| Author | Post |
|---|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25th, 2008 08:02 am |
|
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-update-obama-not-citizen-law-suit.html
I wonder can they remove him ( if he makes it into office )
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25th, 2008 03:35 am |
|
2centsworth wrote: From Sunday's Televised 'Meet the Press' Senator Obama was asked about his
stance on the American Flag.
Obama Explains National Anthem Stance
Another lying dog post. Check out the truth for yourselves:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/stance.asp
|
2centsworth
Member
| Joined: | Tue Feb 28th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 78 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 08:25 pm |
|
From Sunday's Televised 'Meet the Press' Senator Obama was asked about his
stance on the American Flag.
Obama Explains National Anthem Stance
Sun, 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, General Bill Ginn' USAF (ret.) asked Obama
to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is
played. The General also stated to the Senator that according to the United
States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171 ... During rendition of the
national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present e xcept those in
uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right
hand over the heart. At the very least, Stand and Face It.
Senator Obama Live on Sunday states, 'As I've said about the flag pin, I
don't want to be perceived as taking sides', Obama said. 'There are a lot of
people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And
the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting
in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less
bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing.' If that
were our anthem, then I might salute it. We should consider to reinvent our
National Anthem as well as to redesign our Flag to better offer our enemies
hope and love. My wife disrespects the Flag for many personal reasons.
Together she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the
past, many years ago. She has her views and I have mine'.
WHAAAAAAAT????????? Yes, ladies and gentlemen, you heard it right. This
could possibly be our next President. I, for one, am speechless.
Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 05:05 pm |
|
Newshound wrote: Evidence has emerged that Sen. Barack Obama belonged to a socialist political party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.
Obama's campaign had earlier denied the presidential candidate was ever a member of the New Party.
But past copies of the New Party News, the party's official newspaper, have been found and they show Obama posing with New Party leaders, list him as a New Party member and include quotes from him.
Read the latest now on WND.com.
[/url]
[url=http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78945]http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78945
Another knuckle dragger comes forward.
|
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1027 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24th, 2008 04:15 pm |
|
Evidence has emerged that Sen. Barack Obama belonged to a socialist political party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.
Obama's campaign had earlier denied the presidential candidate was ever a member of the New Party.
But past copies of the New Party News, the party's official newspaper, have been found and they show Obama posing with New Party leaders, list him as a New Party member and include quotes from him.
Read the latest now on WND.com.
[/url]
[url=http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78945]http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78945
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 07:04 pm |
|
Helen here wrote: What I see he toke a little off the top , and did nothing to give it back .
With all that money he collected from some of those donation , seeing some are in trouble why not return it ?
Are you really this intelligent or are you just pulling our legs?
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 07:01 pm |
|
What I see he toke a little off the top , and did nothing to give it back .
With all that money he collected from some of those donation , seeing some are in trouble why not return it ?
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:46 pm |
|
Cobra wrote: Fred wrote: No, we are not...certainly no where near the expenditure of campaign funds on personal items. I get that they are now saying they would be donated....riiiiiight.
So what? There are REAL issues like the potential for voter fraud committed by ACORN and their affiliate organizations. Who spoends what on clothes or room service is petty and means nothing. It won't work and you'll change no one's mind.
There are real issues like the economic crisis, health care, and the war. Duh, duh, duh.
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:44 pm |
|
oop! wrote: Look your guys are going low
I notice CBS is griping about the Palin make over and say nothing about The Obama's spending on setting , clothing , hotel stays ect...
You are going to find that he is deeper in a pile.
He has never explain how he managed to pay all his bills off just before running , I honestly think he's made a deal with the devil and with his group of friends hell is not to far off for the American people if they don't open their eyes
You do know that Obama is a millionaire, don't you? He wrote 2 books. He made a lot of money because he is intelligent and people are willing to pay to read what he wrote.Last edited on Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:45 pm by EarnestLi
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 06:37 pm |
|
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/who-are-paying-obamas-bills-you-might-be-surprised
Got any money vested in these , take it out before it's to late
|
Cobra
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 24th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 352 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:44 pm |
|
Fred wrote: No, we are not...certainly no where near the expenditure of campaign funds on personal items. I get that they are now saying they would be donated....riiiiiight.
