Newszap Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
Newszap Forums > Arizona Public Forums > Surprise Public Issues Forum > Disagreeing with Surprise Councils action

Disagreeing with Surprise Councils action
 
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
cindisue_g
Member


Joined: Wed Feb 22nd, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 979
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 01:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Craig wrote: http://www.azcentral.com/community/surprise/articles/2008/05/07/20080507gl-nwvmuseums0507cover.html

 

I got a better idea. Lets empty these out and put in 2 more sports bars where i can take my family :)

Craig, we've missed you.  Welcome back.  Please, please no more sports bars; how about another nail salon?

spincycle
Member
 

Joined: Wed Oct 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 157
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 06:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
Craig wrote: http://www.azcentral.com/community/surprise/articles/2008/05/07/20080507gl-nwvmuseums0507cover.html

 

I got a better idea. Lets empty these out and put in 2 more sports bars where i can take my family :)

Why empty them out? We could have drinks with the "kachina" dolls. :D

Nice to see you around, Craig. Looking forward to seeing some new pics!

Last edited on Thu May 8th, 2008 06:04 am by spincycle

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 06:00 am
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.azcentral.com/community/surprise/articles/2008/05/07/20080507gl-nwvmuseums0507cover.html

 

I got a better idea. Lets empty these out and put in 2 more sports bars where i can take my family :)

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 04:58 am
 Quote  Reply 
How can the Council spend $190,000 for who knows what, and then say they can not give the staff raises that they have earned?

Last edited on Thu May 8th, 2008 05:09 am by rvukanovich

Reactr
Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 12th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 50
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 04:36 am
 Quote  Reply 
I would like for all my tax money go to CITY services, such as police,fire etc. The non-profits should be self-sustaining.  Peoria fed the Challenger operation for years. Once a non-profit learns the city (taxpayers) will subsidize them they will be back year after year. Taxpayers are smart enough to determine which non-profits they want to fund.

spincycle
Member
 

Joined: Wed Oct 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 157
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 03:51 am
 Quote  Reply 
razenkn wrote: Spin, I have to ask ...do you never express a logical theory or a solution to a problem or support those who want what is best for the City?  All we ever hear from you is negative rhetoric, and you constantly hurl nasty unfounded insults against some really fine and upstanding pillars in our community.  You need to stop and think before you speak Spin, not everybody is out for themselves.  Yes it is a new day in Surprise, thank God. :):cool:

 

Oh my! I've been admonished by the infamous "Cane Raiser"(aka-BIGGEST HYPOCRITE on this site)...

And as a matter of fact, YES, I do offer solutions and support those who are ETHICAL. I'm sorry I've found those folks few and very far between in this area.

Carry on... 



razenkn
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 31st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1764
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 02:57 am
 Quote  Reply 
 

Didn't Mayor Shafer award funding to WVAM when she was in office?  What was she, a sugar Mama?  She would laugh at that and she would laugh at you for being so ridiculous.  We need to support our arts and culture venues as well as our sports venues.  They are here.  They bring people here.  You can't throw them to the wolves after they invest in our City and say sorry, you are on your own.  Even though you are a crucial element in our City's success and reputation as a diverse community, we aren't going to support you when you need us to.  What kind of message is that?

Spin, I have to ask ...do you never express a logical theory or a solution to a problem or support those who want what is best for the City?  All we ever hear from you is negative rhetoric, and you constantly hurl nasty unfounded insults against some really fine and upstanding pillars in our community.  You need to stop and think before you speak Spin, not everybody is out for themselves.  Yes it is a new day in Surprise, thank God. :):cool:

 

spincycle
Member
 

Joined: Wed Oct 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 157
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 8th, 2008 02:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
"While the Heard has cut back hours and staff to save money, the West Valley Art Museum has signed a contract for a new development director whose role will be to reach out to the community to find additional funding (Yea, from the Surprise Sugardaddy). The museum recently signed business consultant Marianne Archibald to the job. Mayor Lyn Truitt in January recommended the city hire Archibald as a cultural director, but he failed to receive support from a council majority."

________________________________________________________________________

Hmmmmmm!!!

"A New Day for Surprise"??? I think not....:?

Last edited on Thu May 8th, 2008 02:34 am by spincycle

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 10:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 

Razenkn said, which I assumed was addressed to me


But to try to slime without facts makes for better website fodder doesn't it Mr V?

Would you rather he didn't support them? If he didn't then you would be on here complaining about that, he can't win with you people.

Razenkn, had you read my comment you would have noticed that I made no reference to either The West Valley Art Museum or the Heard Museum.

Although I support Mayor Truitt and the Council I will address my complaint to them tomorrow night.

kennyw
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jun 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 17
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 10:08 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The facts speak for themselves - Close political relationship between the WV Museum and Truitt!!

