Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
> Delaware Public Forums > State of Delaware Public Issues Forum > Markell to unveil budget -- Plan must address $750M shortfall

Markell to unveil budget -- Plan must address $750M shortfall
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 26th, 2009 07:59 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 


Why is nothing every mentioned about the reserve of monies Delaware had before Ruth Ann Minner took office?



Many of us average folks have been fiscally responsible and living within our means. There are rules ... don’t spend what you don’t have, and don’t buy what you can’t afford! These same rules should have applied to Ruth Minner when she was taking plane trips to buy antiques, helicopter rides, etc., and living in the Governor’s Mansion free of any and all monthly bills the rest of us struggle to pay. Delaware is now broke, but Ruth Minner can afford to build a library, amazing!



There should be an investigation into what happened to tall of Delaware’s reserve monies just before Ruth Minner took office, and an account of all the tax payer’s monies she spent while in office instead of pay cuts to Delaware state employees that worked most of their lives to get where they are on the pay scale. Take Ruth Minner’s library money to help Delaware pay for this economic nightmare! All politicians should be held responsible for every cent they spend of tax payer’s monies.



Ruth Minner made numerous bad decisions which put Delaware in the mess it’s in — where was her compassion and sacrifices?



I hope all you voters are very happy about who you voted for, and who is now in positions of authority: You were warned to be careful what you wished for: one example: See Delaware State News "Letter to the Editor" Friday, July 25, 2003.



P.S. — Oh, and hasn’t one person ever noticed that the "people no longer have a voice." It doesn’t matter what the people of Delaware don’t want, and vote against, you can be sure that the subject at hand is stalled for awhile, but in the end everything is passed! The politician’s don’t listen to what the people have to say and it’s a shame. Only during election time are the people needed and heard.



Gloria Meredith


Harrington

Last edited on Tue May 26th, 2009 08:00 pm by tspong

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 10:32 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Also from NY here.  When I was young we used to have can and bottle collection drives (Scouts, YMCA, school, etc.) and take the returns back for cash for our cause.

It also keeps the streets cleaner because kids and bums will pick them up along the road for spending money.

When our grandchildren visit from NY, they collect all of the bottles and cans while they're here (much to their parents chagrin) and take them home for a nickel each.

Maybe the local schools would stop sending their kids out to beg for money at Wal*Mart for their team or activity with a program for deposits.

Last edited on Sat May 23rd, 2009 10:33 pm by Playing the Game

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 09:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I don't know how it is in DE. but, when I was in NY (they had the tax too) I could take the returns to any place that sold the beverage. If I so chose,  I could put the same container in my recycles and the STATE got the money, not the distributers.

Last edited on Sat May 23rd, 2009 09:21 pm by dover-diva

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 07:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I agree.   The deposit law concerning plastic beverage containers is at least 20 years old.  Many, many nickels have been collected by distributors from purchasers over that time period.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 05:16 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I think the legislators who came up with the idea of escheating the unrefunded bottle deposits have a good idea. Believe that was mentioned by the Republican caucus as part of their plan. Maybe the Dems had it, too , but whoever raised it ought to follow through. The tax sure hasn't helped the roadside litter and at least we'd get some of the money we paid back because the distributors who are supposed to collect the tax sure don't make it easy to redeem containers for the deposit.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 02:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
dover-diva wrote: I know this was said someplace before, but, where can the consumer get their money back for the bottle deposits??  The money is not redeemed because there is no place to redeem it!

I have no doubt that the bottle deposit law was enacted in an effort to ensure that plastic beverage containers would be returned to a retailer so that they would not litter the landscape.  But you are correct -- I cannot identify a single retailer who will accept the containers or return the deposit.  Most of us simply forget those nickels and recycle the container.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 01:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
•Take Back Bottle Bill Money: Currently, beverage distributors collect the deposits on bottles as part of Delaware’s container law, but the bulk of this money is not redeemed by consumers. This money should be considered escheat property and revert to the state.

I know this was said someplace before, but, where can the consumer get their money back for the bottle deposits??  The money is not redeemed because there is no place to redeem it!

Skjuda
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 2nd, 2006
Location: Camden, Delaware USA
Posts: 384
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 12:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hmm I think it was Jack Mar-minner-kel

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 01:21 am
 Quote  Reply 
Let me think???????????  Oh yeah, Jack the Ripper.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 23rd, 2009 01:00 am
 Quote  Reply 
And who was the Treasurer of the State of Delaware during the Minner administration who would have had oversight responsibility for financial systems?

davidlanderson
Member


Joined: Sun Mar 5th, 2006
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 576
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 22nd, 2009 02:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
  My concerns about the spending spree of local and state governments have come to fruition.   

At the state level, we have a crisis.  While most of the attention has gone to huge proposed pay cuts, senior centers are facing a loss of a third of their funding, and taxpayers are facing significant increases.  
As Sussex County showed, not going wild in the good times means that you can not panic in the bad.
 With governments at all levels raising taxes in the next couple of years, the state has a responsibility to use our money wisely.  It is not.
The Delaware Financial Management System has been shown to be highly inefficient to say the least. It may very well be siphoning 10% of our tax money through its inefficiencies. Its inability to pay vendors in a timely, but quick system is costing us more in fees. Its incomprehensibility is costing us unnecessary paperwork. Learning the system is like learning a foreign language. Its bulky nature is forcing workers to do expensive work arounds. Its inefficient structure is so burdensome that the cost of writing a check is estimated to be $50 by comparison it is $6 or less in the private sector. The dealings with vendors alone have been documented to cost $200,000,000.00 a year by the Wilmington News Journal.  A patch on the vendor portion was suggested in 2004 and it will not go live until 2010.  That is 1.2 billion dollars tossed away,
 A financial management system is designed to save money not cost more money.  Please don't talk about raising my taxes while the money that you have goes out the bottom of the bucket.
This system has literally cost us Billions of dollars. DFMS is Bernie Madoff of financial accounting.  It is robbing seniors of services, teachers of well earned step raises due to education, and tax payers of hard earned money.
The best budget reform legislation that anyone could introduce would be a joint resolution to establish a commission to find a new financial management system. Whenever I hear a hybrid approach being discussed, I get concerned. Let’s study this and see if we can go world class instead of poverty class.

Lavitakus
Member
 

Joined: Sat Jan 14th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1311
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 22nd, 2009 05:34 am
 Quote  Reply 
Yeah well, good luck with all of that, spong.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 21st, 2009 03:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

GOP leadership presents state budget proposal


Delaware State News


DOVER — State House Minority Leader Richard Cathcart, R-Middletown, and House Minority Whip Dan Short, R-Seaford, detailed a plan addressing the state budget situation in a letter sent Wednesday to Gov. Jack A. Markell and members of the Joint Finance Committee — the group of 12 lawmakers currently crafting the next budget.


"With respect to our budgetary challenges, we’ve been repeatedly told that ‘everything is on the table,’" Rep. Cathcart stated in the letter. "It’s time we put that pledge to the test."


Reps. Short and Cathcart said they put the plan together using ideas from wherever they found them. "Some of the suggestions originated with us, many came from the governor, still others came from legislators, groups and private citizens," Rep. Short said. "By drawing from a diverse set of sources, we believe this is a plan that gets us a long way towards solving our budget crisis."


