| Author | Post |
|---|
goldrush
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1403 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 08:51 pm |
|
ItsAllAConspiracy wrote: goldrush wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified". Naaaaa, you think after two terms he's more qualified? Duh -- God willing OR is this why some are so concerned about Pres Obama's possible unpreparedness or lack of related experience?
Bush was qualified at get his friends good jobs at the expense of running business into the ground and bankrupting them. He avoided combat himself and feels mighty fine sending the real heroes off to combat while knowing he stayed home and hid. Yeah talk about Kool-Aid. This guy must spike his with the best stuff ever to keep the pubbies so blinded by his loving smile. Ahhhhh Bush... LOL talk about lovebugs, he killed the economy made his private war longer than WW2 and wasted trillions on the Iraqi's and not even a squeak from the pubbies. Just loving coos... Awwww
Obama would die for a resume that included managing general partner of the Texas Rangers, Governor of Texas or could boast of having a Harvard MBA.
Uhhh der... Republican... Smart??? Why, why that's umpossible!!!
As I said, love your sarcasm. Right on!
|
ItsAllAConspiracy
Member
| Joined: | Thu Aug 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 383 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 08:42 pm |
|
goldrush wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified". Naaaaa, you think after two terms he's more qualified? Duh -- God willing OR is this why some are so concerned about Pres Obama's possible unpreparedness or lack of related experience?
Bush was qualified at get his friends good jobs at the expense of running business into the ground and bankrupting them. He avoided combat himself and feels mighty fine sending the real heroes off to combat while knowing he stayed home and hid. Yeah talk about Kool-Aid. This guy must spike his with the best stuff ever to keep the pubbies so blinded by his loving smile. Ahhhhh Bush... LOL talk about lovebugs, he killed the economy made his private war longer than WW2 and wasted trillions on the Iraqi's and not even a squeak from the pubbies. Just loving coos... Awwww
Obama would die for a resume that included managing general partner of the Texas Rangers, Governor of Texas or could boast of having a Harvard MBA.
Uhhh der... Republican... Smart??? Why, why that's umpossible!!!
|
goldrush
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1403 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 08:36 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified". Naaaaa, you think after two terms he's more qualified? Duh -- God willing OR is this why some are so concerned about Pres Obama's possible unpreparedness or lack of related experience?
Bush was qualified at get his friends good jobs at the expense of running business into the ground and bankrupting them. He avoided combat himself and feels mighty fine sending the real heroes off to combat while knowing he stayed home and hid. Yeah talk about Kool-Aid. This guy must spike his with the best stuff ever to keep the pubbies so blinded by his loving smile. Ahhhhh Bush... LOL talk about lovebugs, he killed the economy made his private war longer than WW2 and wasted trillions on the Iraqi's and not even a squeak from the pubbies. Just loving coos... Awwww
Obama would die for a resume that included managing general partner of the Texas Rangers, Governor of Texas or could boast of having a Harvard MBA.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 04:53 am |
|
Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified". Naaaaa, you think after two terms he's more qualified? Duh -- God willing OR is this why some are so concerned about Pres Obama's possible unpreparedness or lack of related experience?
Bush was qualified at get his friends good jobs at the expense of running business into the ground and bankrupting them. He avoided combat himself and feels mighty fine sending the real heroes off to combat while knowing he stayed home and hid. Yeah talk about Kool-Aid. This guy must spike his with the best stuff ever to keep the pubbies so blinded by his loving smile. Ahhhhh Bush... LOL talk about lovebugs, he killed the economy made his private war longer than WW2 and wasted trillions on the Iraqi's and not even a squeak from the pubbies. Just loving coos... Awwww
|
Mamazoyd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jul 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2060 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 02:51 am |
|
goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified". Naaaaa, you think after two terms he's more qualified? Duh -- God willing OR is this why some are so concerned about Pres Obama's possible unpreparedness or lack of related experience?
Last edited on Wed Sep 16th, 2009 02:52 am by Mamazoyd
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 02:03 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: It was kinda entertaining like his deer in headlights reaction to 9/11. He was so prepared for that too. 
Give the guy a break already luci...that is as partisan as it gets. How do you think you would react if someone whispered in your ear that the US is under attack when it was the least of your worries at that moment and it's up to you to protect the entire nation 300 MILLION people? He's sitting in front of these little kids and now he has a full blown crisis and true catastrophe, not a made up one and his mind must have been going a 1,000 miles an hour. I think of all the criticism of GWB, this might be the most mean spirited. You can beat him up all you want, but this is when GWB and I bonded, this is when he shined...I think he is a true American Hero. He stepped up to the plate like nobody I have ever seen and he was resolute, determined and effective. God Bless him. 
|
goldrush
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1403 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:43 am |
|
Mamazoyd wrote: goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
I think Bush may have the edge on "qualified".
|
Mamazoyd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jul 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2060 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:37 am |
|
goldrush wrote: Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well. None of them would be any better prepared than the others. I know, I know, the conservatives would like us to think that they are more prepared than the other guy, in this case President Obama. It is an accumulated effort on the strategic parts of the administration to react appropriately. Bush really should learn to keep some of his thoughts to himself -- he's not the best person to be dissing someone else. At least his wife is gracious.
|
goldrush
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1403 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:32 am |
|
| You must have failed the breathalyzer test. It's good to know you made it home. Last edited on Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:32 am by goldrush
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:27 am |
|
| It was kinda entertaining like his deer in headlights reaction to 9/11. He was so prepared for that too.
|
goldrush
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1403 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:26 am |
|
Mamazoyd wrote: Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
Good point. 'bama is ill prepared to be leader of the free world. For that matter, president of these united states. His domestic agenda is falling apart. Oh well.Last edited on Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:27 am by goldrush
|
Mamazoyd
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jul 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2060 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:19 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Bush's book should be called "Memoirs of a Howdy Doody Doll". This man had more people pulling the strings of his presidency then the last 15 presidents combined. To think he said someone doesnt have a clue. LOL, this book should be in the humor section if it were not so sad what he did to America. I guess not having a clue about our economy, how to fight the real terrorist and healthcare were not a major concern for his little mind.
