| Author | Post |
|---|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 03:00 am |
|
What would you say to Barbie in the White House Lou?
Hypothetical
Worst possible case, Obama really screws something up and earns more animosity for the Democrats then ever George the Lesser brought down on us. (Lord I know it is far fetched, but it is hypotetical!!).
The inbreeders are running rampant in the GOP and they have not been expunged. We have not taken out the trash. Lou you know the idiot from village of Wasilla is their girl! Caribou Barbie manages to get the Oval Office. d**n, I bhetter stop, this is even frightening me!!
Get serious Lou, it is in your best interests to help us regain control. Or the oath of office will be "You Betcha!"
(By the way, I think each of us should send a letter to our local stations supporting the T&A weather girls. We need to be sure they are successful there so they never think of joining Barbie in politics!! There are far too many perverts out there wiling to vote for the T&A platform)
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 01:39 am |
|
The bard wrote: callmelou wrote: ght out LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course. 
Well hopefully its real nature and not the one where the wolves are running for their lives like she envisions. 
No, No, no......we're going to keep Caribou Barbie right out front as a constant reminder to the Indies and mod Repub's of what the Republican party has come to represent....Obvious, the Repubs coulnd't shut her up as a candidate as much as they tried, and now she is a money hungary, still incompetent quitter....Rock on, Sarah!..Hit as many talk shows as you can....many people need to see how dumb you really are over and over and over until it sinks in....I'm hoping she does a Playboy spread before the next election
Lou and Lucifer. Is either one of you politically naive enough to actually believe we would be better off with a ONE PARTY SYSTEM?
Look, there does appear to be a glimmer of hope coming from New York. The "Conservative" candidate there is actually in the CONSERVATIVE PARTY. All need happen is on or two of the authoritarian puppet masters to bestow praise on this p[arty and the lemmings will migrate there in droves. And Caribou Barbie could well be leading the pack.
As to the Playboy spread, Lou that is just crude. As much as I detest the woman, I do not feel th quip to have been in good taste.
I would much, much, much rather have a Democrat in the WH, of course....the way to accomplish that best is to have someone like Barbie as the candidate of your party...when your party is again controlled by the moderates, and not the crazies, let me know..we'll talk again....if and when that happens, I'll agree to the two party system...in the meantime, uh uh. On the Playboy spread...time will tell. But look back ot some of the things she has said...she is above nothing.
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 01:22 am |
|
callmelou wrote: ght out LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course.
Well hopefully its real nature and not the one where the wolves are running for their lives like she envisions.
No, No, no......we're going to keep Caribou Barbie right out front as a constant reminder to the Indies and mod Repub's of what the Republican party has come to represent....Obvious, the Repubs coulnd't shut her up as a candidate as much as they tried, and now she is a money hungary, still incompetent quitter....Rock on, Sarah!..Hit as many talk shows as you can....many people need to see how dumb you really are over and over and over until it sinks in....I'm hoping she does a Playboy spread before the next election
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 12:00 am |
|
callmelou wrote: ght out LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course.
Well hopefully its real nature and not the one where the wolves are running for their lives like she envisions.
No, No, no......we're going to keep Caribou Barbie right out front as a constant reminder to the Indies and mod Repub's of what the Republican party has come to represent....Obvious, the Repubs coulnd't shut her up as a candidate as much as they tried, and now she is a money hungary, still incompetent quitter....Rock on, Sarah!..Hit as many talk shows as you can....many people need to see how dumb you really are over and over and over until it sinks in....I'm hoping she does a Playboy spread before the next election
Lou and Lucifer. Is either one of you politically naive enough to actually believe we would be better off with a ONE PARTY SYSTEM?
Look, there does appear to be a glimmer of hope coming from New York. The "Conservative" candidate there is actually in the CONSERVATIVE PARTY. All need happen is on or two of the authoritarian puppet masters to bestow praise on this p[arty and the lemmings will migrate there in droves. And Caribou Barbie could well be leading the pack.
As to the Playboy spread, Lou that is just crude. As much as I detest the woman, I do not feel th quip to have been in good taste.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 10:24 pm |
|
ght out LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course.
Well hopefully its real nature and not the one where the wolves are running for their lives like she envisions.
No, No, no......we're going to keep Caribou Barbie right out front as a constant reminder to the Indies and mod Repub's of what the Republican party has come to represent....Obvious, the Repubs coulnd't shut her up as a candidate as much as they tried, and now she is a money hungary, still incompetent quitter....Rock on, Sarah!..Hit as many talk shows as you can....many people need to see how dumb you really are over and over and over until it sinks in....I'm hoping she does a Playboy spread before the next election
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 10:09 pm |
|
BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course.
Well hopefully its real nature and not the one where the wolves are running for their lives like she envisions.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 09:30 pm |
|
the bard wrote..
From whatever niche on the political spectrum you have carved out, somehow one would expect you would have enough interest in the well being of your nation to at least discuss issues facing us. Lord knows, you certainly complain enough. Yet when opportunities to actually discuss issues are presented, the lot of you would rather b**ch, snipe each other and complain.
What sort of Americans are you? For that matter, what sort of human beings are you? Do you really think all you have to do is b**ch, cry and complain and some fairy godmother will wave her wand, utter some cute phrase and fix it for you? What universe do you come from?
You mean like this....."issue discussion"? (pssst...Rush has recently lost his "lard ass"...) stay current if you want to stay in the debate....
the bard wrote...
While this fat slob has some small element of truth in his rants, his mercenary quest for ratings and profits coupled with his history of utter hypocrisy means even that small element of truth is dismissed in the utter revulsion this CLOWN causes people to feel! Then to have this revulsion affixed to our party because of this lard ass' supposed affinity for the Republican Party is simply criminal.
