Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Illegal Immigration
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 24th, 2009 04:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
stewbaby wrote: I seriously doubt if Obama will use the National Guard to do any type of border enforcement whether it be for drugs or illegals.  Besides they would not be ARMED.


 

They need to be armed. A Border Patrol officer was killed last night near Campo in an area known for smuggling people and drugs. The agent was shot in the head and dead when the others found him. Yet Carper, Castle and the rest of the drones in Washington will just brush this off as another minor incident, like the people killed by the illegal drunk drivers, and go ahead with their plans to legalize the people who invaded us and cut funding for more border walls.

stewbaby
Member
 

Joined: Wed Aug 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 24th, 2009 04:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I seriously doubt if Obama will use the National Guard to do any type of border enforcement whether it be for drugs or illegals.  Besides they would not be ARMED.

Have you noticed that when referring to race relations or profiling, Obama now includes Hispanics in every sentence.  (Looking for Votes)

Have you noticed that it pays to be an ILLEGAL??  Our state law enforcement will not even charge them for driving without a license or insurance, but would nail any citizen for any infraction.  Now I even hear that if health reform passes the only people who will pay a penalty for not having insurance will be American citizens, and illegals will be exempt.  PAYS TO BE ILLEGAL!!!!!

 

The Insyder
Member


Joined: Sun Dec 11th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 802
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 01:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Have you heard that he Obama administration is developing plans to seek up to 1,500 National Guard volunteers to step up the military's counter-drug efforts along the Mexican border? The plan is a stopgap measure being worked out between the Defense Department and the Homeland Security Department, and comes despite Pentagon concerns about committing more troops to the border — a move some officials worry will be seen as militarizing the region.  So like, what’s wrong with using the Minutemen?  They have done a good job and won the praise of local law enforcement. 

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 27th, 2009 02:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I'm guesing that all our reps, really don't give a d**n. May they be the first to go to BO H**L.:X

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 27th, 2009 02:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The only reason Castle keeps getting elected in Delaware is because the Democrats vote for him. He's more dependable for them than he is for the Republicans .

stewbaby
Member
 

Joined: Wed Aug 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 27th, 2009 02:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As the originator of this blog I feel it is time to reraise this issue especially due to recent events regarding President Obama bringing AMNESTY to the forefront this week.

We are on the path of becoming a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY!!  Our government has borrowed and spent out grandchildren into poverty.  They are instituting laws that Will over tax even us poor people.  To complete their mission they will legalize 20 to 30 million illegals who in turn will bring 5 family members into the US totalling 100 to 150 million Hispanics creating an overload on our melting pot and expediting the white race as a minority.  Keep in mind we already have !0% of Mexico's population now, most of whom are uneducated and unskilled. 

One thing that has really caught my attention is how Congressman Castle is gong along with the Democrats.  Even yesterday he voted for the CAP and Tax bill.   As an Independent I even voted for him.  AMAZING!!!

GOD HELP US!!

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 24th, 2009 08:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote: PtG, I haven't had the pleasure of seeing a post from L 457 but on your recommendation I will attempt to look one up. As far as the Crawford ranch goes I would enjoy seeing our former King out hunting in front of little Dicky there sometime.
Ohhh, how naughty. Just be sure you don't post anything like that about FlyCatcher. You'll get a visit from "The Service".

Bixby
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 2357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 24th, 2009 06:21 pm
 Quote  Reply 
When Obama was a US Senator he voted against an amendment to the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 to "require the enforcement of existing border security and immigration laws and congressional approval before amnesty can be granted." (US Senate, June 7, 2007)

More than two out of three Americans (67%) favor an enforcement first policy.  Just 18% are opposed to it. (Rasmussen, May 7, 2006)

Judging from Obama's appointments to his Cabinet, it appears that nothing will be done except perhaps an overbearing push towards amnesty at all costs, the public be d**ned.

Last edited on Wed Jun 24th, 2009 06:23 pm by Bixby

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jun 21st, 2009 01:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote:  DD, Still trotting out those aluminum hat retread stories I see.
  Just a reminder you must have forgotten to list those "good" things the King did about illegal immigration during his reign of terror.
  I forgot to mention in my last post how surprised I was that your opinion of B. Clinton was much kinder than mine is of King George. I guess you are just the better person.

Gee thanks, I'll sleep much better tonite.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jun 21st, 2009 01:07 am
 Quote  Reply 
Check the Reality thread on the State of Delaware Forum.  You're like conjoined twins in a horror movie.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jun 21st, 2009 12:12 am
 Quote  Reply 
PtG, I haven't had the pleasure of seeing a post from L 457 but on your recommendation I will attempt to look one up. As far as the Crawford ranch goes I would enjoy seeing our former King out hunting in front of little Dicky there sometime.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 11:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
 DD, Still trotting out those aluminum hat retread stories I see.
  Just a reminder you must have forgotten to list those "good" things the King did about illegal immigration during his reign of terror.
  I forgot to mention in my last post how surprised I was that your opinion of B. Clinton was much kinder than mine is of King George. I guess you are just the better person.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 07:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote:  
  That list of "good" that he did could be written in 16 pt. type on a matchbook cover. Why not start with what this thread is about. List any of your perceived "good" on Illegal Immigration. 
  It's true Clinton's indiscretions were a stain (excuse the choice of words) on the oval office and I would never defend them. That being said if you care to look at Presidential history, far more sinister acts some of them illegal have been carried out in that office. Some by GWB have cost people their lives. Scandal, while humiliating (just ask some of the holier than thou Senators and Congressmen from both parties) has little or no effect on the lives of anyone but those involved.
  If this countries Constitution survived the assault on it by King George little Dicky and their band of henchmen (and that's a big if) it will no doubt survive Obamas.
  I have reached the point where I consider the former King less than nothing and the majority of people in this country already know who is worse.