Bush on Obama: 'This guy has no clue'
Posted: September 15th, 2009 05:54 PM ET
From CNN's Lauren Kornreich
Bush on Obama: 'This guy has no clue'.
WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former President George W. Bush "seemed to feel considerable unease" with John McCain as the Republican presidential nominee, according to ex-speechwriter Matt Latimer in his tell-all memoir on his days in the White House.
In Latimer's new book, "Speech-less: Tales of a White House Survivor," set to hit bookstores on September 22, he reveals Bush's reactions to the economic collapse, the presidential campaign, and other memorable events. GQ published an excerpt from the memoir in its October issue.
Latimer said Bush liked Mitt Romney best and that he was "clearly not impressed with the McCain operation." Latimer said the former president wanted to appear with McCain at a campaign event in Phoenix, but after he was told the then-Republican nominee couldn't get enough people to show up, he called it a "cruel hoax."
"'He couldn't get 500 people? I could get that many people to turn out in Crawford.' He shook his head. 'This is a five-spiral crash, boys.'"
Bush presumed Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee, according to Latimer, and was extremely critical of Barack Obama. Latimer said Bush was "ticked off" after one of Obama's speeches and he said the future president wasn't "remotely qualified" for the challenges of the job.
"(Bush) came in one day to rehearse a speech, fuming. 'This is a dangerous world,' he said for no apparent reason, 'and this cat isn't remotely qualified to handle it. This guy has no clue, I promise you,'" Latimer said.
Latimer also made the controversial assertion that after Sarah Palin was tapped as McCain's running mate, Bush reportedly asked whether she was "the governor of Guam" and said that she was "not even remotely prepared." A former Bush and Palin aide has challenged the accuracy of the charge.
Wow, this is rather convoluted. And Bush with "this is a dangerous world" -- ya think? And like he was prepared? Who would have considered him anymore prepared than Obama to handle anything? Crazy, just crazy.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16th, 2009 01:02 am |
|
Bush's book should be called "Memoirs of a Howdy Doody Doll". This man had more people pulling the strings of his presidency then the last 15 presidents combined. To think he said someone doesnt have a clue. LOL, this book should be in the humor section if it were not so sad what he did to America. I guess not having a clue about our economy, how to fight the real terrorist and healthcare were not a major concern for his little mind.
Bush on Obama: 'This guy has no clue'
Posted: September 15th, 2009 05:54 PM ET
From CNN's Lauren Kornreich
Bush on Obama: 'This guy has no clue'.
WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former President George W. Bush "seemed to feel considerable unease" with John McCain as the Republican presidential nominee, according to ex-speechwriter Matt Latimer in his tell-all memoir on his days in the White House.
In Latimer's new book, "Speech-less: Tales of a White House Survivor," set to hit bookstores on September 22, he reveals Bush's reactions to the economic collapse, the presidential campaign, and other memorable events. GQ published an excerpt from the memoir in its October issue.
Latimer said Bush liked Mitt Romney best and that he was "clearly not impressed with the McCain operation." Latimer said the former president wanted to appear with McCain at a campaign event in Phoenix, but after he was told the then-Republican nominee couldn't get enough people to show up, he called it a "cruel hoax."
"'He couldn't get 500 people? I could get that many people to turn out in Crawford.' He shook his head. 'This is a five-spiral crash, boys.'"
Bush presumed Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee, according to Latimer, and was extremely critical of Barack Obama. Latimer said Bush was "ticked off" after one of Obama's speeches and he said the future president wasn't "remotely qualified" for the challenges of the job.
"(Bush) came in one day to rehearse a speech, fuming. 'This is a dangerous world,' he said for no apparent reason, 'and this cat isn't remotely qualified to handle it. This guy has no clue, I promise you,'" Latimer said.
Latimer also made the controversial assertion that after Sarah Palin was tapped as McCain's running mate, Bush reportedly asked whether she was "the governor of Guam" and said that she was "not even remotely prepared." A former Bush and Palin aide has challenged the accuracy of the charge.
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12th, 2009 01:11 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: callmelou wrote: Razenkn wrote: No failure here......
John Stossel's Take
Commentary from Co-Anchor of ABC News' "20/20"
It's time for a change.
In one month, I leave ABC News.
In October, I will join the folks at Fox.
I plan to do a one hour prime time show every week on FBN, the Fox Business Channel, and contribute to various existing programs on Fox News Channel.
I’m grateful to ABC News for allowing me to do stories that challenged conventional wisdom, and occasionally enraged many of its viewers. But it’s said that everyone should change jobs every 7 years. I’ve been at ABC for 28 years ...
In my new job, I want to dig into the meaning of the words “liberty” and “limited government”. ABC enabled me to do some of that, but Fox offers me more airtime and a new challenge.
I’m still considering what I will do with my own show, one hour each week. Economics certainly. Exercises in understanding libertarianism. My “take” on the issues of the day. Kind of like this blog. In fact, maybe we’ll call it, Stossel’s Take?
I ask you for your ideas. A studio audience? Should I wander around Congress?
To be continued.....
Wow..and he's not even a 28 yo blonde chick who doesn't eat.
