| Author | Post |
|---|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 02:14 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: I prefer a level playing field.
What does that mean it PTG speak?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 02:13 am |
|
| I prefer a level playing field.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 01:06 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: I will then tell you to stop making personal attacks on posters. Attack the issue, attack the method, attack the substance. I am abrasive, demanding, questioning, and obnoxious. I attack what I believe is wrong and defend what I believe to be right.
I couldn't agree with you more. You are abrasive, demanding, questioning, and obnoxious. Apparently you are so confident in your beliefs that you feel okay about being rude and nasty to those who disagee with you. I offered to discuss issues with you once and you couldn't handle it.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:51 am |
|
| I will then tell you to stop making personal attacks on posters. Attack the issue, attack the method, attack the substance. I am abrasive, demanding, questioning, and obnoxious. I attack what I believe is wrong and defend what I believe to be right.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:45 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Playing the Game wrote: I am politely asking you to stick to discussing topics and not individual posters. It's your choice Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
Really? You believe you do have a talent for provoking? Maybe I judged you too harshly. Maybe you should try again.
I don't believe I have ever known you to be polite. You are superficial and biased, but not polite.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:43 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: I am politely asking you to stick to discussing topics and not individual posters. It's your choice Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
Really? You believe you do have a talent for provoking? Maybe I judged you too harshly. Maybe you should try again.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:40 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Now Terrance that is a personal and profane attack on another poster. Please stick to opinions on issues, not personalities.
Terrance wrote:
aflyonthewall wrote: I thought this was an interesting comparison. In answer to the question, "If your (you're) still thinking about voting for Obama; I have a question for you...." The answer at the bottom of the picture was "Is your head up your *ss?" http://www.obamacures.com I had to edit the profanity so the webmaster would not remove.
What a pathetic posting. There's no doubt about where your head is at.
Please explain?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:28 am |
|
Is the religious "left" the Unitarian Universalist Church? I always thought it would be interesting to attend services that begin their prayers with "To whom it may concern".
Fred wrote:
I know this is a hard concept for some to understand, but religious does not necessarily have to be equated to the right....they did a pretty good job of convincing a lot of you, however. There are religious centrists and the religious left, and none of them have a monopoly on God.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 12:02 am |
|
Now Terrance that is a personal and profane attack on another poster. Please stick to opinions on issues, not personalities.
Terrance wrote:
aflyonthewall wrote: I thought this was an interesting comparison. In answer to the question, "If your (you're) still thinking about voting for Obama; I have a question for you...." The answer at the bottom of the picture was "Is your head up your *ss?" http://www.obamacures.com I had to edit the profanity so the webmaster would not remove.
What a pathetic posting. There's no doubt about where your head is at.
|
aflyonthewall
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 28 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 11:42 pm |
|
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Obama_Pays_Female_Staff_/2008/07/01/108863.html?s=al&promo_code=654C-1
|
They are all the same
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 7th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 551 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 11:31 pm |
|
| Terrance, it is quite obvious that his head is not anywhere near Obama's. Take off your blinders. Obama is a flip-flopping, left wing liberal radical in sheep's clothing. He's like a chameleon - keeps changing. However, I will have to say that his flip-flopping (even though he doesn't really subscribe to the flip-flop) is more main stream. You see, even he recognizes that he is far left and that much of which he has been proposing is wrong..so, now he is changing his positions to those on which McCain has steadily campaigned.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 08:05 pm |
|
aflyonthewall wrote: I thought this was an interesting comparison. In answer to the question, "If your (you're) still thinking about voting for Obama; I have a question for you...." The answer at the bottom of the picture was "Is your head up your *ss?" http://www.obamacures.com I had to edit the profanity so the webmaster would not remove.
What a pathetic posting. There's no doubt about where your head is at.
|
aflyonthewall
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 28 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 07:28 pm |
|
I thought this was an interesting comparison. In answer to the question, "If your (you're) still thinking about voting for Obama; I have a question for you...." The answer at the bottom of the picture was "Is your head up your *ss?" http://www.obamacures.com I had to edit the profanity so the webmaster would not remove.
Attachment: upass.jpg.jpg (Downloaded 68 times) Last edited on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 07:47 pm by aflyonthewall
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1432 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:09 pm |
|
| Correct. No monopoly on God, or Satan for that matter, or Marx, or on the Gaia.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6578 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 05:55 pm |
|
| I know this is a hard concept for some to understand, but religious does not necessarily have to be equated to the right....they did a pretty good job of convincing a lot of you, however. There are religious centrists and the religious left, and none of them have a monopoly on God.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1432 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 05:37 pm |
|
Fred wrote: Okay, I'll be more specific...right wing evangelicals. Be it Hagee, Parsley, or Falwell, his sucking up to them bothers me greatly. I know what he is trying to accomplish, and I don't think he much of chance of pulling it off, but that bothers me.