Rush Limbaugh is an ENTERTAINER. Axelrod has that exactly correct. Rush Limbaugh and Bozo the Clown are birds of a feather! This CLOWN causes the Ditto Heads to salivate on cue, that is more then true. But those authoritarians are not the majority.
or like this..."issue discussion"???
The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
It would appear you don't read or follow your own principles (and I use that term loosely). You do a fair share of name calling, insulting, and demonizing folks for simply expressing their ideas, beliefs and opinions all falling under the 1st Amendment. It would also appear if you had your way, you would wave a magic obama wand and stifle all dissension allowing you to be in control all the while calling the opposition to your misguided views "Authoritarians". Hypocrite??? Yup.
You claim to be a "Republican" but yet you have not mentioned one "republican principle" or one "republican" that you actually respect, agree with or follow, instead you continue to state how much you hate everything and everyone republican much like another poster on here that does that very thing. She has likewise lost all credibility. Never a word about how destructive and dangerous this Prez and his thugs are to our Nation you claim to luv. You just spend all your time trashing and bashing conservative republicans. That doesn't sound very "republican anything" to me. Doesn't sound very high road to me. (Please correct me if I'm wrong, I have to admit I read very little of your self-serving bilge).
What's the purpose behind "pretending" to be a Republican while you are most assuredly liberal and luv President Procrastinator??? I don't get what's in the game for you. Is it to try to perpetuate the notion the Republican party is drastically divided and dying?? Cause you all tried that before and it didn't work then and it isn't going to work now. So if that is what all this nonsense is about, you need to stop wasting our time and stop your feeble attempt to "take-over" our little blogsite here, we like it just fine. If you can't own up to what and who you really are, then don't expect anyone on this forum to "drink the juice", save it for the Barry Bootlickers that don't question his motives or his hypocrisy. Rokey dokey??  
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 08:22 pm |
|
That the day has arrived that something like this can be said about the public face of our party ......
"He does it every day on radio. He's marketing the outrageous. And he does very well with it," Axelrod said. "But, as I said, he's an entertainer. We've got bigger responsibilities."
And have it be true is an outrageous failure on our part.
While this fat slob has some small element of truth in his rants, his mercenary quest for ratings and profits coupled with his history of utter hypocrisy means even that small element of truth is dismissed in the utter revulsion this CLOWN causes people to feel! Then to have this revulsion affixed to our party because of this lard ass' supposed affinity for the Republican Party is simply criminal.
Rush Limbaugh is an ENTERTAINER. Axelrod has that exactly correct. Rush Limbaugh and Bozo the Clown are birds of a feather! This CLOWN causes the Ditto Heads to salivate on cue, that is more then true. But those authoritarians are not the majority.
We need the independent vote and the moderate vote, Ditto Heads cannot elect a president. Instead The EGO ON LOAN FROM GOD has provided a focal point to bring ridicule down on the entire party!
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 07:10 pm |
|
The bard wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
Personally, I think she's got too much baggage to do much more than what she's doing right now...and I think it's people like you who give her credibility. Your constant attempts to marginalize her make her appear to be a threat...and that keeps her out front. Y'all need to calm down...and let nature take it's course.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 03:43 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
Thank you Lucifer, it makes the effort to expose them worthwhile. The more people who see them for what they truly are, the sooner they will be marginalized.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 1st, 2009 01:46 pm |
|
The bard wrote: The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
Cult is the perfect word to use for repubbicants. They have become a cult. They know they are not relevant but are willing to destroy our country to remain in power. Their backwoods approach shows such a lack of intelligence and direction. When you read up on them or even items here you are alarmed at the similarities to extremists around the world.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30th, 2009 04:28 am |
|
The problem, Lucifer, lies in the cult following Caribou Barbie has deveoped.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30th, 2009 03:54 am |
|
LOL, like the DNC needs to waste money on the mindless twit. Palin is so far gone off her rocker. She is wasting our time and the only reason she remains in the news is her few repubbicant worshippers who think she is brilliant.
DNC asks supporters to take on Palin's 'lies'
Posted: October 29th, 2009 05:30 PM ET
From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
The Democratic National Committee is taking fresh aim at Sarah Palin.
(CNN) - The Democratic National Committee is taking fresh aim at Sarah Palin, encouraging supporters to attack the former Alaska governor on Facebook in order to "debunk her lies."
In an e-mail to supporters, and on a new Web site, the DNC asks supporters to call out Palin when she uses Facebook to transmit what the committee says are falsehoods.
"The more we push back with the truth, the more Sarah Palin and others like her will have to think twice before they promote lies, and the less they'll be able to derail progress," DNC executive director Jen O'Malley Dillon wrote in the e-email.
Palin is the latest high-profile Republican to be targeted by the DNC in a campaign they've labeled "call 'em out." Other Republicans in the DNC's cross-hairs have included House Minority Leader John Boehner, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, and Minnesota Rep. Michele
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 05:54 pm |
|
Now Sarah falls under the entertainer blog since she is not even remotely able to be in politics being the quitter she is and how she abandoned Alaska to go make a buck on the circuit. Talk about the double standard where repubbiecants call the current prez ill equipped to handle the White House they were more than drooling over the absolute moron from Alaska as some genius. She is reduced to the level of Rush and Beck. Entertainers that the pubbicants swoon over and pour their hard earned cash in to their pockets for no gain other than to be ignored by the rest of the country.
Analysis: Palin's high-risk, high-reward strategy
By Alexander Mooney, CNN
cnnAuthor = "By Alexander Mooney, CNN";
October 28, 2009 12:04 p.m. EDT
Palin's endorsement of third-party rival to GOP-anointed candidate was slap in face to party establishment.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Sarah Palin stepped down as governor of Alaska in July
- She is often considered one of the potential GOP 2012 contenders
- CNN poll: Palin has lost support among independent voters
- Conservative writer: "Palin has thrown the old GOP playbook out the window"
Washington (CNN) -- When Sarah Palin weighed in last week on the contentious special congressional election in New York, she did so in her trademark way: unconventionally.