That sounds a little jealous to me......MEOW..!!! Don't take this personally because I don't mean it that way but are you old and have a weight problem or something, these young good looking and smart women seem to annoy the crap out of you for some reason....LOL
Hon......I think you have me confused with the person you're married to.Last edited on Sat Sep 12th, 2009 06:08 am by callmelou
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11th, 2009 11:52 pm |
|
callmelou wrote: Razenkn wrote: No failure here......
John Stossel's Take
Commentary from Co-Anchor of ABC News' "20/20"
It's time for a change.
In one month, I leave ABC News.
In October, I will join the folks at Fox.
I plan to do a one hour prime time show every week on FBN, the Fox Business Channel, and contribute to various existing programs on Fox News Channel.
I’m grateful to ABC News for allowing me to do stories that challenged conventional wisdom, and occasionally enraged many of its viewers. But it’s said that everyone should change jobs every 7 years. I’ve been at ABC for 28 years ...
In my new job, I want to dig into the meaning of the words “liberty” and “limited government”. ABC enabled me to do some of that, but Fox offers me more airtime and a new challenge.
I’m still considering what I will do with my own show, one hour each week. Economics certainly. Exercises in understanding libertarianism. My “take” on the issues of the day. Kind of like this blog. In fact, maybe we’ll call it, Stossel’s Take?
I ask you for your ideas. A studio audience? Should I wander around Congress?
To be continued.....
Wow..and he's not even a 28 yo blonde chick who doesn't eat.
That sounds a little jealous to me......MEOW..!!! Don't take this personally because I don't mean it that way but are you old and have a weight problem or something, these young good looking and smart women seem to annoy the crap out of you for some reason....LOL
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11th, 2009 10:56 pm |
|
Razenkn wrote: No failure here......
John Stossel's Take
Commentary from Co-Anchor of ABC News' "20/20"
It's time for a change.
In one month, I leave ABC News.
In October, I will join the folks at Fox.
I plan to do a one hour prime time show every week on FBN, the Fox Business Channel, and contribute to various existing programs on Fox News Channel.
I’m grateful to ABC News for allowing me to do stories that challenged conventional wisdom, and occasionally enraged many of its viewers. But it’s said that everyone should change jobs every 7 years. I’ve been at ABC for 28 years ...
In my new job, I want to dig into the meaning of the words “liberty” and “limited government”. ABC enabled me to do some of that, but Fox offers me more airtime and a new challenge.
I’m still considering what I will do with my own show, one hour each week. Economics certainly. Exercises in understanding libertarianism. My “take” on the issues of the day. Kind of like this blog. In fact, maybe we’ll call it, Stossel’s Take?
I ask you for your ideas. A studio audience? Should I wander around Congress?
To be continued.....
Wow..and he's not even a 28 yo blonde chick who doesn't eat.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11th, 2009 04:23 pm |
|
No failure here......
John Stossel's Take
Commentary from Co-Anchor of ABC News' "20/20"
It's time for a change.
In one month, I leave ABC News.
In October, I will join the folks at Fox.
I plan to do a one hour prime time show every week on FBN, the Fox Business Channel, and contribute to various existing programs on Fox News Channel.
I’m grateful to ABC News for allowing me to do stories that challenged conventional wisdom, and occasionally enraged many of its viewers. But it’s said that everyone should change jobs every 7 years. I’ve been at ABC for 28 years ...
In my new job, I want to dig into the meaning of the words “liberty” and “limited government”. ABC enabled me to do some of that, but Fox offers me more airtime and a new challenge.
I’m still considering what I will do with my own show, one hour each week. Economics certainly. Exercises in understanding libertarianism. My “take” on the issues of the day. Kind of like this blog. In fact, maybe we’ll call it, Stossel’s Take?
I ask you for your ideas. A studio audience? Should I wander around Congress?
To be continued.....
|
callmelou
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 28th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 583 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11th, 2009 05:42 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Being the author of the rules did not entitled you to be at the head of the line missy. Please get an application and apply like everyone else. New ticket # 964...
Now serving # 12.....
Hellooooooo, I'm #1...already cleared for duty! You have the right to yank said clearance...but security checks re: said rules, are part of my job description. Now if you've got the time to do it all yourself...then fire my hard work'n silly A$$ and I'll sit back and collect unemployment. okie dokie? 
Ok fine you win, you still have a job. Oh and by the way your healthcare deduction is now $700 a month for only you and the fact that you are 3.2 ozs overweight will increase by an additional $25 along with the coffee drinking surcharge of $15 a month. So on payday you owe me $741. There are no increases for the next 17 years either.
Your generous offer is almost too good to refuse...but I'm think'n I could make more in consulting fees as an independent contractor for DarkSide Inc. I'll have my peeps call your peeps to set up a time for you and I to do a little more negotiating...LOL
Hi, there. Just wondering: what the hell are you two talking about?
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10th, 2009 07:46 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Being the author of the rules did not entitled you to be at the head of the line missy. Please get an application and apply like everyone else. New ticket # 964...
Now serving # 12.....
Hellooooooo, I'm #1...already cleared for duty! You have the right to yank said clearance...but security checks re: said rules, are part of my job description. Now if you've got the time to do it all yourself...then fire my hard work'n silly A$$ and I'll sit back and collect unemployment. okie dokie?
Ok fine you win, you still have a job. Oh and by the way your healthcare deduction is now $700 a month for only you and the fact that you are 3.2 ozs overweight will increase by an additional $25 along with the coffee drinking surcharge of $15 a month. So on payday you owe me $741. There are no increases for the next 17 years either.
