| Author | Post |
|---|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 05:57 pm |
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
It seems as if the senior school tax exemption is in jeopardy. Is elimination of the senior citizen school tax exemption part of the Markell Legislative wish list? Talk of this tax grab is circulating around Legislative Hall but it seems to be under the media radar. Why?
Are some of our Legislators planning a last-minute "summer surprise" on our senior citizens?
I’m planning to stop by Legislative Hall next Tuesday, June 23rd with some friends at 2 p.m. to try to express my opinions. We would like some support. Help us to help you before it is too late.
Jim Hannan
Dover
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 04:24 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Tax bills voted down in House
Proposals to increase fees on alcohol, cigarettes, may return next week
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — Three bills that would have raised the tax on alcohol and cigarettes and increased the fees for alcohol licenses — and helped the state find the funds to cover a nearly $800 million budget deficit — failed in the House on Thursday. But, they are not yet dead.
Legislators could recall the vote within three legislative days. While recalling the vote will not be difficult, changing the outcome of the vote appears as though it may be.
The vote down party lines emphasized a rift deeper than just a difference of opinion on taxes.
House Republicans, who voted as a bloc against the bills, said they felt ignored and left out of the political process.
"We are participants in this process if we’re sitting on this side of the aisle or not," said House Minority Leader Rep. Richard C. Cathcart, R-Middletown.
Gov. Jack A. Markell said that was not the case, that instead the House Republicans were unwilling to make the tough decisions necessary to get the state through the budget crisis.
"I’m disappointed. We still don’t have the bipartisan support we need," said Gov. Markell. "Not a single Republican has voted to make the tough revenue decisions."
Each of the bills required a three-fifths majority to pass — which means that all of the Democrats and at least one Republican would need to vote "yes."
All 16 of the House Republicans voted "no" to each of the measures. House Majority Whip Rep. Valerie Longhurst, D-Bear, switched her vote to "no" so that she would be able to recall the vote at a later date.
Only a member of the prevailing side can make the motion for a vote to be recalled.
Before the voting even began on Thursday, the outcome was apparent.
Rep. Cathcart stood up and spoke for his caucus. He said the Republicans were uncomfortable voting on revenue-enhancing bills without knowing what the entire package would look like.
"Voting on revenue bills in a piecemeal fashion is, quite frankly, a disservice to the taxpayers," he said.
House Majority Leader Rep. Peter C. Schwartzkopf, D-Rehoboth Beach, said the enormity of the budget deficit, coupled with the fast-approaching deadline to balance the budget, made it necessary that they start getting things done.
"We’re going to have to do a lot of things we don’t want to do," said Rep. Schwartzkopf.
There was little debate on the measures after the initial comments were made by the party leaders. Much more discussion was likely done in caucus, which lasted more than two hours before the representatives came out onto the floor.
The discussion that did occur centered on amendments that Rep. Deborah Hudson, R-Wilmington, placed on the tax bills. Her amendments, which ended up failing, would have sunset the taxes after one year.
As the voice vote on the amendments was occurring, representatives yelled their "yeses" and "nos" so loudly, the microphone system went down for a few minutes.
"I went not voting. I don’t want to be charged for fixing that," joked Rep. Joseph W. Booth, R-Georgetown, during the only light moment of the evening.
After the votes were tallied, Gov. Markell and other Democratic leaders held an impromptu press conference to vent their frustration.
Gov. Markell said he had been offering to meet with the House Republicans for weeks, that he had breakfast with Rep. Cathcart recently to discuss the proposal and that staff members had delivered all of the information the Republicans had requested.
"We’ve lost another week. My hope is that we get back to a bipartisan approach," said the governor.
When asked what was going to be done to get the bills passed, he said "that’s going to be up to (the Republicans)."
Rep. Cathcart said the Republicans would stop standing in the way when they were included in the process and when they could see an entire package.
He said that without knowing what budget cuts were going to be made, how much stimulus money would be coming into the state and what other taxes were being proposed, they could not vote on individual measures.
The General Assembly must pass a balanced budget by June 30.
Gov. Markell said there was not yet another plan to raise the $22 million that was expected to be generated through these taxes.
"We are really working to get these passed," he said.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 04:15 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Committee cuts college funding
Federal money will replace lost cash for two years
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — Although the Joint Finance Committee voted Thursday to take 7 percent across the board from the state funds going to each institution of higher education in Delaware, the institutions will not yet feel the budget cuts thanks to federal stimulus funds.
The University of Delaware would see a $8.8 million cut, Delaware State University would have their funds cut by $2.5 million and Delaware Technical & Community College would see a $4.6 million cut.
Although the schools are facing serious cuts, the money will be replaced for the next two years with money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Despite the reprieve right now, Controller General Russell T. Larson said it was just putting off the pain.
The money "will drop off the charts in fiscal year 2012," he said. "It is just deferring the hurt."
Members of the committee disagreed over whether or not to include epilogue language that encouraged the institutions of higher education to cut the pay of their employees by 2.5 percent.
Since it is a public institution, employees at Delaware Technical & Community College would receive the same salary cut as other state employees.
University of Delaware and Delaware State University are both public-private institutions and the state does not control how they pay their employees.
Rep. Joseph E. Miro, R-Pike Creek, said he thought the statement was necessary since the committee had already voted to cut the pay of other state employees.
But some legislators were opposed.
"I respectfully and vehemently disagree with that premise," said Rep. Melanie George Marshall, D-Bear. She said she did not like the idea that the committee would be setting the precedent of telling institutions that do business with the state that they must cause their employees pain if they can avoid it.
"I never thought I’d say this, but I agree with Rep. Miro on this," said Rep. James J. Johnson, D-Wilmington.
"I actually agree with Rep. Marshall. So I guess we’re all switching sides," said Rep. Joseph W. Booth, R-Georgetown.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
oop! Member

| Joined: | Sat Dec 10th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1020 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 01:07 pm |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Dear Sylvia - I am against taxation, not assisting young people to smoke. Bennett is the one blowing smoke as are the rest of the Democrats who voted for the increase.
THE SOLUTION IS TO MAKE SMOKING ILLEGAL if they were actually serious.
PTG
How else are they pay for the numbers two daoghter rehab ?
So can any one tell if Ms Biden is still on the job?
|
no way Member
| Joined: | Sun Apr 19th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 40 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:31 pm |
|
Playing the Game wrote: Dear Sylvia - I am against taxation, not assisting young people to smoke. Bennett is the one blowing smoke as are the rest of the Democrats who voted for the increase.
THE SOLUTION IS TO MAKE SMOKING ILLEGAL if they were actually serious.
Thats never going to happen their having too much fun screwing around with people.
|
Playing the Game Member

| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 5408 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:11 pm |
|
Dear Sylvia - I am against taxation, not assisting young people to smoke. Bennett is the one blowing smoke as are the rest of the Democrats who voted for the increase.