While other potential 2012 presidential contenders largely stayed quiet on the divisive congressional race that has exposed fault lines in the party, Palin delivered a slap in the face to Republican Party leadership in Washington when she offered a full-throated endorsement of third-party conservative Doug Hoffman over the GOP's anointed candidate, Dede Scozzafava.
Palin's surprise backing -- not even Hoffman's press secretary knew it was coming until it popped up on his Google reader -- left some political observers scratching their heads, wondering why Sen. John McCain's running mate would risk alienating her party's establishment for a long-shot candidate in a race with little national visibility.
Palin's credibility with the conservative wing of her party is already solid, unlike other potential 2012 candidates who are either largely unknown to conservatives or appear too moderate, like possible 2012 contenders Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty or Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal.
Instead, some strategists say Palin should begin to court less partisan-charged voters, or at least avoid alienating them, if she's serious about being a viable presidential candidate.
"In the year since the election has ended, [Palin's] done nothing to expand her appeal beyond that base to the middle of the electorate where elections are decided," former McCain campaign manager Steve Schmidt said recently. "That independent vote is going to be up for grabs in 2012."
But Palin's latest move laid bare the unpredictability that has come to characterize the former Alaska governor since her bid for the vice presidency came to an end nearly a year ago, and has again raised the question of what, exactly, she wants and which game plan she is following.
To be sure, if the former governor is considering a run for the White House in 2012, as several unaffiliated Republican strategists and political observers believe that she is, at first blush she is off to a less than auspicious beginning.
In some ways, the last year has unfolded for her like a reality TV show gone wrong: a governorship plagued by ethics investigations that ended with a shocking and widely mocked resignation speech, the repeated airing of sour grapes from former McCain campaign aides, a series of embarrassing scheduling mishaps at key Republican Party events, and a bevy of tabloid reports carrying insidious allegations about her personal life.
Just-released CNN polling confirms the last 12 months have taken a toll on the Alaska Republican's popularity. Her overall approval rating has dipped to 41 percent and she trails former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in a hypothetical matchup for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012 by 7 points. Moreover, Palin's unfavorable rating is 15 points higher than Huckabee's.
Palin has also made few of the conventional moves befitting a presidential candidate-in-waiting: She's rarely shown up at party events, has made virtually no public appearances since she resigned the governorship, or granted no national media interviews and retained no political staff.
What could be most troublesome for Palin at this stage: Most Americans can't seem to envision her ever being the commander-in-chief.
"Her biggest problem is the perception that she is not qualified to be president," CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said. "Seven in 10 Americans, and nearly half of all Republicans, say she is not qualified. It's a problem that politicians have faced before, but one that few have been able to overcome."
On the other hand, the former Alaska governor keeps injecting herself into national policy debates, largely from Facebook postings that have taken aim at President Obama's stances on a host of issues, a sign that she is set on remaining a relevant political figure.
Palin has thrown the old GOP playbook out the window
--Matt Lewis, conservative writer
She's also retained a fervent following and the bona fide rock-star status that enabled her to pack more campaign town hall meetings than McCain could on his own.
Two-thirds of all Americans in the CNN poll think she is not a typical politician. If Palin has her eye on the White House, she's staking out a different path toward it.
"Palin has thrown the old GOP playbook out the window," said Matt Lewis, a conservative writer for the Web site Politics Daily. "She believes that the world has changed, that all the old rules don't apply, and the conventional wisdom no longer exists."
That the former Republican vice presidential nominee hasn't broadened her political appeal in the last year was made clear when the two Republicans in the midst of hard-fought races for governor this November, Chris Christie in New Jersey and Bob McDonnell in Virginia, both declined to invite her on the campaign trail, fearing she may turn off independent voters.
Other Republican candidates vying for office in 2010 have only offered vague assurances the Alaska Republican is welcome in their territory, well aware Democratic opponents will seize on any sight of the divisive political figure.
The CNN poll also shows Palin has lost support among independent voters over the last year, drawing approval from 41 percent of them now, 10 points lower than that group's approval last year. She fares even worse with self-identified moderate voters, drawing only a 34 percent approval rating.
But does any of that matter? It's usually die-hard conservatives who vote in Republican presidential primaries, and Palin's support among this group remains strong, 62 percent, according to the CNN poll. And an eager army continues to support her, some of whom have raised more than $40,000 in hopes that she'll appear at an Iowa GOP event next month.
Moreover, as the Tea Party movement has made clear, a passionate grassroots movement now exists, ready to embrace a leader.
If the Alaska governor locks down that niche voting bloc ahead of the presidential primary season, she could face a smoother course to the nomination. On the flip side, if she's seen as too closely aligned with the Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck crowd, her viability as a national candidate could virtually become nonexistent.
By any measure, it's a high-risk, high-reward strategy.
"There [are] a lot of things happening that are changing," Lewis said. "It could be that Sarah Palin has captured that zeitgeist, that she sees things that nobody else sees, or it could be that she's running a really bad campaign. We'll find out."
Last edited on Wed Oct 28th, 2009 05:57 pm by LucifersLandlord
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:29 pm |
|
| The observation notes and exposition for this authoritarian rant are to be found on the Goldwater Republican thread.
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 07:34 am |
|
The bard wrote: Has anyone yet noticed that NOT A SINGLE ONE of the authoritarians has denied being an authoritarian?
Think about it, not one of them has denied they are authoritarians.... It makes you actually laugh out loud when you consider it. Just the concept of meekly accepting the application of such a label is inconceivable.
Could it be that providing the references to the definitive texts on the syndrome deprived them of denial? There were the traits of the authoritarian for all to see, it did make it impossible for them to deny, did it not?