So what? There are REAL issues like the potential for voter fraud committed by ACORN and their affiliate organizations. Who spoends what on clothes or room service is petty and means nothing. It won't work and you'll change no one's mind.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:39 pm |
|
No, we are not...certainly no where near the expenditure of campaign funds on personal items. I get that they are now saying they would be donated....riiiiiight.
|
oop!
Member
| Joined: | Sat Dec 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 722 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:37 pm |
|
Look your guys are going low
I notice CBS is griping about the Palin make over and say nothing about The Obama's spending on setting , clothing , hotel stays ect...
You are going to find that he is deeper in a pile.
He has never explain how he managed to pay all his bills off just before running , I honestly think he's made a deal with the devil and with his group of friends hell is not to far off for the American people if they don't open their eyes
Last edited on Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:57 pm by oop!
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:30 pm |
|
oop! wrote: Acorn is only one more reason to rethink your vote . There will be more things that come out about the Obama's and their friends , thier fund raising and where some American tax money was sent that Obama got.
These will change the election
When reality displeases you, retreat to the Isle of Delusions.
|
oop!
Member
| Joined: | Sat Dec 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 722 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23rd, 2008 04:27 pm |
|
Acorn is only one more reason to rethink your vote . There will be more things that come out about the Obama's and their friends , thier fund raising and where some American tax money was sent that Obama got.
These will change the election
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20th, 2008 08:16 pm |
|
I thought this was an appropriate place to put this.
Obama raised 150 Million from 3 million new contributors, mostly in small $50 donations. These obviously aren't corporate donors, but individuals. A couple of things...
1. We've got more individuals contributing than ever before...and this is in a down economy. What does this mean for the future? Is it a good thing?
2. There have been a few examples of local candidates doing really dumb things..such as that clown who implied we should investigate all of Congress to see how "American" they are. I get that these are local bumpkins who found themselves on the national stage for perhaps the first time and made a fool of themselves, but what about the fact that such a performance can generate 500K worth of donations nationwide to get rid of such clowns? I suspect that this goes on both sides; for instance, the guy down in Florida who paid 120K to a woman not his wife probably has seen his opponent's campaign contributions skyrocket.
Is it a good thing? Leave aside for a moment that it is Obama, because I seriously doubt that any candidate will stick with public fiancing when they see Obama has 150 MILLION to spend in the last 2 weeks...it could just as easily have been McCain, or God forbid next time, Palin.
Is it an improvement when you get that many individual, non-tax free donations?
|
EarnestLi
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 13th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 605 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19th, 2008 01:38 pm |
|
| Spreading hatred and fear. Welcome to the McCain campaign.
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19th, 2008 02:33 am |
|
| http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/columnists/article/obamas_terrorist_co_chairman/22685/
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:42 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: No
Really? Than do you think he woke up two weeks ago to the problem that he thought needed a 700 Billion Dollar bailout? Or that the 3 page "plan" they had was worked out months ago, or so they say?
I don't think he wanted this bailout plan any more than any of us wanted.....probably a whole lot less, in fact, since it goes on his legacy. He waited literally until the last moment, hoping, I think, that other factors might come into play to pick up the economy a bit. They didn't, and he was forced to do this.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 04:27 am |
|
| It just keeps getting weirder.
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2671 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 03:12 am |
|
| No
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 02:45 am |
|
I've said that anybody who wants this job at this point is crazy.
Do you not think the President was hoping this mess would hold together with paste and chewing gum until he left?
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2671 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 02:42 am |
|
| No. But I would rather let your Liberal Boy get the heat for the next 4 so America can see what they have done to GWB for the past 8
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 02:41 am |
|
WTF?
Are you throwing in the towel?Last edited on Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 02:41 am by Fred
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2671 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 01:00 am |
|
Let us admit that Obama is the best to govern over the next 4 years of chaos. He will not be able to get any of his plans through Congress because we will be so deeply entrenched in economic turmoil.