THE SOLUTION IS TO MAKE SMOKING ILLEGAL if they were actually serious.
|
sylvia65 Member
| Joined: | Thu Jul 24th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 05:40 am |
|
"For me, it’s an easy decision," said Rep. E. Bradford Bennett, D-Dover, of his support of the cigarette-tax increase. His father passed away from lung cancer caused by smoking cigarettes.
"Hopefully that’ll help prevent some young people from starting to smoke," he said.
Dear "Playing the Game"
I am not a smoker either, but you seem to be part of the problem and not part of the solution my dear. How can you criticize a person for wanting young people to stop smoking? Smoking causes cancer and ends up costing our society more in the long run. It effects everyone around that person who is smoking also. Physically and emotionally. Seems like you are one of those people that love to hate. I think what Rep. Bradford Bennett stands for is commendable.
|
dover-diva Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1973 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 06:29 pm |
|
| CUT SPENDING!!! Also ask Jack Markell, who served as State Treasurer for 3 terms, why he did NOT forsee the probable deficit. That was his job- right????? Perhaps he should pay back his salary since he did such a crummy job. Last edited on Thu Jun 18th, 2009 06:30 pm by dover-diva
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 05:14 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
New tax bills introduced in House
Proposals would increase fees on personal income, corporations
Legislative Notebook
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — In an effort to close the state’s budget deficit, Rep. John A. Kowalko, D-Newark, introduced multiple tax bills on Wednesday.
The bills would add new brackets to the personal income tax, increase the corporate franchise tax and raise the tax on limited liability corporations.
The goal of the bills is to "generate revenue to displace the need for the pay cuts (for state employees)" Rep. Kowalko said.
Some of the bills cover the same fields and serve as multiple options for legislators.
House Bill 238 would increase the personal income tax to 6.95 percent for all income between $60,000 and $100,000 in a year. It would also increase the tax to 7.95 percent for all income over $100,000.
The legislation would bring in $90.5 million annually.
House Bill 239 would raise the tax on limited liability corporations by $50 a year to $300 per year. The increase would raise $29 million a year for the state.
House Bill 240 would increase the corporate franchise tax from $165,000 a year to $195,000. The proposal would bring in $45 million annually.
Gov. Jack A. Markell proposed increasing the tax to $180,000 in his budget recommendation in March.
House Bill 241 would increase the tax on limited liability corporations by $25 annually. The tax of $275 a year for LLCs would bring in $14.5 million for the state.
House Bill 242 would adjust the personal income tax so that all income between $25,000 and $60,000 is taxed at 5.65 percent, all income between $60,000 and $100,000 is taxed at 6.95 percent and all income over $100,000 is taxed at 7.45 percent. The legislation would bring in $74.5 million a year.
"The alternative is to hamper our economy," said Rep. Kowalko.
Sen. Adams hospitalized
Senate President Pro Tempore Thurman Adams Jr., D-Bridgeville, 80, was hospitalized after feeling ill over the weekend, said Senate Majority Leader Anthony DeLuca, D-Newark.
Sen. Adams was taken to the hospital for testing. Information regarding the type of tests he was undergoing was not available.
He will hopefully return to the Senate next week, said Sen. DeLuca. Sen. Adams was elected to the General Assembly in 1972.
Coalition presents proposals
State Workers United for a Better Delaware presented a proposal on Wednesday of ways to raise money without cutting the pay of state employees.
Coalition officials said the pay cut for state workers hurts the entire state because it reduces the amount of money going into the economy.
In their proposal, which includes ways to raise $530 million, they suggested increasing the tax on limited liability corporations by $100 a year, upping the corporate franchise tax and reinstating the inherited wealth tax, among others.
In addition, the coalition recommended granting a casino license to the Del Pointe project in Millsboro.
"Del Pointe is a no-brainer," said Delaware State Education Association president Diane Donohue. "They are willing to pre-pay $20 million. How can we not look at that?"
Gov. Markell said he is looking into all of the proposals, but also said the state cannot tax its way out of the budget crisis.
Beer in groceries bill tabled
Legislation that would allow the sale of beer and wine in grocery stores was tabled in the House Revenue and Finance Committee on Wednesday.
House Bill 193 failed to garner enough support because legislators were worried about how much it would cost to regulate the trade. Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
Last edited on Fri Jun 19th, 2009 03:42 pm by tspong
|
Tired1969 Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 03:40 am |
|
This is how the vote went on the paycut
Maybe those against should not be re-elected
The vote was 7 for the 2.5% cut, 5 against it.
All the House and Senate R’s voted against it, plus Sen. Dave McBride – D.
So, the people voting for the 2.5% cut were:
Rep. Dennis Williams - D
Rep. Melanie George Marshall – D
Rep. James Johnson – D
Rep. John Mitchell – D
Sen. Nancy Cook – D
Sen. Bruce Ennis – D
Sen. Margaret Rose Henry – D
Voting against the cut were:
Sen. Dave McBride - D
Sen. Dori Connor – R
Sen. Catherine Cloutier – R
Rep. Joe Booth – R
Rep. Joe Miro – R
|
Playing the Game Member

| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 5408 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 04:31 pm |
|
Our Corrupt Legislators wouldn't want to tick off the people who keep getting them elected every year. Every State with a deposit program gets the unrefunded deposits back. It's like abandoned property.
Not Delaware, they would rather tax retired folks than their buddies.
|
Two Cents Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1464 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 03:40 pm |
|
| AMEN, Hartlyboy!!
|
Hartlyboy Member

|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 03:37 pm |
|
| And why aren't they also taking back the unrefunded deposits on bottles that distributors collect but don't pay back because it's such a pain for consumers to return them? That's a couple million a year and seems like a no-brainer. Have to wonder who the distributors are connected to when the politicians ignore low hanging fruit like that and instead want to take school tax exemptions away from seniors.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 03:33 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Revenue forecast shows modest gains
Abandoned property audit helps increase estimate by $8.5M
By Randall Chase
Associated Press
NEW CASTLE — A state panel on Monday gave a modest boost to the official revenue forecast Delaware lawmakers will use in fashioning a budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Members of the Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council voted to increase the revenue estimate for fiscal 2010 by $8.5 million compared to last month’s estimate.
The increase was largely attributable to an expected $20 million settlement involving an abandoned-property audit. Modest increases in estimated lottery proceeds and personal and corporate income tax revenue also helped offset a $17.5 million decrease in estimated bank franchise taxes and a $4 million drop in projected gross receipts taxes.
The panel also decreased bank franchise and gross receipts estimates for the current year by a combined $13.1 million, which was offset by upward revisions in income taxes and miscellaneous revenues, leaving a net increase of $2.8 million over last month’s estimate.
The revenue update is the last that members of the Legislature’s budget-writing Joint Finance Committee will be able to use as they try to finish work on a budget for the new fiscal year. The committee voted last week to cut state employees’ pay by 2.5 percent for fiscal 2010, but lawmakers will have to approve additional cuts, as well as tax and fee increases, to reach the balanced budget required under state law.
