Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Media Bias
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Habanero
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: DelMarVA, USA
Posts: 4822
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 05:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Interestingly enough (and definitely not surprising) CNN is trying to hush up what transpired.  The video clip was rather quickly, and very quietly, removed from the CNN website and the "journalist" is now on "leave."  Interesting indeed.

Unfortunately for CNN, the video is not going away, no matter how much even Google tries to hide it.

Cobra
Member


Joined: Tue Oct 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 520
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 08:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
CNN 'journalist' shows true colors
 
A truly amazing piece of audio
 
-- a CNN reporter (using that phrase very, very loosely) interviewing a man with his child, and seemingly personally offended that someone could actually criticize the government spending that's going on. She demonstrates her complete lack of understanding of history and instead reveals her pro-Obama views as she calls the protests 'anti-government,' 'anti-CNN' and the best for last... 'it's not family viewing.' Huh?  Transcript

Newshound
Member


Joined: Fri Dec 23rd, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1256
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 15th, 2009 07:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Have things turned? AdAge says media will maul Obama

The mainstream media have had a love affair with Barack Obama during the campaign and transition, many have observed — but the honeymoon may soon be over. That’s the view of the trade publication Advertising Age, which predicts that the media will inevitably begin shining a more critical light on the new president.

In an article headlined “Fading love affair: How the media will maul Obama,” Ad Age notes, “It’s been conventional wisdom for at least a year now that the media is ‘in the tank’ for Obama . . .

“But all political infatuations must come to an end — and already you can begin to see the media straining mightily to assert its ‘objectivity.’”

Ad Age cites an editorial in the Los Angeles Times, which was staunchly supportive of Obama during the campaign, pledging that the paper will “watch Obama, to hold him to his work, and to report back.”

And another Obama supporter, The New York Times, ran a story headlined: “Signs of trouble emerge in transition’s last days.”

The Ad Age article stated that Obama “so far continues to appear deeply competent and eerily disciplined. He just won’t cooperate with the media’s need for a narrative shift. But no matter. The media always finds a way.”

no one else
Member


Joined: Sun Dec 4th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 557
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 6th, 2009 01:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Allegations in Ann Coulter's latest blockbuster book, Guilty: “Liberal ‘Victims’ and their assault on America”— have reportedly gotten her banned for life by NBC. "We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," a "Today" show insider reportedly told Matt Drudge. Coulter’s website reports that her scheduled appearance on NBC's "Today" show has been cancelled. "I guess this ends the 'they just want to get ratings' argument about liberal media bias," comments Coulter. (Newsmax)

However, they welcomed, and still welcome, anyone critical of Bush and invite bashing by all guests.  The leftist double standard and their idea of a free speech.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 12:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What the guy who does it calls it is of no consequence; it is what we think of it.

ANY such attacks are despicable; the obvious historical reference of the lynching of blacks made it strike more chords, but it doesn't make it any worse, or better.

 

countrynow
Member
 

Joined: Wed Oct 8th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 588
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Oct 29th, 2008 12:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
With  the  Palin  effigy-  no  crime  was  committed  because  there  is  no  historical  precedent  for  violence  against  white  women  by  hanging.  Disgusting,  yes.  A  double  standard,  perhaps.  This  was  done  in  Oregon  with  an  Obama  effigy  and  the  homeowners  were  forced  to  remove  it  or  face  litigation.  The  guys  who  put  the  Palin  effigy  up  there  called  it  "an  installation  of  art."  I  call  it  despicable  and  completely  without  evidence  of  intelligence.  How  liberal  in  this  country  are  we  willing  to  go  to  justify  an  immoral  act  and  violation  of  human  decency? 

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 10:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Playing the Game wrote: But the "skinheads" only threatened to do what they wanted to do and they are in jail for hate crimes.  The Palin haters got a laugh and a chuckle and they actually hanged her in effigy?
The skinheads were plotting to kill someone. Even you can't be that stupid!

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 10:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
But the "skinheads" only threatened to do what they wanted to do and they are in jail for hate crimes.  The Palin haters got a laugh and a chuckle and they actually hanged her in effigy?

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 10:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Playing the Game wrote: Were they arrested and charged with a hate crime?
Not that I know of, but I am glad someone at least tried to expose them for the trash they are.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 10:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Were they arrested and charged with a hate crime?