Your generous offer is almost too good to refuse...but I'm think'n I could make more in consulting fees as an independent contractor for DarkSide Inc. I'll have my peeps call your peeps to set up a time for you and I to do a little more negotiating...LOL
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10th, 2009 02:18 am |
|
BigSurprize wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Being the author of the rules did not entitled you to be at the head of the line missy. Please get an application and apply like everyone else. New ticket # 964...
Now serving # 12.....
Hellooooooo, I'm #1...already cleared for duty! You have the right to yank said clearance...but security checks re: said rules, are part of my job description. Now if you've got the time to do it all yourself...then fire my hard work'n silly A$$ and I'll sit back and collect unemployment. okie dokie?
Ok fine you win, you still have a job. Oh and by the way your healthcare deduction is now $700 a month for only you and the fact that you are 3.2 ozs overweight will increase by an additional $25 along with the coffee drinking surcharge of $15 a month. So on payday you owe me $741. There are no increases for the next 17 years either.
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Sep 9th, 2009 07:24 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Being the author of the rules did not entitled you to be at the head of the line missy. Please get an application and apply like everyone else. New ticket # 964...
Now serving # 12.....
Hellooooooo, I'm #1...already cleared for duty! You have the right to yank said clearance...but security checks re: said rules, are part of my job description. Now if you've got the time to do it all yourself...then fire my hard work'n silly A$$ and I'll sit back and collect unemployment. okie dokie?
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 9th, 2009 06:42 pm |
|
Being the author of the rules did not entitled you to be at the head of the line missy. Please get an application and apply like everyone else. New ticket # 964...
Now serving # 12.....
|
BigSurprize
Member
|
Posted: Wed Sep 9th, 2009 03:21 am |
|
| You can answer or ignore (per the rules)...but sometimes ya gotta say what the heck! Who are these far right wacko terrorists you speak of and WHAT, pray tell...have they done?
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 9th, 2009 02:47 am |
|
I hope that stooping to terrorist activities like some of the wackos on the right is not spreading to the wackos on the left. This is a disgrace period.
RNC
Posted: September 8th, 2009 05:57 PM ET
From CNN Political Editor Mark Preston and Bob Kovach
WASHINGTON (CNN) – The Republican National Committee was placed in lockdown for 1.5 hours Tuesday afternoon after a suspicious package was discovered in the mailroom.
The U.S. Capitol Police investigated and determined there was no threat. Initial results from the tests on the scene indicate the substance was sugar. A hazmat team and other authorities have left the scene.
The building was reopened to the public at around 5:40 p.m. ET.
“There was a suspicious package found in the RNC mailroom,” RNC spokeswoman Gail Gitcho told CNN. “We worked with the U.S. Capitol Police to investigate the situation and have been given the all clear.”
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 09:36 pm |
|
Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote:
Luci, don't want to break your heart here but honestly, I don't ever think about what you are doing. Really, I don't. That is a world of your own making. I wasn't aware anyone was leaving you alone but if that's what you want then you are on the wrong forum. LOL
This would be another untruth from you since you apparently do, caused you commented.
There's those marbles in the mouth again luci, I have no idea what you just said. Please translate.
I am sorry you are unable to comprehend what you wrote. I merely made a comment about it. So you do care what I am doing. Here you are yet again. If you didn't care you wouldn't post. I appreciate the compassion I find it surprising and comforting to know that in the end you are a human being.. Happy Labor Day Raz.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 08:35 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote:
Luci, don't want to break your heart here but honestly, I don't ever think about what you are doing. Really, I don't. That is a world of your own making. I wasn't aware anyone was leaving you alone but if that's what you want then you are on the wrong forum. LOL
This would be another untruth from you since you apparently do, caused you commented.
There's those marbles in the mouth again luci, I have no idea what you just said. Please translate.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 07:56 pm |
|
Razenkn wrote:
Luci, don't want to break your heart here but honestly, I don't ever think about what you are doing. Really, I don't. That is a world of your own making. I wasn't aware anyone was leaving you alone but if that's what you want then you are on the wrong forum. LOL
This would be another untruth from you since you apparently do, caused you commented.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 07:49 pm |
|
Luci, don't want to break your heart here but honestly, I don't ever think about what you are doing. Really, I don't. That is a world of your own making. I wasn't aware anyone was leaving you alone but if that's what you want then you are on the wrong forum. LOL
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 07:44 pm |
|
Big Surprise where are you??? They broke the Cone of Silence rules!!!!
Whats the matter Raz, could not stay away. Sorry you only like a onesided debate and think you are (hehehe) shutting us down with your facts. Did you PM your Pollyman to get some polls on Healthcare and post them cause you never have any facts. LOL. Until then leave me to my cone of silence excile that you and your merry band think you have put me in.
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 02:49 am |
|
CNN Poll: Majority Now Oppose Obamacare
posted at 4:06 pm on September 2, 2009 by Allahpundit
48/51, with most of those in opposition “strongly” against it. The crosstabs are full of goodies — e.g., just 21 percent think their family will be better off under ObamaCare, 55 percent think they’ll pay more for treatment versus just 19 percent who say less — but here’s my favorite data point.
He’s been swearing up and down for months that he’s not after a government takeover of health care, and this is what he gets. Likewise, after assuring us ad nauseam that seniors won’t lose any Medicare benefits, the split found by CNN on whether Medicare recipients will likely be better off or worse off under ObamaCare is … 26/43. The guy’s credibility is shot. And yet, as I write this, news is breaking that he’s planning to address a joint session of Congress a week from today, on the dopey theory that one more chorus of “if you like your plan, you can keep your plan” will somehow rally an increasingly skeptical public to his side. We don’t believe you anymore, Barry: Too many out-and-out lies about the numbers, too much doublespeak from prominent Democrats about the public option as a trojan horse for single-payer — just “too much bulls**t” generally, as one attendee at Steny Hoyer’s town hall put it. No wonder the Democrats’ huge lead in party affiliation has collapsed since May.