The suggestions included in the plan were selected based on:


•Maximizing existing resources;


•Reducing costs;


•Cutting the size of the state government to position Delaware for the future;


•Minimizing the impact to taxpayers, state employees and teachers.


The plan cites $227.1 million that is already available to meet the FY 2010 shortfall. This includes revenue the state has received via federal stimulus money, as well as money the state will get through sports betting, table games and the redistribution of net slot-machine proceeds.


There are also nearly $335 million in cost-cutting and revenue-generating suggestions for FY 2010. Taken together, the plan would close $562 million of the $800 million shortfall.


Additionally, there are suggestions that would save an additional $206.5 million annually, starting as early as FY 2011.


"These are ideas that would save state taxpayers a huge amount of money, but would realistically take at least a year to implement," Rep. Short said. "However, we need to undertake these initiatives now so we can start the process of positioning Delaware for an uncertain future."


Among the proposals is a suggestion to trim the state work force by 4,000 over the next four to six years via attrition, returning the work force to 27,500 — about its size in 2000.


According to the State Pension Office, at least 200 state workers and teachers leave state service each month. Assuming 75 percent of these workers are essential employees that must be replaced, the state could still reduce its work force by 600 workers via attrition in FY 2010 alone.


"We believe this is a conservative estimate," Rep. Cathcart said. "In fact, we anticipate the pace of this drawdown will naturally accelerate in future years as the performance reviews that Gov. Markell has ordered are completed and agencies are reorganized for greater efficiency."


The plan includes two tax increases, which are modified versions of suggestions Gov. Markell made as part of a package of six tax hikes. The state personal income tax would be raised by 1 percent for those making over $60,000 and one-half of 1 percent for those making less. The plan would also raise the corporate franchise tax.


"We kept the tax increases to an absolute minimum in this plan and, with the idea that state revenues will rebound as the economy strengthens, both of these changes would expire or ‘sunset’ after three years," Rep. Cathcart said.


Joe Rogalsky, a spokesman for Gov. Markell, said the governor and his staff are reviewing the GOP plan.


"The governor is looking at those proposals," Mr. Rogalsky said. "Some of their ideas he has already proposed. He will be working with the General Assembly over the next six weeks to address the budget shortfall. He does have concerns about plans to increase taxes that place the burden on the middle class."


Both Reps. Cathcart and Short said the plan isn’t intended as a final solution, but has the potential to jump-start talks by providing a base on which to build.


"This plan would bridge more than three-quarters of our budget gap, drawing from ideas of Republicans and Democrats alike," Rep. Cathcart said. "Not all of the people in my caucus are happy about all the items in this plan, just as I’m sure the governor and other lawmakers will have issues with some aspects. I’m not thrilled with some of it, but that’s kind of the point. Everyone is going to need to concede some ground to get to the place where we collectively need to be."


Highlights of the plan include:


•Cut the State Work Force Via Attrition: Trim the state work force by 4,000 workers over the next four to six years via attrition. This would return the work force to its approximate size in 2000. According to the State Pension Office, each month approximately 100 employees apply for pension and another 100 apply for pension withdrawals. Even assuming that 75 percent of these 2,400 workers that leave state employment annually are essential employees that must be replaced, the state could still reduce its work force by 600 workers via attrition in FY 2010 alone.


$27 million (FY 2010 & $180 million annually when fully implemented.)


•Institute a Tax Amnesty for Delaware: In 11 states where this has been implemented recently, the states reaped an average of .41 percent of their annual revenues as a result of the amnesty.


$12.3 million (FY 2010)


•Temporarily Lift Spending Cap: Currently, the state can only spend 98 percent of projected revenue (Title 29, Section 6533). We should temporarily raise this threshold to 99 percent of projected revenue. This would leave the state with a prudent one-percent buffer and, more importantly, safeguard Delaware’s top bond ratings by leaving the Rainy Day Fund fully intact. This action would allow the state to use available revenue, while still leaving a $200M safety net (one percent buffer and Rainy Day Fund) in place.


$30 million (FY 2010)


•Take Back Bottle Bill Money: Currently, beverage distributors collect the deposits on bottles as part of Delaware’s container law, but the bulk of this money is not redeemed by consumers. This money should be considered escheat property and revert to the state.


$3 million (annually)


•Reform Student Transportation Spending: Track the number of students being bused to/from school and pay transportation reimbursements based on these actual numbers, rather than paying reimbursements for all students eligible for transportation. Many eligible students use other means to get to/from school. (Assumes saving 10 percent of the $66 million that state pays school districts for student transportation.)


$6.6 million (annually)


•One-year Cut to CTF: Temporarily cut, for one year, the Community Transportation Fund of all state legislators by $100,000. Transfer saved money from the Transportation Trust Fund to the General Fund. This would expire or "sunset" after one year.


$6.2 million (FY 2010)


•Temporarily Raise the Personal Income Tax: Temporarily raise the PIT, increase the brackets for those making below $60K by one-half of 1 percent. Increase the brackets for those making $60K and above by one-percent. This progressive tax increase would "sunset" after three years.


$40 million (FY 2010), $104 million (FY 2011)


•Temporarily Raise Corporate Tax: Raise the Corporate Franchise Tax, to "sunset" after three years.


$97.4 million (FY 2010), $73.2 million (FY 2011)


•Sale of Unused/Surplus Items:


Sell all three fixed-wing State Police aircraft and explore partnership with air flight program at Delaware State University for legitimate uses of fixed-wing aircraft (i.e., Delaware Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Control surveys, marijuana interdiction, etc.).


Sell state-owned golf courses, with a covenant the land be maintained as a golf course or some other open-space use.


Sell former MBNA building near Rodney Square, Wilmington.


Sell one or both state-owned marinas.


$20 million (FY 2010)


•Corporate Report Filing Fee: Increase annual corporate report filing fee from $25 to $40.


$4 million (annually)


•Temporarily Suspend Open Space Programs: Temporarily re-allocate special funds (farmland preservation, open space, and DelDOT) to General Fund.


$40 million (FY 2010)


•Temporarily Suspend Automatic Raises: Suspend "salary step increases" for public school teachers, State Police and DelTech instructors. Also, continue the freeze of all career-ladder promotions initiated during FY 2009.


$11.5 million (FY 2010)


•Cut Contractor Costs: Reduce contractor, consultants and employment services by 10 percent.


$7.5 million (FY 2010)


•Disability Eligibility: Modify the eligibility to receive benefits under the state’s short-term-disability program from 20 days to 60 days.


$3.5 million (annually)


•Holiday Swap: Replace three existing state holidays with floating holidays state employees could take at their discretion.


$1 million (annually)


•Qualify Senior Property Tax Exemption: Means-test senior-property-tax program.


$9 million (annually)


•Eliminate Vacant Positions: Eliminate vacant positions and reduce use of seasonal/casual employees.


$3.5 million (FY 2010)


•Medicaid Change: Adjustment to Medicaid in-patient hospital "outlier methodology."


$3.8 million (annually)


•Raise Recording Fee: Increase Mortgage Recording fee to $25 and use proceeds to fund operating cost at Dept. of State.


$5.3 million (annually)


•Minor Reorganization: Delaware Health Care Commission Moved to DHSS (Markell proposal).