Perhaps he would be better off remaining with the far left socialists (not quite communists but indeed Marxists) and the Bill Ayers/Bernadine Dohrn types thrown in with a Rezko or two. Better with the irreligious left than the religious right, correct Fred? After all, with Wright and Pfleger, Meeks that should serve as a "faithful" man and therefore need for any other clergy. Don't forget Rashid Khalidi.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6578 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 01:51 pm |
|
Okay, I'll be more specific...right wing evangelicals. Be it Hagee, Parsley, or Falwell, his sucking up to them bothers me greatly. I know what he is trying to accomplish, and I don't think he much of chance of pulling it off, but that bothers me.
|
Hartlyboy
Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 01:31 pm |
|
Compromised himself too often with the far right???! Spoken like a true lefty. Those of us moderates think he has compromised himself too often with the far left [aka Kennedy and crowd].
Anyway, we need Obama to give the country another glimpse of what the Democrats can really do when they are in control, and , if the country survives, the pendulum will swing back in the other direction in another 4-8 years. We have stumbled through a few centuries with this sort of back and forth and hopefully we'll continue the process, -though your man makes me wonder if the usual process can survive.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6578 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 12:13 pm |
|
Well, he is inexperienced, relatively speaking. McCain is also old, not so relatively speaking.
We do not elect a President very often on what he has done, but rather what we think he will do. There are exceptions, but they usually are of the George Washington/Dwight Eisenhower type. I get that both candidates records are somewhat spotty, and I get that Obama is backing off somewhat on his 16 months and out of Iraq (EXACTLY as I said he would do). This doesn't detract from his overall goal of ending the war relatively quickly, and I think it really shows that there isn't much of a differnce in the overall goal of getting the troops home as quick as possible as McCain does....The difference is that if McCain gets in and does it in 24 months, the Repubs can claim it as a "victory", regardless if the outcome is any different then if Obama does it.
I don't think Obama is my perfect candidate, but he is better than McCain. I think McCain would have done a much better job than President Bush, and I am sorry that the Republicans "swift boated" him 8 years ago, but I think he missed his chance. He doesn't seem to have the same edge and sharpness that he did back then, and he has compromised himself with too many on the far right.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 02:09 am |
|
Fred wrote: It would be a start, but only a start.
Just because a candidate voted for or against a "We Love Puppies Act" doesn't tell the whole story, and when you start getting into amendments, substitutes for amendments, amendments to amendments, procedure calls, it gets a bit more complicated. A Senator may or may not vote for the "We Love Puppies Act" for any number of political or procedural reasons, let alone that the act might have called for something that he didn't think reflect what it actually did (see "Patriot Act" for more details).
Those who jump to VR are the ones whose candidate is dead in the water. McBush's camp is trying every old ploy. They've tried "tax and spend", 'flip floper", "inexperienced", etc. McBush has nothing to recommend him. He has sold out so thoroughly that he no longer can rely on those who respected him for his independence.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6578 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 01:36 am |
|
It would be a start, but only a start.
Just because a candidate voted for or against a "We Love Puppies Act" doesn't tell the whole story, and when you start getting into amendments, substitutes for amendments, amendments to amendments, procedure calls, it gets a bit more complicated. A Senator may or may not vote for the "We Love Puppies Act" for any number of political or procedural reasons, let alone that the act might have called for something that he didn't think reflect what it actually did (see "Patriot Act" for more details).
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 01:28 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Please specify McCain's Critical Non - Votes, now compare them with Obama's............
Fred wrote:
Actually, other then a spate of NVs (which McCain also has) I generally agree with Obama's positions. Thanks!
Next we'll be reading tea leaves.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 7th, 2008 11:49 pm |
|
Please specify McCain's Critical Non - Votes, now compare them with Obama's............
Fred wrote:
Actually, other then a spate of NVs (which McCain also has) I generally agree with Obama's positions. Thanks!
Last edited on Mon Jul 7th, 2008 11:56 pm by Playing the Game
|
a fish out of water
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 41 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 7th, 2008 10:51 pm |
|
Bixby wrote: Those of you who support Barack Obama may be interested in examining his Senate voting record. After scrutiny, ask yourselves, sans political rhetoric, sound bytes, and campaign slogans, if you really support him and think that his record justifies him to be the CIC.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490
Thanks. This was helpful. I was swaying towards voting for Obama but see that his record (up till March or so of this year) told the real story. A lot of NV on the war, voted for immediate troop reduction. Troublesome votes on border patrol and votes such as these:
13/2008
Immigration Enforcement and Border Fence Amendment
S Amdt 4231
N
Amendment Adopted - Senate
(61 - 37)
06/06/2007
Denying Legal Status for Immigrants Convicted of Certain Crimes
S Amdt 1184
N
Amendment Rejected - Senate
(46 - 51)
06/06/2007
Law Enforcement Review of Z Visa Applications
S Amdt 1250
N
Amendment Adopted - Senate
(57 - 39)
06/06/2007
Barring Immigrants with Certain Criminal Histories
S Amdt 1333
Y
Amendment Adopted - Senate
(66 - 32)
No. I do not think I will vote for Obama.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6578 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 7th, 2008 06:48 pm |
|
| Actually, other then a spate of NVs (which McCain also has) I generally agree with Obama's positions. Thanks!
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 6th, 2008 01:28 pm |
|
Bixby wrote: Those of you who support Barack Obama may be interested in examining his Senate voting record. After scrutiny, ask yourselves, sans political rhetoric, sound bytes, and campaign slogans, if you really support him and think that his record justifies him to be the CIC.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490
If you take the time to examine McBush's record you will find that he has reversed himself on about everything in the last few years. Talk about flip flop.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1432 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 6th, 2008 12:57 pm |
|
Those of you who support Barack Obama may be interested in examining his Senate voting record. After scrutiny, ask yourselves, sans political rhetoric, sound bytes, and campaign slogans, if you really support him and think that his record justifies him to be the CIC.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 4th, 2008 02:15 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Effete.
Oh God no, not effete! Effete! Oh no!
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 4th, 2008 02:11 am |
|
| Effete.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 4th, 2008 01:56 am |
|
aflyonthewall wrote: terrance- you state that Obama and his wife have done more for this country than most. Please elaborate. I can't think of a thing that they have done for this country other than run for office. No notable legislation. His wife is not proud to be an American. What have they done?
I doubt that anything I could say would cause you to rethink your position, so why bother? When you make a statement like "His wife is not proud to be an American.", you demonstrate how honest you are and how serious your question is.
If I want to bang my head against a wall, I prefer to pick the wall.
|
Peekaboo
Member
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 239 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 11:30 pm |
|
I don't know what he's done either but I do know what he is going to do. He said so.
OBAMA SAYS: "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.... That's not leadership. That's not going to happen."
-Senator Barack Obama, Campaign Speech, May 2008
|
aflyonthewall
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 28 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 09:57 pm |
|
| terrance- you state that Obama and his wife have done more for this country than most. Please elaborate. I can't think of a thing that they have done for this country other than run for office. No notable legislation. His wife is not proud to be an American. What have they done?
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 07:42 pm |
|
Footloose wrote: Playing the Game wrote: I was simply referring to the posting styles of your current moniker and the old one. I look forward to the discourse.
Oh, man, please say it aint so! Is he really Taos Eddy? Bummer! Webmaster, stay alert.  Terrance. If you are not, accept my apology.
Footloose, I have already said I am not Taos Eddy. I don't even know who Taos Eddy is. Apparently the game Playing The Game likes to play is the disinformation game.
|
Footloose
Member
| Joined: | Tue Nov 22nd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 305 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 06:46 pm |
|
Playing the Game wrote: I was simply referring to the posting styles of your current moniker and the old one. I look forward to the discourse.
Oh, man, please say it aint so! Is he really Taos Eddy? Bummer! Webmaster, stay alert. Terrance. If you are not, accept my apology.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 06:29 pm |
|
| I was simply referring to the posting styles of your current moniker and the old one. I look forward to the discourse.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 05:33 pm |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Welcome back Eddy, we missed you..
This is your comment to me in another thread
-"Be careful about making people disappear".
Be careful about making people disappear in the context of simply imprisoning people and never giving them a legal hearing.
Context is everything. What kind of desperation cause one to take something out of context and use it for something entirely different?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 04:18 pm |
|
Welcome back Eddy, we missed you..
This is your comment to me in another thread
-"Be careful about making people disappear".
Last edited on Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 04:52 pm by Playing the Game
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 04:04 pm |
|
Playing the Game wrote: We could always Mirandize the enemy combatants before we capture them.
Tank had a thoughtful post, he got a thoughtful response. You get zip.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 03:35 pm |
|
| We could always Mirandize the enemy combatants before we capture them.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:48 pm |
|
Tank wrote: Terrance wrote: We have imprisoned some people who were not involved in terrorist activity.
Congress alone has the power to declare war and it hasn't.
Browsing thru past posts, I think that whether you have a formal declaration of war or not, it's plain to me that these guys couldn't care less. The war is against international terrorism wrought by radical Islamists. Please read.
We are fighting these people. They are very dangerous and they need to be eliminated.