Two more data points. Bear in mind as you study them that a majority still claims to be in favor of a public option:
 So. So deep is the public’s worry about further government expansion right now that they’re willing to sacrifice measures they might otherwise agree with in principle (like the public option) simply to put the brakes on and preserve the status quo.
Democrats may counter that some polls show that the actual pieces of Obama’s plan have majority support. This doesn’t matter. What matters is that what the public understands to be in Obama’s plan isn’t popular. Polling from 2005 showed that Bush’s actual plan for social security – allowing younger workers to invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in private retirement accounts – split the public 50-50, while people disapproved of the perceived Bush plan – “privatization” – by a 2:1 margin. Perception is what matters, and right now the public is against what it perceives as being the Obama plan; the late summer push to educate voters seems to have failed.
Nor can Democrats likely count on the public “waking up” to what a great bill they’ve passed by 2010. Key portions of it, such as the “public option,” don’t come into being until well after the election.
Again, this is fundamentally a credibility problem. The public may love love love the public option in isolation, but it views the promise of a modest, deficit-neutral program against the backdrop of government expansion in all directions and mind-boggling debt as far as the eye can see. And since that backdrop’s going to remain for the foreseeable future, I don’t see how Obama avoids this same problem with the rest of his agenda going forward. His prospects are, shall we say, thoroughly wee-wee’d up.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 02:44 am |
|
luci wrote...
There is no other direction for republicans to go so up is a good thing.... LOL
The presz is so bad and running the counrty badly and blah blah blah, yes he is spending like a republican at a military hardware expo. He is in front of the TV camera just about as many times and GWB bumbled a speech. Even in despair and economic woes Americans still dont trust the pubbies.
Huh?? Are you writing with marbles in your mouth luci? LOL I bet you didn't write this now did you?? Did you lift this from one of the goony loony huff and puffies?? It makes no sense but seriously, you can pound your chest all day about the Republicans being the come back kids but it doesn't change the facts. This is without a doubt the most corrupt, crazy, radical, hate filled admin in our entire history. It's becoming easier and easier to expose them because they continue to get fuller and fuller of themselves and can't stop talking. LOL I don't know that the republicans are so good or if it's the extremists Barack Hussein Obama surrounds himself with is so incredibly bad. Could be a toss up, but people are paying attention and they ain't liking what they are hearing and seeing. These guys don't get much more anti American and your luvbug is right in the middle of them, how about trying to explain that. You don't because you can't.
Last edited on Sun Sep 6th, 2009 02:45 am by Razenkn
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2009 01:53 am |
|
There is no other direction for republicans to go so up is a good thing.... LOL
The presz is so bad and running the counrty badly and blah blah blah, yes he is spending like a republican at a military hardware expo. He is in front of the TV camera just about as many times and GWB bumbled a speech. Even in despair and economic woes Americans still dont trust the pubbies.
Poll: Republicans make gains, but still trail Democrats
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Despite the drop in President Obama's approval ratings, Republican policies are still not as popular as Democratic policies, according to a new national poll.
Fifty-two percent of people in CNN poll believe Barack Obama's policies will move country in right direction.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday morning indicates the GOP has gained some ground in polls in recent months, but Democrats still hold the advantage on key issues such as the economy and health care.
Fifty-two percent of people questioned say the president's policies will move the country in the right direction. An equal percentage feel the same way about the policies of the Democrats in Congress.
What do Americans think of Republican policies? Forty-three percent say the GOP's policies will move the country in the right direction. Nearly half of those polled said congressional Republicans would move the country in the wrong direction.
But the percentage of people who think Obama will move the country in the right direction has dropped 11 points since May, while congressional Democrats have seen a 5 point dip. Congressional Republicans have seen a 4 point rise over the same period.
Polls in recent weeks have shown Obama's approval rating in the mid-to-low 50s -- a significant drop from early summer, when most polls had his rating at 60 percent or higher.
"Barack Obama's drop in the polls has not made the Republican Party more popular than the Democrats," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. Still, he adds, "The GOP may be in a more competitive position -- a comparison with poll results from May suggests that the gap between the parties has been closing."
The survey suggests that, by 13 points, Americans think the Democrats rather than the Republicans would do a better job handling the economy and Medicare. The Democrats have a 9 point advantage on health care and an 8 point edge on Afghanistan. The two parties are tied on the question of how they'd handle taxes and the federal budget deficit. The GOP holds a clear advantage on just one issue -- terrorism.
According to the poll, six in 10 say that the GOP has not done enough to cooperate with Obama. A bare majority says the president has done enough to cooperate with Republicans, a significant drop the April result for the same question.
"Two-thirds of all Americans are angry at the way the government in Washington is working, and the Democrats get the brunt of that anger," adds Holland. "But the amount of anger has not quite reached the level that polls found in 1994, when voters turned the Democrats out of power in Congress and elected a GOP majority for the first time since the 1950s."
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted August 28-31, with 1,010 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the overall survey, and plus or minus 4.5 percentage points for the breakdowns by party.
|
HawgRider
Member
| Joined: | Thu Aug 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 199 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 5th, 2009 03:56 am |
|
| I can only say that I hope someday someone will stand up!