$2.9 million (annually)


Suggestions for Cost-Cutting Beyond FY 2010


•Reduce State Construction Costs:


Temporarily suspend prevailing wage for all school construction and other state projects for four years. Study the impacts.


$70 million (annually)


•Save money on school construction by standardizing designs and leveraging better prices on the purchase of materials.


$14 million (annually)


•Reform Purchasing for Public Schools. Implement a "centralized procurement program" for local school districts, vocational-technical school districts and charter schools.


$25 million (annually)


•Consolidate School Administration. Save on administration and support costs by replacing local services for the 19 school districts with broad, shared services on a regional or statewide basis. Local school districts would be kept intact, but this action would significantly reduce the inefficiency of duplication.


$30 million (annually)


•Reform state purchasing. Establish and enforce policies for unified billing and minimize use of state-issued checks and state-owned credit cards to appropriate purchases.


$60 million (annually)


•Efficiency Rewards Program. Create a program whereby state employees and private citizens can make suggestions to cut costs and/or improve efficiency. If the idea has merit and is implemented, the person submitting the idea would get 10 percent of the estimated first-year cost savings, capped at $25,000 max. (Assumes a savings of one-quarter of 1 percent of the operating budget.)


$7.5 million (annually).

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 21st, 2009 03:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Panel makes more trims from budget


Health, Children’s departments face cuts


By Leah Burcat


Delaware State News


DOVER — The Joint Finance Committee was back at work on Wednesday trying to find ways to cut the budget.


On the cutting block for the day were the following departments: Health and Social Services; Children, Youth and Their Families; and Finance.


In total, the committee found $126 million in savings from the Department of Health and Social Services, and cut $1.1 million from the Children’s Department, and $129,000 from the state’s financial agency.


The majority of the Health and Social Services savings will be offset by federal stimulus funds passed earlier this year.


The cuts come primarily from travel, contractual, employee-recognition and supply expenses. Personnel costs for the agencies have not yet been looked into.


One major development was the exclusion of a healthcare provider tax, which failed to garner significant legislative support last year, and a subsequent $15 million in cuts to the Department of Health and Social Services it was supposed to cover.


Such a tax leverages federal matching dollars and is employed by more than 40 other states.


Under the proposal introduced last year, the state would have implemented a 1.95-percent tax on hospital revenues, which would generate about $30 million. That would trigger a 50-percent federal match of $15 million. The state would increase its Medicaid reimbursement to the providers to repay the $30 million.


Wayne A. Smith, Delaware Healthcare Association president and chief executive officer, said the health care provider tax would end up harming hospitals throughout the state, in part because they all are private, nonprofit institutions.


"The provider tax would be very injurious to hospitals," Mr. Smith said. "Hospital taxes cannot be designed so there are not winners and losers."


Although former Gov. Ruth Ann Minner suggested in her budget recommendation that it be used to generate $15 million, Gov. Jack A. Markell and the members of the Joint Finance Committee decided to look to other sources to find the funds.


In addition, Joint Finance Committee members proposed raising recordation fees from $6 to $30 for each document or paper recorded or filed.


The additional money would go into the Delaware Cultural Access Fund and is expected to grow to $5.325 million annually.


The money would be used to cancel out proposed cuts from the Division of the Arts, Delaware State Historic Preservation Office, Delaware State Museums, Division of Libraries and the Delaware Public Archives.


Such a plan must still be introduced as legislation and passed in both chambers of the General Assembly.


Although the committee’s work centered on cutting, some budget items were — at least temporarily — rescued from the cutting block.


The group, working with suggestions from Gov. Jack A. Markell, voted to reinstate programs that provide vaccines to first responders, educational opportunities for pregnant teenagers, infant mortality education and $67,000 to fund private-school nurses.


"Health is the main area where [Gov. Markell] has restored items," said Ann Visalli, the state’s budget director. "There aren’t a lot of those. We’re obviously trying to cut."


Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 20th, 2009 06:00 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy wrote: If they are $26 million short this year they can rein in DelDOT and their paving programs. We are watching them widen a back road out near Hartly that carries little traffic and then they are going to tar and chip it -again. Why do we waste money doing this to a road that was fine as is?
Good news on this one at least. The work being done isn't to widen the road after all. One of the landowners on that road found that out through a contact with the 29th District Representative, Pam Thornburg. Her staff got in touch with someone in DelDOT who explained what they are doing and that was passed back to the concerned people out there. It made sense and saved some anxiety and concern about government spending. An example of a quick response from both Thornburg and DelDOT. We'll have to give 'em both an attaboy.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 08:42 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Hartlyboy -- you know it's all about not wanting to risk not spending all the appropriation for this year for fear that it will be reduced next year.   Until the state actually get the process underway of reducing the size of state government, people at the top will continue to think that way.   Gov. Markell should hire me for 6 months with the responsibility of rightsizing the state government -- farewell to between 4,000 and 6,000 positions and the people presently filling them.
Would Markell be first????   Promise.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 08:20 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Two Cents wrote: Now, DIVA -- if your proposal was adopted, there would be less or no reason to build a transportation center at the Water St./Queen St. intersection.  All those construction dollars would have to be expended elsewhere!!

Man--  I can't win:(. 2 interesting articles in wall street journal today. 1. Tax the rich, lose the rich and 2. California reckoning. http://www.wsj.com

 

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 07:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Now, DIVA -- if your proposal was adopted, there would be less or no reason to build a transportation center at the Water St./Queen St. intersection.  All those construction dollars would have to be expended elsewhere!!

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 06:26 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The state should also consider taking 1/2 of the DART buses off the roads. Each and everyone I see, in my travels, have 0-3 (mostly  ZERO) people riding them. The large ones should go first and then reduce the # of smaller ones.

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 05:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy -- you know it's all about not wanting to risk not spending all the appropriation for this year for fear that it will be reduced next year.   Until the state actually get the process underway of reducing the size of state government, people at the top will continue to think that way.   Gov. Markell should hire me for 6 months with the responsibility of rightsizing the state government -- farewell to between 4,000 and 6,000 positions and the people presently filling them.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 05:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
If they are $26 million short this year they can rein in DelDOT and their paving programs. We are watching them widen a back road out near Hartly that carries little traffic and then they are going to tar and chip it -again. Why do we waste money doing this to a road that was fine as is?

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 04:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Del. revenue estimate decreased


State deficit for current year about $26 million


By Randall Chase


Associated Press


NEW CASTLE — State lawmakers charged with fashioning the budget for the fiscal year starting July 1 have a daunting task ahead of them.


The panel that sets Delaware’s official revenue forecast voted Monday to decrease the revenue estimate for the current year by more than $18 million, leaving a deficit of about $26 million that must be closed by the end of June.


The decrease was due largely to a drop in estimated personal income tax revenues, with declines in bank-franchise, insurance and cigarette taxes also contributing to the downward revision.


Estimated revenue for next year increased by $29 million, thanks to a proposal for the state to allow a sports-betting lottery and take a larger share of revenue from Delaware’s three slot-machine casinos.


But even with the new gambling revenue and some $150 million in federal stimulus money, officials still need to find about $600 million in revenue or cost savings to reach a balanced budget for the new fiscal year.


