| Author | Post |
|---|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 10:00 pm |
|
Apparently President Procrastinator has determined not enough folks have purchased homes that cannot afford to pay for them so he has decided to extend the $8,000 first time homebuyer credit. There are so many things wrong with this stategy on so many levels but again fraud and corruption rears its ugly head once more to the top (anything to do with Gov't run seems to have that issue).
19,000 filers who didn't buy a home but filed a claim...
74,000 filers who weren't 1st time buyers....
500 claims by people under the age of 18 including a 4 year old....
53 at least of IRS Employees filing illegal or inappropriate claims....
Now the Prez believes it a good thing to extend this program on the backs of taxpayers much like the flawed and abused Cash4Clunkers even though there is no recovery in the housing market and no recovery in jobs. Heck, we'll just keep spending until we drop is the new liberal mantra apparently, but we will buy homes and cars for those who are less able to do so themselves. This is nothing more than "SPREAD THE WEALTH" legislation. TAKE from those who are working hard and paying their taxes to GIVE to those who are making less and cannot afford to own a home at the present time. SOCIALISM on steroids. Hence, the REAL OBAMA agenda.
Just an FYI....it is the IRS who will be "THE ENFORCER" of mandatory and "qualified" health insurance programs for us, but do we really want an arm of the Fed Gov't that is so corrupt that 53 of their employees were trying to steal money but happened to get caught running anything?? How many were there that didn't get "caught"??  
Last edited on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 10:03 pm by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 7th, 2009 07:21 pm |
|
Last edited on Mon Sep 7th, 2009 11:21 pm by designman124
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2009 07:41 pm |
|
What are Barack Obama’s objectives? What is he really trying to accomplish, as our President?
Austin Hill
Our current Commander-In-Chief won the presidency last year with very broad, generalized campaign themes of “hope,” “change,” and to a lesser degree, “transformation. ” He promised a foreign policy that would correct all the “mistakes” of George W. Bush, and an economic policy that would take wealth away from “rich” people and give it to people who were “deserving” of it.
Today, after roughly eight months in office, nobody doubts that President Obama has brought about a dramatic level of ”change.” But what is the purpose of Obama’s “change,” where is it leading, and what is all this “change” supposed to produce for the United States?
Despite philosophical and policy differences, most U.S. Presidents (certainly those of of recent history) have been, in their own ways, beholden to an agenda of keeping America safe and prosperous. But today I wonder if anyone believes that our President’s current agenda actually enhances safety and prosperity, or if, perhaps, some other agenda is being advanced.
In terms of foreign policy and national security, President Obama campaigned on, among other things, a promise to repair relationships between the U.S. and the rest of the world, relationships that he claimed President Bush had horribly damaged. Seven days after his inauguration – and before making any sort of televised address to the American people – President Obama made a regionally televised address to the “Muslim World” in the Middle East, to “reassure” Muslims that “Americans are not your enemy.”
Since then, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has scoffed at our President, publicly calling him “naïve,” and challenging Obama to a “debate.” A poll released last week indicates that, now, a mere 4% of Jews in the nation of Israel (our nation’s greatest ally and the most stable nation in the Middle East) believe that our President is “pro-Israel,” while a majority of Israelis oppose Obama’s demand for a a temporary freeze of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. And despite President Obama’s “demand” that Abdelbeset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi, the terorrist convicted of the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, be held under house arrest in his home of Libya after being released from a Scottland prison last week, the very Muslim Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi nonetheless provided a celebratory hero’s welcome to al Megrahi, and allowed him his freedom.
President Obama has unnerved the Jewish world, and appears to have emboldened the terrorist world. This does not provide a pathway to safety and prosperity for the United States.
In terms of his economic policy, President Obama is perhaps even more perplexing. As a candidate he expressed all-out disdain for American corporations and repeatedly promised to increase corporate taxes and regulations, expressed anger and “outrage” when corporations reported profits that were too big, and promised to “give back” corporate profits to “the American people.” At the same time, Obama was fond of reminding America that one of his chief economic advisors was investment and wealth creation guru Warren Buffett .
Today, Buffett stops short of admitting that his friend Barack has made any mistakes, but nonetheless admits that the so-called “economic stimulus bill” entailed tremendous waste, that the level of our national debt is staggeringly dangerous, and that the economy is in far worse condition than most people realize. And while I have been anticipating that, eventually, we would see an emergence in the press of the idea that President Obama is “in over his head with the economy,” I didn’t figure this would happen until after the 2010 elections . Only 3 months ago it seemed that President Obama could, politically speaking, continue for the foreseeable future to blame economic troubles on George W. Bush.
But reality has emerged in the media much sooner than I had predicted. Economic news outlets such as CNBC, Bloomberg, and Financial Times have raised concerns over the dangerous levels of deficit spending, while thoughtful writers like Fred Barnes and John Stossel have carefully analyzed the President’s own remarks about economics, and his behavior in office, and have concluded that Obama doesn’t know how the economy works.
But does President Obama simply not “get it” on economics, or is there another issue in play? Certainly the President has an agenda of re-distributing wealth, taking away from “rich people” and giving to those who he believes are deserving. But his policies reach beyond mere wealh re-distribution, and if current policy trends continue, there will simply be less wealth in the United States that can be re-distributed.
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to argue that President Obama is seeking to advance American peace and prosperity – this is so, at least in terms of how “peace” and “prosperity” have customarily been defined. Does President Obama have his own definitions for these terms? And how might his agenda of “transformation” entail something entirely different from anything America has known before?
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28th, 2009 08:25 pm |
|
Watch out for this one:
Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
August 28, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
Posted by Declan McCullagh
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.
The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. "It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill."
Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller's aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.
A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president's power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.
When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. "We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs--from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records," Rockefeller said.
The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government's role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is "not as prepared" as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.
Rockefeller's revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a "cybersecurity workforce plan" from every federal agency, a "dashboard" pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a "comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy" in six months--even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.
The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "As soon as you're saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it's going to be a really big issue," he says.
Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)
"The language has changed but it doesn't contain any real additional limits," EFF's Tien says. "It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)...The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There's no provision for any administrative process or review. That's where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it."
Translation: If your company is deemed "critical," a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.
The Internet Security Alliance's Clinton adds that his group is "supportive of increased federal involvement to enhance cyber security, but we believe that the wrong approach, as embodied in this bill as introduced, will be counterproductive both from an national economic and national secuity perspective."
Last edited on Sun Aug 30th, 2009 07:55 pm by designman124
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28th, 2009 06:44 pm |
|
This will take your breath away. It is a segment done by Glenn Beck this week. He has devoted the entire week to the roots of Barack Hussein Obama's political philosophy and what he has in mind for our great Country soon to become a "TRANSORMED" Country that we will not recognize. It is beyond mindboggling that our main stream media remains silent, even those who used to be top notch investigative reporters. They are sitting on this and pretending they don't know. Why? What's in it for them? This administration promises them unlimited access to them for their loyalty and it's working, for now.
Scroll down toward the bottom of the page to get to the video. It will blow you away. You can be guaranteed Glenn can verify all of this information or it would be on the front page of the NYT. This investigative reporting is exactly why the radicals are doing everything they can to shut Glenn down, but it ain't working.
http://www.americansforprosperity.org/national-site
Last edited on Fri Aug 28th, 2009 06:46 pm by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25th, 2009 10:22 pm |
|
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25th, 2009 07:03 pm |
|
Ahhh, the truth comes out. BHO's attorney general Eric Holder has decided he wants to move forward on prosecuting the CIA agents involved in enhanced interrogation of the GITMO terrorists responsible for blowing up 3,000 Americans on 9-11. He is releasing the terrorists into the US so they can have Constitutional rights such as a trial.
Hmmm, interesting though that it is his law firm that is involved in DEFENDING said TERRORISTS and it is Eric Holder who fought for the pardon of BHO's other friend, BOMBER BILLY Ayers group when Clinton left office. He also fought for the pardon of the TERRORIST group FALN. Can we see a pattern going on here?
The group behind trying to get Glenn Beck's sponsors to drop him is the new Green Jobs CZAR, self proclaimed "Communist" convicted felon, Van Jones activist organization. Glenn is investigating our "Secret" Czars and Van Jones doesn't want the light shined on him, why would that be I wonder??
So you have the Prez trying to get in a little golf and his attorney general is out pounding his chest and all wee-weed up that he must prosecute the American professional CIA agents who prevented thousands of more American's from being killed by these same terrorists his law firm is going to defend.
Is this just to change the subject from his OBAMACARE debacle or is it Billy the "Bomber" Ayer's saying you better do something to pacify your radical friends and base on the left?
But at least Barack Hussein Obama came out and did a very nice speech in support of the Islamic celebration of Ramadan today, it was sincere and heartfelt. He praised them for their "religion of peace". How about telling that to the 3,000 American families who lost loved ones on 9-11 Mr Prez??? 
Last edited on Tue Aug 25th, 2009 11:10 pm by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25th, 2009 02:23 pm |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: No New Taxes?
Millions face shrinking Social Security payments
WASHINGTON -- Millions of older people face shrinking Social Security checks next year, the first time in a generation that payments would not rise.
The trustees who oversee Social Security are projecting there won't be a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the next two years. That hasn't happened since automatic increases were adopted in 1975.
By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down. Nevertheless, monthly payments would drop for millions of people in the Medicare prescription drug program because the premiums, which often are deducted from Social Security payments, are scheduled to go up slightly.
"I will promise you, they count on that COLA," said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who now heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "To some people, it might not be a big deal. But to seniors, especially with their health care costs, it is a big deal."
Cost of living adjustments are pegged to inflation, which has been negative this year, largely because energy prices are below 2008 levels.
Advocates say older people still face higher prices because they spend a disproportionate amount of their income on health care, where costs rise faster than inflation. Many also have suffered from declining home values and shrinking stock portfolios just as they are relying on those assets for income.
"For many elderly, they don't feel that inflation is low because their expenses are still going up," said David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP. "Anyone who has savings and investments has seen some serious losses."
About 50 million retired and disabled Americans receive Social Security benefits. The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,153 this year. All beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent increase in January, the largest since 1982.
!!Last edited on Tue Aug 25th, 2009 02:24 pm by designman124
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25th, 2009 06:51 am |
|
designman124 wrote: No New Taxes?
Millions face shrinking Social Security payments
WASHINGTON -- Millions of older people face shrinking Social Security checks next year, the first time in a generation that payments would not rise.
The trustees who oversee Social Security are projecting there won't be a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the next two years. That hasn't happened since automatic increases were adopted in 1975.
By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down. Nevertheless, monthly payments would drop for millions of people in the Medicare prescription drug program because the premiums, which often are deducted from Social Security payments, are scheduled to go up slightly.
"I will promise you, they count on that COLA," said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who now heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "To some people, it might not be a big deal. But to seniors, especially with their health care costs, it is a big deal."
Cost of living adjustments are pegged to inflation, which has been negative this year, largely because energy prices are below 2008 levels.
Advocates say older people still face higher prices because they spend a disproportionate amount of their income on health care, where costs rise faster than inflation. Many also have suffered from declining home values and shrinking stock portfolios just as they are relying on those assets for income.
"For many elderly, they don't feel that inflation is low because their expenses are still going up," said David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP. "Anyone who has savings and investments has seen some serious losses."
About 50 million retired and disabled Americans receive Social Security benefits. The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,153 this year. All beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent increase in January, the largest since 1982.
NIel, hon..if you actually read something other than the comics, you'd have learned that the small decrease is due to the SS COLA being 0 and the Part D (which came in under bush), went up 2 bucks. 
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25th, 2009 06:06 am |
|
Why did this administration bring back the DEATH BOOK for the VA to give to the returning VETS and those who are now disabled? When the BHO appointed VA Director Ducksworth was asked she lied through her teeth saying it was taken down from the website because it is being reformed. But that isn't true, it's still on the website and other documents refer to it as an informational guide. It's a disgusting piece of s**t.