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 5th, 2009 02:29 am |
|
HawgRider wrote: LL.. Politicans don't take the blame for anything. They are above being blamed. They did it all for the good of the American People.
You know the people who are too stupid to do anything for themselves.
Aint that the truth Two stupids dont makem smart. Last edited on Sat Sep 5th, 2009 02:30 am by LucifersLandlord
|
HawgRider
Member
| Joined: | Thu Aug 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 199 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 5th, 2009 02:15 am |
|
LL.. Politicans don't take the blame for anything. They are above being blamed. They did it all for the good of the American People.
You know the people who are too stupid to do anything for themselves.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 5th, 2009 02:09 am |
|
Ernest went to Jail why not GWB? While I am no fan of GWB (no kidding) jail isnt the answer. If he and his bunch of lying cronies would come forward and admit fault then give them a presidential pardon. We know Pubbies cannot admit being wrong, but if they would ever realize its just the truth we want not their heads.
Could George W. Bush end up behind bars?
- (CNN) -- Could George W. Bush or some of his top aides end up behind bars?
George W. Bush could be investigated for the steps taken after 9/11.
It's extremely unlikely, but the Obama administration is taking its first steps along a path that could lead in that direction, with the investigation of Central Intelligence Agency interrogators involved in the war on terror.
"You don't know where these things are going to end up," former CIA agent Peter Brookes told me. "They could go to very high levels in the government."
The probe will focus on whether interrogators exceeded their instructions and broke the law when, for example, they choked a prisoner until he lost consciousness or threatened another one with a gun and a power drill.
There is no obvious enthusiasm in the Obama administration for second-guessing the CIA's efforts after September 11, 2001 to keep America safe.
President Obama has said several times he wants to "look forward, not back."
Republicans immediately criticized the new investigation and even some Democrats said it would be unpopular.
"This is not very good politically for the administration," said Democratic strategist James Carville. "The public clearly doesn't have much of an appetite for this."
But Attorney General Eric Holder said evidence of abuses was compelling enough to require it. No one knows what other evidence will ultimately compel the administration to do.
The American Civil Liberties Union, an activist organization that campaigns against prisoner abuse, says "any investigation that truly follows the facts where they lead would inevitably lead to prosecutions of high government officials,"
Does it sound far-fetched?
One Bush administration legal advisor, Jack Goldsmith, says his colleagues were acutely conscious that the president or his advisors could someday be investigated for the steps they took or approved after 9/11.
And remember that Bill Clinton was impeached for just lying about sex. Do you think George W. Bush or his top aides will end up behind bars? Sound off below
American politics is unpredictable, the investigation hasn't even begun and it will take a long time. My guess is that some very important people will be watching it closely.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 4th, 2009 01:54 am |
|
Here is a local picture of the TEA PARTY and their use of kids for protests and signs I am sure they understand.
Photos from the Glendale 'Tea Party' Protest: Kids & Parents Get Angry
|
designman124
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 14th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4262 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 1st, 2009 02:18 am |
|
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 1st, 2009 02:01 am |
|
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 1st, 2009 12:36 am |
|
Wow Cheney actually wrong!!! Never!! He cant be wrong he is revered by his mass of rightwing connies who will go to the grave saying he is right even if something proving him wrong surfaces.
Commentary: Cheney wrong on interrogations
Editor's note: Peter Bergen, CNN's national security analyst, is a fellow at the New America Foundation, a Washington-based think tank that promotes innovative thought from across the ideological spectrum, and at New York University's Center on Law and Security. He's the author of "The Osama bin Laden I Know: An Oral History of al Qaeda's Leader." This commentary is adapted from a longer article
Peter Bergen says the evidence is that coercive interrogations likely did more harm than good.
(CNN) -- Former Vice President Dick Cheney said in an interview Friday that just-released CIA documents demonstrate the effectiveness of coercive interrogation techniques.
"My sort of overwhelming view is that the enhanced interrogation techniques were absolutely essential in saving American lives and preventing attacks on the Unites States," Cheney told FOX News Sunday. "I think they were directly responsible for the fact that for eight years we had no further direct attacks on the United States."
So what do the newly-released CIA documents show, in combination with the other records on the matter already in the public domain?
The first al Qaeda member to be subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" was Abu Zubaydah, a Palestinian al Qaeda logistician in his early 30s. Zubaydah was captured in March 2002 in a shoot-out in Faisalabad, Pakistan.
He was the subject of intense interest from American officials as they believed he was the first al Qaeda insider whom they could interrogate who might know the form of the next terror attack. And so Zubaydah was the first prisoner to be placed in a secret overseas CIA prison, this one located in Thailand.
There he was interrogated by Ali Soufan, one of the FBI's few Arabic-speaking agents. Zubaydah described Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, al Qaeda's operational commander, as the mastermind of 9/11, and he confirmed that Mohammed's alias was "Mukhtar," an important clue in helping to track him down.
Abu Zubaydah's confirmation of Mohammed's role in the attacks on Washington and New York was arguably the single most important piece of information uncovered about al Qaeda after 9/11 and it was discovered during the course of a standard interrogation without recourse to any form of coercion. Soufan told Newsweek that "we were able to get the information about Khalid Sheik Mohammed in two days."
Later, over Soufan's vociferous objections, a CIA contractor stepped in to take over Abu Zubaydah's interrogations. The FBI's standard, non-coercive techniques were jettisoned and Abu Zubaydah was stripped naked, deprived of sleep, subjected to loud noise and wide variations in temperature and he was later "waterboarded" 83 times.