It is time for America to turn to 2012 when we will hopefully have some real choices for leadership.
|
Rightwinger
Member
| Joined: | Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 442 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 12:51 am |
|
| Those who voted for Ross Perot helped Slick Willy get elected!
|
Two Cents
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 668 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008 02:35 pm |
|
| If all who claimed to have voted for Perrot when he ran had actually done so, he would have been elected president!
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 353 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008 04:20 am |
|
| Should have put Ross Perot in.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008 03:50 am |
|
Fred wrote: Well, Helen, Terrence told you why he was voting for Obama....his selection of Palin helps reinforce that decision, as does just about everything he does these days. He keeps trying to make "statements" such as suspending his campaign, and the American public aren't buying it.
I didn't think McCain was going to win before the Palin pick, but thought he had a chance. I thought the Palin pick was a gamble, and said so...and it looked like, for a while, it did. However, while she certainly helped McCain raise funds and get the fundies out of their moribund state, it also activated those on the other side. Just like the rightes weren't real thrilled with McCain, we on the left really could not raise the anti-McCain feeling to a certain level until the selection.
I wish McCain had been selected as President 8 years ago, when he had his integrity. He would have made a much better President then the current one, but the 8 years have not been kind to McCain, or his legacy. He has sold his soul repeatedly during this campaign as he knows this is his last chance. Sadly, it is beginning to look like he will have lost everything.
I wish anyone other than W were selected 8 years ago. Little Orphan Annie would have done a better job of things.
|
Fred
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | Dover, Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 7173 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008 02:39 am |
|
Well, Helen, Terrence told you why he was voting for Obama....his selection of Palin helps reinforce that decision, as does just about everything he does these days. He keeps trying to make "statements" such as suspending his campaign, and the American public aren't buying it.
I didn't think McCain was going to win before the Palin pick, but thought he had a chance. I thought the Palin pick was a gamble, and said so...and it looked like, for a while, it did. However, while she certainly helped McCain raise funds and get the fundies out of their moribund state, it also activated those on the other side. Just like the rightes weren't real thrilled with McCain, we on the left really could not raise the anti-McCain feeling to a certain level until the selection.
I wish McCain had been selected as President 8 years ago, when he had his integrity. He would have made a much better President then the current one, but the 8 years have not been kind to McCain, or his legacy. He has sold his soul repeatedly during this campaign as he knows this is his last chance. Sadly, it is beginning to look like he will have lost everything.
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 1st, 2008 09:12 pm |
|
Palin is not running for President nor is Biden. Talking about MCCain being a hot head Obama only thinks Biden is under control , just make him mad .
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 1st, 2008 08:51 pm |
|
| I'm voting for Obama because I don't think we can survive another four years of failed foreign and domestic policies. Now I'm also voting for Obama because I dread what would happen if Palin became President.
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 1st, 2008 07:38 pm |
|
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU-EpU13K_o
|
Runnerman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30th, 2008 07:53 pm |
|
They are all the same wrote:
September 30, 2008
ACORN, Obama, and the Mortgage Mess
By Mona Charen
The financial markets were teetering on the edge of an abyss last week. The secretary of the Treasury was literally on his knees begging the speaker of the House not to sabotage the bailout bill. The crash of falling banks made the earth tremble. The Republican presidential candidate suspended his campaign to deal with the crisis. And amid all this, the Democrats in Congress managed to find time to slip language into the bailout legislation that would provide a dandy little slush fund for ACORN.
ACORN stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, a busy hive of left-wing agitation and "direct action" that claims chapters in 50 cities and 100,000 dues-paying members. ACORN is where Sixties leftovers who couldn't get tenure at universities wound up. That the bill-writing Democrats remembered their pet clients during such an emergency speaks volumes. This attempted gift to ACORN (stripped out of the bill after outraged howls from Republicans) demonstrates how little Democrats understand about what caused the mess we're in.