Nobody in America should ever be given a piece of PELOSI like that to guide them. These heroes have paid the highest price for our Country and have been through so much trauma and sacrifice then their GOVERNMENT hands them a DEATH BOOK to read? What is wrong with these people? They have absolutely no respect for life whatsoever. Does anyone really have to ask why there is so much anger out there in middle America?
Last edited on Tue Aug 25th, 2009 06:06 am by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24th, 2009 02:45 pm |
|
No New Taxes?
Millions face shrinking Social Security payments
WASHINGTON -- Millions of older people face shrinking Social Security checks next year, the first time in a generation that payments would not rise.
The trustees who oversee Social Security are projecting there won't be a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the next two years. That hasn't happened since automatic increases were adopted in 1975.
By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down. Nevertheless, monthly payments would drop for millions of people in the Medicare prescription drug program because the premiums, which often are deducted from Social Security payments, are scheduled to go up slightly.
"I will promise you, they count on that COLA," said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who now heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "To some people, it might not be a big deal. But to seniors, especially with their health care costs, it is a big deal."
Cost of living adjustments are pegged to inflation, which has been negative this year, largely because energy prices are below 2008 levels.
Advocates say older people still face higher prices because they spend a disproportionate amount of their income on health care, where costs rise faster than inflation. Many also have suffered from declining home values and shrinking stock portfolios just as they are relying on those assets for income.
"For many elderly, they don't feel that inflation is low because their expenses are still going up," said David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP. "Anyone who has savings and investments has seen some serious losses."
About 50 million retired and disabled Americans receive Social Security benefits. The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,153 this year. All beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent increase in January, the largest since 1982.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24th, 2009 06:26 am |
|
| Senior Moment: very profound..thanks!
|
Senior Moment
Member
| Joined: | Tue Dec 9th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 461 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2009 09:40 pm |
|
Strains of change breed strange politics
By LEONARD PITTS
Our story so far: Last year, Barack Obama was elected president, the first American of African heritage ever to reach that office. If this was regarded as a new beginning by most Americans, it was regarded apocalyptically by others who promptly proceeded to lose both their minds and any pretense of enlightenment.
These are the people who immediately declared it their fervent hope that the new presidency fail, the ones who cheered when the governor of Texas raised the specter of secession, the ones who went online to rechristen the executive mansion the ``Black'' House and to picture it with a watermelon patch out front.
On tax day they were the ones who, having apparently just discovered the grim tidings April 15 brings us all each year, launched angry, unruly protests. In the debate over healthcare reform, they are the ones who have disrupted town hall meetings, shouting about the president's supposed plan for ``death panels'' to euthanize the elderly.
Now, they are the ones bringing firearms to places the president is speaking.
The Washington Post tells us at least a dozen individuals have arrived openly -- and, yes, legally -- strapped at events in Arizona and New Hampshire, including at least one who carried a semiautomatic assault rifle. In case the implied threat is not clear, one of them also brought a sign referencing Thomas Jefferson's quote about the need to water the tree of liberty with ``the blood of . . . tyrants.''
It remains unclear, once you get beyond the realm of Internet myth, alarmist rhetoric and blatant lie, what the substance of the president's supposed tyranny might be. ``Socialized healthcare?'' Given that our libraries, schools, police and fire departments are all ``socialized,'' that's hard to swallow.
When and if the implied violence comes, perhaps its author will explain. Meanwhile, expect those who stoked his rage -- i.e., the makers of Internet myths, alarmist rhetoric and blatant lies -- to disdain any and all moral responsibility for the outcome.
These are strange times. They call to mind what historian Henry Adams said in the mid-1800s: ``There are grave doubts at the hugeness of the land and whether one government can comprehend the whole.''
Adams spoke in geographical terms of a nation rapidly expanding toward the Pacific. Our challenge is less geographical than spiritual, less a question of the distance between Honolulu and New York than between you and the person right next to you.
Such as when you look at a guy who thought it a good idea to bring a gun to a presidential speech and find yourself stunned by incomprehension. On paper, he is your fellow American, but you absolutely do not know him, recognize nothing of yourself in him. You keep asking yourself: Who is this guy?
We frame the differences in terms of ``conservative'' and ``liberal,'' but these are tired old markers that with overuse and misuse have largely lost whatever meaning they used to have and with it, any ability to explain us to us. This isn't liberal vs. conservative, it is yesterday vs. tomorrow, the stress of profound cultural and demographic changes that will leave none of us as we were.
And change, almost by definition, always comes too fast, always brings a sense of stark dislocation. As in the woman who cried to a reporter, ``I want my country back!'' Probably the country she meant still had Beaver Cleaver on TV and Doris Day on Your Hit Parade.
Round and round we go and where we stop, nobody knows. And it is an open question, as it was for Henry Adams, what kind of country we'll have when it's done. Can one government comprehend the whole? It may be harder to answer now than it was then.
The distances that divide us cannot be measured in miles.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2009 09:29 pm |
|
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22nd, 2009 11:57 pm |
|
Who will be tagged Dr Death in this administration? Will it be the radical left wing Congress if they pass this HUGE GOV TAKEOVER of our health care? Or will it be squarely on Barack Hussein Obama's shoulders?
When they tell you can't have that chemo drug and offer you a death assist pill instead, who are you going to complain to? At least right now the folks in Oregon can come here or in most states and get critical care, but not in Oregon because it is STATE RUN and they call ALL the shots, not you...not your doctor....not your family. You just get a letter, not a phone call or a personal visit, just a letter condemning you to death. But if we are all on that plan, we are screwed...royally. Where are we going to go?
I believe Barry's buddy Warren Buffet said it best "You DON'T invest in anything you don't understand". And Barack Hussein Obama himself doesn't even understand it and neither do any of the people who will be voting on it yet they are still trying to sell "it" whatever "it" is.