Following his arrest in Pakistan in March 2003, Mohammed was also subjected to intensive coercive measures. He was taken to a secret CIA prison in northern Poland where he initially proved resistant to interrogation. In the words of the 2004 CIA's inspector general report on detainees that was also released this week, Mohammed was an accomplished resister, provided only a few intelligence reports prior to the use of the waterboard, and analysis of that information revealed that much of it was outdated, inaccurate or incomplete."
Following his defiance, Mohammed was subjected to a number of coercive interrogation techniques including being waterboarded 183 times. But did Mohammed's coerced interrogations really lead to any substantive plots against the American homeland being averted? The short answer is no.
A document the government released in 2006 around the time Mohammed was transferred from his secret CIA prison to the prison camp at Guantanamo offered details on the plots he had hatched against the United States:
"KSM [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] launched several plots targeting the U.S. Homeland, including a plot in late 2001 to have ... suicide operatives hijack a plane over the Pacific and crash it into a skyscraper on the U.S. West Coast; a plan in early 2002 to send al-Qaeda operatives to conduct attacks in the U.S.; and a plot in early 2003 to employ a network of Pakistanis ... to smuggle explosives into New York and to target gas stations, railroad tracks and a bridge in New York."
The newly-released CIA documents merely rehash the range of anti-American plots cooked up by Mohammed that the government already made public three years ago. And while this "second wave" of attacks all sounded very frightening, there is no indication that these plots were ever more than just talk.
The chances of success, for instance, of al Qaeda's plan to attack the skyscraper on the West Coast -- since identified as the 73-story U.S. Bank Tower in Los Angeles -- were described by Mohammed in one court document to be "dismal."
Of the terrorists, alleged and otherwise, cited by the CIA inspector general that Mohammed fingered during his coercive interrogations, only Ohio truck driver Lyman Faris was an actual al Qaeda foot soldier living in the United States who had the serious intention to wreak havoc in America. However, he was not much of a competent terrorist: In 2002 he researched the feasibility of bringing down the Brooklyn Bridge by using a blowtorch, an enterprise akin to demolishing the Empire State Building with a firecracker.
If that was the most threatening plot the United States could discover by waterboarding the most senior al Qaeda member in American custody, it was thin stuff indeed. And when the English journalist David Rose asked FBI director Robert Mueller last year if he was aware of any attacks on America that had been disrupted thanks to intelligence obtained through "enhanced techniques," Mueller replied: "I don't believe that has been the case."
Historians will likely judge the putative intelligence gains made by abusive interrogation techniques were easily outweighed by the damage they caused to the United States' moral standing.
That is certainly the view of Adm. Dennis Blair, the director of national intelligence, who wrote in April 2009, "These techniques hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefits they gave us and they are not essential to our national security." Quite.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 05:41 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
LOL last word... BUMP.... Hey when you return from planet Raz how bout bringin them there facts with you. Havent seen any yet and as for corrections. I do believe we have been here before let me remind you again. I admit my mistakes and thank the person for correcting me. You just happen to be one person who hasnt done that and I know it burns... Sorry to have to remind you of all your mistakes there buddy. Nice try.
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
Still can't answer your charge eh luci? See that's my point. You throw those bombs out there but you can never back them up. Not surprised but then you shouldn't be surprised that nobody is listening to you. Planet RAZ?? I kind of like that! Maybe I will start a restaurant with that name and serve Liberal mixed message stew. What do you think???
LOL you think I care if you and your merry band of bloggers ignoring me hurts my feelings or dont listen. You are smaller than I thought. Once again why I dont need to back up my information. You have not proven it wrong. Never have, you just give us your opinion no back up.... LOL Run for president RAZ you are the transparency we are all looking for. Oh and to be a liberal I would need to be supporting what the president is doing and posting his message night and day like you do for the homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (America's Al Jazeera) and the radio moron or like you did for GWB even though his actions were criminal. I dont do that do I? Now there is another fact for you.
OH NO!!! You forgot to throw in Gov Palin's baby Trig!! Or...the RACIST remark...or the swastika card carrying right wing crazies....LOL
If you see no need to back up your bomb throwing statements then why do you bother coming on here and posting the goofiness??? Really, why do you waste your time? Nobody wants to hear someone on here day after day taking cheap shots with no facts and no information to offer, just nasty negative diatribe they get from huff and puffy (kind of a girlie site luci, maybe you should look elsewhere) and then try to defend your statements that have no merit????
It's hard to take you serious. See, we are paying attention and now we all know that attack crap with no facts Saul Alinsky Barack Hussein Obama teachings and we aren't listening anymore. It's old, it's outdated and it's weird take over America s**t that nobody wants to listen to anymore. That was 60's crazy talk. People love their Country, and that crazy talk ain't gonna change that.
We all know you get the leftie "attack Fox News" talking points but unless you actually watch any of the programs, it deems you null and void of any real meaningful debate. Here's a challenge for you luci, you watch one program on FOX and come on here and tell me how they are biased and crazy and we will debate that. Now that's a fair and balanced idea don't you think?
Sorry, I know that is kind of tough on you but facts are facts max. I'm just trying to help you out from looking foolish.
So now your trying to tell what I can and cannot post cause you dont like reading it??? Wow may wanna rethink that foolish comment when you are always calling people the blog police there sheriff. Keep'm coming Raz, you might actually find something factual and not look like the rightwing loon (your comment) trying to make wild and baseless attacks against me and what I post. I have nothing to prove to someone that has not proven anything to me or posted any facts. So we can do this all night if you would like or I will be the bigger man/ woman for you just in case you maybe and let you have the last word( you will do it anyway I am sure) to end your fruitless attacks. Goodnite....