"Thank goodness we passed the bill for the lottery, or we’d be in more trouble,’’ said state House Speaker Robert Gilligan, D-Wilmington.


The projected gain of $53.5 million from sports betting for next year was partially offset by declines in other revenue categories, including a $19.7 million drop in projected personal income tax revenue.


David Gregor, an analyst with the state finance department, said revenues from personal income tax returns that were due April 30 and from estimated quarterly tax payments are down, with revenue from estimated payments off by about 30 percent.


"It’s pretty clear that folks have changed their outlook; their payments are down,’’ he said.


While processing of personal income taxes has been slower than usual, partly due to a shortage of seasonal employees, Gregor said it appears the average refund has increased by about 20 percent.


Meanwhile, the larger state share of slot-machine revenue is expected to add about $3.7 million to state coffers this year.


For next year, more than half of the $53.5 million expected from sports betting, or roughly $36 million, is expected to come from the state’s increased share of slot-machine revenue and from the annual $4 million sports-betting-licensing fee to be paid collectively by the state’s three casinos. Officials said it remains to be seen whether and how sports betting results in increased slot-machine play, or "crossover’’ among people traveling to the casinos to make sports bets.


"I think we’re going to do much better with sports betting than people think,’’ Gilligan said.


While officials believe the sports lottery will be up and running by the start of the National Football League season, Gregor acknowledged the timetable could change.


"I think everyone knows the NFL is not real thrilled with this, and there may be some legal action on their part,’’ he said.


The NFL and other professional sports leagues, as well as the NCAA, remain opposed to any sports betting in Delaware, saying it would tarnish the image of athletics and lure young people into gambling.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 8th, 2009 07:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Governor Markell does not appear to be up to the task of dealing with our budget crisis. His proposals do not address the underlying problems we are facing.


The across the board 8% pay cut for state workers is misguided and will probably make a bad situation worse. Cleaning up and straightening out the problems within our state agencies makes more sense, but this apparently is beyond the scope of Governor Markell’s vision and experience.


Expanding gambling opportunities within our state is also misguided.


Simply put, we need to get rid of government waste and mismanagement and work within our communities to encourage new business and industry. Our citizens need honest employment. Our communities need adequately prepared and managed growth plans. We need clean, renewable energy and affordable health care.


Unfortunately for us, it appears as if our state legislators are equally unprepared for this challenge. Inadequate solutions lead to desperation and desperation leads to rash action.


The growing call for a state sales tax is a symptom of the level of desperation we are sinking to. The legislature’s recent approval of a modified version of Governor Markell’s gambling bill is a truly rash action.


Intelligent leadership is becoming an oxymoron in Delaware.


Brendan Buschi


Magnolia

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 1st, 2009 05:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

I am a taxpayer in the State of Delaware and am writing in support of Gov. Markell’s budget. As a former tax collector in a medium size city (in another state), I am familiar with the government revenue stream, and in particular, the position of the public in paying taxes. In that position, I heard directly from the tax payers how the snow plows come to everybody else’s street early, how pot holes are selectively repaired, how some services are a waste, and the list went on. But these very same tax payers who were directly affected by a particular government program or service and would make a strong argument why these programs and services were necessary and a sensible expenditure of government funds, would at the same time, tell me why another service or program, equally supported by others, was not necessary and a waste. The end result was then, and still is, that the public wants all kinds of services and programs but there is just a limited amount of money to provide them. This situation is not new and is always a factor in putting together government budgets, but what is unusual at this point in time is the desperate economic backdrop for government at all levels. For Governor Markell and the state legislature, creating a realistic budget unfortunately comes down to choosing from among alternatives and options, that unfortunately will impact all of us regardless of the final choice. His proposed budget minimizes the negative impact. It is choosing the least bumpy road to get to the destination, but a road that must be traveled. No one is happy with the budget choices, but these are the only choices.


In summary and by analogy, I never found a diet that I really liked, but a diet was nevertheless needed; and this budget is a financial diet which is also needed. That is why I urge passage and support for this budget and for all Delaware residents and taxpayers to accept the hard but necessary choices that went into it.


Michael A. Morris


Wilmington

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 29th, 2009 12:51 am
 Quote  Reply 
I see urine as the main water source at that point.

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 28th, 2009 04:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
dover-diva wrote: Just another observation. The flowers are beautiful. They are also perennials (they'll come back next year), why does the state dig them up, give them away, and spend a million to replace each year?? Like anyone remembers the color schemes from year to year. Mostly red, white and "blue" or some variation thereof.

Every couple of years perennials have to be thinned because they multiply, so use these to create beauty elsewhere.

I love flowers and I completely agree with you!  The flowers aren't going to appear nearly as lovely when state workers pull up to work each morning and realize those flowers are more imortant to the state than they are.

realistic1
Member
 

Joined: Sat Apr 25th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 26th, 2009 04:28 am
 Quote  Reply 
The full-time DSP pilots can't get qualified because a retired DSP pilot in a casual/seasonal pilot postiion is getting all the flying time.  And, the Commander of the Aviation Unit is a Paramedic...what's he know about Aviation???  Shouldn't the Commander of an "Aviation" Unit be a pilot????

If the state wants to save dollars, the DSP or the state needs to establish specific policies or more clear guidelines on what emergencies the DSP helicopters respond to.  Who decides to dispatch the helicopter...the trooper or paramedic on the scene or the 911 Communication Techs?  I don't think sending the helicopter out for a kid falling out of bed constitutes an emergency...check that one out...and there are many more like that.  And, why did they go to a 24/7 when there are other air services available when needed.  That added about $2M to the budget and who pays for that...the taxpayers.  Many additional overtime hours were expended as well until it was stopped.

Tom Wagner, this would be a good one for an audit!

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 24th, 2009 02:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Just another observation. The flowers are beautiful. They are also perennials (they'll come back next year), why does the state dig them up, give them away, and spend a million to replace each year?? Like anyone remembers the color schemes from year to year. Mostly red, white and "blue" or some variation thereof.

Every couple of years perennials have to be thinned because they multiply, so use these to create beauty elsewhere.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 24th, 2009 01:50 am
 Quote  Reply 
It might help if the state workers who know where the money is being wasted would raise the issue with the guy who wants to cut their pay. Why do the state police pay $2mm a year for heavy sea rescue helicopter that they didn't even have anyone qualified to fly for over a year? Are they trying to do the same job the Coast Guard does ? have they ever used it? Not the Medivac copter, that's a different bird.

A million here , a million there and pretty soon you have the 91 million Jack, the Ex-Treasurer of the State is trying to take out of employees hides to make up his mythical $750 million 'deficit'.

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 23rd, 2009 12:06 am
 Quote  Reply 
I am responding to "Sick of People Complaining" from the DE State newspaper's forum section.

State workers and others,  I APPLAUD you for exercising your civic duty to hold your elected officials accountable for their actions!  Our commitment to living in a society for the people by the people does not limit itself to election day.  Folks are aware more than ever that government officials from both parties need to be watched.  That is the true HOPE emerging for our country.  We all know the casinos send their execs to Dover.   Regular folks have the right to be heard too!  The elected officials I know greatly appreciate our participation and ask that we please keep it coming.  Let's hope the Governor agrees.