Slick Willy's "scandal" re: monica lewinsky was a blip on the radar. Reread the history of Kosovo.

Also from the history I have been reading the most imperialistic president we have had to date was Ta,Da, Teddy Roosevelt. Check out his crimes and misdemeanors.

To get back to the original thread which was illegal immigration - yes it is illegal and all should have to go back to their original homes,on their own monry, do not collect $200.00 and do not pass laws that will give them blanket amnesty.  1st to go ---BO's aunt.


 

Last edited on Sat Jun 20th, 2009 07:40 pm by dover-diva

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 05:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 
CC you and Legends 457 need to go on a honeymoon together.  Maybe you could camp out at the Crawford Ranch and get a glimpse of your fav pres working on his ranch.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 04:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
 
  That list of "good" that he did could be written in 16 pt. type on a matchbook cover. Why not start with what this thread is about. List any of your perceived "good" on Illegal Immigration. 
  It's true Clinton's indiscretions were a stain (excuse the choice of words) on the oval office and I would never defend them. That being said if you care to look at Presidential history, far more sinister acts some of them illegal have been carried out in that office. Some by GWB have cost people their lives. Scandal, while humiliating (just ask some of the holier than thou Senators and Congressmen from both parties) has little or no effect on the lives of anyone but those involved.
  If this countries Constitution survived the assault on it by King George little Dicky and their band of henchmen (and that's a big if) it will no doubt survive Obamas.
  I have reached the point where I consider the former King less than nothing and the majority of people in this country already know who is worse.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 05:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
CC I despised Bill Clinton just as much as you hate GWB. I thought and still think he was a slimeball and made a mockery of the Oval Office(now known as the oral office).

But for my sanity I did not protest so vehemently esp. in front of my children. We discussed without wanting him lynched. A lot of anger towards GWB was/is jusitified, however, if it wasn't for the LMSM that kept banging the same drums, day after day, ad infinitum, some of the good that he did do might have had a chance to be recognized.

I, myself have reached that point with B Hussein Obama. He is a nothing. If this country's constitution survies him then I think given the two- GWB vs BHO the people will finally understand who really was the worst.:)

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 04:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
  DD, you are correct I do have a lot of anger after 8 years of unbelievable ineptitude from our former President.
  His reign of terror is akin to eating a bowl of chili peppers. You can't get rid of the effects just because the bowl is empty. Now let me try that deep cleansing breath...................................................................No that didn't do it. He was and still is every persons nightmare.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 04:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
 HB, I feel the same way about any good candidate including a Republican but McCain certainly wasn't one. Of course our definitions of a good candidate would differ. The most palatable candidate for me in the recent Presidential election was Ron Paul.
  I would definitely take issue with Democrats ruling Washington for at least 4 of those 6 years since nothing George wanted during that time was denied him. He not only did little about spending increases he fostered the majority of them with the complete complicity of his party. It's funny you would use the term "take no prisoners approach" because I have heard the same comments from Democrats about the first 6 years of the Kings rule.
  I have never looked at the Huffington Post or DU and probably never will but maybe we can get back to "neocons" meaning some other time.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
CC, I'd agree that few, if any, conservatives voted for Obama over McCain. Much more likely from the voting statistics I saw , they just didn't vote. If a good Independent came up, or even more unlikely, a good Democrat, a true conservative would vote for either without concern. I would have supported Zell Miller in a heartbeat over a Susan Collins.

Your King George phobia aside, you need to recognize he actually did little [unfortunately] about the spending increases that went on. For the last 6 years , the Democrats have effectively ruled Washington through a combination of intimidated Republicans and, since 2006, by sheer numbers. I grudgingly admire their take no prisoners approach to politics but abhor the direction they are taking the country while applying it.

Now, back to the term 'neocon' you middle-roaders like to use. Someday when you have a moment, try to find a good definition of that term [ the Huffington Post and DU are not credible sources]. I doubt Dick Cheney fits that term, in any of the ways I understand it.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:36 am
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote:   TF,  nowhere in my post did I claim affiliation with the Republican Party or the Democrats nor would I want to. I hope that an Independent Party candidate will soon have enough support in this country to make a serious run. In case you haven't noticed there are more registered Independents in this country than registered Republicans or Democrats.
 
  I can only take your word for your self proclaimed ability to achieve success, hopefully it isn't on the backs of illegal aliens. I began working at age 15 and was able to retire comfortably several years ago with no debt and am still not of Social Security age. In some folks view I have been successful. As far as successful Republicans vs. Democrats I doubt that you will find either party has a monopoly on that. You may indeed know a lot of Democrats that don't possess your abilities to gain "success" as I know many Republicans that don't possess the abilities to achieve my "success". So What? Not everyone in this country or this world for that matter is born with the same opportunities and abilities, but guess what? They can still consider themselves successful in their own way even if they don't measure up to your definition of success.
 
  The trouble I have sleeping at night began with King Georges second term and the first trillion in debt his administration saddled us with. Claiming Republicans want to reduce the deficit after Georges 8 years is ludicrous at best. The vast majority of Republican politicians are just ticked off that they are not the ones directing the spending towards their own special interest groups. As far as feeling the pain goes, most people I know were feeling the pain several years ago and the end is not in site.

With all that anger I don't know how you DO sleep @ nite. GWB id NO LONGER PRESIDENT!!  Take a deep cleansing breath and exhale. GWB wasn't the best but BO is every normal person's nightmare.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
  TF,  nowhere in my post did I claim affiliation with the Republican Party or the Democrats nor would I want to. I hope that an Independent Party candidate will soon have enough support in this country to make a serious run. In case you haven't noticed there are more registered Independents in this country than registered Republicans or Democrats.
 
  I can only take your word for your self proclaimed ability to achieve success, hopefully it isn't on the backs of illegal aliens. I began working at age 15 and was able to retire comfortably several years ago with no debt and am still not of Social Security age. In some folks view I have been successful. As far as successful Republicans vs. Democrats I doubt that you will find either party has a monopoly on that. You may indeed know a lot of Democrats that don't possess your abilities to gain "success" as I know many Republicans that don't possess the abilities to achieve my "success". So What? Not everyone in this country or this world for that matter is born with the same opportunities and abilities, but guess what? They can still consider themselves successful in their own way even if they don't measure up to your definition of success.
 
  The trouble I have sleeping at night began with King Georges second term and the first trillion in debt his administration saddled us with. Claiming Republicans want to reduce the deficit after Georges 8 years is ludicrous at best. The vast majority of Republican politicians are just ticked off that they are not the ones directing the spending towards their own special interest groups. As far as feeling the pain goes, most people I know were feeling the pain several years ago and the end is not in site.

The Future
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 8th, 2009
Location: Milford, Delaware USA
Posts: 187
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 07:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote:   HB, I doubt that any "conservatives" changed their vote to Obama and kept McCain from being elected. The more likely scenario is McCain couldn't convince enough Independents he wouldn't continue the King George dynasty. The Independent voters of this country are and will continue to be the needed voting block to be elected in this country. For better or worse they elected the "King" and now they have elected the "Savior".

  I am completely against amnesty for illegal's and I am well aware that Obama was sitting firmly on that bandwagon, but I hardly think he is any worse on this subject than one of the dubious cosponsors (McCain) of the previous Amnesty bill. I have written and emailed my Representatives on more than one occasion to express my views on this subject for whatever that was worth.

  BTW as far as Carper is concerned you will get a similar Republican response from Congressman Castle. This emphasizes the need for people like Senator Sessions to have a louder voice in his party.

  The term "neo con" originated much earlier than the '70's as you undoubtedly know and like many other words from our language it has morphed several times over the years. Your definition would certainly have been correct at one time but I doubt the current neo con would agree with it. The current crop of neo cons are Dick Cheney types and don't consider it a negative term at all. Just as true liberals don't consider the label "liberal" a negative term.

  If you consider yourself a conservative I can certainly respect that and I agree with some conservative points of view but I also agree with some liberal points of view that is why I am a registered Independent. I cannot and will not ever support radical views from the right or left because they are always counterproductive. Like the majority of Independents in this country every election I am forced to choose which of the two parties ideas are the closest to my own. Then decide weather to support one or waste my vote with a right in. The real point being people like Limbaugh and his radical lemmings do nothing but push Independents away from the Republican party. If that is their goal they are succeeding masterfully.

THats fine with me... If you can sleep at night knowing that when you voted for the liberals, you also voted for thier socialist agenda; then so be it.... That being said, I don't think you should be affiliated with the republican party if you are ok with what is going on. ...   We do not need any more moderate republicans in our party... That is how we got here in the first place... I geuss I am a so called NEOCON and I am bad for the republican...  But I am also a good person who is willing to work hard to achieve my goals and I believe in my own abilites to gain success.. I know alot of liberals who can't say the same..

THats the thing that people don't understand anymore...The issues that are effecting our country today are no longer right or left issues..  Either you are for all of the government spending or you aren't!  Either you want to pay more taxes and have the government run your life or you want taxes to be cut and government to downsize..  Regardless of which party you are in we will all be feeling the pain if the government keeps spending money that we just don't have;...  So next time you go to vote keep that in mind! 

Why not pick a side so you can vote in the primary?

Last edited on Thu Jun 18th, 2009 07:19 pm by The Future

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 05:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
  HB, I doubt that any "conservatives" changed their vote to Obama and kept McCain from being elected. The more likely scenario is McCain couldn't convince enough Independents he wouldn't continue the King George dynasty. The Independent voters of this country are and will continue to be the needed voting block to be elected in this country. For better or worse they elected the "King" and now they have elected the "Savior".

  I am completely against amnesty for illegal's and I am well aware that Obama was sitting firmly on that bandwagon, but I hardly think he is any worse on this subject than one of the dubious cosponsors (McCain) of the previous Amnesty bill. I have written and emailed my Representatives on more than one occasion to express my views on this subject for whatever that was worth.

  BTW as far as Carper is concerned you will get a similar Republican response from Congressman Castle. This emphasizes the need for people like Senator Sessions to have a louder voice in his party.

  The term "neo con" originated much earlier than the '70's as you undoubtedly know and like many other words from our language it has morphed several times over the years. Your definition would certainly have been correct at one time but I doubt the current neo con would agree with it. The current crop of neo cons are Dick Cheney types and don't consider it a negative term at all. Just as true liberals don't consider the label "liberal" a negative term.

  If you consider yourself a conservative I can certainly respect that and I agree with some conservative points of view but I also agree with some liberal points of view that is why I am a registered Independent. I cannot and will not ever support radical views from the right or left because they are always counterproductive. Like the majority of Independents in this country every election I am forced to choose which of the two parties ideas are the closest to my own. Then decide weather to support one or waste my vote with a right in. The real point being people like Limbaugh and his radical lemmings do nothing but push Independents away from the Republican party. If that is their goal they are succeeding masterfully.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 04:50 am
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote: Take it whichever way you like. It was not any nastier than your previous post nor was it intended to be. Memory lane is never a useless walk if we attempt to learn from our mistakes. Neo con certainly applies and is no more misused than "liberals". If you don't think my comments about Senator Sessions were positive you must not have read them.