ACORN does many things under the umbrella of "community organizing." They agitate for higher minimum wages, attempt to thwart school reform, try to unionize welfare workers (that is, those welfare recipients who are obliged to work in exchange for benefits) and organize voter registration efforts (always for Democrats, of course). Because they are on the side of righteousness and justice, they aren't especially fastidious about their methods. In 2006, for example, ACORN registered 1,800 new voters in Washington. The only trouble was, with the exception of six, all of the names submitted were fake. The secretary of state called it the "worst case of election fraud in our state's history." As Fox News reported:
"The ACORN workers told state investigators that they went to the Seattle public library, sat at a table and filled out the voter registration forms. They made up names, addresses, and Social Security numbers and in some cases plucked names from the phone book. One worker said it was a lot of hard work making up all those names and another said he would sit at home, smoke marijuana and fill out the forms."
ACORN explained that this was an "isolated" incident, yet similar stories have been reported in Missouri, Michigan, Ohio, and Colorado -- all swing states, by the way. ACORN members have been prosecuted for voter fraud in a number of states. (See http://www.rottenacorn.com.) Their philosophy seems to be that everyone deserves the right to vote, whether legal or illegal, living or dead.
ACORN recognized very early the opportunity presented by the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977. As Stanley Kurtz has reported, ACORN proudly touted "affirmative action" lending and pressured banks to make subprime loans. Madeline Talbott, a Chicago ACORN leader, boasted of "dragging banks kicking and screaming" into dubious loans. And, as Sol Stern reported in City Journal, ACORN also found a remunerative niche as an "advisor" to banks seeking regulatory approval. "Thus we have J.P. Morgan & Co., the legatee of the man who once symbolized for many all that was supposedly evil about American capitalism, suddenly donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to ACORN." Is this a great country or what? As conservative community activist Robert Woodson put it, "The same corporations that pay ransom to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton pay ransom to ACORN."
ACORN attracted Barack Obama in his youthful community organizing days. Madeline Talbott hired him to train her staff -- the very people who would later descend on Chicago's banks as CRA shakedown artists. The Democratic nominee later funneled money to the group through the Woods Fund, on whose board he sat, and through the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, ditto. Obama was not just sympathetic -- he was an ACORN fellow traveler.
Now you could make the case that before 2008, well-intentioned people were simply unaware of what their agitation on behalf of non-credit-worthy borrowers could lead to. But now? With the whole financial world and possibly the world economy trembling and cracking like a cement building in an earthquake, Democrats continue to try to fund their friends at ACORN? And, unashamed, they then trot out to the TV cameras to declare "the party is over" for Wall Street (Nancy Pelosi)? The party should be over for the Democrats who brought us to this pass. If Obama wins, it means hiring an arsonist to fight a fire.
Copyright 2008, Creators Syndicate Inc.
|
Legends457
Member
| Joined: | Mon Feb 20th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 225 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21st, 2008 12:42 pm |
|
DE19899 wrote: Only in the USA do we have the richest poor people in the world. Families on welfare and section 8, living below the poverty line. Yet they have electric, plumbing, trash pickup, and cable tv. That's quite a different picture than the poverty seen in other countries. Take Obama's relative, living in a mud hut on less than $12 a year. Now that's real poverty. What is Obama doing to help his family living in abject poverty? Why send him some of OUR money, of course!
Send them some of your CIO stock...... You must have enough knowledge to go work for John McCain...... that comment took the cake for dumb and dumberLast edited on Sun Sep 21st, 2008 04:25 pm by Legends457
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21st, 2008 04:55 am |
|
DE19899 wrote: Only in the USA do we have the richest poor people in the world. Families on welfare and section 8, living below the poverty line. Yet they have electric, plumbing, trash pickup, and cable tv. That's quite a different picture than the poverty seen in other countries. Take Obama's relative, living in a mud hut on less than $12 a year. Now that's real poverty. What is Obama doing to help his family living in abject poverty? Why send him some of OUR money, of course!
When you utter things like this are you dribbling out the side of your mouth?
|
Habanero
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | DelMarVA, USA |
| Posts: | 4056 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20th, 2008 04:37 am |
|
Playing the Game wrote: This speaks for itself. It's not the price, it's who spends it..........................
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/19/obama-laments-debt-but-promises-billions-for-anti-poverty-program/
As far as I'm concerned ANYTHING dealing with the UN should be suspect and NOT just automatically accepted by the US. In fact it should automatically be REJECTED by the US...............which I know will never happen in my lifetime. *****SIGH*****
|
DE19899
Member
| Joined: | Tue Sep 4th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 32 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20th, 2008 12:15 am |
|
Only in the USA do we have the richest poor people in the world. Families on welfare and section 8, living below the poverty line. Yet they have electric, plumbing, trash pickup, and cable tv. That's quite a different picture than the poverty seen in other countries. Take Obama's relative, living in a mud hut on less than $12 a year. Now that's real poverty. What is Obama doing to help his family living in abject poverty? Why send him some of OUR money, of course!
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 2671 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 10:33 pm |
|
This speaks for itself. It's not the price, it's who spends it..........................
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/19/obama-laments-debt-but-promises-billions-for-anti-poverty-program/
|
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 548 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 07:10 pm |
|
A Strong case against Obama
David Freddoso---political reporter and author laid out one of the best arguments to vote against Barack Obama. His report is so persuasive that the Obama campaign wants this guy silenced. Why is Barack Obama trying to shut David Freddoso up? Probably because he has a clear, well laid out argument against Barack Obama that even Barabara Boxer apparently has a tough time disagreeing with. It’s the well documented record about the Born Alive Infant Act and Obama’s resistance to it and his lies to cover up his actions in the Illinois State legislature. The documentation is there for all to see if you take the time to Google it up. The report is so compelling that it cuts right through the political BS and and demonstrates exactly why Barack Obama is the #1 most liberal Senator in the United States Senate. Obama uses tactics right out of the "Handbook for Radicals" written by his ten-year mentor in ACORN, Saul Aulinsky.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 04:54 am |
|
Habanero wrote: Helen here wrote: http://ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/2008/06/obamas-corruption-ties.html
Hey T how come when you call MCCain ( McBush ) it's ok but, when oop! used Obama's nick name ( Obama Bin-Laden ) it was wrong?
Because, Helen, m'dear, they do not like being reminded hat it was Ted Kennedy himself who called Obama -"Osama." Nor do they wish to be reminded how close the Biden name is to the rest of it. (BInlaDEN)
You need to get back on those meds.
|
Habanero
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | DelMarVA, USA |
| Posts: | 4056 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 01:32 am |
|
Helen here wrote: http://ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/2008/06/obamas-corruption-ties.html
Hey T how come when you call MCCain ( McBush ) it's ok but, when oop! used Obama's nick name ( Obama Bin-Laden ) it was wrong?
Because, Helen, m'dear, they do not like being reminded hat it was Ted Kennedy himself who called Obama -"Osama." Nor do they wish to be reminded how close the Biden name is to the rest of it. (BInlaDEN)
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 08:12 pm |
|
Helen here wrote: http://ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/2008/06/obamas-corruption-ties.html
Hey T how come when you call MCCain ( McBush ) it's ok but, when oop! used Obama's nick name ( Obama Bin-Laden ) it was wrong?
McBush implies a legitimate connection between Bush and McCain. Obama has no connection whatever to bi Laden. Isn't that self evident.
|
Helen here
Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 08:10 pm |
|
http://ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/2008/06/obamas-corruption-ties.html
Hey T how come when you call MCCain ( McBush ) it's ok but, when oop! used Obama's nick name ( Obama Bin-Laden ) it was wrong?
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 05:18 pm |
|
Boo wrote: Terrance wrote: Idaho Observer wrote: Fred wrote: Except, that of course, is isn't just a matter of civility. It is a matter of providing a balanced tax cut.
What people like those you quote forget to mention is the amount of the increased taxes on those who make more than 250K. While you can argue that ANY tax increase is bad, even in a time of deficit spending, you have to look at the exact percentage of increase that Obama is talking about rather than just blathering about a tax increase.
However, I will give credit that there is acknowledgement that Obama's tax cuts will help 95% of Americans. You're dreaming. Second plank of the Communist Manifesto is a heavy, progressive income tax. We 95% will take a big hit,
Have you skipped taking Haldol? What does the Communist Manifesto have to do with anything? What about alien clones? Well, even we po folk down in Hogshead Holler knows what the Manifesto has to do with anything. It's the heavy progressive income tax that Obama and them Dems keep on a pushin. Its a plank that both the Dems and the Commies rely heavy like on. Now we aint at all disappreciative of Dems, ya know. We shore appreciated the good ole TVA. One of the goodest welfare forgrams to hit us here in Tennessee. Nothin like floodin all the land ta make room fer dams and such. Relocated us outta one holler and into ntother. Well, Uncle Earl and Aunt Minnie is still livin on Roosevelt's welfare programs. Leaves them room to engage in Uncle Earl's moonshine business. See. We southern Democrats are an enterprisin lot.
Thanks for your eloquent commentary.
|
Boo
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 481 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 04:28 pm |
|
Terrance wrote: Idaho Observer wrote: Fred wrote: Except, that of course, is isn't just a matter of civility. It is a matter of providing a balanced tax cut.
What people like those you quote forget to mention is the amount of the increased taxes on those who make more than 250K. While you can argue that ANY tax increase is bad, even in a time of deficit spending, you have to look at the exact percentage of increase that Obama is talking about rather than just blathering about a tax increase.
However, I will give credit that there is acknowledgement that Obama's tax cuts will help 95% of Americans. You're dreaming. Second plank of the Communist Manifesto is a heavy, progressive income tax. We 95% will take a big hit,
Have you skipped taking Haldol? What does the Communist Manifesto have to do with anything? What about alien clones? Well, even we po folk down in Hogshead Holler knows what the Manifesto has to do with anything. It's the heavy progressive income tax that Obama and them Dems keep on a pushin. Its a plank that both the Dems and the Commies rely heavy like on. Now we aint at all disappreciative of Dems, ya know. We shore appreciated the good ole TVA. One of the goodest welfare forgrams to hit us here in Tennessee. Nothin like floodin all the land ta make room fer dams and such. Relocated us outta one holler and into ntother. Well, Uncle Earl and Aunt Minnie is still livin on Roosevelt's welfare programs. Leaves them room to engage in Uncle Earl's moonshine business. See. We southern Democrats are an enterprisin lot.
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 04:19 pm |
|
oop! wrote: Terrance wrote: The price we will have paid by the time we get to the elections is astronomical. All brought to you courtesy of McBush.
Better to have your so called McBush then having Obama Bin-Liden
You will see the Old white hair dude will grow on you and more is to come out on Obama.
And it will be via Clintons and other Democrats, The party it's self needs a come to order meeting. This could be their year , but they have 48 days to pull it together or stew for four more years.
About the only place you could get away with this kind of bigotry and slander is right here. To compare any of our leaders to bin Laden is a disgrace. Even your white haired dude would scrape this kind of stuff off the bottom of his shoes.
Water always finds its own level. So does character.
|
oop!
Member
| Joined: | Sat Dec 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 722 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 03:51 pm |
|
Terrance wrote: The price we will have paid by the time we get to the elections is astronomical. All brought to you courtesy of McBush.
Better to have your so called McBush then having Obama Bin-Liden
You will see the Old white hair dude will grow on you and more is to come out on Obama.
And it will be via Clintons and other Democrats, The party it's self needs a come to order meeting. This could be their year , but they have 48 days to pull it together or stew for four more years.
Last edited on Thu Sep 18th, 2008 03:52 pm by oop!
|
Terrance
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1117 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 03:03 pm |
|
The price we will have paid by the time we get to the elections is astronomical. All brought to you courtesy of McBush.
|
oop!
Member
| Joined: | Sat Dec 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 722 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 01:33 pm |
|
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Rec/rec.radio.shortwave/2008-09/msg01049.html
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/22/acorn-watch-pt-ii-obama-hid-800000-payment-to-acorn-through-citizen-services-inc/
What is Acorn ?
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/07/whats-acorn-up-to-voter-fraud-as-usual/
Guess Obama can't knock out his opponents in the big Election like he did on his stumping grounds.
|
Current time is 02:29 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6   |
|