 State workers and elected officials I personally know to be of outstanding character and merit share a very different view regarding the meetings you speak of.   Regarding the nature of his own salary, I have already caught my new governor being "shifty" as my daddy calls it.   He taught me to watch those folks like a hawk if I must deal with them.    

Now is the time for our new Governor to choose what kind of leader he wants to be.  I have led and been led many times.  I have yet to encounter a leader who doesn't make mistakes or come up with a bad idea from time to time.  It is the grace and humility you show afterwards that determines whether the people will follow you.  It is the Governor's actions after the proposal that has created this sea of complaints.  If he is still firmly commited to his proposal as it stands, then stand before the people and make them see.  Lead, Governor.  You must be able to come out when the sun isn't shining if you want respect.

 

 

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 03:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It is a bad idea and it will affect morale in the classroom.   The governor did not make the time to examine his actions and realize that the hatchet approach to pay cuts will do more damage than good. 

TruthwillOut
Member


Joined: Tue Mar 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 560
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 03:09 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy wrote: Looking at all the other ways for the state to cut expenditures is indeed healthy, but you all seem to miss the bigger question about whether this whole $750 million deficit is more than smoke and mirrors. Do they really need to cut employee salaries to address a shortfall of $200 million from the 2009 budget to the 2010 budget? They need to get that DuPont ex-Treasurer up there and see if he can explain the $700 million numbers with a straight face. Has anyone noticed that this guy hasn't been in front of any cameras during all this? Maybe he has too much financial savvy to be able to be part of a con like this?
wasnt it you who pointed out there is several hundred million in some funds out there? Then take into consideration the 100s of millions the state has invested.

If you want to know the real financial standing of the state get the CAFR

google it to learn more

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 03:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I agree with you about the skeptical numbers.   He certainly squirmed when questioned about his own pay raise.  That's when I concluded that he's dishonest.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 05:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
Looking at all the other ways for the state to cut expenditures is indeed healthy, but you all seem to miss the bigger question about whether this whole $750 million deficit is more than smoke and mirrors. Do they really need to cut employee salaries to address a shortfall of $200 million from the 2009 budget to the 2010 budget? They need to get that DuPont ex-Treasurer up there and see if he can explain the $700 million numbers with a straight face. Has anyone noticed that this guy hasn't been in front of any cameras during all this? Maybe he has too much financial savvy to be able to be part of a con like this?

freespeech
Member
 

Joined: Thu Apr 9th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 26
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 10:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Mr. Dogoloff,

What would YOU "do if your household income were suddenly hit with a 10 percent pay cut?"  That's exactly the question we are asking.  Thank you for so clearly supporting our point of view.  I bet if it goes through, the citizens it effects will be far more creative than our governor. It is pure comedy that supporters like yourself constantly tout forcibly taking money from 3% of the citizens of the state as shared sacrifice.  Are you one of the 97% who have not been asked to share 10 percent of what you were promised?

I will tell you exactly where to find the money.  End entitlement.  We should not reward those who don't work.  Just yesterday I found another job to continue to ensure that I can pay my bills.  If I can work 2 jobs to make ends meet, why can't someone on welfare work 2 jobs to make ends meet?  Seems a little crazy to those of us who work.  Shouldn't our state reward those people first?

Teachers do consider the needs of students every day!  We got into this business because we saw a need.  Many of us gave up more lucrative career paths.  Don't lecture us on consideration of the needs of students.  Those in the trenches understand far more clearly than those who aren't. 

If being obstinate and out of touch is "leading by example" then our governor is great at it.  He has forgotten long ago, if he ever knew, what it is like to be a common man.  He won't even consider other options.  It is evident when you see him field questions at meetings.  Suggestions to consider other options visably irritate him and he is dismissive at best.

True leaders I know are considerate, reasonable, compassionate, reflective and able to admit when they have made mistakes. 

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 06:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I would like to address several points in your letter, Mr. Dogoloff.  I'm not sure what you're reading or who you've been talking to.   Many of the points you are making have already been addressed in this paper and other places. 

1.  "..the gov. led by example by cutting 10% of his salary..":    The governor accepted a 29% pay raise over our former governor the day he stepped into office fully aware of this budget crises.  He cut 10% of that.  That's a 19% raise in pay for the office of governor when he is proposing a 10% cut in pay for state workers who have not seen a raise in years.   When state workers inquired about this, he responded that "he does not set his salary."   Yes, that is a fact.  However, he has the ability to lead by example by giving back all of this raise at this time and then cutting 10% of the salary he has left.    That would put him on a level playing field with state workers who no longer trust him to do the right thing.   Yesterday the news reported that Governor Markell has decided to take a 20% cut in the 2010 budget.  We are waiting for the actual salary amounts to determine whether or not the governor is taking that 20% off the 10% reduced salary- which would mean he still gets a raise in pay over the former governor - OR- has he now cut his salary enough to effectively take a 1% pay cut from the former governor's salary while cutting pay 10% for state employees other than himself?   If he continues on this pathway, this breach of trust will haunt him throughout his tenure.  

      A wise and caring teacher once instructed me to "Do the right thing and you'll get the right results."  That being said, state workers I am deeply sorry for any role I may have played in helping to elect this governor.  I have a pit in my stomach that will not go away because of this.  I can only promise that I will do my best to make this right by acknowledging my error in judgement and making the time to work toward making this right for you.  Your concerns and anger are valid.  

Governor, as our leader, it is now your turn.  Are you still willing to stick with your example of leadership by communicating to state workers, "What's not good enough for my own family is totally acceptable for your family and shame on you for thinking otherwise?"

2.  "What would happen if our household incomes... 25% cut?"   First off, let's acknowledge to families with 2 state workers heading their households and making over $60,000 dollars a year that this is not an imaginary scenario for them.  It's reality.   They will lose 22% of their household income this year under this plan.  They will do as all families do.  They will sit down and evaluate their basic needs and their core values.   They may lose their home b/c it will be hard to sell, give up a car, or decide not to have a child.   They may be forced into bankruptcy. They may skip meals to feed their family.  They will not spend money on many things they care a lot about but do not absolutely need at this time.  These are cuts.  It is painful, but they will cut expenses. 

The people I know take pride in their work ethic and will likely take a 2nd job that is way below their "pay grade" to make ends meet.  They will continue to work full time for less for the state while doing so.  They and I know people who choose not to work a job they don't like, but collect government aid instead.  We will continue to pay our taxes which support their lifestyle choice while we continue trying to do the right thing.  We will do this even though we started out with nothing and worked multiple awful jobs to acquire something without taking from others who work.   We wonder if anyone in government cares about us enough to acknowledge this reality and do something meaningful about it.  There are 2 types of "needy among us."  There are those who truly need and those who are "needy" by choice.  Again, a failure to acknowledge these things while asking for compassion from those whose families are now being threatened through no fault of their own fosters growing resentment and distrust of our government.

 3.  "the situation that greeted... when.. assumed office.."  The governor was our treasurer for 8 years.  He was a part of the administration that allowed this shortfall to happen.   As treasurer, he was aware of the numbers.  As voting citizens we did not hear from him about this during his tenure.  That is why people hold him more accountable than someone who came from outside the administration.   It is why many people feel betrayed when the administration tells them they just got in the door.  During the spending spree, many people chose to live within their means.  It is fair and valid for them to be upset that they are now being asked to risk their households to pay for the reckless choices of others.  Failure to acknowledge this fosters resentment and distrust, especially when you seek to deny a personal role in it.  People know.