$90,000 for a Museum that has had little Surprise funding to date and now in a tight budget year Truitt is ready to open the public purse.  Also in his campaign he stated he was a fiscal conservative - that's not happening. 

If he were ethical - a statement that since he has had political connections with the Director  and museum - it best that he abstain from the issue and let the Council decide it on the merits.

You can use slime and other cute words but you can't hide this record to date!!

razenkn
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 31st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1764
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 09:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You forgot to mention that BOTH the Heard Museum and WVAM are requesting help. 

You can investigate until your eyes bug out but you won't find anything underhanded or illegal being conducted.  Mayor Truitt's support for the WVAM goes back for many, many years.  He supports all of our arts and culture facilities, he campaigned on that and it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to or much effort to find that out, but you would rather try to make something sinister out of it that doesn't exist.  All of that information was on his political website for ALL to see. 

The WVAM has come before the City many times in years past for help. 

But to try to slime without facts makes for better website fodder doesn't it Mr V?

Would you rather he didn't support them?  If he didn't then you would be on here complaining about that, he can't win with you people.  :X

 


Last edited on Wed May 7th, 2008 10:04 pm by razenkn

foxtrotlady
Member
 

Joined: Sun Mar 9th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 08:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Now there's a shocker...everything Truitt has done since he took office has been about personal gain and political payback.  Just what has he done for Surprise?  Name one thing?  I'll tell ya, NOTHING!  He even voted against the HOA and water issue, which is a slap in the face to the residents of Surprise.

I believe that maybe it is time to start thinking about those recall papers, June is just around the corner.

kennyw
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jun 17th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 17
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 08:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Wake up to this move by our Mayor.  The West Valley Art Museum has approached the City for $90,000 to cover operating costs.  Facts the Director of the Museum, Conny Stover was a leader in the Truitt campaign for Mayor and the Museum hosted one of his fund raising events.  Now Truitt supports the City funding their operating costs.  This reeks of rampant political pay back.

A new day for Surprise? - This is another step of our Mayor's political pay off - The hiring of an assistant to the Mayor has been fully discussed with it's political pay back issues. 

The support of the WV Museum's request by Truitt should be fully investigated!

Mamazoyd
Member


Joined: Sun Jul 9th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 947
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 06:56 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Bingo, pretty much true.  So where's the transparency?:?
Long gone and nevermore?

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed May 7th, 2008 05:09 am
 Quote  Reply 
The old Council did things above the table where all was seen, that got them in trouble with what they called the cave people.

 

This Council has honed their skills as politicians and operate under the table.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 2nd, 2008 03:58 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Nobody understands how this happened or the intent of the Council.

 

This misunderstanding if there is one, will continue until the city has a web page for questions and answers. Maybe the Mayors assistant could answer our questions and concerns on the INTERNET so all could see.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu May 1st, 2008 07:41 pm
 Quote  Reply 

No discussion on Item #10 April 24th, why?
Surprise, AZ News

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 13th, 2008 05:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 

Was there a wrong decision made on this issue?
Surprise, AZ News

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Apr 4th, 2008 01:04 am
 Quote  Reply 
A lot of what we are doing at the city center for recreation could have made a nice fix, located at Surprise Farms. Resident's were unsuccessful  in their pitch to improve the park at Surprise Farms.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 03:02 am
 Quote  Reply 
If as you say the CM is Figmo, do we know who is going to be the interim CM?

goldrush
Member
 

Joined: Mon Sep 4th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1173
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 11:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As they say in the military, the CM is FIGMO.

razenkn
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 31st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1764
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 11:24 pm
 Quote  Reply 
 

There is a brand new communication device on the market now called a telephone.  Maybe you should pick it up and place a phone call to the CM's office.  Remember, he has been on vacation and will probably be on vacation until his retirement date.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 11:14 pm
 Quote  Reply 
They say that all emails are answered.

odds_are
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jan 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 41
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 10:50 pm
 Quote  Reply 
rvukanovich,

Are you going to sound the alarm every time they don't jump for another of your emails? 

 

goldrush
Member
 

Joined: Mon Sep 4th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1173
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 10:43 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Craig wrote 2-11-08:

I asked about closing santefe and dysart to left turns. Here is the response i recieved.

The current design is to restrict the left turn from Santa Fe on to
Dysart (southbound) for "normal" traffic.  The emergency vehicles will
have full right of way and should not be impacted or forced to make
u-turns or detoured to Greenway.

If you have further questions, please contact me.

Nick

Nicholas D. Mascia, PE, PTOE
City of Surprise Development Engineer

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Feb 19th, 2008 07:16 pm
 Quote  Reply 

 

Emailed a question to the City Manager about Santa Fe & Dysart, Feb.12th still no answer.