"There are no 11th-hour changes to the projections that will allow us to avoid making the very difficult decisions that need to be made over the next few weeks to balance the budget," Gov. Jack A. Markell warned in response to the latest revenue estimates.
According to the revised numbers, revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30 is expected to be 6.2 percent less than last year’s total. A similar 6.4 percent is expected in the new fiscal year compared to the current year.
"Dozens of tough decisions remain, and we need a bipartisan consensus to produce a balanced budget," Gov. Markell said.
Despite the modest upticks in revenue estimates Monday, officials said Delaware’s economy continues to struggle, particularly in the financial services sector.
"Here’s the problem," DEFAC revenue subcommittee chairman Ken Lewis said as a chart showing trends in the bank franchise tax was projected on a screen.
Officials expect bank franchise tax revenue to total about $82 million this year, compared to $130 million last year.
"The June collections were just half of what the bank commissioner’s office was expecting," Lewis noted.
The bank franchise tax forecast for next year is even dimmer, with estimated revenue of only $34 million.
"Essentially, the large credit card banks are sort of out of the picture for next year ... Basically, this is an industry that’s going through turmoil and structural change. Who knows what it’s going to look like in two years?" Mr. Lewis said.
Some council members believe an upturn in consumer credit card spending as the economy improves will benefit the banks, while others think federal legislation aimed at curbing industry abuses will increase the cost of borrowing and have a detrimental effect.
|
dover-diva Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1973 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 02:06 am |
|
Tired1969 wrote: Mr. Markell did indeed inherit a seriously flawed budget but, 1). He was the state Treasurer during the time the state was in a spending fury and could have influenced some decisions that were made to get us into this mess, and 2) I do not share your optimism especially after he cut into the small take home pay that it takes to take care of my family. There are other ways he and Ms Cook can work towards fixing Delaware's financial crisis. For one thing they need to cross party lines. Colin Bonini has some interesting ideas that do not cut the pay of a workforce that hasn't gotten a raise in three years.
Yes indeedy, he was the state treasurer and he did nothing. You all remember that next election. 
|
Tired1969 Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 02:03 am |
|
| Mr. Markell did indeed inherit a seriously flawed budget but, 1). He was the state Treasurer during the time the state was in a spending fury and could have influenced some decisions that were made to get us into this mess, and 2) I do not share your optimism especially after he cut into the small take home pay that it takes to take care of my family. There are other ways he and Ms Cook can work towards fixing Delaware's financial crisis. For one thing they need to cross party lines. Colin Bonini has some interesting ideas that do not cut the pay of a workforce that hasn't gotten a raise in three years.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 09:14 pm |
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
Let’s face it. Governor Markell inherited the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Fortunately for us, however, and for the people of Delaware, Governor Markell remains self assured and resolute as he and his cabinet diligently face the complexities of a budget crisis and a precipitious decline in state resources across the board.
A serious recession and soaring unemployment interact with Delawares’ need for enough income to product a mandatory balanced budget before July 1. As we know, the General Assembly is a key player in resolving this issue.
Governor Markell is a no nonsense business man. I have every confidence that he will steer us through the current economic pitfalls. He needs our support and he deserves the opportunity to direct our state in a positive direction for now, for tomorrow, and our childrens’ tomorrow.
Irv Levitt Dover
Last edited on Mon Jun 15th, 2009 09:15 pm by tspong
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 05:05 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Taxing times for Delaware legislators
Increases look to be certainty as clock beginning to run out
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — As legislators continue with their work of balancing the budget this year, tax increases are not just a possibility, but nearly a guarantee.
While the Joint Finance Committee has voted on hundreds of millions of cuts, they have not gone even as far as Gov. Jack A. Markell suggested in his budget recommendation. The committee reduced the pay cuts for state employees from 8 percent to 2.5 percent; and reinstated money to the public school transportation fund, the transportation reimbursement fund for parents of non-public-school children, the phragmites control program and to the school nurse program, among others.
The state is facing an $800 million budget shortfall for fiscal year 2010. Gov. Markell suggested cutting the operating budget by $526 million and finding the rest through revenue generation, the sports lottery and federal stimulus funds.
With the Joint Finance Committee choosing to cut less than the governor suggested, so far — it appears the only way the state will meet its constitutionally mandated goal of a balanced budget by June 30 is by upping taxes even more than the governor recommended.
Legislation has already been introduced that would increase the alcohol tax, raise the tax on cigarettes, up the alcohol licensing fee, tax seasonal rental properties and authorize the sale of beer and wine in grocery stores.
On Wednesday, the alcohol and cigarette taxes were released from the House Revenue and Finance Committee despite a strong showing of opposition from the public.
Owners of restaurants, liquor stores and convenience shops showed up to share their fears about the bills.
Carrie Leishman, of the Delaware Restaurants Association, said the increase in fees and taxes would mean that many struggling eateries would go under.
"This comes at a very, very bad time," she said.
Roger Roy, representing the tobacco retailers’ association, said the increase in the cigarette tax would lead to fewer sales to out-of-state buyers and ultimately a loss of jobs in the state.
The tobacco industry employs 935 people in Delaware — the tax increase could likely cause that number to drop by 130, he said.
Four individuals, representing health organizations, did speak in support of the cigarette tax increase. No one spoke in support of raising the alcohol tax.
Despite the lack of support, legislators said the bills were necessary to solve the state’s serious budget dilemma.
"I didn’t expect to walk in here and have everyone happy," said House Majority Leader Rep. Peter C. Schwartzkopf, D-Rehoboth Beach, the sponsor of the bills that would increase the cigarette and alcohol taxes. "We need this money to solve a budget crisis."
Even if all of the taxes introduced so far were passed as is, they are not expected to bring in more than $40 million in the first year.
Where will the state recoup the rest of the money needed to balance the budget?
Gov. Markell also suggested upping the personal income tax by 1 percentage point on all income more than $60,000 and increasing the corporate franchise tax.
The increase in the personal income tax would bring in about $30 million and the corporate franchise tax could bring in more than $80 million.
Such legislation has yet to be introduced. When it is introduced, it will likely need to be at even higher rates than suggested by Gov. Markell.
And it is likely those taxes will face just as tough opposition as the taxes introduced already.
Time is ticking down. There are only five official legislative days left for lawmakers to find the answers.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 09:56 pm |
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
NEW IDEAS TO RAISE TAXES
Here we go again! I see where our esteemed lawmakers in Dover are going to raise our sin Taxes yet again. Seems to me they never say anything about cutting entitlement programs, but I guess one wouldn’t want to make their political base mad and not vote for them.
I’m waiting for a new slogan to emerge to justify these tax increases. Remember, the Minner Administration’s slogan for the last tax increases was “Save the Children:. How about a new slogan “we’re here to save you from yourself”.
