Home | Advertise Online | Archives | Coupons | Marketplace | Newszap Media Kit | Site Feedback | Subscriptions

 Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

Sotomeyor is probably toast
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
rescue48
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 23rd, 2006
Location: Fel-town, Delaware USA
Posts: 191
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 12:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Hooray for the firefighters.  That's all I have to say about that.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 05:35 am
 Quote  Reply 
Fred wrote: So do you think there has never been another Supreme Court appointee who had a decision overturned?

She'll get voted in because she is the President's pick, she is qualified, and she has not made a lot of controversial statements or decisions.  Whether that is right or not isn't the point; the other issues some have tried to raise will have no real impact on the vote.


We can agree she'll get voted in because there are enough forelock-tugging Democrats to do it. Being the "president's pick" means squat in a balanced Congress and claiming she is qualified and has not made any controversial statements or decisions is simply ludicrous. Even the recent USSC overruling was a testament to her incompetence when the liberal, dissenting side of the decision took her to task for poor legal practices.

But, again, I agree, she'll get in. We have a Senate now [with the Saturday Night comic] which is filibuster proof so more such egregious acts can be expected going forward.We can only hope putting an incompetent racist on the Supreme Court will be their worst transgression.

Last edited on Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 12:13 am by Hartlyboy

Fred
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 10th, 2005
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 8242
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jul 1st, 2009 02:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
So do you think there has never been another Supreme Court appointee who had a decision overturned?

She'll get voted in because she is the President's pick, she is qualified, and she has not made a lot of controversial statements or decisions.  Whether that is right or not isn't the point; the other issues some have tried to raise will have no real impact on the vote.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 10:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I don't think there is a Republican in the Senate with stones enough to call her out.  However, I think there are one or two Democrats with a Conservative bent who just might.

Jurisprudence wrote:
No, this SC decision would do nothoing to harm Judge Sotomayor except that it would give Republicans and conservatives a basis for asking difficult questions. That being said, barring some unforseen calamity, there are sufficient votes for confirmation. HB's illustration of what a majority can do serves as a prime example of majority power.

Jurisprudence
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 28th, 2005
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 902
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:25 pm
 Quote  Reply 
No, this SC decision would do nothoing to harm Judge Sotomayor except that it would give Republicans and conservatives a basis for asking difficult questions. That being said, barring some unforseen calamity, there are sufficient votes for confirmation. HB's illustration of what a majority can do serves as a prime example of majority power.

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:18 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am afraid you are correct.

Hartlyboy
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3559
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 04:36 am
 Quote  Reply 
No, this won't derail her. If Congress can vote on bills that aren't even there at the time of the vote [cap and trade] or rush through trillion dollar pork bills that then lay around while the economy goes deeper in the hole, they will surely find a way to get this racist representative of the Obama posse on to the Supreme Court.

cedarcreek
Member


Joined: Sun Nov 9th, 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1527
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 11:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Moreover. . . is this a blow to affirmative action?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/29/supreme.court.discrimination/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5408
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 10:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The Supreme Court that this lady is trying to join threw a wrench into her plans today.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-06-29-scotus-firefighters_N.htm


 Current time is 08:31 am



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.
Click here to go to the Newszap.com home page

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.1703 seconds (14% database + 86% PHP). 19 queries executed.