Surprise, AZ News

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 11th, 2008 10:07 pm
 Quote  Reply 


Safety concerns or dirty politics


Monica Alonzo- Dunsmoor

Daily News-Sun


 


Consensus:
Sun Citian agrees with other vendors swap-meet owner’s mistake was running for Surprise Council.

 

Having 5,000 to 10,000 people every Thursday night we were always doing improvements especially the volume of the music which at times was loud.

We had violations such as the exits in case of a fire, they were, as other violations always corrected. City Department heads told me to operate the business as I was until I ran for the City Council when they arrested me without any warning.

razenkn
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 31st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1764
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 11th, 2008 08:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
 
Vukanovich wrote...

The city had me shackled and thrown in jail in the hope that I would not be elected.



Why don't you tell people the real reason why you were arrested?

Just like every other story on here, there are always two sides.

 


 

Last edited on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 08:41 pm by razenkn

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Feb 11th, 2008 06:05 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I asked about closing santefe and dysart to left turns. Here is the response i recieved.

The current design is to restrict the left turn from Santa Fe on to
Dysart (southbound) for "normal" traffic.  The emergency vehicles will
have full right of way and should not be impacted or forced to make
u-turns or detoured to Greenway.

If you have further questions, please contact me.

Nick

Nicholas D. Mascia, PE, PTOE
City of Surprise Development Engineer

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2008 03:31 pm
 Quote  Reply 

You haven’t seen anything yet, wait until you see want they want to do in the original square mile.

 

Having lived and having a business in the original square mile of the City of Surprise I was always concerned and active about its development by serving on the Planning and Zoning Board.

 

I decided to run for the position with the city council when I perceived what the City plans were for the square mile which I and others thought were wrong, that was why I believe that I was elected.





The city had me shackled and thrown in jail in the hope that I would not be elected.

They then waited 3 years to recall me after by redistricting I was out of the area that I was elected in.

 

A good example of the city policy and plans for this area was by forcing a recycling business to close its doors after being there for over 25 years.

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2008 12:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Ok i dont know how to load 2 attachments.

What impact will it have on station 301 in accessing grand ave when emergencey calls are responded to in the area ?

Attachment: santafedrdysart.pdf (Downloaded 8 times)

Last edited on Sun Feb 10th, 2008 01:55 pm by Craig

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2008 12:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Well i went back and read it. It calls for a pernenant elimination of the left turn from santafe to southbound dysart. I dont drive there is that going to be an issue?

Attachment: BNSFdysart.pdf (Downloaded 4 times)

Last edited on Sun Feb 10th, 2008 12:45 pm by Craig

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Feb 9th, 2008 06:00 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It is hard to believe that this Council would put a consent Item on the Jan. 14th meeting that would have a huge impact on the people living North of Grand, East of Dysart including the business's located in that area.

 

The item that I am referring to is Item #4 going West on Sant Fe, there will be no left turn on Dysart, where will they go?

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 10:42 am
 Quote  Reply 
As i said before the previous council hired that lawyer and he outlined the problems with the policy. They should start there. Not hire another person to review them. Fix the problems they already know they have.

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 10:42 am
 Quote  Reply 
As i said before the previous council hired that lawyer and he outlined the problems with the policy. They should start there. Not hire another person to review them. Fix the problems they already know they have.

razenkn
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 31st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1764
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 03:22 am
 Quote  Reply 
rvukanovich wrote: They should of voted whether or not the City Manager was to hire an auditor, this was quite specific.

I believed that Councilman Alton was on the right track but Joe Johnson made it a ethics isuue only.

I believe the action they took should have been on an agenda item at a later meeting.

These are just your opinons Bob, obviously not the current council.  There are seven people on there making decisions, sorry they didn't do what you wanted, but that is what happens when you aren't on the council.  Nobody will agree with them every time, and they probably won't agree with each other every time, that's life.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 02:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
They should of voted whether or not the City Manager was to hire an auditor, this was quite specific.

I believed that Councilman Alton was on the right track but Joe Johnson made it a ethics isuue only.

I believe the action they took should have been on an agenda item at a later meeting.

Craig
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 21st, 2006
Location: Surprise, Arizona USA
Posts: 1606
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 02:23 am
 Quote  Reply 
You say you dont think they did this correctly. Could you please provide what you think should have been done ? It would be a big help.

rvukanovich
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 286
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008 02:14 am
 Quote  Reply 

 

 

By not taking action on an agenda item and then later modifying the item to support their actions.

Complete story at Surprise, AZ News


 Current time is 10:26 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   



Click here to read our Policies & Disclaimers.

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez