mr. Ryan.


After that, the remainder of the balance must be paid by June 27 without added interest, Mr. Neuberger said, or three payments on June 27, Oct. 3 and Jan. 2, 2008, must be made with quarterly 7-percent interest added.


"I don’t know what it’s going to happen with the town," Cheswold Mayor Donald Tinari said. "The town will be under the burden to take care of it."


Council wants to schedule a public hearing to discuss the settlement with residents and possible methods to come up with the funds.


After the hearing, a special election will be held to vote on what solution will work best for the town, he said.


Post your opinions in the public issues forum at newszap.com.

Staff writer Ali Cheeseman can be reached at 741-8250 or acheeseman@newszap.com.

bigbear from the north
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 2nd, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 969
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 1st, 2008 03:54 pm