A good communicator learns early on "if you have to explain it" then you are losing. That is exactly what BHO is doing, spending all of his air time explaining what is NOT in the bill and trying to convince people that what they know to be fact because they did read it is all a myth or rumor or misinformation. Sadly, it is BHO who is handing out false information and he needs to scrap the plan and begin again.
Maybe while he is lounging around his vacation mansion and playing golf he will have that Epiphany like he did this week when he suddenly claimed GOD as his partner in this scheme while trying to use the religious leaders as his foot soldiers asking them to go door to door to explain how this is a moral issue.
BHO is on such high moral ground with his "let the baby die outside of the womb during a botched abortion" or "wouldn't want my girls to be punished with a baby" type of mentality isn't he? I wonder if GOD was listening to him then? Or does he just call on GOD when he needs to "inspire" folks to do his bidding? That could be another thread.
This is the same President who didn't bother to publicly recognize and celebrate National Prayer Day. He doesn't attend Church now that he has quit his Black Liberation Theology United Trinity Church. Isn't he the same guy who bashed President Bush for invoking GOD from time to time? Only President Bush walked the talk, I think BHO is just being disingenuous.
What if President Bush had invoked GOD and the TEN Commandments when he wanted his prescription bill passed...saying "If you do not believe in my plan you are not moral and a bad Christian/Jew" "you are all liars" "un-American" because that is primarily what BHO has been saying all week. President Bush even got seared for admitting he listens to a "higher being" for guidance.
Where was the ACLU this week claiming "violation of Separation of Church and State" when Barack Hussein Obama was talking "that Christian talk" to all those religious leaders? Amazing how slow they are to show up on his front door step. They were literally camped on President Bush's entire 8 years in office.
Last edited on Sun Aug 23rd, 2009 12:03 am by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 03:01 pm |
|
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 06:52 am |
|
Razenkn wrote:
Really, you need to stay on topic pepe. Do you ever comment on the topic or just play stupid?? Nobody including me knows who Gino is or who this imaginary friend that is out of work but why do you keep insinuating that is me? Really, I get paid very well for what I do, I'm happy, and I do this as a kind of sick hobby...LOL
I have a weakness and it is national politics, it's my passion because I know if we don't stand up and fight for what is right then what is right will go away.
I don't know how to explain that to people like you in your language pepe but you need to seriously think about what the left is trying to do to our great country and it may be irreversible. Think about that. We've had a really good life up until now, this group wants to take that away and turn us into a GOVERNMENT RUN STATE. Creepy, sick and frightening for our kids. American's aren't going to stand for that. We all know it's inherently wrong, even you.
LOL.Bon Jour!! I see......When someone with whom you disagree makes a typo, it's OK to ridicule them but when you make a typo, pointing it out to you is going off topic, lol....Gino..I have no interest in discussing it with you further, just try to understand you are not as infallible as you'd like us all to think, and politics is certainly not your only weakness...oui? Also, Gino..please don't lie by telling us you deeply care about this country. Nobody who does would want our leader to fail...I am relieved you think you are well paid by doing this forum and starting the insurance website, but, I really hope your income is greater than $250,000 so you can pay more taxes than I, lol....Au revoir and bon soir, mes aimee .
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 05:32 am |
|
Really, you need to stay on topic pepe. Do you ever comment on the topic or just play stupid?? Nobody including me knows who Gino is or who this imaginary friend that is out of work but why do you keep insinuating that is me? Really, I get paid very well for what I do, I'm happy, and I do this as a kind of sick hobby...LOL
I have a weakness and it is national politics, it's my passion because I know if we don't stand up and fight for what is right then what is right will go away.
I don't know how to explain that to people like you in your language pepe but you need to seriously think about what the left is trying to do to our great country and it may be irreversible. Think about that. We've had a really good life up until now, this group wants to take that away and turn us into a GOVERNMENT RUN STATE. Creepy, sick and frightening for our kids. American's aren't going to stand for that. We all know it's inherently wrong, even you.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 04:45 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote:
LOL, Holy Moly.... pepe/BIG Booty sounded like a real expert on how it works when you get banned from here, I wonder where she got all that knowledge from? Experience perhaps, LOTS of experience...LOL??
With this GOV RUN health care debacle the REAL BHO has come to light and now there is no question he is leaning this country extreme left rather than centrist as he promised. That is why his poll numbers are dropping at such a rapid pace. Apparently his disapproval ratings have risen faster than any other President in history in such a short time period.
Bill Clinton said last week if he just passes this debacle (my word) his approval ratings would go right back up once the debate is over, I say Mr Clinton is full of PELOSI. This Country is not extreme far left and people elected this Prez on the premise of campaign promises that were full of platitudes, the YES I CAN, HOPE and CHANGE style of rhetoric but he's not showing any leadership skills resulting in the Audacity of NOPE. He's not coming through. He's trying to CHANGE America alright but for the worst and he's not giving anybody any hope of it being better under his leadership style. Even the young kids who swooned over him are dropping like flies.
He has completely ignored the two wars we are fighting and the results are in. They are both escalating and getting out of control so what is our DEAR LEADER going to do about that? He should have come out today and talked about it to assure people he is on top of the terrible attacks that killed and injured so many people in Bagdad but he's silent. That is the REAL OBAMA we are seeing now and it's not all that pretty. He is in front of the cameras every day to push his socialism, but he needs to stay in the Oval Office for a CHANGE and take care of the real business of running our Country. He's placing our National security in grave danger by ignoring what is going on around him.
Bopn Jour!! Mr. Raz, I have tried to understand your first paragraph but sadly, it makes no sense...selling insurance may be taxing your ability to communicate, no? Think you you for your interest tho, and Ms. Boots tweeted me and said to give a big hello to rantsnraves, whoever that is...Au revoir, Gino!
What language is Bopn jour? Is that like being a Poppin Jay? LOL Well, we all know who you are SR/meatloaf/murphite/bigbooty/pepe, but seriously nobody on here really cares all that much. We like ridiculing you as the comedic relief but as far as what you think not that you ever share that minute bit with us, we just use you as our hahahaha factor. Aren't you embarassed? Just a little??