Here’s some suggestions for our lawmakers in Dover to consider: Take over all tobacco and alcoholic beverage outlets and turn them into state owned stores, that way you could keep all the profits. How about taking over all 3 casinos in the state, that way you cut out all the middlemen. Oh, I forgot the Horseman’s cut, but seems ½ a percent is fair. How about putting carbon meters on motor vehicle’s tailpipes to measure your carbon footprint. That way you would be required to go to the DMV every month and pay a carbon tax for your contribution to climate change. Better yet, how about requiring taxi meters in all motor vehicles in the state for miles driven every month. They would be computerized and sealed by the state and would send your mileage by satellite to the DMV every month, so they could send you a monthly bill for miles driven. Out of state drivers would be required to pay a mileage tax at every new toll booth at every road entering or exiting the state. I can just imagine now, some of the out of state drivers coming upon a toll booth on a back road out in the sticks!
I wrote these outrageous proposals with tongue in cheek, “But Beware”, someday these might come to pass. I wouldn’t put anything past our anointed leaders, both Federal or State to come up with more tax and spend ideas in their head long rush for us to become a nanny state. To our lawmakers:
“Enough is Enough”! The taxpayers don’t have money trees in their backyards!
Walter G McGinnis Jr.
Smyrna
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 04:49 pm |
|
| Beer is easier to make than wine and white lighting is not much more difficult. As long as you don't sell it, it is legal. There is also the option of buying it where it is not taxed so high. No matter, the income to the Delaware budget will decrease when the populace decides the price is too high. Alternatives are always available.
|
The Future Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 04:11 pm |
|
TruthwillOut wrote: Cos half the price of booze is a tax and thats not enough for them.
IF YOU RAISE THE TAX WE WILL QUITE DRINKING! AND ALL YOU WILL HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IS LOOSING MOORE JOBS
I also love how the public was not allowed to see the bill untill the last minute.
Why hasnt the open gov bill been signed yet?
There are plenty of people in lower delaware who either make or know how to make wine and other distilled beverages... I have had the pleaseure of having some pretty good "wine" made from fruits found right here on the eastern shore.. So we won't have to quit drinking.. our local guys will just have to step up production!!lol
|
TruthwillOut Member

| Joined: | Tue Mar 17th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 03:45 pm |
|
Cos half the price of booze is a tax and thats not enough for them.
IF YOU RAISE THE TAX WE WILL QUITE DRINKING! AND ALL YOU WILL HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IS LOOSING MOORE JOBS
I also love how the public was not allowed to see the bill untill the last minute.
Why hasnt the open gov bill been signed yet?
|
Two Cents Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1464 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 03:24 pm |
|
| Wait til this time next year, when all these new tax revenues have not been realized on an actual basis! The state of delaware will have an even larger budget hole to have to deal with by then -- both for the FY2010 actual results, and the FY2011 budget cycle. It should be great fun by then. The legislature seems completely unwilling or incapable of making the necessary reductions in spending to eliminate these problems.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 03:13 pm |
|
Delaware legislators rush through booze tax, just in time for summer
By David Sirkin and Jonathan Williams
In our age of political vitriol and angst, there is not much that both sides can agree on, except perhaps that good laws are rarely rushed through the legislative process. Case in point is the sudden rush in the Delaware legislature to push through a huge new tax increase of as much as 136 percent on alcoholic beverages in the state. It wasn’t until the end of the day Tuesday, June 9, that Majority Leader Pete Schwartzkopf even allowed the public to see House Bill 212.
Terrified by Delaware’s looming $751 million budget deficit, state lawmakers and Gov. Jack Markell are trying to squeeze more revenue from anywhere possible. That’s certainly understandable and the state has made some tough choices, including an 8 percent pay cut for 33,000 state employees. However, more than doubling the alcohol excise tax is likely to have unintended consequences, especially for Delaware’s tourism industry.
Tourism is the economic lifeblood of many Delaware communities and generates over $1.8 billion annually. Pleasant beaches and nice weather notwithstanding, tourism is not immune to economic downturns, as 1,500 recently unemployed hospitality workers can attest. Many individuals and families have to make tough choices with their finances right now and the impact of mistreating these out of state visitors, who are the golden geese of Delaware’s economy, is not fully known. Before it is rushed to the Governor for a quick signing, this bill needs to be given proper scrutiny so that its true consequences may be considered by the taxpayers.
When asked if they were worried about “Fleecing the Tourists” Joe Rogalsky, in the Governor’s office, pointed out that Delaware’s current liquor taxes are lower than liquor taxes in neighboring states, in particular he pointed to New Jersey. This recognizes the idea that people want to get the biggest bang for their buck, which at the moment is in Delaware. Unfortunately, according to the Federation of Tax Administrators, the proposed tax will make Delaware the least price competitive of all its neighbors, taxing liquor 300 percent higher per gallon than Maryland and 10 cents per gallon higher thanW New Jersey.
While it is true that few people make their vacation decisions based solely on the price of a Daiquiri, tourists are cautious citizens who look to many factors when deciding how to spend their hard earned vacation dollars. And the fact is that the hospitality industry of Delaware will not just absorb this new tax, they will pass down the added cost to the people of Delaware, and to the tourists.
The other problem is one of pure tax avoidance. When Maryland dramatically raised its cigarette tax the revenue collected ended up being well bellow their projections. The reason was simple. All Maryland smokers had to do was go to a neighboring state with much lower cigarette taxes and stock up. This tax increase didn’t just depress cigarette sales but also associated convenience store sales as well as smokers bought more snacks, sodas, newspapers, etc. out of state. How difficult would it be for beach goers to simply bring their lower taxed alcohol with them instead of buying it in Delaware? This bill could actually result is less revenue for the state and for businesses.
Delaware merchants attract a lot of out of state shoppers with the promise of sales-tax-free shopping. By increasing the hidden excise tax on liquor the benefits of no sales tax quickly disappear as will the state’s competitive advantage.
The problems brought on by years of rampant over-spending will not be solved by taking more from the taxpayer. Hopefully, Gov. Markell, and the legislature will avoid these reactionary taxes that will be an economic liability. Taxpayers and tourists should not be punished for years of wasteful spending in Dover. In difficult economic times like these, it is important for legislators to always think before they tax.
David Sirkin is a research assistant with the American Legislative Exchange Council.
Jonathan Williams is the Director of Tax and Fiscal Policy at the American Legislative Exchange Council and the author of Rich States, Poor States.
Last edited on Fri Jun 12th, 2009 03:15 pm by tspong
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 03:43 am |
|
Kirk
I totally disagree. One simple question. If it is going to take a 50% sales tax (note that the Fair Tax is not a sales tax as you describe it ) how high do you think the extremely inefficient income tax will have to be. The workers will not pay it. It will be better to set on one's derriere and use the "government's" money.