Nope...we recognized you the minute you started pontificating all over the blog...(which reminds me...does anyone know when the blog janitor is due? To be honest...I think bard should clean up their own mess)...but even if we hadn't already known about these books and/or theories...you led by example with every cursed authoritarian breath of hot air that came outta your computer. You and your dirty socks are sad-sad little people...with too many issues for a public forum. You were extremely rude to a very nice lady on here who doesn't indulge in name calling...yet you expected her to jump through your hoop cutting her off with a demand to know the source for her post. Then you have the audacity to instruct you imaginary followers to never give in to demands from authoritarians re: their sources...what a crock!
Note to your inner child - Your constant need to play these games is a cry for help...do yourself a favor and go find it elsewhere. We're responsible for our behavior...not yours.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 05:08 am |
|
Authoritarianism is a movement to submit to a "man on horseback," to attack those who are different, to march in lockstep.
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:35 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: callmelou wrote: The bard wrote: "For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
I understand the $4.95 includes a beverage...koolaide.
foolaide is more like it cause they got fooled for the 8 years he was in office and he is still their messiah no matter what. Talk about being flatfooted and no direction .. LOL
Dang, Luc...it's just not you anymore without the green. 
(umm, foolaide is LOL funny...but ya might wanna consider changing it to foolade - unless it was your intention to insult those who work as Teacher's Aides and/or School Bus Aides, to name a couple )
Luci has become the new gemmy, nothing to offer, just comes on to hit and insult then leaves. Really doesn't matter what color just need to keep the bee hive going...LOL
LOL Now see, that's sooo not true Raz...(shame on you)...Luc has always been much nicer than GEM ever was.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:23 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: callmelou wrote: The bard wrote: "For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
I understand the $4.95 includes a beverage...koolaide.
foolaide is more like it cause they got fooled for the 8 years he was in office and he is still their messiah no matter what. Talk about being flatfooted and no direction .. LOL
Dang, Luc...it's just not you anymore without the green.
(umm, foolaide is LOL funny...but ya might wanna consider changing it to foolade - unless it was your intention to insult those who work as Teacher's Aides and/or School Bus Aides, to name a couple )
Luci has become the new gemmy, nothing to offer, just comes on to hit and insult then leaves. Really doesn't matter what color just need to keep the bee hive going...LOL
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:15 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: callmelou wrote: The bard wrote: "For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
I understand the $4.95 includes a beverage...koolaide.
foolaide is more like it cause they got fooled for the 8 years he was in office and he is still their messiah no matter what. Talk about being flatfooted and no direction .. LOL
Dang, Luc...it's just not you anymore without the green.
(umm, foolaide is LOL funny...but ya might wanna consider changing it to foolade - unless it was your intention to insult those who work as Teacher's Aides and/or School Bus Aides, to name a couple )
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 02:07 am |
|
callmelou wrote: The bard wrote: "For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
I understand the $4.95 includes a beverage...koolaide.
foolaide is more like it cause they got fooled for the 8 years he was in office and he is still their messiah no matter what. Talk about being flatfooted and no direction .. LOL
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 10:51 pm |
|
d**n! Lucifer humiliates me and then you cause me to spew my coffee all over the screen!! Pass me a napkin!!
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 09:27 pm |
|
The bard wrote: "For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
I understand the $4.95 includes a beverage...koolaide.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 08:36 pm |
|
"For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
Thanks Lucifer... Thank you very much!!! A former Republican PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!! And the tickets are going for $4.95 per person or $19 for a group!!!!
You know these authoritarians are embarrassing enough without you rubbing it in!!
I think even Eisenhower events get a higher gate then that!!
$4.95!!
Not even $5.00!!
It is so hard to type with my head so low in shame!!
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 06:34 pm |
|
LOL, GWB has to motivate the crowds in Texas cause he would probably be laughed out of any other state. His speech also is taking swats at the current administration so his silence has been broken and he is now on the bashing bandwagon to. I love how he said he brought dignity to the office. Well yeah you did in some areas and in others he was horrendous. Now thats entertainment repubbicant style. Please exit to the unlocked door GWB.
Bush debuts as motivational speaker
Posted: October 27th, 2009 10:03 AM ET
From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
Bush spoke at a 'Get Motivated!' event in Fort Worth, Texas Monday night
(CNN) - Former President George W. Bush made his debut as a motivational speaker Monday night, telling a Fort Worth, Texas crowd it's futile to waste energy chasing popularity.
"It's so simple in life to chase popularity, but popularity is fleeting, it's not real," Bush said at a "Get Motivated!" business seminar, a multi-city event its organizers describe as an "energizing, action-packed, star-studded, fun-filled, spectacular stage show."
The president himself saw wild popularity swings during his eight years in the White House, garnering nearly a 90 percent approval rating in the months following the attacks on September 11, 2001 and exiting office with only the support of 31 percent of Americans, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll.
The former president was greeted enthusiastically by the 11,000 attendees of the event, according to the Fort Worth Telegram, and he spoke casually for about 20 minutes.
Event organizers declined to disclose how much the former president was compensated for the appearance, though former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani received $100,000 for a similar speech at the event two years ago.
Bush, who has made few public appearances or statements since leaving office nine months ago, also took the opportunity to reflect on his presidency.
"Every single day, I was honored to be your president by bringing honor and dignity to the office," he said. Bush also added later that his faith played a large role in guiding his decisions: "From a personal perspective, I don't see how you can be president without relying upon an almighty."
Colin Powell, the former Bush Secretary of State who spared with many members of the president's inner circle over the invasion of Iraq and endorsed Barack Obama's presidential bid - also spoke at the event and offered high praise of his ex-boss.
"We are safer than we were before 9-11 because of President Bush," Powell said.The former president is also scheduled to participate in another "Get Motivated!" seminar in San Antonio, Texas on December 2, according to the company's Web site.