4.  "I have heard....criticize.... what cut?"   Mayor Guiliani is well known for his work in NYC.   In a recent interview he shared his method for renewing that great city.  It sounds an awful lot like what the folks will be doing at home.  He asked hard questions about his priorities and used that as his guide.   Education and law enforcement were determined by the people to be critical needs.  He chose not to make cuts there.   He went through the rest of the budget and began to cut.  I think teachers are upset because our governor appears to be talking out both sides of his mouth when it comes to education.  Because he has already been caught being dishonest about the nature of his own salary, they and other state workers have quickly learned not to trust him when he says these cuts are temporary and there is no other alternative.  Which leads me to...

5.  "I have read with interest......criticisms.....But...little..contructive suggestions..."  I have been to meetings, I have written letters, I have read many outstanding letters from others-  all offering alternative ideas for the governor's plan.   My elected officials have requested numbers from the governor's office that they are not receiving.  Those who do write to the governor receive the same form letter which is now dated and tired.  It does not acknowledge the many ideas and feedback floating out there.  This is what fosters the perception that the governor is out of touch and unwilling to listen to anyone.   B/c this writing is lengthy and packed with redundant information already, I will trust you to please go back and do some more reading on your own.  I assure you, people are writing all the time about alternatives.  If you disagree with everyone but the governor, that is your choice to make.  I'm certain you must respect my right to disagree and will at least confirm that other ideas are out there.

In conclusion,  I am deeply sorry that you have not been able to stay up to speed with all of this information.   There is SO much out there to absorb right now, it's a challenge for anyone.   As a concerned citizen, I feel responsible for the error in judgement I may have made in voting for this governor.  I will continue to do my best to stay informed and active to atone for my previous action.  I don't know if this will help inform your criticism of state workers, but I have made the extra effort to share the concerns I'm hearing and I share.

 

 

 

Last edited on Thu Apr 23rd, 2009 08:38 pm by Born Country

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 03:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Budget gap less than expected



 Officials warn better days are still in the distance


By Leah Burcat


Delaware State News


DOVER — The economic downturn in the state may be bottoming out, said financial experts on Monday, but it could take years for the state to see economic activity indicative of pre-recession times.


Numbers for the fiscal year 2009 budget shortfall improved slightly at Monday’s meeting of the Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council, giving the state’s economic forecasters their first breath of relief since June.


The state now expects to bring in $3.162 billion for this fiscal year — up from $3.154 last month.


And although the gap in the fiscal year 2010 budget widened by nearly $30 million, it was a significantly smaller drop than seen in prior months.


"This is actually, I think, pretty good news," said Kenneth Lewis, an economics professor at University of Delaware and chairman of the council’s revenue subcommittee. "The rate of decrease is slowing down."


The revenue subcommittee predicted the state will bring in $2.909 billion in fiscal year 2010 — down from the $2.937 billion estimate in March.


The biggest cause of the decrease was the drop in personal income tax brought in to the state. As Delawareans continue to lose their jobs and lose money on stocks, the money the state brings in through taxes decreases.


Despite the relatively good news, the state still faces a tremendous budget shortfall — $26.5 million for this fiscal year and $778 million for the next one.


In addition, it is expected to take the state years to get back to where it was before the recession.


John E. Stapleford, University of Delaware economics professor, said Delawareans should not expect to see pre-recession economic conditions until the fourth quarter of 2012.


"It looks as though the economy is stabilizing, but it’s hard to say that’s good news," said Joshua W. Martin III, chairman of DEFAC.


Adding truth to that statement are the state’s unemployment numbers, which continue to rise, even though the economic situation appears to stabilize on paper.


Unemployment in March was 7.7 percent. In February the number was at 7.3 percent.


Ironically, though, Delaware’s rising unemployment numbers may help the state bring in more money through other means.


After three consecutive months of a state’s unemployment reaching above 6.7 percent, the state qualifies for Tier 3 status, which means more federal stimulus funds for Medicaid.


On Friday, when the state’s Department of Labor released the unemployment numbers for March, Delaware officially reached its third month above 6.7 percent.


The new status could mean about $4 million more for Medicaid, said Ann S. Visalli, the state’s budget director.


Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 08:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

"State must find ways to cut," DSN Guest Commentary, 4/16/09, submitted by Rep. Joseph W. Booth. While he addresses the governor’s proposal to cut wage and benefits of our state’s employees, he also says Delaware needs to reduce the size of its work force. Cutting the number of workers, "will not only help some of the current fiscal stress, it’ll force us to be more efficient. We should task each department secretary with the goal of cutting costs by 10%" As a small businessman, he added, he knows hard economic times require difficult decisions. So, his solution/decision is to reduce the number of state workers. They, in turn, will join the long lines for unemployment benefits, adding to the number of people who can no longer pay their mortgages, health care, etc., etc., etc.! What’s wrong with this picture? Well, first of all, the state workers did not cause the shortfall! The former Gov. did! The department secretaries did, especially Sec. Wicks! And, yes, the state legislature did! The latter includes you, Rep. Booth! As a member of the Joint Finance Committee, you know better than anyone, that is the truth of the matter! I single out one department in particular, DOT, because whatever hair brained scheme both former Sec. Nathan Hayward placed before you, you approved. And, Sec. Wicks is doing the exact same thing, e.g., the Dover road from West Dover to DuPont Highway. DOT’s job should be maintaining our roads and bridges, not emulating New Jersey with numerous overpasses. Maintaining what we have, before anything else!


The former Gov., the department secretaries, and the state legislature spent the taxpayer’s money and federal funds in ways they would never spend their own money. States are mandated to balance their budgets, instead they spend constituent’s money like water! Guaranteed, they do not spend their own money in such a fashion! Therefor, the only people who should "take the hit," for the shortfall are those who caused it! You have a lot of arrogance and gall, Rep. Booth, for suggesting otherwise. You should all take a long, hard look at yourselves and realize the true meaning of representing us, and not yourselves. Stop passing the buck, take the hit!


Theresa M. Ratti


Dover

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 08:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

I have read with interest the criticisms of Governor Markell’s plans to balance the budget. But I have heard little in the way of constructive suggestions to meet this challenge.


What would we do if our household incomes were suddenly hit with a 25 percent cut? That is exactly the situation that greeted Governor Markell and Lt. Governor Denn when they assumed office in January. That translates into a $750 million shortfall in this year’s budget. Their budget decisions have been guided by key principles of fiscal responsibility, compassion by keeping our core commitments, and shared sacrifice. I have heard teachers and other State employees criticize the Governor for asking them to share in the sacrifice. I wonder what they would cut — The police, cut prison budgets and release offenders? Or maybe the veterans’ hospital beyond that already envisioned. I have heard teachers take the position that it would be better if some teachers were fired rather than all teachers accept a temporary eight percent pay cut. That seems to me to be both selfish and not very considerate of the needs of students. I know that this has been a heart wrenching exercise for our Governor. But throughout the process he has worked to find savings within State government and to protect programs that affect the most needy among us.