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 05:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Helen here wrote: Strange how a Palin look a like dummy with noose around her neck hanging from a house is just a decoration , but had the dummy resembled Obama, it would have been a hate crime !

Double statndard again

http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/hanged-by-a-noose-palin-attacks-go-to-another-level/2008/10/28/1224955990851.html


Actually I heard the harshest criticism of this very action last night and it was given by Keith Olbermann. You can watch it here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#27408713

I don't know of anybody who approves of this trash. It was a disgraceful act.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Oct 28th, 2008 04:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Strange how a Palin look a like dummy with noose around her neck hanging from a house is just a decoration , but had the dummy resembled Obama, it would have been a hate crime !

Double standard again

http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/hanged-by-a-noose-palin-attacks-go-to-another-level/2008/10/28/1224955990851.html

Last edited on Tue Oct 28th, 2008 10:39 pm by Helen here

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 11:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/06/obama.colbert/index.html

Obama hit team strikes

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 11:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1612802

Now i uderstand the family of these two donated to Obama , and in the banking business.

What is going on here ?

http://nh.barackobama.com/page/group/LexingtonCountySouthCarolinaforObama

Last edited on Mon Oct 27th, 2008 11:28 pm by Helen here

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 09:28 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.politics/2008-09/msg03564.html

Maybe this guy will spead the wealth to send Obama disciples to school and let them run his country.


Now if he did get student loans and worked as he claimed , how in the hell did he pay them all back ? When it took him 17 years to pay off traffic tickets .


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2109211/posts

Last edited on Mon Oct 27th, 2008 09:36 pm by Helen here

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 09:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://savagepolitics.com/?page_id=326

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 09:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://wasteofmyoxygen.wordpress.com/2008/10/26/la-times-refuses-to-release-tape-of-barack-obama-admitting-close-ties-to-plo-terrorist-rashid-khalidi/

Not if this is not hiding the crap nothing is

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 04:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Helen here wrote: Dear theres a tape to prove it.

Look I believe in Civil rights  but I also believe in Civil responsibility too!

There has been no slaves I know of in the last 100 or so years , all Americans were given the right to vote , if they lost it for crimes committed that's their bad not mine.

There is honest work out there some seem to think they are to good to do, others depend on hand outs cause they can . Even some of the riches people in the country are taking money they don't deserve . It is time we all start giving back , but not in higher taxes to give to those who think the world owes them a favor for being born.

It's called working honestly for a living. Giving on your own not being forced to makes the coffee taste better.  




Then I guess you're really voting for Obama because the vast majority of people in this country will pay less taxes under his proposal than they will under McCain's.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Dear theres a tape to prove it.

Look I believe in Civil rights  but I also believe in Civil responsibility too!

There has been no slaves I know of in the last 100 or so years , all Americans were given the right to vote , if they lost it for crimes committed that's their bad not mine.

There is honest work out there some seem to think they are to good to do, others depend on hand outs cause they can . Even some of the riches people in the country are taking money they don't deserve . It is time we all start giving back , but not in higher taxes to give to those who think the world owes them a favor for being born.

It's called working honestly for a living. Giving on your own not being forced to makes the coffee taste better.  



Last edited on Mon Oct 27th, 2008 04:03 pm by Helen here

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Helen here wrote: http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/2001-interview-obama-explains-that-wealth-distribution-should-be-legislated/

 

You hear what you want to hear. As always.

We have been living through a massive redistribution of wealth in this country. It even predates the current President. Wealth has been concentrated more and more in the hands of fewer and fewer people. The middle class has been broken.

These actions were the result of legislative actions that enabled them to happen.

What would you call outsourcing and moving American industry offshore? These things did not just happen, they were enabled through legislation. How about needless industry subsidies and tax cuts? Who benefited most from these things.

It was doctrinal and ideological adherence to free market capitalism with the "market" regulating business practices, that have landed us in the mess we are in.

Only people with limited understanding and judgement fail to see this. They also see criticisms of what happened as being socialistic or communistic.

We need to fix a broken system. I'm not sure we can anytime soon and I think there is a lot of pain coming our way.

 

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/2001-interview-obama-explains-that-wealth-distribution-should-be-legislated/

 

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 01:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Playing the Game wrote: What makes you think it's partisan?
You need to say please.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 12:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What makes you think it's partisan?