"For a limited time only," the Web site says, tickets are available for that event at $4.95 per person or $19 for a group.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 03:11 pm |
|
Well what do you know? Media Matters did not consider the Ego on Loan from God of significant consequence to retain his blustering more then a few days. You know it is hard to find fault with that, he is a waste of bandwidth.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 04:53 am |
|
LOL, it says YOUR SORRY this page cannot be found....LOL Hmmm go figure, media matters/George Soros are always so reliable for truth and facts....what ever could have happened???? MamoBardo, you are gonna have to do much better than that if you want to play with the big kids on here.
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 04:46 am |
|
No I have my notes right here... And here is the link to the clip..http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910230019 Do enjoy! I know that I did..
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 04:44 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: The bard wrote: That Rush clip is hilarious!! Can these clowns ever accept responsibility for their actions?
And what "Rush clip" would that be, bard...did you lose your notes again?
It would appear that bardo is losing it which accounts for her 'voices' losingit.
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 04:27 am |
|
The bard wrote: That Rush clip is hilarious!! Can these clowns ever accept responsibility for their actions?
And what "Rush clip" would that be, bard...did you lose your notes again?
|
The bard
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 03:55 am |
|
That Rush clip is hilarious!! Can these clowns ever accept responsibility for their actions?
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26th, 2009 08:02 pm |
|
Wow, do you think someone has woke up and smelled the coffee??? Thats right Newt time to drop a few of your hate mongers and step up to the plate and be part of the team and not just the umpires calling the game.
Gingrich: 'You can't have a purely right-wing majority'
Posted: October 26th, 2009 12:03 PM ET
From CNN Radio's Bob Constantini
Gingrich spoke to CNN Radio.
WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has taken considerable heat from conservative activists for endorsing Republican Dede Scozzafava over Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in next month's special congressional election in New York.
But Gingrich is defending his approach to re-building the Republican Party. It begins, he said, by accommodating those who might disagree with you.
"Both parties have to recognize, you can create a center-right majority in America, which we did with Reagan in '80 and we did it again with the 'Contract with America' in '94," Gingrich said in an interview with CNN Radio. "You can't have a purely right-wing majority; you can't have a purely left-wing majority."
The former speaker claimed that Democrats are doing their part to help the GOP by promoting a liberal ideology. "Today, the Democrats are moving toward a secular-socialist model that is guaranteed minority in America," he said.
And he was cautiously optimistic about the 2010 midterm elections.
"Next year, I think we could win [governorships in] Iowa, Kansas, Wisconsin, the Senate seat in Illinois. In Ohio, we could win both the governorship and the Senate seat," Gingrich said. He also predicted losses for three prominent Democratic incumbents: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.
Along with the New York special election, Republicans are also watching two key gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. Gingrich predicated the GOP will win in Virginia "by a big margin," but was less optimistic about the party's chances in the Garden State.
"I think we have a good chance to win New Jersey, if people conclude that voting for the third-party candidate just re-elects [incumbent Gov. Jon] Corzine," he said.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26th, 2009 04:19 am |
|
Mamazoyd wrote: The Buzz Log What’s hot on Yahoo! Buzz™ (and why)... Our crack team of editors takes a closer look at the hottest trends on Yahoo! Buzz.
 Obama's Fake Thesis Buzz
Rush Was Punked: “Obama Thesis” Hoax by Claudine Zap 28 hours ago
693 Votes It must have seemed so perfect. An obscure blogger unearths some pages of President Obama's college thesis. The report supposedly comes from big-time journalist Joe Klein of Time magazine. And the thesis has some real gems: like Obama's disdain for the Constitution.
The whole thing was nothing more than a satirical post on a humor blog. But Rush Limbaugh, who quoted from the supposed thesis on his radio show, sure wasn't laughing. Here's how it went down.
An unknown blogger picked up on a made-up post meant as a joke, which claimed that Joe Klein had gotten his hands on 10 pages of student Obama's college thesis. Rush Limbaugh jumped on it, which immediately sparked Web searches on "obama thesis."
Supposedly titled "Aristocracy Revisited," the excerpt revealed the president had "doubts" about the "so-called founders." Juicy. Except not true. Limbaugh discovered halfway through his show that he'd been had, but defended himself by saying basically the thesis felt true. Listen in to Rush's mea sorta culpa.
Joe Klein finally jumped in, and called the report "nonsense" on his Swampland blog, and the blogger who thought the hoax was real also apologized.
Let's hope someone kept their sense of humor in all this. Still, for a humble post to go from humor blog to major media outlet sure seems impressive. Someone ought to write their thesis on it. For real.
Doesn't surprise me that an "entertainer" would grab ahold of something like this and go running. Hey, maybe with his sprinting to the (approx.) 50 yard line he was attempting to show he was worthy to buy the football team!
LOL, I like that he stated it as fact. These are the sort of facts that reppubicants rule by and why we are in the disaster we are in today. They are unable to stop and take a look around, they shoot off from the mouth first, then refuse to apologize for their mistake and blame somone else. How typical.
|
Mamazoyd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jul 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2060 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25th, 2009 04:03 am |
|
The Buzz Log What’s hot on Yahoo! Buzz™ (and why)... Our crack team of editors takes a closer look at the hottest trends on Yahoo! Buzz.
Obama's Fake Thesis Buzz
Rush Was Punked: “Obama Thesis” Hoax by Claudine Zap 28 hours ago
693 Votes It must have seemed so perfect. An obscure blogger unearths some pages of President Obama's college thesis. The report supposedly comes from big-time journalist Joe Klein of Time magazine. And the thesis has some real gems: like Obama's disdain for the Constitution.
The whole thing was nothing more than a satirical post on a humor blog. But Rush Limbaugh, who quoted from the supposed thesis on his radio show, sure wasn't laughing. Here's how it went down.
