| Author | Post |
|---|
Mike L
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 05:00 am |
|
loving life
It happened during the first free art show Steve White and Ernie Imbeault put on a couple years ago. The tax collector was Abernathy ( I am pretty sure) and he was reported to the parks dept. and when challenged by them refused at first to provide ID. Scared off some of the little old ladies who were participating.
|
DesertHawk
Member
|
Posted: Sun May 4th, 2008 07:54 pm |
|
| Bump!
|
DesertHawk
Member
|
Posted: Sat May 3rd, 2008 06:14 pm |
|
| Bump!
|
azsunshine
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jan 12th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 380 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 01:10 am |
|
Mike L wrote: ADOR assesses fines and penalties on amts. sold/collected. If what Mrs. Flynn says is true about never selling anything then the % of $00.00 would be what?
Sound like you don't mind if someone in city gov. spends their time spying on you and your neighbors.
DISCLAIMER: I do not know of Mrs Flynn's situation. I am only commenting on sales tax aspect and how one MAY not pay tax on re-sale products. My comments do not suggest anything of Mrs Flynn.
If you are a re-seller of a product you can submit to the first business an exemption certificate so you do not have to pay "sales" tax to the first business. Its not really called "sales" tax--it is a transaction privilege tax. The theory with this is if you are a re-seller you have to submit the tax based on what you sell the product for versus what you paid for the product. If you are the END user of that product then the resale certificate does not apply and you should have been charged that tax in the beginning and the first business should have submitted those funds thus short changing the tax system.
|
lovinglife
Member
| Joined: | Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 24 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 12:36 am |
|
"when they acccomplish that they will no loger have to lurk in the bushes with their camera like our city tax collector was caught doing"
Now now..... that only happens in our wildest dreams. Or here. Your freedoms mean nothing to them as long as they are protected.
When did this happen with a tax collector? Was this person from Apache Junction?
|
Mike L
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 11:26 pm |
|
| when they acccomplish that they will no loger have to lurk in the bushes with their camera like our city tax collector was caught doing or reading our e-mails without search warrants like the Bush administration was caught doing. But that's okay if they get caught at something he still has a few more months to keep them from being sued or give them clemency.
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:52 pm |
|
Be very careful, I understand that the CIA has a new satellite, it's rays can penetrate aluminum foil! This is way beyond just reading our mail and listening to our phone conversations, they are working on mind control of the population!
|
Mike L
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:31 pm |
|
| Could easily be both. Wonder why the cops were spying on an artists seminar held in Mesa last month by Steve White. A friend policeman tried to roust a couple of men in a van parked in front of the gallery and guess what? They had microphones and directional listening devices and were recording everything in the seminar. All this because he was educating people about ther civil rights.
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:25 pm |
|
| If a policeman arrests someone is it because of spying or because they broke the law?
|
Mike L
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:19 pm |
|
ADOR assesses fines and penalties on amts. sold/collected. If what Mrs. Flynn says is true about never selling anything then the % of $00.00 would be what?
Sound like you don't mind if someone in city gov. spends their time spying on you and your neighbors.
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 09:05 pm |
|
It is not a question of Flynn's rights. It is a question of EVERYONE that does business has to have a license, the law is very clear. Flynn wants to have laws & rules for everyone except her!
Some towns in AZ, pay a bounty to city employees who turn in unlicensed businesses. Mesa is one!
She got caught and now is crying because she has to pay the license fee. What will happen if ADOR wants back sales tax and penalties from the time she started the business. Pass the crying towels!!
|
ajBookchin
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 172 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 08:25 pm |
|
Mike L wrote: Why is it that no one out there seems to be concerned that someone in city government has either spent time researching Mrs. Flynn or is aiding and abetting someone who has. If the city were attempting to resarch everyperson in AJ doing business on the internet without a license, it would take a full time staff as they would have to investigate every citizen and every snowbird who winters here. Obviously Shannon has been singled out and if this is the worst they have found on her ( a maybe) I say hurray for her for having the guts to stand up for her constitutional rights and doing what she believes in. I by the way do not happen to beilieve in her choices of recall, (at least not one of them) . That is not the issue though. What bothers me is that the city government is either selectively spying on citizens or is conspiring with someone who is! You may be next!
As I understand, the question was NOT raised by city staff - I do not believe staff has been spending time doing such research, but by a private citizen who targeted Shannon - as a result, the city had to follow up.
Last edited on Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 08:26 pm by ajBookchin
|
Mike L
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 18 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 08:05 pm |
|
| Why is it that no one out there seems to be concerned that someone in city government has either spent time researching Mrs. Flynn or is aiding and abetting someone who has. If the city were attempting to resarch everyperson in AJ doing business on the internet without a license, it would take a full time staff as they would have to investigate every citizen and every snowbird who winters here. Obviously Shannon has been singled out and if this is the worst they have found on her ( a maybe) I say hurray for her for having the guts to stand up for her constitutional rights and doing what she believes in. I by the way do not happen to beilieve in her choices of recall, (at least not one of them) . That is not the issue though. What bothers me is that the city government is either selectively spying on citizens or is conspiring with someone who is! You may be next!
|
hubabuau
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 24th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 30 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17th, 2008 10:15 pm |
|
Having read the article in the AJ News, the comments here from ShannonFlynn and viewing Tuesday nights council meeting on tv, I have a few comments, questions and opinions.
The information about the Parvid Dealers and Retailers (that was posted by ShannonFlynn), clearly had Shannon Flynn listed as a person who appeared to be selling this product with operating hours, phone number and email (flyrep). However, in the article she said that she bought the product(s?) as a distributor to get it at a cheaper price rather than as a customer. Questions that come to mind are: Was that misrepresentation to the company a form of fraud? What products and quantities were purchased? Which leads to, if more product(s?) were purchased for a limited number of personal pets, was something else going on? Breeding?