The Governor has led by example cutting 10 percent of his salary, by instituting cuts in salaries of Cabinet Officers, and by looking out for the needs of children and the neediest among us. Now is the time to come together and support him and others who are working very hard to get us through this crisis.


Lee I. Dogoloff


Dagsboro

 

 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 08:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

In reviewing Governor Markell’s proposed budget, one thing becomes painfully clear. There are no true spending cuts. There is a lot of smoke and more than a few mirrors, but no tangible change in the way this state will do business over the next few years. Just like Representative Pete Schwarztkopf’s (D-Rehoboth Beach) short-term sales tax scheme, which we are expected to believe will "temporarily" increase available funds in order to bridge the proverbial gap in our balance sheet, every proposal given in the new budget seems to be a calculated attempt to maintain the current size of government by "temporarily" cutting expenses. We must do better than that. We must be willing to make some hard choices that will "permanently" correct a portion of the spending addiction that this state obviously has incurred.


Unfortunately, this new administration seems bent on maintaining the current size and scope of government by trimming around the edges and avoiding honest change. The Democrats in Dover seem to believe that we do not have a spending problem, but rather it is the revenue that must increase. Alright, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt. I will, for argument sake, enter their world of delusion and "temporarily" grant them this point. So then, how do we increase revenue?


Their plan is to tax everything that moves, increase the tax on that which keeps moving, and find new ways to tax whatever may still be showing signs of life. This is the best way to kill an economy. Do not take my word for it, look at the worst economies in the nation and you will find the highest burden of taxes. I say it is time to do the opposite. I say it is time to cut taxes. Let’s give value added incentives to businesses so that they will want to create new jobs and invest in their future, which will in turn produce far more revenue than any tax increase ever could because more people will be contributing to the coffers in an ever expanding base of working taxpayers.


A healthy economy can be defined as a free and vibrant exchange of currency. If the government is taking more and more of that currency, there is less and less to flow freely. But when people are left alone to run their own affairs, they will do what is in the best interest of not only their own business, but also the community at large. And there is a secret that those who believe in high taxes, who believe in Keynesian economics, do not want you to know. The little secret is that when someone aggressively pursues a high profit margin in their business, what is usually referred to as greed, that wealth is by nature spread around in the form of jobs and economic development. And that only happens in a low tax climate.


I believe in the ability of the people that live and work in this great state. I believe that they will rise above the current morass and strive to create a better tomorrow if only those in Dover will stay out of their pockets and allow them the freedom to achieve. Let’s encourage the governor to rewrite his budget in such a way as to reflect the revenue potential of the greatest resource our state has to offer, we the people.


Shaun Fink


Millsboro

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 06:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The governor's approach to education is passive aggressive.   He says he supports it, but his actions undermine it.   This will likely prove to be true with the rest of his "vision" as well.  :(

Born Country
Member


Joined: Mon Apr 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 06:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You got it.  Keep the working folks divided and the powerful minority can do whatever they want.  

Who said "the best defense of democracy is a well educated citizenry?" 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 17th, 2009 03:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 

What do you think?


From the Delaware State News:


Panel may give preview of forecast


Revenue subcommittee meeting today


By Leah Burcat


Delaware State News


DOVER — Delawareans may find out more today on a topic that has been on the minds of most for quite some time — the budget.


The Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council’s revenue subcommittee will meet today to estimate the amount of revenue the state will generate for the rest of this fiscal year and the next one. An official economic forecast from the full council is expected Monday.


The meetings today and Monday are significant to state lawmakers as they try to draft a budget for fiscal year 2010 and to find a way to balance the budget for this fiscal year, which ends June 30.


According to the last DEFAC forecast in March, the state is still $30 million short for this fiscal year and is facing a $750 million budget shortfall for fiscal year 2010.


These numbers have continually gotten worse over the past five meetings of the council, even prompting it to call a special meeting in November.


Due to the tremendous size of the revenue shortfalls, Gov. Jack A. Markell has recommended major steps to address the situation, such as instituting a sports-lottery system and cutting the pay of state employees by 8 percent.


If the shortfall were to worsen today, the actions necessary to close the gap would become even more painful.


If it grows worse, Ann S. Visalli, the state’s budget director, said additional cuts would likely have to be made. The state would also look at management controls, she said.


"Regardless of what happens at the April DEFAC meeting, our first priority is getting through ’09," she said.


Because the Delaware Constitution requires a balanced budget, the state cannot end the fiscal year in the red. As June 30 approaches, finding the $30 million becomes even more important, she said.


She said she hoped legislators would pass the sports-betting legislation, since a change in the split of the video-lottery revenue would bring in $7.5 million for this fiscal year to help with the problem.


If today’s meeting offers up a surprise and those on the council predict the shortfall to decrease, the budget office’s action would not be much different, said Ms. Visalli.


"It would be very premature to take anything off the table in terms of cuts based on anything that happens in April," she said.


The council will still meet in May and June, she said.


"We need to be prepared for any downturns," said Ms. Visalli.


And others agreed.


"Either way, it’s a very, very challenging year," said Rep. E. Bradford "Brad" Bennett, D-Dover. "The governor proposed his budget and it’s up to us (legislators) at this point in time to modify it based on the numbers, whether they go up or down."


Post your opinions in the public issues forum at newszap.com.


Staff Writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.

TruthwillOut
Member


Joined: Tue Mar 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 560
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
TruthwillOut wrote: Both the state and the federal gov can balance their budgets by stopping their unconstitutional spending. our govs were created for very specific reasons. NONE of those reasons include taxing citizens to give others entitlements or grants. Example 700k to kraft foods. Or Billions given to foriegn countries by the Fed. Gov.
Pass a law that demands each line item has to have a cite to the applicable constitution section that allows the spending. not only will you find their is no shortage you will actually be able to lower the income tax thereby creating more spending.
Of course this means the legislature will have to actually learn what its purpose is and what it has authority to spend for. this needs to be occording to the constitution NOT occording to some judge(s) who are paid from taxes.  Hint its not your job to create jobs or public libraries or the arts etc. your job is to protect our liberties, regulate commerce, and provide for the common defense. by having cops and courts you protect our rights. By having laws and cops you regulate commerce. Hint paying the kent county levy court $15 cos I want to replace my old toilet is not regulating commerce. its down right robbery!

 
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f8f8f8"http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20090415/OPINION10/90414073/1111
Another stupid thing delaware does employee out of state people. The lock box for traffic tickets is in Philly the red lights are in NJ

Two Cents
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1464
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 11:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Unfortunately, Mr. Booth is likely the only legislator with the testicular fortitude to think these things, let alone to have his opinions publiched.   It would be wonderfuul if he is able to persuade his colleagues to see these truths as well.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 10:19 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I must be dreaming, a Delaware Politician who believes in reducing the size of government.  We could have a new Governor in the making if he follows through with his suggestions.

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 07:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a guest commentary submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."
 