An unknown blogger picked up on a made-up post meant as a joke, which claimed that Joe Klein had gotten his hands on 10 pages of student Obama's college thesis. Rush Limbaugh jumped on it, which immediately sparked Web searches on "obama thesis."
Supposedly titled "Aristocracy Revisited," the excerpt revealed the president had "doubts" about the "so-called founders." Juicy. Except not true. Limbaugh discovered halfway through his show that he'd been had, but defended himself by saying basically the thesis felt true. Listen in to Rush's mea sorta culpa.
Joe Klein finally jumped in, and called the report "nonsense" on his Swampland blog, and the blogger who thought the hoax was real also apologized.
Let's hope someone kept their sense of humor in all this. Still, for a humble post to go from humor blog to major media outlet sure seems impressive. Someone ought to write their thesis on it. For real.
Doesn't surprise me that an "entertainer" would grab ahold of something like this and go running. Hey, maybe with his sprinting to the (approx.) 50 yard line he was attempting to show he was worthy to buy the football team!
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 04:36 am |
|
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 03:40 am |
|
|
Schoolmarm
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 13th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 233 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 05:01 pm |
|
callmelou wrote: BigSurprize wrote: callmelou wrote: Only Ni could misspell "duh"....think books, not cartoons, guy.
DUH v. DOH – All You Need to Know
by Brad Shorr on Karen Swim and I were having a little email exchange about Project Confident Friendship. The word duh came up, and it got me wondering about duh versus doh.
Let’s Dissect Duh and Doh
Duh rose to popularity in the 1980’s as one of the four or five words that constituted the Valley Girl vocabulary. At our house back then, both “Duh!” and the rather cryptic expression “No duh!” were heard up to 500 times a day. The American Heritage Dictionary defines duh as follows –
Used to express disdain for something deemed stupid or obvious, especially a self-evident remark.
Doh, Homer Simpson’s favorite expression, is clearly ready for prime time. Believe it or not, the word was added to the Oxford English Dictionary way back in 2001. Merriam-Webster defines doh as follows –
Used to express sudden recognition of a foolish blunder or an ironic turn of events.
Of course!!! I should have known that Ni is a follower of Homer Simpson...He was a cartoon....Homer, I mean, not Ni....Doing Wikipedia night shift, bigrants?
---still knitting sweaters for Jimmy Carter.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 07:05 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: callmelou wrote: Only Ni could misspell "duh"....think books, not cartoons, guy.
DUH v. DOH – All You Need to Know
by Brad Shorr on Karen Swim and I were having a little email exchange about Project Confident Friendship. The word duh came up, and it got me wondering about duh versus doh.
Let’s Dissect Duh and Doh
Duh rose to popularity in the 1980’s as one of the four or five words that constituted the Valley Girl vocabulary. At our house back then, both “Duh!” and the rather cryptic expression “No duh!” were heard up to 500 times a day. The American Heritage Dictionary defines duh as follows –
Used to express disdain for something deemed stupid or obvious, especially a self-evident remark.
Doh, Homer Simpson’s favorite expression, is clearly ready for prime time. Believe it or not, the word was added to the Oxford English Dictionary way back in 2001. Merriam-Webster defines doh as follows –
Used to express sudden recognition of a foolish blunder or an ironic turn of events.
Of course!!! I should have known that Ni is a follower of Homer Simpson...He was a cartoon....Homer, I mean, not Ni....Doing Wikipedia night shift, bigrants?
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 06:42 am |
|
callmelou wrote: Only Ni could misspell "duh"....think books, not cartoons, guy.
DUH v. DOH – All You Need to Know
by Brad Shorr on Karen Swim and I were having a little email exchange about Project Confident Friendship. The word duh came up, and it got me wondering about duh versus doh.
Let’s Dissect Duh and Doh
Duh rose to popularity in the 1980’s as one of the four or five words that constituted the Valley Girl vocabulary. At our house back then, both “Duh!” and the rather cryptic expression “No duh!” were heard up to 500 times a day. The American Heritage Dictionary defines duh as follows –
Used to express disdain for something deemed stupid or obvious, especially a self-evident remark.
Doh, Homer Simpson’s favorite expression, is clearly ready for prime time. Believe it or not, the word was added to the Oxford English Dictionary way back in 2001. Merriam-Webster defines doh as follows –
Used to express sudden recognition of a foolish blunder or an ironic turn of events.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 06:18 am |
|
| Only Ni could misspell "duh"....think books, not cartoons, guy. Last edited on Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 06:19 am by callmelou
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4261 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 05:57 am |
|
DOH!!
Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:55 PM
NEW YORK -- MSNBC's Contessa Brewer has apologized for mixing up civil rights activists Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
She made the slip-up Wednesday while introducing Jackson during a segment on homelessness.
After the introduction, Jackson stared at the camera from a studio in Burbank, Calif., and said, "I'm Rev. Jesse Jackson."
Brewer explained that her script read that she was to introduce "the Rev. Al Sharpton."
She continued, "We all know who you are, Rev. Jackson. I'm so sorry
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4261 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 03:57 pm |
|
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4261 |
| Status: |
Online
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 03:55 pm |
|
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 11:12 pm |
|
Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: LLL, this article is a complete backpedal. I saw the video of her saying it. There's no denying it. Now she wants to blame it on a dead guy for giving it to her? She also wants to say that others did it too? That's her big excuse?!
She said she turns to him OFTEN. This means she gets a lot of her ideas from him, not just this one. If she turns to him OFTEN, why does she need to hear the quote from someone else? Seems very much like she is taking it back in some ways.
Claiming to admire Mao for his "political philosophy" is dreadful and now she's trying to sugar coat it. Sorry Anita. You need to just admit it.
It took her 3 days to come up with this nauseating justification.
LLL, Beck isn't the one who is wrong here. You are just getting your information from sites that want to help defend these idiots. I watched the episode of Beck and watched her make those comments. Did you? Didn't think so!