But, bacak to the subject. Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall this evening in the WAR ROOM? Did you know the Barry administration now has a "WAR ROOM"??? Not for the real wars, the bombings and killing of innocent lives and of our brave soldiers, nooooo, they have a WAR ROOM for their strategy on how to shove GOVERNRMENT RUN HEALTH CARE, ONE PAYER SYSTEM down our throat. They could give two flips about what is going on and who is getting killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, they want to shove through their SOCIALISM programs.
Does that make you sick enough to stand up and be counted? I hope so or you can kiss America goodbye....
Bon Jour, Gino...!! again today you are an angry, angry man...so I cannot discuss issues with you as long as you disregard manners and call names and ridicule those born overseas, oui? So if you grow up, and act as you'd like your children to act, we will notice the difference...I am curiopus tho, since you are a good patriot and love English, when you wrote,
MR RAZNKNE wrote
But, bacak to the subject.
Mr. Raznkne, I looked throughout my Dictionary and I cannot find that word. I do not think it is a typo since you ridiculed me for that and you say all the time, Mr. Raznkne, that you are not a hypocrite and you would be a hypocrite if you ridiculed others but not yourself, no, so expalin that word and tell us where we can find it defined, okey dokie?but I wanted to tell you I think steering posters to the organization in Phoenix which sells insurance, by tell ing them it is a senior citizen advocacy site is misleading, no? Can you not find an honest job? I am very disappointed and you won't be finding any customers on the left..we are too smart, you see. Perhaps the Palin followers would consider what you have to sell, LOL and Ms. Boots sends her warm regards..she said to add...."muah!" I cannot tell you what else she said about you, for that would be rude...Au revoir!
Last edited on Thu Aug 20th, 2009 04:59 am by
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 04:26 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote:
LOL, Holy Moly.... pepe/BIG Booty sounded like a real expert on how it works when you get banned from here, I wonder where she got all that knowledge from? Experience perhaps, LOTS of experience...LOL??
With this GOV RUN health care debacle the REAL BHO has come to light and now there is no question he is leaning this country extreme left rather than centrist as he promised. That is why his poll numbers are dropping at such a rapid pace. Apparently his disapproval ratings have risen faster than any other President in history in such a short time period.
Bill Clinton said last week if he just passes this debacle (my word) his approval ratings would go right back up once the debate is over, I say Mr Clinton is full of PELOSI. This Country is not extreme far left and people elected this Prez on the premise of campaign promises that were full of platitudes, the YES I CAN, HOPE and CHANGE style of rhetoric but he's not showing any leadership skills resulting in the Audacity of NOPE. He's not coming through. He's trying to CHANGE America alright but for the worst and he's not giving anybody any hope of it being better under his leadership style. Even the young kids who swooned over him are dropping like flies.
He has completely ignored the two wars we are fighting and the results are in. They are both escalating and getting out of control so what is our DEAR LEADER going to do about that? He should have come out today and talked about it to assure people he is on top of the terrible attacks that killed and injured so many people in Bagdad but he's silent. That is the REAL OBAMA we are seeing now and it's not all that pretty. He is in front of the cameras every day to push his socialism, but he needs to stay in the Oval Office for a CHANGE and take care of the real business of running our Country. He's placing our National security in grave danger by ignoring what is going on around him.
Bopn Jour!! Mr. Raz, I have tried to understand your first paragraph but sadly, it makes no sense...selling insurance may be taxing your ability to communicate, no? Think you you for your interest tho, and Ms. Boots tweeted me and said to give a big hello to rantsnraves, whoever that is...Au revoir, Gino!
What language is Bopn jour? Is that like being a Poppin Jay? LOL Well, we all know who you are SR/meatloaf/murphite/bigbooty/pepe, but seriously nobody on here really cares all that much. We like ridiculing you as the comedic relief but as far as what you think not that you ever share that minute bit with us, we just use you as our hahahaha factor. Aren't you embarassed? Just a little??
But, bacak to the subject. Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall this evening in the WAR ROOM? Did you know the Barry administration now has a "WAR ROOM"??? Not for the real wars, the bombings and killing of innocent lives and of our brave soldiers, nooooo, they have a WAR ROOM for their strategy on how to shove GOVERNRMENT RUN HEALTH CARE, ONE PAYER SYSTEM down our throat. They could give two flips about what is going on and who is getting killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, they want to shove through their SOCIALISM programs.
Does that make you sick enough to stand up and be counted? I hope so or you can kiss America goodbye....
Last edited on Thu Aug 20th, 2009 04:28 am by Razenkn
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 02:51 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
No, sorry, Ni but that's not how it works. When you wrote your real name on your profile, it appeared on your profile regardless of which puter you used. You are not able to change info on your profile using a friend's puter unless you logged in to the website. Also, while I'm educating you, if you are banned from entering a forum, your ISP is banned so you cannot re-register.....nobody else could register from that puter either, according to the TOS of this forum. That means I could not be Ms. Boots, oui? Let me gently suggest that you do more reading about puters and less reading cartoons, ok?
You don't know what you are talking about. You make things up as you go along. You make no sense Brenda--as usual. Have a nice trip. See what it is like in a seriously bankrupt state.
Bon jour, Sadly I am not taking a trip and my name is not Brenda, Niel, but I see what a bankrupt state is like becuase I live in AZ, where the Gov is powerless with the State Leg of which her own party has control? How does that happen, Ni? I think you lived in a bankrupt country before the US..yes? tell us what is was like in SA.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 02:47 am |
|
Razenkn wrote:
LOL, Holy Moly.... pepe/BIG Booty sounded like a real expert on how it works when you get banned from here, I wonder where she got all that knowledge from? Experience perhaps, LOTS of experience...LOL??
With this GOV RUN health care debacle the REAL BHO has come to light and now there is no question he is leaning this country extreme left rather than centrist as he promised. That is why his poll numbers are dropping at such a rapid pace. Apparently his disapproval ratings have risen faster than any other President in history in such a short time period.