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 04:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
Helen here wrote: http://www.youdecide2008.com/2008/10/07/strong-arming-the-media/

Trying to take away the freedoms again and again

You seem to know every partisan website out there.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:37 am
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.youdecide2008.com/2008/10/07/strong-arming-the-media/

Trying to take away the freedoms again and again

Habanero
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: DelMarVA, USA
Posts: 4822
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:25 am
 Quote  Reply 
Disgusted wrote: Sad to state, but yes, this is what passes for American journalism.  The editorial page/segment is now the whole paper/broadcast. 



You stated that perfectly, and I say that as someone who used to earn a living as a journalist/reporter. 

In fact I find that to be a part of my background that I downplay more than anything else, as it is a "profession" that currently rates even lower than trial lawyers.

And just as an aside, the prickliness of Biden when asked a question he doesn't like is not something new.  He took more than one attitude with me about questions I asked him as a reporter ---- more than 20 years ago.  And I wasn't the only one that got the "you're joking" treatment.  Back then it didn't make the national news because no one really gave a rat's rearend about a Senator from Delaware.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 03:21 am
 Quote  Reply 
http://gospelscoop.com/News/Reporter_Ask_Biden_if_Obama_is_a_Marxists

Disgusted
Member
 

Joined: Thu Sep 29th, 2005
Location: Dover
Posts: 708
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 01:37 am
 Quote  Reply 
Newshound wrote: Double standard
Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin interviewed with CNN’s Drew Griffin this week and the subject of Biden’s comments came up. Palin didn’t hold any punches, asking, “Why does Joe Biden get a pass on such a thing? Can you imagine if I would have said such a thing?... I think that we would have been hounded and held accountable...[Y]ou guys would have clobbered me.”
All Griffin could do was admit, “You’re right.” (Even Dan Rather conceded, “Certainly if Sarah Palin had said this it would be above the fold in most newspapers.”)
Later in the interview, Griffin did try to clobber Palin, and he lied in order to do it. “The press has been pretty hard on you,” he said. “The Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above’.”
Palin repeatedly pressed Griffin for a name—“Who wrote that one?” —but Griffin refused to supply it. The author, it turns out, is Byron York, a National Review contributor, but what he said was quite different from the way Griffin portrayed. York wrote, “Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or—or, well, all of the above. Palin, the governor of Alaska, has faced more criticism than any vice-presidential candidate since 1988, when Democrats and the press tore into Dan Quayle.” Clearly, this was not his opinion, but the media’s portrayal of her. This is what now passes as journalism?

Sad to state, but yes, this is what passes for American journalism.  The editorial page/segment is now the whole paper/broadcast. 

Right on, Byron York.

Helen here
Member


Joined: Sat Dec 31st, 2005
Location: Bug On The Wall, USA
Posts: 4539
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2008 01:26 am
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/biden_tv_interview/2008/10/26/144216.html?utm_medium=RSS

Guess Paline wasn't the only one who was blinded by the head lights , now was she ?

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 10:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Rolling on the floor laughing wrote: EarnestLi wrote: I have to give you credit on ignoring me fool.
   

Actually, I prefer your cartoons to what you would probably write. On the other hand, you're no match for the rabbit. I liked the rabbit.

Rolling on the floor laughing
Member


Joined: Fri Oct 24th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 48
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 08:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
EarnestLi wrote: I have to give you credit on ignoring me fool.
   

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 08:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cobra wrote: Neither does anyone else.  Take a hike.

I have to give you credit on ignoring me fool.

Cobra
Member


Joined: Tue Oct 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 520
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 06:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Neither does anyone else.  Take a hike.

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 06:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cobra wrote: Those Republicans you name are not doctrinaire conservatives just as many Democrats are not doctrinaire socialists.  Your post here, just like all the others, have no meaning and are a waste of bandwidth.  No one here likes you, except maybe 1 or 2, but you are overwhelmingly the most hated.  Take a hike!

I really don't care what you think of me.

Cobra
Member


Joined: Tue Oct 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 520
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 06:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Those Republicans you name are not doctrinaire conservatives just as many Democrats are not doctrinaire socialists.  Your post here, just like all the others, have no meaning and are a waste of bandwidth.  No one here likes you, except maybe 1 or 2, but you are overwhelmingly the most hated.  Take a hike!