Next, we all know that there is no way that Social Security is going to be saved. Professional politicians have not touched this "third rail" in over ten years. And that was to tax Social Security as income? A government Ponsi scheme is still a Ponsi scheme and someday there will be a coming to Jesus meeting, as my mother used to say.
I will agree that as long as the government continues to spend (or print) money it does not have, neither the Fair Tax nor income tax will work. My number one question is still, "What are we going to do to solve the problem?" The present system is not going to hold up, The government's take over of business is not going to work, the income tax system is not going to work, and you say the Fair Tax will not work. I assume you have an alternative that will work. Share it with us, please!
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 08:59 pm |
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
This budget process is separating the weak from legislators from the strong. Senator Schwartzkopf stated in a committee meeting this week that the body was elected to make tough decisions if taxes need to be raised. I strongly believe that any senator or representative who reacts by trying to raise taxes instead of stepping on toes to trim back spending is weak.
It is easier to impose new taxes than to demand thrift from the government they were elected to control. Every vote to raise taxes, whether by imposing fees or by increasing the costs to Delaware businesses, shows that legislator’s inability to do their job. They give in to the system which protects their own territory. they
give in to the political cronies who look out for their own best interests instead of the people’s interests. They give in to the Delaware Way, and every citizen will be forced to pay for their weaknesses.
Where are those who speak for their constituents? Who in Legislative Hall has the courage to stand up for their electorate? Why are we standing by while the process of self protective government steamrolls over us?
Brian Shields
Sussex County Chair
Libertarian Party of Delaware
Seaford
|
Lavitakus Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1311 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 05:38 pm |
|
tspong wrote: What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Cigarette, alcohol tax bills near vote
Millions expected to be raised by new legislation
I think they are idiots.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 05:35 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
State employee pay cut still possible
No consensus reached after committee meets
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — Although many legislators have spoken out against pay cuts for state employees — and even Gov. Jack A. Markell has said he did not want to introduce the idea — the proposal is still on the table.
Members of the Joint Finance Committee, the legislative body responsible for crafting the budget, met in private on Wednesday night to talk about the possibility of salary cuts.
"We talked about the pay issue and we made progress," said Rep. Joseph W. Booth, R-Georgetown, one of the group’s 12 members.
The group was unable to come to a consensus, in part because up-to-date figures regarding the number of state workers that are scheduled to retire before the end of the fiscal year are not yet available, he said.
Despite the belief by many that the legislature would not approve the 8 percent across-the-board pay cut for state employees that was proposed by the governor in March, it appears cuts are still a distinct possibility.
Revenue estimates have continued to fall and little support has been garnered for alternative solutions.
Rep. Booth said the group talked about a variety of pay cut options, but that Gov. Markell’s 8-percent salary cut suggestion was still on the table.
The Joint Finance Committee will meet again on Friday. Starting Friday afternoon, when Gov. Markell signs House Bill 1, the meetings will be open to the public.
State employees, who have been aggressive in their campaign against the pay cuts, will be holding the third of three rallies today to continue to express their opposition to the plan.
Helping small businesses
The first bill sponsored by members of the Small Business Caucus, House Bill 85, was placed on the House agenda on Tuesday.
The legislation would reform rating rules for small employer group health insurance by compressing the top and bottom insurance rates, reducing the variance between rate premiums and limiting the adjustments that can be made year to year.
Delaware State Chamber of Commerce senior vice president of government relations A. Richard Heffron said that it is not uncommon for some individuals to see a 25-percent spike in their health insurance premiums.
The legislation would cap those adjustments at 15 percent. Mr. Heffron said the bill would help control rising costs of health insurance for small businesses and their employees, adding predictability to the process.
Supporting strawberries
Rep. Gerald W. Hocker, R-Ocean View, introduced legislation, House Bill 203, on Tuesday that would designate the strawberry as the state fruit.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
Two Cents Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1464 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 05:31 pm |
|
tspong wrote: Legislators voted to release from a committee bills that would increase the tax on alcoholic beverages, raise cigarette taxes, and increase the alcohol licensing fees.
Despite a strong showing of public opposition to the measures, state lawmakers said the state’s ever-increasing budget shortfall made the move necessary.
"I didn’t expect to walk in here and have everyone happy," said House Majority Leader Rep. Peter C. Schwartzkopf, D-Rehoboth Beach, the main sponsor of all three bills. "I’m not happy either."
Rep. Schwartzkopf, you and your cronies should be spending more time and effort eliminating wasteful state spending, rather than searching out ways to further increase revenues through increased taxation.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 04:36 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Cigarette, alcohol tax bills near vote
Millions expected to be raised by new legislation
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — Delawareans heading to their favorite convenience store to pick up a pack of cigarettes or going to the liquor store for a bottle of wine may soon see prices rising as legislators got one step closer on Wednesday to raising taxes on alcohol and tobacco.
Legislators voted to release from a committee bills that would increase the tax on alcoholic beverages, raise cigarette taxes, and increase the alcohol licensing fees.
Despite a strong showing of public opposition to the measures, state lawmakers said the state’s ever-increasing budget shortfall made the move necessary.
"I didn’t expect to walk in here and have everyone happy," said House Majority Leader Rep. Peter C. Schwartzkopf, D-Rehoboth Beach, the main sponsor of all three bills. "I’m not happy either."
The state is facing a nearly $800 million budget shortfall for fiscal year 2010. Lawmakers are still trying to find $26 million by June 30 to cover this year’s shortfall.
The tax on alcoholic beverages — which would increase 2 cents per can of beer, 3 cents per five ounces of wine, and 15 cents per 750 milliliters of liquor — is expected to help reduce the deficit by $5.3 million in fiscal year 2010. It is expected to bring in $8.8 million in fiscal year 2011.
Increasing the cigarette tax from $1.15 a pack to $1.60 per pack would raise $16 million for fiscal year 2010 and $21 million in the following year. The increases in the alcohol licensing fees are expected to bring in about $600,000 a year.
Despite the state’s need to balance its budget, many small business owners said they believed the state was actually doing itself a disservice.
By hitting small businesses, especially restaurants and liquor stores, with multiple fees and taxes at the same time, the state was going to see many companies laying off workers or going under altogether, which would mean a decrease in the revenue generated from the personal income tax and other taxes paid by the businesses.
"In a good year our profits are razor-thin," said Carrie Leishman, of the Delaware Restaurant Association. "This comes at a very, very bad time."
More than 30 members of the public spoke at Wednesday’s meeting of the House Revenue and Finance Committee.
Four individuals — representatives of the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society and the American Lung Association, and a doctor — spoke in support of the tax increase on cigarettes. They said that the increase in cost would lead to fewer young people starting the habit.
All the rest spoke out against the idea of increasing taxes.
A major concern of the group was that Delaware would lose the competitive advantage it currently holds over nearby states in regards to alcohol and cigarette sales because of its low taxes.
In response to these concerns, Rep. Deborah Hudson, R-Wilmington, said she would be attaching amendments to all of the bills that would sunset the taxes after one year.