My response that you quoted was to something else. I have been in a lengthy back and forth about whether or not the SC ruled correctly on the prisoners we are detaining.
Someone compared this to what we did with Japanese and German prisoners in WWII. I was explaining that was different because we were at war with other nations and we were functioning under the GCs. Since we are not at war with any other nation and since we claim that the GCs don't apply, we need to have a reasonable way to address the issue of prisoners. We simply can't hold them for the duration of the war as we did in WWII.
I agreed with the SC ruling because it made sure that anyone we imprisoned would have a basic hearing in which it was determined if there was just cause to imprison them. That seemed both fair and reasonable.
Not everyone being held was scooped up off a battlefield. There have been some people who were imprisoned simply because someone else reported something to us. In some cases that turned out to be incorrect and we held innocent people.
I don't understand why anyone would object to making sure that the people we had in prison were actual enemies.
|
Tank
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 305 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:16 pm |
|
Terrance wrote: We have imprisoned some people who were not involved in terrorist activity.
Congress alone has the power to declare war and it hasn't.
Browsing thru past posts, I think that whether you have a formal declaration of war or not, it's plain to me that these guys couldn't care less. The war is against international terrorism wrought by radical Islamists. Please read.
The Insyder wrote: © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
A refugee from the Muslim Middle East thinks he has discovered Islam's 20-point plan for conquering the United States by 2020 – a plan revealed in the latest issue of Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
Anis Shorrosh, author of ''Islam Revealed'' and ''The True Furqan,'' is a Christian Arab-American who emigrated from Arab-controlled Jerusalem in January 1967.
''The following is my analysis of Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020,'' Shorrosh says. ''Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?''
1. Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.
2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they fail to tell African-Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same, ''Abed.''
3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.
Is any of this sounding familiar to you ??
4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.
5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corporations or a controlling stock.
6. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41 percent of it comes from the Middle East.
7. Yell ''foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran'' anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.
8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. (Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?) Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way.
9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961).
Use no birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.
Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one can't legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.
Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2,000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide). Only a few ''sleeper cells'' have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil.
10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are currently 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the U.S. which teach loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. In January of 2002, Saudi Arabia’s Embassy in Washington mailed 4,500 packets of the Quran and videos promoting Islam to America's high schools – free of charge. Saudi Arabia would not allow the U.S. to reciprocate.
11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish ''Centers for Islamic studies'' with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education institutions.
12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists.
13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.
14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls.
15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America's justice system.
16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S., but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.
17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam.
18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media.
19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.
20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the U.S. by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.
Shorrosh is a member of the Oxford Society of Scholars, has traveled in 76 countries, and is a lecturer and producer of TV documentaries. ''Islam Revealed'' is a bestseller now in its eighth printing. His forthcoming 10th book, from which the 20-point plan is abridged, is titled ''Islam: A Threat or a Challenge.''
''The True Furqan'' is also available for viewing on Islam-Exposed.org. Shorrosh's new website is Focusing-on-Islam.com.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 02:11 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: You might want to check that out before you continue.
Enlighten me.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:52 am |
|
| You might want to check that out before you continue.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:46 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Sorry friend, but this is what you said,
"We have allowed ourselves to imprison people for a host of reasons and some of them were not involved in terrorism."
This was said in discussion about American policy in the current war on terrorism, which is a declared war by Congress.
I'm not your friend.
We have imprisoned some people who were not involved in terrorist activity.
Congress alone has the power to declare war and it hasn't.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:43 am |
|
Sorry friend, but this is what you said,
"We have allowed ourselves to imprison people for a host of reasons and some of them were not involved in terrorism."
This was said in discussion about American policy in the current war on terrorism, which is a declared war by Congress.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:37 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: I am politely asking you to stick to discussing topics and not individual posters. It's your choice Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
Really? You believe you do have a talent for provoking? Maybe I judged you too harshly. Maybe you should try again.
Let me see if I got this straight. After you called me an America hater a moment ago, you are asking me politely to what?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:34 am |
|
I am politely asking you to stick to discussing topics and not individual posters. It's your choice Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
Really? You believe you do have a talent for provoking? Maybe I judged you too harshly. Maybe you should try again.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:31 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
Really? You believe you do have a talent for provoking? Maybe I judged you too harshly. Maybe you should try again.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 1734 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:25 am |
|
Now that is a personal attack Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 974 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 3rd, 2008 01:14 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Obama gets upset when you talk about his ears Terrance.
Terrance wrote:
The nice thing about our country is that you don't have to cast your vote for anybody in particular. You can vote for McBush or Mickey Mouse or not at all.
You work so hard to provoke. Too bad you have no talent for it.
|
Current time is 10:17 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   |
|