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 05:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Newshound wrote: Double standard
Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin interviewed with CNN’s Drew Griffin this week and the subject of Biden’s comments came up. Palin didn’t hold any punches, asking, “Why does Joe Biden get a pass on such a thing? Can you imagine if I would have said such a thing?... I think that we would have been hounded and held accountable...[Y]ou guys would have clobbered me.”
All Griffin could do was admit, “You’re right.” (Even Dan Rather conceded, “Certainly if Sarah Palin had said this it would be above the fold in most newspapers.”)
Later in the interview, Griffin did try to clobber Palin, and he lied in order to do it. “The press has been pretty hard on you,” he said. “The Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above’.”
Palin repeatedly pressed Griffin for a name—“Who wrote that one?” —but Griffin refused to supply it. The author, it turns out, is Byron York, a National Review contributor, but what he said was quite different from the way Griffin portrayed. York wrote, “Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or—or, well, all of the above. Palin, the governor of Alaska, has faced more criticism than any vice-presidential candidate since 1988, when Democrats and the press tore into Dan Quayle.” Clearly, this was not his opinion, but the media’s portrayal of her. This is what now passes as journalism?

Palin has proved so distasteful to life long Republicans that you now here people named Eisenhower, Buckley and Goldwater endorsing Obama. Go spread your vile distortions to those stupid enough to believe you.

Newshound
Member


Joined: Fri Dec 23rd, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1256
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2008 04:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Double standard
Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin interviewed with CNN’s Drew Griffin this week and the subject of Biden’s comments came up. Palin didn’t hold any punches, asking, “Why does Joe Biden get a pass on such a thing? Can you imagine if I would have said such a thing?... I think that we would have been hounded and held accountable...[Y]ou guys would have clobbered me.”
All Griffin could do was admit, “You’re right.” (Even Dan Rather conceded, “Certainly if Sarah Palin had said this it would be above the fold in most newspapers.”)
Later in the interview, Griffin did try to clobber Palin, and he lied in order to do it. “The press has been pretty hard on you,” he said. “The Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above’.”
Palin repeatedly pressed Griffin for a name—“Who wrote that one?” —but Griffin refused to supply it. The author, it turns out, is Byron York, a National Review contributor, but what he said was quite different from the way Griffin portrayed. York wrote, “Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or—or, well, all of the above. Palin, the governor of Alaska, has faced more criticism than any vice-presidential candidate since 1988, when Democrats and the press tore into Dan Quayle.” Clearly, this was not his opinion, but the media’s portrayal of her. This is what now passes as journalism?

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 05:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Newshound wrote: EarnestLi wrote: There are so many here that seem to be advocating for a return to McCarthyism and witch hunts. They were all probably too young to remember Senator Joe. Either that or they were too stupid to understand how truly anti-American that really was.If you read the Verona Papers you might think that history vindicated Joe McCarthy.

Next you'll be telling us Hitler was just misunderstood.

Newshound
Member


Joined: Fri Dec 23rd, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 1256
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 03:57 pm
 Quote  Reply 
EarnestLi wrote: There are so many here that seem to be advocating for a return to McCarthyism and witch hunts. They were all probably too young to remember Senator Joe. Either that or they were too stupid to understand how truly anti-American that really was.If you read the Verona Papers you might think that history vindicated Joe McCarthy.

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 03:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
There are so many here that seem to be advocating for a return to McCarthyism and witch hunts. They were all probably too young to remember Senator Joe. Either that or they were too stupid to understand how truly anti-American that really was.

countrynow
Member
 

Joined: Wed Oct 8th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 588
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 
They are all the same wrote: I don't know.  Let me think about what really is or really not American. 

Is refusing to place your hand over your heart while pledging allegance to the flag American or Anti-American?

Is refusing to wear a flag pin on your lapel American or anti-American?

Is saying that this is the first time in your adult life that you have been proud to be an American - American or anit-American?

Is attending a church for 20 years in which the pastor preaches "God d**n America" - American or anti-American?

I will do the American thing and let you decide.

I think it is every bit anti-American and the media is so biased and liberal that they would like to see America d**ned.

VOTE MCCAIN.  Let us not make the mistake once again of voting a man into office who will not keep America strong.  Remember Carter.  We all hung our heads in shame when every night our blindfolded hostages were paraded before the world while held hostage in Iran.  That is when Night Line was started.  Every night we were reminded that we were the whimps of the world.  It took the election of President Reagan to restore our dignity and strength.