I agree that your comments about Sessions were positive, at least from my perspective but I would like to take issue with the use of Neo-Con. Liberals tend to use this term as some sort of denigration of conservatives and, to an extent , it is ,but not for the reasons you think.

You see, a 'neo-con' is not a super conservative but just the opposite. It is Conservative Lite. Neo-con is literally a 'new conservative'. In the 70's ,when the term first came out, it referred to liberals who had come over from the Dark Side and now saw things in a more conservative light. They tended to be more trusting of government , less aghast at taxes and more interested in collaoborative efforts to forge coalitions, etc. than hard core conservatives. A true conservative doesn't trust government worth a d**n , thinks taxes are a curse and so forth. If you can still find it, a columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune did some research on this a couple of years ago , tapping into the minds of people like Paul Weyrich , Rich Lowry, Paul Gigot and a few other conservative and liberal thinkers to get a definition of the term which was again appearing on the scene. At one point it was even considered a code word for anti-semitism because of some of the Jewish people migrating to the right [not enough in my opinion, we still got Obama].

In short, I'd rather be called a conservative than a neo-con. I was never a liberal and don't think like 'em.

Last edited on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 04:52 am by Hartlyboy

Mendavor
Member


Joined: Mon Jan 8th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 562
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 04:32 am
 Quote  Reply 
There is no such thing as "illegal" aliens unless they come from another planet.  We are all citizens of the world.  Have we not been striving for a borderless socisty?  Do not borders creat tensions and conflicts?  You see it here and you see it in the middle east and in Korea.  Drop all borders, turn all governments over to the United Nations and end all conflicts. Workers of the world, unite.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 04:27 am
 Quote  Reply 
counting coup wrote:   The working class citizens of this country owe a huge debt of gratitude to Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for his valiant effort in leading the fight to defeat the previous illegal alien amnesty bill and should look to him again when both sides of the isle try to shovel the next one down our throats. The Republican party could use a more vocal voice from people like Senator Sessions and less from their current crop of self appointed "leaders".
McCain's coziness with the likes of Kennedy over the amnesty bills was one of the reasons he didn't get elected by us 'conservatives' . Too bad you 'working class' citizens decided to put in someone even worse in the Whitehouse as far as supporting illegal aliens. The Republicans are bad on this issue but the Democrats are almost solidly behind it and so are the labor unions. Write Carper about opposition to this and you'll get back the standard Democrat talking points supporting a solution to the 'immigration problem'.

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 01:49 am
 Quote  Reply 
Take it whichever way you like. It was not any nastier than your previous post nor was it intended to be. Memory lane is never a useless walk if we attempt to learn from our mistakes. Neo con certainly applies and is no more misused than "liberals". If you don't think my comments about Senator Sessions were positive you must not have read them.

Last edited on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 04:20 am by counting coup

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 12:13 am
 Quote  Reply 
Are you being nasty? :(  Memory lane is really a useless walk unless you or anyone else has something useful to say that is a positive improvement -in todays' politics. Neo con is such a misused word. 

You also might reread my post and see that i said a handful that think and some- I did NOT paint all liberals with the same brush- but, you are, with you neocon which most people apply to those that they "might" disagree with. BM

Last edited on Thu Jun 18th, 2009 10:41 pm by dover-diva

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 04:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
If "think" is the operative word here than "think" (If that is possible for a neo con) when this proposal was originally advanced and by who. Now take a trip down memory lane and see who was pushing the most recent "illegal alien amnesty" bill the hardest. "Liberals" like Lindsey Graham and John McCain among other Republicans with their cheap labor no matter what the consequences for the rest of us agenda. If and when the conservative side of the isle ever really wanted to do anything to halt the flow of illegal aliens they would get the support of working class folks across this country. The working class citizens of this country owe a huge debt of gratitude to Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for his valiant effort in leading the fight to defeat the previous illegal alien amnesty bill and should look to him again when both sides of the isle try to shovel the next one down our throats. The Republican party could use a more vocal voice from people like Senator Sessions and less from their current crop of self appointed "leaders".

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 01:40 am
 Quote  Reply 
I have always enjoyed reading Mr. Stewart's letters to the editor. ESP: re-- the ILLEGALS that have invaded this country and the handful of libs that "think" (if that is poss. for some liberals), that these ILLEGALS are owed something, because they entered this country ILLEGALLY.

His research is good. The problem is as he stated, the persons in congress etc. DO NOT pay into the system. They have there own golden parachutes. But, they'll do anything for a vote- legal or illegal.

Last edited on Tue Jun 16th, 2009 01:52 am by dover-diva

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 08:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Congress is once again trying to deprive us of our fragile and rapidly diminishing Social Security benefits by giving them to illegal aliens from Mexico.


With Medicare in crisis and our country in a depression I am stunned at the depth of irresponsible government. Under direction from the Bush administration, the State Department and the Social Security Administration are considering a Totalization Agreement, in which 345 billion dollars in Social Security benefits would be granted to illegal aliens from Mexico. The Bush White House thought that this would be a low cost favor to get in to, then Mexican President, Vicente Fox’s good graces.


Why would the U.S. government care about being in Fox’s good graces? Mexico could not be a worse neighbor. The Mexican government encourages their sick, their criminals and their poor illiterates to violate our borders. They have overwhelmed our welfare system, our schools, our prisons and our hospitals. Our border states have declared emergencies and are being overrun by drug traffickers, kidnappers and other felons. Mexico is a conduit for terrorists. Their lawlessness made it one of the top ten global risks. Our Homeland Security is diminishing rather than strengthening under the illegal-alien loving Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano’s reign. In my opinion she is one of the most ineffective members of President Obama’s cabinet of rerun Clintonites and misfits.


This agreement would be a significant difference from the 20 or so agreements that are already in place between the United States and other countries because under those agreements, only people legally residing and working in the United States are eligible to receive Social Security benefits. Unlike those twenty other countries, illegal Mexican aliens are unidentifiable. The last amnesty had over a 70% fraud rate. The INS and the SSA knowingly accepted massive numbers of fraudulent rent receipts, earnings records and birth records. Our country is awash with fake I.D.s and other documents generated by American businesses that feasted on the lax requirements.


In December, the press reported on a looming deal between the administration and the government of Mexico which would make hundreds of thousands of Mexican citizens eligible for U.S. Social Security benefits. The centerpiece of the agreement would be a so-called "totalization," which would mean that even if a Mexican citizen did not work in the United States long enough to qualify for Social Security, the number of years worked in Mexico would be added to bring up the total and thus make the Mexican worker eligible for cash transfers from the United States. Our government kept this a secret from American taxpayers and sold us down the drain. The entire illegal immigrant system is awash in fraud.


Several years ago the U.S. government built a huge Social Security Administration Office in Mexico City in order to handle the millions of illegal Mexicans that will be lining up to steal our social security; many will steal it under several names. Washington must be pretty certain that is going to happen.


U. S. citizenship should be a mandatory requirement for anyone wanting our tax dollars. The Mexican Totalization Agreement is a devious insult to the millions of Americans who pay their entire working lives into the system and now face the possibility that there may be nothing left when it is their turn to retire.


The proposed agreement is nothing more than a financial reward to those who have willingly and knowingly violated our own immigration laws. Talk about an incentive for illegal immigration! How many more would break the law to come to this country if promised U.S. government paychecks for life? Is creating a global welfare state on the back of the American taxpayer a good idea? The program also establishes a very disturbing precedent of U.S. foreign aid going to individual citizens rather than to states.


Ex-US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said, "This is another traitorous giveaway proposal; work less than two years and get decades of welfare/social security, irregardless of whether they even have a green card. For officials to funnel public funds to the foreigner over the border fits the description of treason. The social security disability system will presumably also be open to hostile foreigners, who will only have to work two years here, get registered as disabled, move to Mexico and live on $800.00 a month for the next fifty years. The social security basic levels of payments are several times the median wage of Mexico. If 20 million sign up, it will only involve traitors shipping out around $200 billion a year."


If all this isn’t enough to make you sick to your stomach or fighting mad the agreement also contains a provision that U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges. "WHY?"


Anyone relying on social security alone is living at poverty levels. Yet members of Congress have a bigger retirement package than the CEO’s of most companies today. Even their 401K’s were covered by AIG. In addition they have given themselves the best health care coverage in the world. Many members who have recently left Congress will draw more than $1 million over their lifetimes. The National Taxpayers Union projects that in the future many will haul in over $2 million. Even those members of congress convicted of major offenses still collect their pensions. Only treason can stop their pensions. Why don’t we use their retirement money to fund social security for illegal immigrants and watch how fast they fix the problem? What is wrong with our government?


William J. Stewart


Bridgeville

The Future
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 8th, 2009
Location: Milford, Delaware USA
Posts: 187
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 07:50 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Agreed!!!!

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 07:17 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hartlyboy wrote: T.F., I believe most of the references you laid out but ,unfortunately, the clowns we have representing us -strike that -voting against us in Washington march to their own drum and it has more to do with sucking up votes than caring about the people who are here now and paying their bloated salaries.
Too true.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 07:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
T.F., I believe most of the references you laid out but ,unfortunately, the clowns we have representing us -strike that -voting against us in Washington march to their own drum and it has more to do with sucking up votes than caring about the people who are here now and paying their bloated salaries.

The Future
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 8th, 2009
Location: Milford, Delaware USA
Posts: 187
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 04:27 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I agree with you one hundred percent and I know my post seemed slanted towards the right... I also understand the push has come from both sides of the Aisle... 

It makes you wonder how many of those so called republicans on the right should actually be on the left!!!  And you are right....All of the politicians have thier own agenda;s for granting amnesty to the illegals. 

The problem is, the people in this country who are hurting the worst (lower & middle class americans) are the ones who will be effected the most...either by the loss of their jobs to cheaper labor, the decrease in pay brought on by cheap labor, and the increase in taxes to pay for all the social services!!

People in this country need someone to unite them and an independent or moderate republican party is not the answer. 

counting coup
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 29th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 307
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 04:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
T.F.   The push for illegal alien amnesty is coming from both sides for different reasons. I agree with most of your post about illegal aliens. The only part I don't get is anyone trying to claim this is a partisan issue. The previous administration tried to get amnesty passed with the help of many Dems and Republicans with Graham and McCain leading the way. A huge uproar from constituents blocked it previously and that will be necessary to have a chance of defeating it again. A large group of Republicans led by Senator Sessions with the help of some Democrats formed a bipartisan coalition to defeat it previously. The task of derailing it this time may be more daunting than last, but it will surely require the same bipartisan effort. Call, write and email your Representative when it comes up for consideration.

dover-diva
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 23rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 1973
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 03:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Thank you.;)

The Future
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 8th, 2009
Location: Milford, Delaware USA
Posts: 187
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 02:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Lavitakus wrote: The Future wrote:  we are giving jobs away that many americans need right now.   By making the "illegals, legal we are rewarding people for knowingly breaking the laws of our country. 