"We will be able to see if there was a profound effect on business," she said.
"I have no problem revisiting all of them," said Rep. Schwartzkopf, although he did say he worried that one year would not be enough time for the state to recoup the money it needs.
The three bills now head to the House floor for a vote.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
Kirk Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 482 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 01:03 pm |
|
TR: again, an awful assumption on your part - just because people disagree with you they must be uninformed. The primary criticism of "Fair Tax" is now, and has been, that there is less than $10T in total consumption, of which nearly $2T would not be taxed under the "Fair Tax" Program (basic farm produce, life-preserving medications though quality of life meds would be taxed, etc.) This leaves about $8T to tax. There is a budget in excess of $3T, excluding the Afghan War and the current Stimulus Plan. To raise $3T on a taxable base of only $8T requires a sales tax rate of over 35%. If we are to balance the budget as the baby boomers draw Social Security and Medicare, we will need to increase that consumption/sales tax to more than 50%. The "Fair Tax" advocates assert that a 50% sales tax will not alter the public's spending patterns, and if it does it will only be for the good. I do not care how much you pretend that the reason people do not support this is because they are uninformed, it is the informed people that are the most vocal opponents.
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11th, 2009 02:23 am |
|
Kirk
You need to read the latest John Linder bill that is before Congress, I think a close scrutiny will reveal your concerns have been addressed and the proper corrections have been incorporated. Several millions (of PRIVATE money, not special interest money) have been spent to find a system that can replace the extremely inefficient income tax system.
I will reiterate, most do not educate themselves and some are not capable if they only have a government education!
|
Playing the Game Member

| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 5408 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 10:15 pm |
|
Dear Brad Bennett - When everyone stops buying cigarettes, how are you going to fund all of the programs that you morons in Leg Hall keep raising the tax to fund? I am not a smoker, just a taxpayer who knows a band of fools when he sees one and every band needs a leader.
Then to top all of this off we had another brilliant member decide that it was high time to make the strawberry the state fruit. What planet do you folks live on?
tspong wrote:
"For me, it’s an easy decision," said Rep. E. Bradford Bennett, D-Dover, of his support of the cigarette-tax increase. His father passed away from lung cancer caused by smoking cigarettes.
"Hopefully that’ll help prevent some young people from starting to smoke," he said.
Supporting strawberries
Rep. Gerald W. Hocker, R-Ocean View, introduced legislation, House Bill 203, on Tuesday that would designate the strawberry as the state fruit.
|
Kirk Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 482 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 08:41 pm |
|
TR: you make the mistake of assuming that anyone who disagrees with your position is not educated properly... just remember that the same could be said of you and your positions. The reason that I do not support the "Fair Tax" movement is the lack of realism in the assumptions and policy recommendations of the proponents. This has nothing with either education or political perspective, but the argument itself. For example, it assumes that shifting away from an income, corporate income and payroll tax to a consumption tax system will not cause any disruption to consumption or to any markets for goods and services. It assumes that the government will instantaneously reduce its expenditures by more than 25% - which would require significant reductions/elimination of one (or more) of the following (take your pick): social security, defense, interest on existing debt, medicare. It assumes that people will gladly report all transactions and not attempt to evade the "new" national sales taxes. The lack of realism of any one of the above is enough to make one say "huh?" let alone the long list of further problems. There are problems with the mathematics of their proposed tax rates - a 23% tax on the $8T of consumption does not yield enough revenues to pay for a $3T Government budget (and this excludes stimulus and Afghan War spending). There are also problems of enforcement methods and costs (the Fair Tax movement originally suggested that there would be NO enforcement costs, but when people starting laughing at them they changed their tune). I appreciate that you are frustrated with the current state of affairs, but in the future you would stand to win over more people with better arguments than "you must not be educated".
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 07:39 pm |
|
TruthwillOut wrote: ITS LONG PASSED TIME FOR A HOUSE CLEANING AT LEGISLATIVE HALL
"It is long past time for a house cleaning........." was the mantra when I cast my first ballot in 1961. It is still the same today. As I have said before, Term Limits and the Fair Tax. Will it happen? No. Why? Because voters will continue to vote their own interests and will not give either proposal a fair discussion.
I have seen no posted solutions in the little time since I joined this forum and if the government continues to educate our youth, they will not have the knowledge to discuss the subjects intelligently.
|
dover-diva Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1973 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 07:12 pm |
|
| For once TWO, I agree with you and what you said.
|
TruthwillOut Member

| Joined: | Tue Mar 17th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 04:10 pm |
|
HERE WE GO AGAIN Every time you brain dead monkies running the state dont have enough money to throw at your special interests voters you want to raise taxes on things like this.
THE ANSWER IS NOT MORE TAXES ITS LESS SPENDING. BUT WE THE CITIZENS WHO FOOT THE BILL ARENT ALLOWED IN YOUR CLOSED DOOR MEETINGS COS THE GOV HASNT SIGNED THE BILL INTO LAW.
ITS LONG PASSED TIME FOR A HOUSE CLEANING AT LEGISLATIVE HALL
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 04:00 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Bills would raise taxes on cigarettes, alcohol
Legislative Notebook
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — Following up on Gov. Jack A. Markell’s budget recommendation, which included suggestions to raise multiple taxes, three revenue-generating bills were introduced in the House on Tuesday.
The bills, all sponsored by House Majority Leader Rep. Peter C. Schwartzkopf, D-Rehoboth Beach, would increase the cost for an alcohol license, raise the cigarette tax and increase the tax on alcoholic beverages.
Under the legislation, the cigarette tax would increase from $1.15 to $1.60 a pack. The alcohol tax would increase 2 cents per 12-ounce can of beer, 3 cents per 5 ounces of wine and 15 cents per 750 milliliter of liquor.
"Each penny on a can [of beer] is worth $400,000," said Rep. Schwartzkopf.
Although similar legislation has failed in the past, he said he believes the votes are there to pass the bills.
"For me, it’s an easy decision," said Rep. E. Bradford Bennett, D-Dover, of his support of the cigarette-tax increase. His father passed away from lung cancer caused by smoking cigarettes.
"Hopefully that’ll help prevent some young people from starting to smoke," he said.
All three bills, along with legislation filed Thursday, House Bill 188, which would tax temporary rental units, were assigned the House Revenue and Finance Committee and will have a hearing today.
School board vote in Nov.?
Legislation that would move school board elections from their current date on the second Tuesday in May to coincide with the general elections in November passed in the House on Tuesday.
Supporters said the measure, House Bill 117, would help save the state money and increase voter turnout for school board elections. Opponents argued that the move would politicize school board elections.
Popular vote option explored
In the future presidents could be elected through popular vote, if legislation introduced in the House on Thursday passes, and similar legislation in other states garners approval.
House Bill 198 would enter Delaware into an interstate compact known as the Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote.