In the article, Shannon Flynn said that she was misinformed on the license process for a distributor. Questions that come to mind are: Did the misinformation come from the city License Department? The parent company? Or the Department of Revenue?
In comments here, ShannonFlynn has addressed certain people in a response, and insinuates that they contacted the city regarding her business. Yet at Tuesday nights meeting, she insinuated that someone on the council was behind this. Questions that come to mind are: Is there substantiated proof that who she is accusing is behind this discovery? Is Shannon Flynn casting doubt on anyone that she thinks is 'out to get her'? Or is this just a defense mechanism?
My opinion, Shannon Flynn was either deceitful to the manufacturer or is just trying to cover her past actions without repercussions. Casting aspersions towards people and councilmembers without proof of who the real whistle blower is, sends a message that she is not a very trusting person with anyone. (Based upon comments Shannon Flynn made later in the meeting regarding animal inspections and that she would not let them into her home, in fact even her family has to call before coming over and only three members of her church have been to her home.) I realize that people enjoy and demand their privacy. However, when a person publicly states that they will run as a candidate for council, the privacy they covenant is nonexistent. My opinion.
Shannon Flynn, awaiting your response.
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15th, 2008 04:23 pm |
|
PLEASE read YOUR COMMENTS of 5 March
http://www.newszapforums.com/forum7/54280.html
Posted: Wed Mar 5th, 2008 04:12 pm
Parvaid Dealers & Retailers
Store Hours: M-F 9:30am-6:30pm; Sat 10am-6pm; Closed Sunday ARIZONA RETAILERS:. Apache Junction, AZ. Shannon Flynn Phone: (480) 671-
|
BlowingUrCover
Member
| Joined: | Sun Apr 6th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 6 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15th, 2008 03:31 pm |
|
You are trying to hard to defend yourself. Again!
|
ShannonFlynn
Member
| Joined: | Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 68 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15th, 2008 05:09 am |
|
Right above my name is
Sunshine Health Foods
410 Trainor Gate Road
Phone: (907) 456-5433
Store Hours: M-F 9:30am-6:30pm; Sat 10am-6pm; Closed Sunday
Not my hours. I am NOT a BUSINESS!
I know different.
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15th, 2008 01:15 am |
|
Flynn
My wife did not call the city. YOU put the information out on a blog on 5 March 2008. The blog was 'Flynn Stephens Seek Office'! YOU listed 'Parvaid Dealers & Retailers' with YOUR store hours. YOUR MOUTH got you in trouble!
DON'T try to distract from your lawless activities!
Last edited on Tue Apr 15th, 2008 01:33 am by mike85220
|
ShannonFlynn
Member
| Joined: | Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 68 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15th, 2008 01:06 am |
|
Mr. & Mrs. Weller,
There are many different ordinances and laws within the state of Arizona. Along with ways in which to collect them. Just because I worked at the ADOR does not mean I know the law on "DISTRIBUTORSHIP". Many individuals can be a distributor and not have to have a license. One could work under the companies TPT license number and the company would report to the city, state and IRS. There is in deed a loop hole. If you are a distributor that does not retail there is also no license needed. That is not the question however.
I will willing pay for this license if it is within my duty to do so. Just as I pay my land tax, income tax and file early yearly for the state and IRS. I question this issue because of my experience with the ADOR and I understand that many times individuals do not get all or have all of the information needed to know and understand state law. I have seen it with my own eyes.
I will not hand over my rights just because a local government worker says I have to get a license. TRUST BUT VERIFY!
Thanks for the call into the city Mr. and or Mrs. Weller. I noticed your wife on another site.
ajbizowner wrote:
"Take it from someone who has lots of experience "digging up old bones" for a hobby - there is far more information "out there" waiting for the right digger to come along. There are obvious things like birth/marriage records, court and police records, but also business licenses, tax records, employment information, even prison records as detailed as cell number, inmate evaluations and parole information or release date. I love the challenge of research!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I would rather deal with this issue at hand then to portray your morals. Asking for special treatment because one thinks one has the backing of the council and a person on staff does not make it right. Asking for this treatment because one was asked to speak at call to the public against Mr. Walp. There was a letter written to Kelly and a response mailed back from him. I KNOW THIS TO BE FACT>
You shame me for a business license issue you researched? You did not find any other businesses under my name? You are becoming too personal. You have been attacking me for sometime now. I have tried to communicate with you in a healthily productive positive manner. I will no longer. Notes are being taken and if there are any other issues I will make ever attempt within court of law to resolve this issue with you as well as with your wife.
Good day. Last edited on Tue Apr 15th, 2008 05:34 am by ShannonFlynn
|
ajbizowner
Member
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14th, 2008 05:41 pm |
|
I must not know the right people, I had to get a license BEFORE I started my business. I did not have the option of 'looking in to it' after two years of selling!!!
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14th, 2008 04:51 pm |
|
| Since Walp has accompanied Flynn on her quest to get signatures for the recall, can it be assumed that he covered up her skirting of city, state and federal laws? This possible corrupt link needs to be investigated!!
|
mike85220
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 12th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 13 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14th, 2008 04:17 pm |
|
The second page of todays "AJ NEWS" has Shannon Flynn as operating a 'DISTRIBUTORSHIP" from her home since 2006! Why and how can Flynn operate a business without proper licenses or who covered it up for her? She rails about corruption in government but is the central figure in a sales tax fraud even though she worked for the Dept of Revenue and should know better.
STOP THE CORRUPTING FLYNN!!
|
Current time is 07:44 am | |
|