Which jobs exactly are you talking about so I can figure out who exactly is passing on these "rewards" you speak of? If this is the premise of your short story then you should perhapse start with the corporate employer. Jobs and socialism from the template for which you present neglect the corporate socialism which is the driving force behind the puppet show called illegal immigration. Seriously though....which jobs...there are so many to be used as a foundation for the ruse :?

Lavitikus:  I am sorry if you feel my posts are long winded:  I will warn everone right now that this is another long post. But there are some very interesting facts with in;


So lavitikus you are implying that the push for "Illegal Immigrants amnesty" is coming from Corporate lobbyists and that the Democratic party has nothing to gain from the estimated 18 million illegal immigrants in this country becoming legal citizens? Since when has Obama or any other member of his administration been Pro-Business? I don't see this administration doing anything to help any corperation or businessin this country, unless they have something to gain!  (Like 18 million votes)

Being that Mr. Obama recieved about 54 million votes, I think him and the Democrats would be more then willing to pick up another 18 million to help thier cause.

Here are some interesting facts about illegal immigrants and the industries they are invloved in:

The claim that illegal immigrants drain US services is a myth”

False: From the L.A. Times and Rice University’s Professor Donald Huddle: “Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops but 29% are on welfare.” And as far back as 1997, according to Huddle, the cost of illegal immigration to the American taxpayer was a net (after subtracting taxes immigrants pay) $69 Billion!!!! (Farming Industry)

Claim: “Illegal immigrants do the jobs that Americans won’t.”

False: Americans will perform any legal job necessary to support themselves and their families. As an illustration, recently 270 US citizens were dismissed from an Alabama construction site by a foreman who said the dismissal was “because the Mexicans had arrived”. Linda Swopes, who operates Complete Employment Services in Mobile AL said: "I assure you it is not true that Americans don't want to work. We had been told that 270 jobs might be available, and we could have filled every one of them with men from this area, most of whom lost their jobs because of the hurricane." The identified Mexican illegal immigrant workers were simply willing to work for less money than were US citizens. (Construction Industry)

 

Claim: “Illegal immigrants help the American economy.”

False: Illegal immigrants to the US cost the country at least $10 billion more than they contribute to the economy. The CIS (Center for Immigration Studies) advises that if amnesty is put into place, these costs to the American economy (and the American taxpayer) will triple. The average illegal immigrant family uses $2,700/year more in services than it pays in taxes. In 2002, this amounted to a $10.4 billion drain on the federal budget. Some of the greatest federal costs included: Medicaid ($2.5 billion); treatment for the uninsured ($2.2 billion); food assistance programs ($1.9 billion); the federal prison and court systems ($1.6 billion); and federal aid to schools ($1.4 billion

  • Claim: “Illegal immigrants are just hard-working people who want jobs.”
 

False: The US Justice Department reported that in 2003, alone, 270,000 illegal immigrants had served prison time. The Federation for American Immigration Reform reports: "In March 2000, Congress made public Department of Justice statistics showing that, over the previous five years, the INS had released over 35,000 criminal aliens instead of deporting them. Over 11,000 of those released went on to commit serious crimes, over 1,800 of which were violent ones; including 98 homicides, 142 sexual assaults, and 44 kidnappings. In 2001, thanks to a decision by the Supreme Court, the INS was forced to release into our society over 3,000 criminal aliens who collectively had been convicted of 125 homicides, 387 sex offenses, and 772 assault charges."

 

The Federal Bureau of Prisons estimates that fully one-third of current prison populations are comprised of non-citizen illegals.

 

Islamic terrorists, including Mexicans with terrorist ties, have entered and are continuing to enter the US via our unsecured borders.

 

The violent MS-13 Salvadoran gangs have illegally immigrated across the US-Mexico border. MS-13 has also vowed to kill local police, Border Patrol agents and US citizen-members of the Minutemen project, within the US. 

 

  • Claim: “Illegal aliens help keep cost of goods down”
 

Misleading and false: Although marketplace agricultural products are estimated to be somewhat lower than they would be if US citizens were performing the jobs illegals carry out, the cost to US taxpayers in free services to illegals vastly outweighs any savings to the US consumer. And illegal immigrants are no longer solely operating in agriculture but, have expanded out into multiple industries. In Los Angeles, 49-year old construction worker Michael Williams (jobless for 3 months) said outside of a Home Depot: "You have a lot of illegal aliens here. It takes food off the table." The spread of illegals into other industries is increasing geometrically.

 

Claim: “Illegal aliens are honest and contribute little to crime”

 

Misleading: Many are hard working. However, in Los Angeles, alone, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens. “A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal.”

 

  • Claim: “Illegals do not drive down US workers’ wages”

False: As already presented, illegal immigrants from Mexico are working for far less money than US citizen workers and on a regular basis. An 18 April 2006 article in WSJ by Professor of Economics and Social Policy at Harvard University George J. Borjas (“For a Few Dollars Less”) quotes Paul Samuelson: “…an increase in supply [of workers] will, other things being equal, tend to depress wage rates." Although Samuelson’s conclusions were, for years, disputed, recently they have been proving to be accurate.

 

Borjas writes: “My Harvard colleague Lawrence Katz and I recently examined the impact of the 1980-2000 immigrant influx (and particularly Mexican-origin immigration) for U.S. wages. The results are that, in the short run -- holding all other things equal -- immigration lowered the wage of native workers, particularly of those workers with the least education. The wage fell by 3% for the average worker and by 8% for high school dropouts.” He further concludes: “These effects imply sizable reductions in annual earnings for low-skill workers. In 2000, the typical high school dropout earned $25,000, so that immigration reduced his earnings by $1,200, even after all capital adjustments take place. Mr. Katz and I also examined how much was due to Mexican immigration. We calculated what the wage effects would have been had there been no Mexican immigration between 1980 and 2000. We found that Mexican immigration, which is predominantly low-skill, accounts for all of the adverse impact of immigration on low-skill natives.” In NRO (National Review Online), Borjas continues with: “In fact, immigration may have depressed the wages of low-skilled workers by 5 to 8 percentage points.”

 

I will let you be the judge whether or not you think illegal immigrants should be given amnesty!!! 
 

 

chloe
Member
 

Joined: Thu Oct 2nd, 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 108
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 12:28 pm
 Quote  Reply 
curious reader wrote: Where are all of you Obama supporters, why aren't you backing him up here, I want to hear from you on this issue, Hot Flash for one.
And Fred, what is your opinion on this one

curious reader
Member
 

Joined: Wed Apr 29th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 128
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 03:41 am
 Quote  Reply 
Where are all of you Obama supporters, why aren't you backing him up here, I want to hear from you on this issue, Hot Flash for one.

Lavitakus
Member
 

Joined: Sat Jan 14th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1311
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 02:58 am
 Quote  Reply 
The Future wrote:  we are giving jobs away that many americans need right now.   By making the "illegals, legal we are rewarding people for knowingly breaking the laws of our country. 

Which jobs exactly are you talking about so I can figure out who exactly is passing on these "rewards" you speak of? If this is the premise of your short story then you should perhapse start with the corporate employer. Jobs and socialism from the template for which you present neglect the corporate socialism which is the driving force behind the puppet show called illegal immigration. Seriously though....which jobs...there are so many to be used as a foundation for the ruse :?

stewbaby
Member
 

Joined: Wed Aug 1st, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 14th, 2009 02:22 am
 Quote  Reply 
It is not just those three in Washington pursuing AMNESTY.  The tentacles are everywhere including here in Delaware.  Recently I even talked to a State  Representative and he even admitted that he hasn't seen what has become of Georgetown other than McDonald's has changed its menu to accommodate our friends from south of the border.  Until something serious happens to one of our leaders by an illegal they just don't care.  Could you imagine what the President would do if one or both of his kids had something happen to them by an illegal.  He would become like that woman in San Francisco who lost her husband and two children in an auto accident, and now has a major law suit against the city.  Come to think about it, I would sue the state if something serious happens to one of my family members as a result our law makers and law enforcers are not doing their job!

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 11th, 2009 10:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You got it figured out, Future. Darn shame that the 3 clowns we have in DC are all chomping at the bit to throw us under the bus in hopes of getting some votes for themselves.

The Insyder
Member


Joined: Sun Dec 11th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 802
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 11th, 2009 10:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You hit the nail on the head.  A voter base forever loyal to socialism.  Remember when Bill Clinton gave fast track to 1500 aids tainted Haitians and assorted criminals?  Same thing.

The Future
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 8th, 2009
Location: Milford, Delaware USA
Posts: 187
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 11th, 2009 10:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The real question is,  Why would anybody in there right mind want to make illegal imigrants legal citizens of the united states? 

To people like us, it seems like a no brainer.  By making these people legal citizens we are giving jobs away that many americans need right now.   By making the "illegals, legal we are rewarding people for knowingly breaking the laws of our country.  Who's to say the rest of mexico won't come over here thinking that  they will be able to get amnesty if they make it across our borders. Not to mention the subsidized government health care that they will be elgible for.

But when people like Warren Buffet and other brilliant businessman are jumping on the bandwagon its got to make you wonder why? 

By make "illegals", legal the owners of corperations in this country gets a new workforce that is willing to work twice as hard for half as much.  They get a dependable hardworking employee who will show up everyday to work because if they don't, there families in Mexico will go hungry.(Can you really blame a business owner for doing this though?)Maybe we the american people are partly to blame...There are plenty of Americans who would rather sit at home collecting unemployment checks then finding jobs!!!(Thanks Dem's for creating the welfare state that we live in today!!!)

Why are the Dem's for it? Eventhough they have a good portion of America accepting the fact, that they cannot do anything without the help of the Government? 

Obama gets a new voter base that will be loyal to him because he made it possible for them to become legal citizens.  He also gets a workforce that will be entrenched in the industries involved with manufacturing.  We all know that these workers are the first to get unionized which increases Obama's chances of being re-elected.

So it sounds to me like everybody gets something out of this whole ordeal except middle class america.  Exactly the same middle class that Obama/Biden promised would not be affected by any new taxing or legislation>?  The Middle class america who stood to gain the most from Obama's appointment to office...What a joke...

 

Last edited on Mon May 11th, 2009 10:07 pm by The Future

tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 3357
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon May 11th, 2009 09:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

I noticed that every time there is a failure of government in the U.S. our president and his predecessor immediately throw money at the problem to cloud the issue and distract Americans from the root cause. President Obama recently requested another 1.5 billion from congress to handle our Swine flu problems. Why would we need to squander billions more of our taxpayer’s dollars? Does the Center for Disease Control not have a budget? Isn’t the reason for exorbitant drug prices a result of the huge costs of research and development incurred by pharmaceutical companies? Where is the World Health Organization when we need it? Is congress going to throw more money at yet another problem that should never have occurred except for their ineptitude?