States are given the authority to decide the manner of awarding their electoral votes — states involved in the contract would agree to award its electoral votes to the presidential ticket that receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Currently states award their electoral votes to the ticket that receives the most popular votes in their particular state.
The contract would go into effect when enough states have joined that the group possesses a majority of electoral votes.
Five states have already joined into the agreement — Hawaii, Washington, Illinois, Maryland and New Jersey — and together they have 61 electoral votes. The group would need to have 270 votes to reach a majority.
Protecting first responders
Legislation introduced by Rep. Earl Jaques, D-Glasgow, on Tuesday would ensure that those who recklessly kill one of Delaware’s first responders is eligible to be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Under current Delaware law, a person who recklessly causes the death of an on-duty law-enforcement officer, corrections employee or firefighter is guilty of murder in the first degree and eligible for capital punishment.
House Bill 204 would add paramedics, emergency medical technicians, fire marshals and fire police officers to the same statutes.
Helping small businesses
The first bill sponsored by members of the Small Business Caucus, House Bill 85, was placed on the House agenda on Tuesday.
The legislation would reform rating rules for small-employer group health insurance by compressing the top and bottom insurance rates, reducing the variance between rate premiums and limiting the adjustments that can be made year to year.
Delaware State Chamber of Commerce senior vice president of government relations A. Richard Heffron said that it is not uncommon for some individuals to see a 25-percent spike in their health insurance premiums.
The legislation would cap those adjustments at 15 percent. Mr. Heffron said the bill would help control rising costs of health insurance for small businesses and their employees, adding predictability to the process.
Supporting strawberries
Rep. Gerald W. Hocker, R-Ocean View, introduced legislation, House Bill 203, on Tuesday that would designate the strawberry as the state fruit.
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
TruthwillOut Member

| Joined: | Tue Mar 17th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 03:57 pm |
|
WWJD wrote: Lavitakus wrote: tspong wrote: What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Legislators set to tackle state budget
Carrot and stick!
At their current pace, they should have our budget balanced by June 30...2053!!! Of course, this is the same group welcoming back John Atkins with open arms. Can't expect much from brain-dead monkeys. Whats teh story with john Atkins?
|
WWJD Member
| Joined: | Fri Oct 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 69 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10th, 2009 03:30 am |
|
Lavitakus wrote: tspong wrote: What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Legislators set to tackle state budget
Carrot and stick!
At their current pace, they should have our budget balanced by June 30...2053!!! Of course, this is the same group welcoming back John Atkins with open arms. Can't expect much from brain-dead monkeys.
|
TruthwillOut Member

| Joined: | Tue Mar 17th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 9th, 2009 09:34 pm |
|
my thinking is fine thanks.
Gov. as parent is an abohration to america. we are already wage slaves. Half of what we earn is taken in one tax or another then redistributed. ETC ETC.
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 9th, 2009 08:14 pm |
|
TWO
You need to get up to date with your thinking, modern government dependents have exceeded the producers. When you have a need, you go to the government and hope you get yours before theirs runs out. As you are now the majority, what you say has priority over the minority no matter the correctness. Barney Frank knows this and realizes he can get re-elected by keeping the 51% happy. What better way to do that than to give government money to potential Barney Frank voters. (All three Delaware congressmen feel the same but have not yet reached Barney's skill level) Remember, over 25% of Americans believe that the government has its own money!
What we are striving for, believe it or not, is slavery. Not all, but I think the 51% point has been reached. We want the government to be the master, whether it be health care, retirement, schools, day care, food stamps, roads, free housing, etc. etc., we want it provided. If we had to go back to the original thinking of our founding fathers, many would starve to death. In todays world, that would be cruel. We no longer have the "right" to sit on our behinds and starve to death from laziness. The master is going to tell us where to go, what to do and when to do it and we will feel good because that is what we are being taught.
How are we going to change this direction we are going? Term Limits and the Fair tax. Will it happen? No, because we are being taught (in our government schools, colleges and by the news media) that government is the answer to all our ills and 51% now believe!
Last edited on Tue Jun 9th, 2009 08:16 pm by T R
|
Lavitakus Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1311 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 9th, 2009 07:08 pm |
|
tspong wrote: What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Legislators set to tackle state budget
Carrot and stick!
|
TruthwillOut Member

| Joined: | Tue Mar 17th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 560 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 9th, 2009 04:44 pm |
|
T R wrote: Not to worry, Yesterdays news included an article about Barney Frank's new proposal that the federal government bail out all states that have budgets in the red. This will solve all our problems if our professional politicians can tap Delaware onto this spigot!
And where the heck do you think the Fed gov gets its money? this would mean delawareians would be bailing out other states, along with car companies and banks and hedge fund managers etc.
How did Jon Stuart put it. We gave chrysler 40 Billion and they still filed for bankruptcy. We could have gotten the bankruptcy for free
|
Tired1969 Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 9th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 9th, 2009 01:04 pm |
|
BOTTOM LINE
JFC ARE YOU LISTENING?? No raises for three years in a row, and then a suggestion that the budget has to be balanced yet again on the state employee's backs by taking a cut in pay whether its 8% or 1% is just incredible. I just hope the anger, the frustration, the fear, and the rage that the state employees feel, transfer to the rest of the tax payers of Delaware, and that these feeling are sustained throughout Markells administration and that they rise up to greet him everyday for the rest of his term/s.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 8th, 2009 07:12 pm |
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinion by clicking on "Reply."
Very Sad, that our political system has really taken a low road, how many low income people will be inhaled into poverty by gambling, drinking or using drugs as they become more easily accessible? Where are the real jobs that were promised and when will everyone wake up. To all of the Delaware political system, why are you a follower and not an originator.
You have let the auto industry, food industry, and manufacturing leave the state of Delaware, when will you begin working for your customers, "the tax payers of Delaware"
During good economic times, politicians often take the moral high ground (and quick poll bumps) by opposing gambling, alcohol, and drugs. These days, many states and cities must consider fresh sources of money over strict morals as they search for ways to make ends meet. Here are the most significant examples out there, with more surely on the way:
Gambling
Alcohol
Drugs
Bill Draper
Woodside
|
T R Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 182 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 4th, 2009 05:11 pm |
|
| Not to worry, Yesterdays news included an article about Barney Frank's new proposal that the federal government bail out all states that have budgets in the red. This will solve all our problems if our professional politicians can tap Delaware onto this spigot!
|
taxpayertoo Member
| Joined: | Sun Mar 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 159 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 4th, 2009 02:04 pm |
|
| What is the current number of State employees choosing to retire before June 30th? The pension office had stated that the number was about the same as every year - but in the last 2 weeks I've been hearing of more people deciding to retire sooner rather than later - people who had planned to stay a little longer. And if the numbers are higher will this affect the legislators' decision on pay-cuts? Last edited on Thu Jun 4th, 2009 02:09 pm by taxpayertoo
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 1st, 2009 03:07 pm |
|
What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:
Legislators set to tackle state budget
Del. workers’ pay cut proposal still on the table
By Leah Burcat
Delaware State News
DOVER — When the legislators return on Tuesday, one issue will take center stage — the budget.
Legislative budget writers made progress toward closing the $800 million budget gap during the two-week Joint Finance Committee break that ended on Thursday, but the legislature still has significant ground to cover.
Of Gov. Jack A. Markell’s $526.7 million in budget solutions — the remainder comes from revenue generators — the Joint Finance Committee so far approved $264.6 million in cuts.
The majority of cuts came from travel, contractual, fuel and employee-recognition costs. Personnel expenses were not looked into.
"We’ve been working hard but we’ve still got a way to go," said Rep. Dennis P. Williams, D-Wilmington, the committee’s co-chairman. "We still have some big areas to look at and time is not our ally."
One major issue still on the table is the governor’s proposed salary cut for state employees.
And although even the governor has said repeatedly that he does not like the idea, and legislators have spoken out against the proposal, little has been done to ensure the safety of state workers’ pay.
A balanced budget for fiscal year 2010 must be approved by June 30. The General Assembly must still also find a way to fill the $26 million gap for the current fiscal year.
"They’ve been working very hard," said state budget director Ann Visalli. "And we’re over halfway there."
So far, the committee has enacted about $69 million in cuts recommended in the budget former Gov. Ruth Ann Minner submitted before she left office in January. It also has trimmed about $5.8 million in Medicaid reimbursements to health care providers and cut about $8.5 million from department budgets.
Additionally, the committee has approved using about $130 million in federal stimulus money to shore up Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for low-income families.
Sen. Nancy Cook, D-Kenton, the committee’s co-chairwoman, said the committee is working with the administration to see how cuts in areas, such as education, will affect the flow of federal stimulus money to the state.
"We need to be careful when we’re making cuts, because we don’t want to jeopardize the stimulus money," she said.
In regard to the $26 million that needs to be found for this fiscal year, Ms. Visalli said the money will likely come from savings from keeping state positions vacant or from program lines that have slowed down their spending.
Wherever it comes from, it needs to happen quickly — there are only 13 more legislative days left before June 30.
Making the matter even more challenging is that the numbers could change. The Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council, the group of economic experts that gives the state its financial forecasts, meets once more before the budget deadline.
The council’s revenue predictions for the state have steadily decreased since last June. If the numbers drop again this June, it could leave legislators scrambling to find funds.
"We’re hoping [the] June [DEFAC forecast] will hold steady," said Ms. Visalli. "If June holds steady we’re just going to continue the path that we’re on."
"Right now, it’s like trying to find change in the couch," said Ms. Visalli.
The Joint Finance Committee will continue its deliberations on Monday.
Despite the challenges, committee members said they’re optimistic that they’ll bring in a balanced budget on schedule.
"I’ve been on this committee for a long time," said Sen. David McBride, D-Hawks Nest. "I’m confident that we’re moving in the right direction and that we’ll get this done."
Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.
|
tspong Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3357 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri May 29th, 2009 08:35 pm |
|
Copied below is a guest commentary submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
Plan to Close Budget Gap Draws on Ideas from All Quarters
by State House Minority Leader Richard Cathcart &
State House Minority Whip Dan Short
Our state faces a revenue shortfall of approximately $800 million for the upcoming fiscal year that begins in just a few weeks.
Much of this gap is due to the current economic recession and the dampening effect it’s had on state revenues, but the growth of state spending (up 246% in the last 15 years) has also played a prominent role in our current situation.
We believe this problem is too challenging to be solved by any one group acting alone. With that in mind, we’ve compiled a plan that draws together the best ideas from all parts of the political spectrum including Gov. Markell, members of the General Assembly, non-partisan groups, and private citizens. Each suggestion was selected with an eye towards maximizing resources and reducing costs, while minimizing the impact to taxpayers, state employees and teachers.
While we do not believe state employees should incur a salary cut, it’s clear our government needs to be streamlined. We suggest cutting the state work force by 4,000 workers over the next four to six years via attrition. This move would leave us with about 27,500 workers (including school employees) – about what we had at the start of the decade. According to the State Pension Office, each month approximately 100 employees apply for pension and another 100 apply for pension withdrawals. Even assuming that 75% of these workers are essential employees that must be replaced, the state could still reduce its work force by 600 workers via attrition in FY 2010 alone. The pace of this reduction could be accelerated as Gov. Markell’s performance review bears fruit, agencies are reorganized, and fewer positions are classified as “essential.” This would save $27 million in the upcoming budget, and $180 million annually when fully implemented.
We also recommend instituting a tax amnesty program for Delaware. In 11 states where this has been implemented recently, the amnesty produced an average of .41% of annual revenue – a potential $12 million windfall for the First State.
Additionally, we suggest the sale of state property that is currently unused or not needed for the government’s core mission. For instance, we’d recommend the sale of all three fixed-wing State Police aircraft. State officials have already agreed to ground these aircraft in a cost-cutting move. Why not explore a partnership with the air flight program at Delaware State University for those relatively limited instances where fixed-wing aircraft are needed? Such an arrangement would not only save money, it could potentially foster a beneficial synergy.
The state owns golf courses, office buildings, marinas and other valuable, but non-essential, property. We believe we cannot in good conscience ask citizens to reach deeper into their pockets when assets that could generate millions of dollars in revenue for taxpayers are untouched.
That brings us to the difficult issue of taxes. As much as we would like to avoid tax increases of any kind, the size of our shortfall requires that we find some additional revenue. However, if they are to be part of a holistic approach to this problem, we believe we should make the burden as equitable, painless, and fleeting as possible. While Gov. Markell has proposed a package of six tax hikes, we believe that can be scaled back. We propose modifying the governor’s personal income tax increase so that all wage earners have a share in the solution, and adopting the governor’s call to raise corporate tax. In a further modification of the governor’s plan, we believe both of these tax increases should “sunset” or expire after three years.
Some progress has already been made to bridge the budget gap. Federal stimulus money, as well as steps that have already been taken by state officials, have supplied $227 million. The proposals we’ve compiled for the upcoming budget, only a few of which we’ve just described, would save or produce an additional $335 million. Together, the resulting $562 million provides more than 70 percent of the funds needed to fill the gap.
If we can use this bipartisan plan as a base on which to build, we’re well within striking distance of dealing with the worst budget shortfall our state has ever faced.
For a complete description of the plan, as well as ideas to help the state save an additional $200 million in future budgets, please visit the press release page (Budget Letter to Gov. & JFC) of our website at:
http://www.delawarestatehouse.com.
If we put our differences aside, and work cooperatively, we cannot only get this budget done, but position our state for the challenges we’re sure to face in the future.
Last edited on Mon Jun 1st, 2009 03:14 pm by tspong
|
 Current time is 05:25 am | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
|
|