By Rep. Joseph W. Booth

In recent published reports, I was quoted as favoring the layoff of state workers as an alternative to the across-the-board pay and benefit cuts that have been suggested by the Markell administration.  I feel those comments need to be clarified and amplified.
Gov. Markell has said he wants to recoup nearly $92 million that are currently spent on salaries by cutting the pay of state employees’ by eight-percent. The governor has further proposed that state employees bear a higher portion of their healthcare insurance costs. Combined, both proposals would constitute a 10-percent reduction in compensation.
The biggest problem with these proposals is that the bulk of state employees (about 70-percent) earn fairly modest salaries of between $25,000 and $50,000 annually. Cutting the compensation of a worker making $25,000 by $2,500 is not a minor concession. These are also employees that have not received a raise in recent years.
Predictably, the proposal for cutting employee compensation has had a corrosive effect on morale. I have personally received phone calls and e-mails from state employees lodging allegations against their fellow workers. While I welcome suggestions to increase efficiency, the threat of a pay cut has spawned a malice born of fear and anxiety that can only hurt the cohesiveness of our work force and the quality of service they deliver.
As a member of the Joint Finance Committee, I need to stress that the start of the new fiscal year won’t occur until July 1st. In the time between now and then, state revenue estimates could conceivably get worse, which would grow the current $750 million budget gap.
Should this gap widen, are we going to cut the pay and benefits of state workers further still?
Because Delaware earns considerable revenue from the corporate and financial sectors, this recession is hitting us harder than other states. Still, our misery has plenty of company. All states are feeling the pain of this economic slowdown. Many, like Maryland, are reducing payroll through furloughs and layoffs.
Delaware, too, needs to reduce the size of its work force. Currently, there are 31,693 total authorized positions. Cutting the number of workers will not only help relieve some of the current fiscal stress, it’ll force us to be more efficient.
In fact, I believe the Office of Management and Budget should work with every Delaware agency to review their mission and operations looking for ways to do maintain their core operations using fewer resources. We should task each department secretary with the goal of cutting costs by 10 percent. The key is efficiency, leaving effective workers in place, while increasing the productivity of others by shedding non-essential tasks and streamlining procedures.
Downsizing, or “right-sizing,” our state government may not require layoffs. The natural attrition of the work force – retirements, deaths, people leaving state service – combined with the current hiring freeze, is already taking us down this path.
One of my frustrations as a legislator is that I have not been able to get solid information from the Markell administration on the number of non-essential employees we’re currently losing through attrition. Without that information, it’s impossible to know if more extreme methods of reducing our work force are warranted. I was also disturbed to recently learn that exceptions have been made to the non-essential hiring freeze for people favored by both the Minner and Markell administrations.
As a small businessman, I know that hard economic times require difficult decisions. Gov. Markell has already proposed a host of tax hikes to finance our government. In good conscience, I cannot support any new or increased taxation until the governor and the General Assembly have considered all the options for resolving our budgetary challenges, including reducing the size of our state work force.
Editor’s note: Rep. Booth, of Georgetown, represents the 37th District in the Delaware House of Representatives.

Last edited on Wed Apr 15th, 2009 07:41 pm by tspong

TruthwillOut
Member


Joined: Tue Mar 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 560
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 06:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Both the state and the federal gov can balance their budgets by stopping their unconstitutional spending. our govs were created for very specific reasons. NONE of those reasons include taxing citizens to give others entitlements or grants. Example 700k to kraft foods. Or Billions given to foriegn countries by the Fed. Gov.
Pass a law that demands each line item has to have a cite to the applicable constitution section that allows the spending. not only will you find their is no shortage you will actually be able to lower the income tax thereby creating more spending.
Of course this means the legislature will have to actually learn what its purpose is and what it has authority to spend for. this needs to be occording to the constitution NOT occording to some judge(s) who are paid from taxes.  Hint its not your job to create jobs or public libraries or the arts etc. your job is to protect our liberties, regulate commerce, and provide for the common defense. by having cops and courts you protect our rights. By having laws and cops you regulate commerce. Hint paying the kent county levy court $15 cos I want to replace my old toilet is not regulating commerce. its down right robbery!

 

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 03:28 pm
 Quote  Reply 
What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

House GOP leaders outline budget alternatives


By Leah Burcat


Delaware State News


DOVER — The solution to the state’s budgetary nightmare does not have to follow the steps set forth by the governor, said some members of the state House of Representatives.


The Republican leadership in the House, which includes House Minority Leader Rep. Richard C. Cathcart, R-Middletown, and House Minority Whip Rep. Daniel B. Short, R-Seaford, delivered a letter to Gov. Jack A. Markell on Tuesday outlining its budget suggestions.


Although presented as a means to aid the governor — Rep. Short said, "This is not a partisan issue; this is a state of Delaware issue" — Gov. Markell and his staff said some of the suggestions would actually cost the state money.


"As we move forward in the budget process, it is important that we focus on the fact that this is a zero-sum game — for every cut someone wants to reduce, we need to make it up with revenue or cuts elsewhere," said Joseph Rogalsky, spokesman for Gov. Markell.


Included in the Republicans’ letter were proposals to find cuts from all aspects of state government.


• They suggested splitting net slots and sports-wagering revenue evenly between the tracks and state. The state currently receives 35 percent of video-lottery revenue, the tracks 42 percent, and the rest is divided among the horsemen and vendors.


• The letter recommended reducing the cuts to state employees’ pay and implementing it on a graduated scale. Gov. Jack A. Markell suggested an 8-percent across-the-board pay cut for all state employees.


• It was suggested that the state create a program and monetary incentives for Delawareans to offer cost-saving ideas. "If the idea has merit and is implemented, the person submitting the idea would get 10 percent of the estimated first-year cost savings (capped at $25,000)," the letter reads. Gov. Markell has asked for ideas at town-hall meetings and on the state Web site at http://ideas.delaware.gov. No incentive policy is currently in place.


• They also suggested reducing Grants-In-Aid funding. Grants-In-Aid funding goes to nonprofit agencies, such as the fire companies and Meals-on-Wheels, that help provide services to Delawareans.


"These ideas should generate tens of millions of dollars initially, reducing our operational and capital shortfalls," the letter reads. "In and of themselves, they will not solve the huge fiscal challenges we face. However, we believe they are positive contributions toward making our government smaller, more efficient, and better poised to face the future."


The letter came nearly four weeks after Gov. Markell presented his budget recommendations.


Rep. Short said he and Rep. Cathcart had spent the past month meeting with other members of their party to come up with the ideas.


Mr. Rogalsky said the governor appreciates all suggestions. "We look forward to working with them and working with the rest of the legislature to find the answers to this historic budget situation," Mr. Rogalsky said.


Although he appreciated the gesture, the governor was not keen on all of the ideas, said Mr. Rogalsky.


"Several of the cost-savings ideas from the representatives are already under way. Others may actually make our historic revenue shortfall deeper. Decreasing the amount being raised from the casinos, for example, might mean we have to look at cutting education for our children, or police on the street or care for those who cannot care for themselves," he said.


Post your opinions in the public issues forum at newszap.com.


Staff writer Leah Burcat can be reached at 741-8250 or lburcat@newszap.com.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 01:01 am
 Quote  Reply 
Jack Markell is the wolf in Sherm's clothing. 

The trouble with "Tribbets"............... I mean "Tribbles".

Last edited on Wed Apr 15th, 2009 01:02 am by Playing the Game


 Current time is 05:23 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.6316 seconds (49% database + 51% PHP). 24 queries executed.