Bill Clinton said last week if he just passes this debacle (my word) his approval ratings would go right back up once the debate is over, I say Mr Clinton is full of PELOSI. This Country is not extreme far left and people elected this Prez on the premise of campaign promises that were full of platitudes, the YES I CAN, HOPE and CHANGE style of rhetoric but he's not showing any leadership skills resulting in the Audacity of NOPE. He's not coming through. He's trying to CHANGE America alright but for the worst and he's not giving anybody any hope of it being better under his leadership style. Even the young kids who swooned over him are dropping like flies.
He has completely ignored the two wars we are fighting and the results are in. They are both escalating and getting out of control so what is our DEAR LEADER going to do about that? He should have come out today and talked about it to assure people he is on top of the terrible attacks that killed and injured so many people in Bagdad but he's silent. That is the REAL OBAMA we are seeing now and it's not all that pretty. He is in front of the cameras every day to push his socialism, but he needs to stay in the Oval Office for a CHANGE and take care of the real business of running our Country. He's placing our National security in grave danger by ignoring what is going on around him.
Bopn Jour!! Mr. Raz, I have tried to understand your first paragraph but sadly, it makes no sense...selling insurance may be taxing your ability to communicate, no? Think you you for your interest tho, and Ms. Boots tweeted me and said to give a big hello to rantsnraves, whoever that is...Au revoir, Gino!
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 02:44 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: cestmoi wrote:
Sadly, you write nothing about the subject of the thread and I'm afraid viewers are disappointed in you....Ms. Surpy..you write something of no sense..perhaps it's too late for you to be up, no? . Sadly, the lovely Ms. Boots is forever banned from the forum ici....nobody may use my screen name from their own computer for if they did and I was banned, even though I am sweet and follow all the rules, which IP would be blocked? You see, what you think cannot be so...Mr. Webmaster doesn't ban screen names, he bans IPs...ask Niel about how that works because I explained it to him to, okey dokey? .....I shall tell the lovely Ms. Boots that you asked about her and miss her okey dokey? I think it best you sleep and I am sure she will not object if you dream of...the lovely, wonderful......enchantee.......Ms. Boots! Bon Soir!
Ahhh, but I have discussed the subject with you, darl'n...just indirectly. Since you're not as smart as you'd like us all to think...I'll spell it out for you. This thread is about someone who pretends to be something they're not...how they got where they are today with the help of others...then people grow tired of the lies...and how they lost credibility by acting stupidly. You and BHO have so much in common, BB...you must be proud, no? 
Bon Jour!! So, you say this thread is about you? Someone who is not a hillbobby but pretends to be one, no? Why do you do that, Ms. Surpy? Tell me how are your stresses...and did you call me for lunch for this weekend? We could chat for hours, no? and I perhaps could help you with your francais..I didn't want to be rude, but I can see it's not your first language, oui? But call me and I can perhaps tudor you, okie dokey? But before I must go I wish to sincerely thank you for comparing me to our wonderful President Obama,...although you compare me to "they" so I am unsure of whom else you compare with but as far as President Obama, ,it is an honor and I an grateful. I must return the compliment and share with you that I think you and former President Bush share many characteristics as well. Au revoir for now, mes aimee
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20th, 2009 02:38 am |
|
Obama Funds Drilling--- In Brazil with your money
Obama to spend $2 billion to fund offshore
drilling – for Brazil
By Rick Moran
Just when you think Obama has made the dumbest move of his presidency, he proves once again that there is no limit to his stupidity.
The Wall Street Journal is incredulous:
The U.S. is going to lend billions of dollars to Brazil’s state-owned oil company, Petrobras, to finance exploration of the huge offshore discovery in Brazil’s Tupi oil field in the Santos Basin near Rio de Janeiro. Brazil’s planning minister confirmed that White House National Security Adviser James Jones met this month with Brazilian officials to talk about the loan.
The U.S. Export-Import Bank tells us it has issued a “preliminary commitment” letter to Petrobras in the amount of $2 billion and has discussed with Brazil the possibility of increasing that amount. Ex-Im Bank says it has not decided whether the money will come in the form of a direct loan or loan guarantees. Either way, this corporate foreign aid may strike some readers as odd, given that the U.S. Treasury seems desperate for cash and Petrobras is one of the largest corporations in the Americas.
But look on the bright side. If President Obama has embraced offshore drilling in Brazil, why not in the old U.S.A.? The land of the sorta free and the home of the heavily indebted has enormous offshore oil deposits, and last year ahead of the November elections, with gasoline at $4 a gallon, Congress let a ban on offshore drilling expire.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 07:04 pm |
|
Obama Goes Postal
Aug. 18 (Bloomberg) -- “UPS and FedEx are doing just fine. It’s the Post Office that’s always having problems.” -A
Aug. 11, 2009
No institution has been the butt of more government- inefficiency jokes than the U.S. Postal Service. Maybe the Department of Motor Vehicles.
The only way the post office can stay in business is its government subsidy. The USPS lost $2.4 billion in the quarter ended in June and projects a net loss of $7 billion in fiscal 2009, outstanding debt of more than $10 billion and a cash shortfall of $1 billion. It was moved to intensive care -- the Government Accountability Office’s list of “high risk” cases - - last month and told to shape up. (It must be the only entity that hasn’t cashed in on TARP!)
That didn’t stop President Barack Obama from holding up the post office as an example at a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, last week.
When Obama compared the post office to UPS and FedEx, he was clearly hoping to assuage voter concerns about a public health-care option undercutting and eliminating private insurance.
What he did instead was conjure up visions of long lines and interminable waits. Why do we need or want a health-care system that works like the post office?
What’s more, if the USPS is struggling to compete with private companies, as Obama implied, why introduce a government health-care option that would operate at the same disadvantage?