What do you call it when a country allows three million people a year to cross its borders without any idea of their identity, criminal records or health status; irresponsible, traitorous or anti-American? The people who violate our borders are for the most part Mexicans looking for a better life or to jump on the lifetime welfare wagon or criminals looking for greener pastures. They are predominately poor and illiterate and are from a country where millions die from diseases caused by unmonitored water supplies and where people are compressed in very close proximity to their chickens, cattle and pigs. They live in a culture that pays little attention to personal hygiene and has few standards for disease control.


On a recent trip to Mexico I was shocked to learn that most bathrooms, especially in the south of Mexico, contain a basket for the collection of used toilet paper because overworked sewer systems cannot process it. Third World countries are not keen on washing hands after using a bathroom. And few bathrooms actually contain sink, soap and paper towels to do so. It is no wonder that they arrive in the U.S. with head lice, tuberculosis, A, B and C hepatitis, leprosy, AIDS and several strains of VD that have proven to be very drug resistant. These diseases, especially TB, have been eliminated in the U.S. for many years but are now making a comeback and spreading throughout the U.S. at an alarming rate. Chagas Disease, which destroys heart tissue and other organs, is carried into the U.S. directly from Mexico and Latin America where 18 million people are infected with it. In 2003 the NY Times reported that leprosy carried here by illegal aliens from Brazil, Mexico and the Caribbean, had infected over 7000 people in the U.S.


Our Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano, is an advocate of open borders and Illegal Immigration. I don’t feel very secure with Secretary Napolitano guarding our country. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has declared a state of emergency in California to help state agencies coordinate efforts to stem the outbreak. California has 3 million illegal immigrants and is also on the verge of bankruptcy. Doesn’t that make any impression on her?


Over 4 million Illegal alien school children, here in America, are not inoculated for the plethora of diseases they bring unknowingly into American schools. So while we are all at risk; our children are usually the first to be contaminated. Congress and the President are well aware of this problem and are the cause of it just as in the latest financial debacle. They will try to spin it into the distribution of more uncontrolled billions to the pharmaceutical companies and the lobbyists just as they are doing with Wall Street. It is especially sad when we realize that this problem was caused by irresponsible government that refuses to control its borders just so a small group of American businesses can make huge profits by laying the cost of so called illegal alien labor on the American taxpayers. I personally, would be happy to wash my own car, mow my lawn and purchase whole chickens and welcome identifiable legal immigrants entering through our front door. Landscapers, restaurants, and cleaning services could automate, raise their prices, or lower their profits until Americans could be paid a fair wage for their services. There is no doubt that our immigration system and the Department of Immigration are seriously flawed. The quotas are skewed and the entire operation inefficient. Many of our other arms of government also need reorganizing and everyone in the U.S. knows the government is responsible for allowing this entire situation to occur. Congress and the last eight presidents caused or ignored this problem and allowed it to reach the disastrous proportions that it has now reached. The time has come to fix it properly. If the US needs more immigrants then Congress should take a break from their affairs with lobbyists and reorganize the Immigration service, set realistic and fair entry quotas and bring in skilled identifiable people from all over the world who can bring something to America rather than just take from it.


America has always welcomed legal immigrants and the majority of us can trace our roots back through Ellis Island. Millions of immigrants entered the U.S. through Ellis Island where they had to undergo a medical and legal inspection. The two main reasons they were refused entry were if they had a contagious disease or were likely to become a public charge. Our country should continue to be a melting pot or mix of people from all over the world not just Mexico because President Calderon wants to unload his unskilled, his sick and his criminals on us.


The last president courageous enough to initiate an aggressive program against illegal immigration was President Eisenhower who deported over a million illegal immigrants and shipped them home. At least he recognized an invasion of his country when he saw one and responded to it.


Presently, there are many laws in the US that are unfair, biased or skewed. Americans still obey them and hope the next Congress will not be as easily influenced by big business as the last one. If Americans must obey the law, then illegal immigrants must certainly do so otherwise we will suffer pandemics much more severe than Swine Flu.


William J. Stewart


Bridgeville

 

TruthwillOut
Member


Joined: Tue Mar 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 560
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 27th, 2009 08:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Habanero wrote: Playing the Game wrote: Because we don't want to offend anyone............................   It might violate their rights.  Profiling you know.............

One word:   TOUGH


I get the impression this is far more serious then they are letting on. in other words its more widley spread.

having a quick check to make sure youre not a carrier is not an issue, or shouldnt be. if they dont like it they can stay in mexico. this flu is too virulent not to take precations.  Goggle what happened in 1976.

Habanero
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: DelMarVA, USA
Posts: 4822
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 27th, 2009 05:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Playing the Game wrote: Because we don't want to offend anyone............................   It might violate their rights.  Profiling you know.............

One word:   TOUGH

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 27th, 2009 12:16 am
 Quote  Reply 
Because we don't want to offend anyone............................   It might violate their rights.  Profiling you know.............

Habanero
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: DelMarVA, USA
Posts: 4822
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 26th, 2009 07:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
dover-diva wrote: Playing the Game wrote: Let's see.  The main reason for immigration rules and having standards is to protect the US from disease and criminals.

Now thanks to our lax border standards we have swine flu coming in from Mexico and Mexican criminals driving the crime rate to all time highs in Phoenix.

Amnesty?  My A S S

Now, Now PTG, NYC HS has diagnosed 10 or so students with this flu. How did they get exposed?? The little darlings, went to Mexico on spring break.

All the more reason a travel advisory should be issued in the US about traveling to Mexico and anyone coming into the US from there needs to be questioned/checked in regard to health, as well a legal ability to be in this country to begin with.    Numerous other countries are doing this, why shouldn't we?


 Current time is 05:56 am
Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.4015 seconds (23% database + 77% PHP). 35 queries executed.