AGREED.  Thank  You  for  reminding  us.  History  is  destined  to  repeat  itself  unless  we  remember  the  past.


 

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:43 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bixby wrote: EarnestLi wrote: Bixby, where have you been. This blog is full of disgraceful, filthy statements by those opposed to Obama.An exaggeration to be sure.  Show me one that rises to the level as the Stewart expletive. 

Read the post immediately below yours.

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 2354
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:39 am
 Quote  Reply 
EarnestLi wrote: Bixby, where have you been. This blog is full of disgraceful, filthy statements by those opposed to Obama.An exaggeration to be sure.  Show me one that rises to the level as the Stewart expletive. 

They are all the same
Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 698
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:28 am
 Quote  Reply 
I don't know.  Let me think about what really is or really not American. 

Is refusing to place your hand over your heart while pledging allegance to the flag American or Anti-American?

Is refusing to wear a flag pin on your lapel American or anti-American?

Is saying that this is the first time in your adult life that you have been proud to be an American - American or anit-American?

Is attending a church for 20 years in which the pastor preaches "God d**n America" - American or anti-American?

I will do the American thing and let you decide.

I think it is every bit anti-American and the media is so biased and liberal that they would like to see America d**ned.

VOTE MCCAIN.  Let us not make the mistake once again of voting a man into office who will not keep America strong.  Remember Carter.  We all hung our heads in shame when every night our blindfolded hostages were paraded before the world while held hostage in Iran.  That is when Night Line was started.  Every night we were reminded that we were the whimps of the world.  It took the election of President Reagan to restore our dignity and strength.

Last edited on Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:42 am by They are all the same

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 12:24 am
 Quote  Reply 
Bixby wrote: Fred wrote: Cobra wrote: There you go again. You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week, and the rest of the campaign.No, it wouldn't, because it is done all the time.Yeah, by the Democrat bloggers and usual suspects.  You don't hear about it because I know of no Republican or conservative comedian.  Other than Dennis Miller, I know of no others, and he didn't come up with a remark like that.

 

Bixby, where have you been. This blog is full of disgraceful, filthy statements by those opposed to Obama.

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 2354
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 11:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Fred wrote: Cobra wrote: There you go again. You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week, and the rest of the campaign.No, it wouldn't, because it is done all the time.Yeah, by the Democrat bloggers and usual suspects.  You don't hear about it because I know of no Republican or conservative comedian.  Other than Dennis Miller, I know of no others, and he didn't come up with a remark like that.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 09:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cobra wrote: There you go again. You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week, and the rest of the campaign.


No, it wouldn't, because it is done all the time.

As far as I can tell, it did create a small amount of buzz, but he was a comic performing in front of an audience, and it was a laugh line. And, quite frankly, I agree with him...for her to say the things was wrong, and she basically said so herself....so, I guess Stewart was correct in being offended.

The problem is that the right wing has been very good at the whole "real America" bit, implying that if you don't agree with them that you are not one....but most politicians and pundits were smart enough to make it a bit more subtle than that.

It is like that idiot congresswoman who called for investigations into anti-American legislators, and then  tried to plead she didn't know what she was getting into when she went on a show called...."Hardball". Let's ignore the fact that she is a minor-league media whore on her own, with 30 apperances on the various talk shows....what did she expect, a review of the Phillies-Rays series?

 

Excellent game last night, by the way.  I have to get up at 5, so I hate staying up that late...but well worth it.

EarnestLi
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 605
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Cobra wrote: There you go again. You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week, and the rest of the campaign.

Can you imitate someone else other than RR every now and then. Diversity is the spice of life.

Cobra
Member


Joined: Tue Oct 24th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 520
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 
There you go again. You can bet if a prominent McCain supporter had said “Expletive you, Obama,” if would be the MSM’s lead story that day, the week, and the rest of the campaign.

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What is your point? I've heard expletives used by people on all 4 of the people on the national ticket?

He doesn't like Palin; does that surprise you? He was deeply offended by her words (words, of course, that she took back, sort of...why do you think that was?) that only certain types of people were "Real Americans".  Yes, it was coded ,and yes, it was for "her" supporters, but it was uncalled for.

I agree with what he said.


 Current time is 01:26 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.6925 seconds (46% database + 54% PHP). 46 queries executed.