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 05:06 pm |
|
cestmoi wrote:
Sadly, you write nothing about the subject of the thread and I'm afraid viewers are disappointed in you....Ms. Surpy..you write something of no sense..perhaps it's too late for you to be up, no? . Sadly, the lovely Ms. Boots is forever banned from the forum ici....nobody may use my screen name from their own computer for if they did and I was banned, even though I am sweet and follow all the rules, which IP would be blocked? You see, what you think cannot be so...Mr. Webmaster doesn't ban screen names, he bans IPs...ask Niel about how that works because I explained it to him to, okey dokey? .....I shall tell the lovely Ms. Boots that you asked about her and miss her okey dokey? I think it best you sleep and I am sure she will not object if you dream of...the lovely, wonderful......enchantee.......Ms. Boots! Bon Soir!
Ahhh, but I have discussed the subject with you, darl'n...just indirectly. Since you're not as smart as you'd like us all to think...I'll spell it out for you. This thread is about someone who pretends to be something they're not...how they got where they are today with the help of others...then people grow tired of the lies...and how they lost credibility by acting stupidly. You and BHO have so much in common, BB...you must be proud, no?
Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 05:12 pm by BigSurprize
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 04:05 pm |
|
LOL, Holy Moly.... pepe/BIG Booty sounded like a real expert on how it works when you get banned from here, I wonder where she got all that knowledge from? Experience perhaps, LOTS of experience...LOL??
With this GOV RUN health care debacle the REAL BHO has come to light and now there is no question he is leaning this country extreme left rather than centrist as he promised. That is why his poll numbers are dropping at such a rapid pace. Apparently his disapproval ratings have risen faster than any other President in history in such a short time period.
Bill Clinton said last week if he just passes this debacle (my word) his approval ratings would go right back up once the debate is over, I say Mr Clinton is full of PELOSI. This Country is not extreme far left and people elected this Prez on the premise of campaign promises that were full of platitudes, the YES I CAN, HOPE and CHANGE style of rhetoric but he's not showing any leadership skills resulting in the Audacity of NOPE. He's not coming through. He's trying to CHANGE America alright but for the worst and he's not giving anybody any hope of it being better under his leadership style. Even the young kids who swooned over him are dropping like flies.
He has completely ignored the two wars we are fighting and the results are in. They are both escalating and getting out of control so what is our DEAR LEADER going to do about that? He should have come out today and talked about it to assure people he is on top of the terrible attacks that killed and injured so many people in Bagdad but he's silent. That is the REAL OBAMA we are seeing now and it's not all that pretty. He is in front of the cameras every day to push his socialism, but he needs to stay in the Oval Office for a CHANGE and take care of the real business of running our Country. He's placing our National security in grave danger by ignoring what is going on around him.
Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 04:08 pm by Razenkn
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 07:29 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
No, sorry, Ni but that's not how it works. When you wrote your real name on your profile, it appeared on your profile regardless of which puter you used. You are not able to change info on your profile using a friend's puter unless you logged in to the website. Also, while I'm educating you, if you are banned from entering a forum, your ISP is banned so you cannot re-register.....nobody else could register from that puter either, according to the TOS of this forum. That means I could not be Ms. Boots, oui? Let me gently suggest that you do more reading about puters and less reading cartoons, ok?
Here you go again, always think'n you're smarter than everyone else...we know you kept this a family affair (who else would jump through hoops for you? ). You're the puppet master...so that would be a YES to you being Ms. Boots! Props go out to your backup booties, BB...cuz you couldn't have done any of this without them...short of buying a new computer, of course.
Sadly, you write nothing about the subject of the thread and I'm afraid viewers are disappointed in you....Ms. Surpy..you write something of no sense..perhaps it's too late for you to be up, no? . Sadly, the lovely Ms. Boots is forever banned from the forum ici....nobody may use my screen name from their own computer for if they did and I was banned, even though I am sweet and follow all the rules, which IP would be blocked? You see, what you think cannot be so...Mr. Webmaster doesn't ban screen names, he bans IPs...ask Niel about how that works because I explained it to him to, okey dokey? .....I shall tell the lovely Ms. Boots that you asked about her and miss her okey dokey? I think it best you sleep and I am sure she will not object if you dream of...the lovely, wonderful......enchantee.......Ms. Boots! Bon Soir!Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 07:39 am by
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 06:51 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
No, sorry, Ni but that's not how it works. When you wrote your real name on your profile, it appeared on your profile regardless of which puter you used. You are not able to change info on your profile using a friend's puter unless you logged in to the website. Also, while I'm educating you, if you are banned from entering a forum, your ISP is banned so you cannot re-register.....nobody else could register from that puter either, according to the TOS of this forum. That means I could not be Ms. Boots, oui? Let me gently suggest that you do more reading about puters and less reading cartoons, ok?
Here you go again, always think'n you're smarter than everyone else...we know you kept this a family affair (who else would jump through hoops for you? ). You're the puppet master...so that would be a YES to you being Ms. Boots! Props go out to your backup booties, BB...cuz you couldn't have done any of this without them...short of buying a new computer, of course.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 06:03 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
No, sorry, Ni but that's not how it works. When you wrote your real name on your profile, it appeared on your profile regardless of which puter you used. You are not able to change info on your profile using a friend's puter unless you logged in to the website. Also, while I'm educating you, if you are banned from entering a forum, your ISP is banned so you cannot re-register.....nobody else could register from that puter either, according to the TOS of this forum. That means I could not be Ms. Boots, oui? Let me gently suggest that you do more reading about puters and less reading cartoons, ok?
You don't know what you are talking about. You make things up as you go along. You make no sense Brenda--as usual. Have a nice trip. See what it is like in a seriously bankrupt state.Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 06:05 am by designman124
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 05:48 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
No, sorry, Ni but that's not how it works. When you wrote your real name on your profile, it appeared on your profile regardless of which puter you used. You are not able to change info on your profile using a friend's puter unless you logged in to the website. Also, while I'm educating you, if you are banned from entering a forum, your ISP is banned so you cannot re-register.....nobody else could register from that puter either, according to the TOS of this forum. That means I could not be Ms. Boots, oui? Let me gently suggest that you do more reading about puters and less reading cartoons, ok?