Really now...who cares...we have a Repub. in the cabinet..certainly that could be far worse than someone who referred to Mao....
Don't worry about that. Obama is appointing czars all over the place that are Mao and Marx supporters, so I'm sure his voice will be drowned out by the rest in no time if it hasn't already been. You should be glad about that.
Well, the term 'czars' was a Fox news invention...he didn't have the benefit of using his dad's old boy network to run the country under his name.
I don't care about the origin of the word. The issue is, he's got people advising him and running this country who are appointed into positions that he has created that are not approved by senate, are not vetted, and are there to support an agenda rather than get him through crises. Call it what you want, but there are 20 or 30, maybe even more by now, that have titles and jobs such as "Green Czar" or "Car Czar" and "Pay Czar" that are making policy and decisions without any sort of check and balance.
And fear not, Obama is very well connected. His daddy has set him up with a network of some really interesting "movers and shakers" in Chicago. It's no coincidence that he and the powerful Valerie Jarrett are so close. Valerie comes from an intricate network of people with an agenda contrary to the long held views and values of this country.
They are not "running the country" and he may have whomever he wishes to advise him. One big difference between him and bush is that the latter listened to nobody, and wasn't smart to figure anything our for himself..a very bad combination...As far a the President's dad having influence in Chicago..HUH???..the Fox comedy writers must have come up with that one..or they were thinking perhaps of old man bush's infulence in Texas and just got confused. How would you have any idea of what Jarrett's values are, anyway...seems you have a prefence for the tabloids.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 08:35 pm |
|
BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: I cant believe they dropped Rush from his quest to invest in the St Louis Rams. I was so hoping that he did so that ticket sales would drop and St Louis would be boycotted and the Team and City would fail. I know that is so pubbiecant, but what is fair for one is fair for all now isnt it??? I heard this morning he's filing lawsuits for untrue stories -- gasp!
Yes he thinks someone saying something negative about him requires him to sue. LOL this guy is pure and simple the biggest idiot running the pubbiecants today. I wonder why they swoon over their little God so much?????
Then there's the other side of the coin...Sharpton - the baiter and ambulance chaser. Anyone suprised over this pot and kettle drama needs to wake up...cuz there's an agenda that goes much deeper than these two guys!
Sharpton Threatens to Sue Limbaugh Over His WSJ Column
Saturday, October 17, 2009 
NEW YORK — The Rev. Al Sharpton on Saturday threatened to sue conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh for writing in a column that the civil rights leader played a role in two New York race riots.
In a column published by the Wall Street Journal on Saturday about his derailed bid to become part-owner of the St. Louis Rams, he accuses Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of making comments that helped get him booted from a group that was trying to buy the NFL team.
Limbaugh derided Sharpton as having played "a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot" and the "1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot."
Those comments prompted a quick retort from Sharpton, who called both allegations false.
Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. He did deliver a eulogy at the funeral of the youth whose death in a traffic accident triggered the violence, but that didn't happen until the violence ended.
Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot.
Sharpton's organization had, like other black groups, been involved in picketing the business over its plans to expand into space occupied by a black-owned business, but he said he couldn't be blamed for the madman's rampage.
"Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit," said a written statement released Saturday by Sharpton's spokeswoman. "He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal."
A spokesman for Limbaugh, Tony Knight, of Sitrick and Company, did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment
This is a crack up. Limbaugh has always accused Sharpton of helping to incite racial tensions, it's his job so one has to ask why now?? Why is he suddenly all a twitter over those particular statements, Rush has always said that.
That is what Sharpton does for a living, race-bait. Without it he or Jesse Jackson wouldn't have anything. Did you notice that Sharpton didn't run to Chicago when the black kids beat and killed another black kid on the street while other kids stood by and watched? Thought he was concerned about "his people"?? Guess not. Only when there is a White involved with a Black, then he gets involved and guess who is ALWAYS in the wrong?? Yup, the White guy. Just like he and Jesse Jackson nearly killed each other trying to get to the alleged rape case that turned out to be completely false involving the Duke LaCrosse team and the black girl. They were out in the streets pounding their chests, calling it racially motivated, and they wanted JUSTICE for this poor little black victim who turned out to be a headcase. Did they ever APOLOGIZE to those boys??? NOPE. So I don't think Sharpton should hold his breath waiting on an apology for Rush just telling it like it is.
Sharpton must be needing some cash because he also is trying to hang his "getting some media attention" hat on Sheriff Arpaio as well. Guess the recession has hit Race Baiting too.
Last edited on Mon Oct 19th, 2009 08:36 pm by Razenkn
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 07:35 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: I cant believe they dropped Rush from his quest to invest in the St Louis Rams. I was so hoping that he did so that ticket sales would drop and St Louis would be boycotted and the Team and City would fail. I know that is so pubbiecant, but what is fair for one is fair for all now isnt it??? I heard this morning he's filing lawsuits for untrue stories -- gasp!
Yes he thinks someone saying something negative about him requires him to sue. LOL this guy is pure and simple the biggest idiot running the pubbiecants today. I wonder why they swoon over their little God so much?????
Then there's the other side of the coin...Sharpton - the baiter and ambulance chaser. Anyone suprised over this pot and kettle drama needs to wake up...cuz there's an agenda that goes much deeper than these two guys!
Sharpton Threatens to Sue Limbaugh Over His WSJ Column
Saturday, October 17, 2009
NEW YORK — The Rev. Al Sharpton on Saturday threatened to sue conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh for writing in a column that the civil rights leader played a role in two New York race riots.
In a column published by the Wall Street Journal on Saturday about his derailed bid to become part-owner of the St. Louis Rams, he accuses Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of making comments that helped get him booted from a group that was trying to buy the NFL team.
Limbaugh derided Sharpton as having played "a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot" and the "1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot."
Those comments prompted a quick retort from Sharpton, who called both allegations false.
Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. He did deliver a eulogy at the funeral of the youth whose death in a traffic accident triggered the violence, but that didn't happen until the violence ended.
Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot.
Sharpton's organization had, like other black groups, been involved in picketing the business over its plans to expand into space occupied by a black-owned business, but he said he couldn't be blamed for the madman's rampage.
"Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit," said a written statement released Saturday by Sharpton's spokeswoman. "He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal."
A spokesman for Limbaugh, Tony Knight, of Sitrick and Company, did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment
|
Biggerthanabreadbox
Member
| Joined: | Sat Oct 10th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 60 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 01:46 pm |
|
callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: LLL, this article is a complete backpedal. I saw the video of her saying it. There's no denying it. Now she wants to blame it on a dead guy for giving it to her? She also wants to say that others did it too? That's her big excuse?!
She said she turns to him OFTEN. This means she gets a lot of her ideas from him, not just this one. If she turns to him OFTEN, why does she need to hear the quote from someone else? Seems very much like she is taking it back in some ways.
Claiming to admire Mao for his "political philosophy" is dreadful and now she's trying to sugar coat it. Sorry Anita. You need to just admit it.
It took her 3 days to come up with this nauseating justification.
LLL, Beck isn't the one who is wrong here. You are just getting your information from sites that want to help defend these idiots. I watched the episode of Beck and watched her make those comments. Did you? Didn't think so!
Really now...who cares...we have a Repub. in the cabinet..certainly that could be far worse than someone who referred to Mao....
Don't worry about that. Obama is appointing czars all over the place that are Mao and Marx supporters, so I'm sure his voice will be drowned out by the rest in no time if it hasn't already been. You should be glad about that.
Well, the term 'czars' was a Fox news invention...he didn't have the benefit of using his dad's old boy network to run the country under his name.
I don't care about the origin of the word. The issue is, he's got people advising him and running this country who are appointed into positions that he has created that are not approved by senate, are not vetted, and are there to support an agenda rather than get him through crises. Call it what you want, but there are 20 or 30, maybe even more by now, that have titles and jobs such as "Green Czar" or "Car Czar" and "Pay Czar" that are making policy and decisions without any sort of check and balance.
And fear not, Obama is very well connected. His daddy has set him up with a network of some really interesting "movers and shakers" in Chicago. It's no coincidence that he and the powerful Valerie Jarrett are so close. Valerie comes from an intricate network of people with an agenda contrary to the long held views and values of this country.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 07:05 am |
|
Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: LLL, this article is a complete backpedal. I saw the video of her saying it. There's no denying it. Now she wants to blame it on a dead guy for giving it to her? She also wants to say that others did it too? That's her big excuse?!
She said she turns to him OFTEN. This means she gets a lot of her ideas from him, not just this one. If she turns to him OFTEN, why does she need to hear the quote from someone else? Seems very much like she is taking it back in some ways.
Claiming to admire Mao for his "political philosophy" is dreadful and now she's trying to sugar coat it. Sorry Anita. You need to just admit it.
It took her 3 days to come up with this nauseating justification.
LLL, Beck isn't the one who is wrong here. You are just getting your information from sites that want to help defend these idiots. I watched the episode of Beck and watched her make those comments. Did you? Didn't think so!
Really now...who cares...we have a Repub. in the cabinet..certainly that could be far worse than someone who referred to Mao....
Don't worry about that. Obama is appointing czars all over the place that are Mao and Marx supporters, so I'm sure his voice will be drowned out by the rest in no time if it hasn't already been. You should be glad about that.
Well, the term 'czars' was a Fox news invention...he didn't have the benefit of using his dad's old boy network to run the country under his name.
|
Biggerthanabreadbox
Member
| Joined: | Sat Oct 10th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 60 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 05:47 am |
|
callmelou wrote: Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: LLL, this article is a complete backpedal. I saw the video of her saying it. There's no denying it. Now she wants to blame it on a dead guy for giving it to her? She also wants to say that others did it too? That's her big excuse?!
She said she turns to him OFTEN. This means she gets a lot of her ideas from him, not just this one. If she turns to him OFTEN, why does she need to hear the quote from someone else? Seems very much like she is taking it back in some ways.
Claiming to admire Mao for his "political philosophy" is dreadful and now she's trying to sugar coat it. Sorry Anita. You need to just admit it.
It took her 3 days to come up with this nauseating justification.
LLL, Beck isn't the one who is wrong here. You are just getting your information from sites that want to help defend these idiots. I watched the episode of Beck and watched her make those comments. Did you? Didn't think so!
Really now...who cares...we have a Repub. in the cabinet..certainly that could be far worse than someone who referred to Mao....
Don't worry about that. Obama is appointing czars all over the place that are Mao and Marx supporters, so I'm sure his voice will be drowned out by the rest in no time if it hasn't already been. You should be glad about that.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19th, 2009 05:42 am |
|
Biggerthanabreadbox wrote: LLL, this article is a complete backpedal. I saw the video of her saying it. There's no denying it. Now she wants to blame it on a dead guy for giving it to her? She also wants to say that others did it too? That's her big excuse?!
She said she turns to him OFTEN. This means she gets a lot of her ideas from him, not just this one. If she turns to him OFTEN, why does she need to hear the quote from someone else? Seems very much like she is taking it back in some ways.
Claiming to admire Mao for his "political philosophy" is dreadful and now she's trying to sugar coat it. Sorry Anita. You need to just admit it.
It took her 3 days to come up with this nauseating justification.
LLL, Beck isn't the one who is wrong here. You are just getting your information from sites that want to help defend these idiots. I watched the episode of Beck and watched her make those comments. Did you? Didn't think so!
Really now...who cares...we have a Repub. in the cabinet..certainly that could be far worse than someone who referred to Mao....
|
Current time is 11:31 pm | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...   |
|
|
|