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 01:51 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
Don't sweat the small stuff, d-man...I'm think'n BB's in a pissy mood cuz she got her wings clipped. She needs to take it out on somebody...might as well be us, her imaginary friends, no?  Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 01:55 am by BigSurprize
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 01:40 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
No you don't register computers but if you register on someone elses computer, It automatically adds info from that Computers owner. You should know this since you register multiple people under your or someone elses computer. Ckeck it out.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 01:08 am |
|
designman124 wrote: Palin's office has had white powder delivered to it-- diversionary tactic?
Cocaine, ya think?
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 01:07 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.
Bon Jour! Ahhh..but you don't register computers on newszap, you fill in the blanks on the profile where it asks your name , if not bright enough to understand anyone can see it , lol. I must compliment you on your English tho..Except for the NY accent, one would never know where you come from before. It's nice to see you writing in full sentences without cartoons, mes aimee..au revoir, Niel!
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 12:42 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
I registered a friends' computer and am not who you say I am. Go back to English class.Last edited on Wed Aug 19th, 2009 12:42 am by designman124
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19th, 2009 12:20 am |
|
designman124 wrote: Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
LOLOL..I thought that it wouldn't require much thinking on your part to change your profile once I pointed out you had your last name ond first initial on it, Niel. But, it doesn't change you or what you are, Mr. P. LOL
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18th, 2009 04:51 pm |
|
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18th, 2009 04:45 pm |
|
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18th, 2009 04:37 pm |
|
Schoolmarm wrote: 
Apparently the artist (living in Chicago) supported a Democrat...just not BHO. Hmm, so it wasn't an extreme right concervative's evil plot to demonize our president...another smear campaign against conservatives gone awry. Back to the drawing board, folks...
Clean Slate: Obama Joker Artist Revealed
A 20-year-old, college history major of Palestinian descent who supported Rep. Dennis Kucinich's presidential candidacy is the anonymous artist who turned a Time magazine cover photo of Barack Obama into the nefarious Joker of the Batman series, The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.
FOXNews.com
Last edited on Tue Aug 18th, 2009 04:38 pm by BigSurprize
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 11:14 pm |
|
Bootsie wrote
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
I don't know what you are seeing on my profile. You are dreaming again.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 11:03 pm |
|
SCG_lady wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
 On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
LOL..ya think, Niel?..by the way, as lovely as Brenda is, I'm not her...therefore , you're wrong again, my man...back to your toons with ya.
I'm not Niel either but all your personal attacks on everyone are affecting an important election, Brenda. Your candidate doesn't deserve all the damage you are doing. Think about it.
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
To cover the junk in your trunk dear ~ Duh!
Bon jour!! it's le marm..lonely, hateful, bitter...I am so sorry, dear..perhaps you could join with Mr. Raz, no? I will prey for you...au revoir!
|
SCG_lady
Member
| Joined: | Thu May 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 86 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 10:10 pm |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
LOL..ya think, Niel?..by the way, as lovely as Brenda is, I'm not her...therefore , you're wrong again, my man...back to your toons with ya.
I'm not Niel either but all your personal attacks on everyone are affecting an important election, Brenda. Your candidate doesn't deserve all the damage you are doing. Think about it.
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
To cover the junk in your trunk dear ~ Duh!
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 09:43 pm |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
LOL..ya think, Niel?..by the way, as lovely as Brenda is, I'm not her...therefore , you're wrong again, my man...back to your toons with ya.
I'm not Niel either but all your personal attacks on everyone are affecting an important election, Brenda. Your candidate doesn't deserve all the damage you are doing. Think about it.
If you're not Niel P. perhaps you can explain why you claimed to be on your profile? ...and if I were Brenda, and I am not, why would I be telling people that both John or Sharon are very qualified and effective people? Niel, baby, you're having an identity crisis.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1809 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 06:46 pm |
|
Wow, what happened to Pepe Le PEWette's phony accent? That sounded more like a Roller Derby Babe chomping gum. Guess she forgot who she was posting as. LOL
Last edited on Sat Aug 15th, 2009 06:46 pm by Razenkn
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 03:45 pm |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
LOL..ya think, Niel?..by the way, as lovely as Brenda is, I'm not her...therefore , you're wrong again, my man...back to your toons with ya.
I'm not Niel either but all your personal attacks on everyone are affecting an important election, Brenda. Your candidate doesn't deserve all the damage you are doing. Think about it.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 07:06 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
LOL..ya think, Niel?..by the way, as lovely as Brenda is, I'm not her...therefore , you're wrong again, my man...back to your toons with ya.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 06:03 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that. Br- you are wrong again.
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 05:57 am |
|
designman124 wrote: cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
Ni--Scott Rassmussen is a fringe conservative...but what does popularity have to do with the need for health reform...just shows a half wit former half term Gov of Alaska scared some gullible fringers and birthers....I don't if even Gino believes that.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 15th, 2009 01:01 am |
|
cestmoi wrote: Razenkn wrote: The Quotable Barack Obama
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama, reeling from growing public opposition to his proposed healthcare reform, took to the stage for a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The stated intent of the event was to correct public misperceptions about the president's proposal. But the outcome spoke more to the plan's weaknesses than its strengths.
Reacting to allegations that the plan's so-called "public option" would result in government pushing private health insurers out of the market, Obama glibly responded, "... I think private insurers should be able to compete. They do it all the time. I mean, if you think about ... UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right? ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."
Such is the curse of being Barack Obama that when he occasionally stumbles onto truth it militates against his ambitions.
AHHH, BON jOUR!!!! Why did the fringe right then try to convince us that the gov't plan would put the private plans out of business? Has the Post Office put Fedex and UPS out of business..That's what the President was saying..and here, a foreign born person has to explain it to a patriot...tsk, tsk, Au revoir, mes aimee!!
Poll Results:
Voters Give GOP First Lead on Healthcare
Friday, August 14, 2009 6:02 PM
By: Rick Pedraza
Poll numbers favoring President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform legislation continue to slip, and for the first time in more than two years of polling, voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the handling of the issue of healthcare.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday shows voters favor the GOP on the issue of healthcare by a margin of 44 percent to 41 percent.
|
Current time is 07:34 am | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...   |
|
|
|