Last edited on Mon Aug 31st, 2009 05:42 am by LucifersLandlord
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 05:27 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
LOL last word... BUMP.... Hey when you return from planet Raz how bout bringin them there facts with you. Havent seen any yet and as for corrections. I do believe we have been here before let me remind you again. I admit my mistakes and thank the person for correcting me. You just happen to be one person who hasnt done that and I know it burns... Sorry to have to remind you of all your mistakes there buddy. Nice try.
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
Still can't answer your charge eh luci? See that's my point. You throw those bombs out there but you can never back them up. Not surprised but then you shouldn't be surprised that nobody is listening to you. Planet RAZ?? I kind of like that! Maybe I will start a restaurant with that name and serve Liberal mixed message stew. What do you think???
LOL you think I care if you and your merry band of bloggers ignoring me hurts my feelings or dont listen. You are smaller than I thought. Once again why I dont need to back up my information. You have not proven it wrong. Never have, you just give us your opinion no back up.... LOL Run for president RAZ you are the transparency we are all looking for. Oh and to be a liberal I would need to be supporting what the president is doing and posting his message night and day like you do for the homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (America's Al Jazeera) and the radio moron or like you did for GWB even though his actions were criminal. I dont do that do I? Now there is another fact for you.
OH NO!!! You forgot to throw in Gov Palin's baby Trig!! Or...the RACIST remark...or the swastika card carrying right wing crazies....LOL
If you see no need to back up your bomb throwing statements then why do you bother coming on here and posting the goofiness??? Really, why do you waste your time? Nobody wants to hear someone on here day after day taking cheap shots with no facts and no information to offer, just nasty negative diatribe they get from huff and puffy (kind of a girlie site luci, maybe you should look elsewhere) and then try to defend your statements that have no merit????
It's hard to take you serious. See, we are paying attention and now we all know that attack crap with no facts Saul Alinsky Barack Hussein Obama teachings and we aren't listening anymore. It's old, it's outdated and it's weird take over America s**t that nobody wants to listen to anymore. That was 60's crazy talk. People love their Country, and that crazy talk ain't gonna change that.
We all know you get the leftie "attack Fox News" talking points but unless you actually watch any of the programs, it deems you null and void of any real meaningful debate. Here's a challenge for you luci, you watch one program on FOX and come on here and tell me how they are biased and crazy and we will debate that. Now that's a fair and balanced idea don't you think?
Sorry, I know that is kind of tough on you but facts are facts max. I'm just trying to help you out from looking foolish.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 05:11 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
LOL last word... BUMP.... Hey when you return from planet Raz how bout bringin them there facts with you. Havent seen any yet and as for corrections. I do believe we have been here before let me remind you again. I admit my mistakes and thank the person for correcting me. You just happen to be one person who hasnt done that and I know it burns... Sorry to have to remind you of all your mistakes there buddy. Nice try.
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
Still can't answer your charge eh luci? See that's my point. You throw those bombs out there but you can never back them up. Not surprised but then you shouldn't be surprised that nobody is listening to you. Planet RAZ?? I kind of like that! Maybe I will start a restaurant with that name and serve Liberal mixed message stew. What do you think???
LOL you think I care if you and your merry band of bloggers ignoring me hurts my feelings or dont listen. You are smaller than I thought. Once again why I dont need to back up my information. You have not proven it wrong. Never have, you just give us your opinion no back up.... LOL Run for president RAZ you are the transparency we are all looking for. Oh and to be a liberal I would need to be supporting what the president is doing and posting his message night and day like you do for the homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (America's Al Jazeera) and the radio moron or like you did for GWB even though his actions were criminal. I dont do that do I? Now there is another fact for you.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 04:56 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
LOL last word... BUMP.... Hey when you return from planet Raz how bout bringin them there facts with you. Havent seen any yet and as for corrections. I do believe we have been here before let me remind you again. I admit my mistakes and thank the person for correcting me. You just happen to be one person who hasnt done that and I know it burns... Sorry to have to remind you of all your mistakes there buddy. Nice try.
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
Still can't answer your charge eh luci? See that's my point. You throw those bombs out there but you can never back them up. Not surprised but then you shouldn't be surprised that nobody is listening to you. Planet RAZ?? I kind of like that! Maybe I will start a restaurant with that name and serve Liberal Mixed Message Stew. What do you think???
Last edited on Mon Aug 31st, 2009 05:04 am by Razenkn
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 04:43 am |
|
Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
LOL last word... BUMP.... Hey when you return from planet Raz how bout bringin them there facts with you. Havent seen any yet and as for corrections. I do believe we have been here before let me remind you again. I admit my mistakes and thank the person for correcting me. You just happen to be one person who hasnt done that and I know it burns... Sorry to have to remind you of all your mistakes there buddy. Nice try.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31st, 2009 02:35 am |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
Now you are sounding like the radical left paranoid fringe nutcakes. Seriously. You don't know how to have a normal debate. If you post something that is inaccurate I don't attack you, I simply state the truth. You can agree or disagree....that's called debate.. I don't think this is your thing, really, I know I've said this before but you can't just throw bombs out there without some facts to back them up. I always do. And when I disagree with you I tell you why and what the true facts are. You ain't gettin' this concept luci....You would be better served to stay on the huffy puff site and hang with folks who all agree with you. This doesn't seem to be working for you --
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2009 11:23 pm |
|
Razenkn wrote: LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
LOL, so I am supposed to post my information, which I usually attach an article and you attack it. I post an opinion, you attack it. I laugh, you attack it. I like moderate republicans (gasp), you attack it and them. And in the end , your fruitless attacks with no facts to support you. Ahhhhh to be a conservative must be great. Oh I saw the crazy right loons story too so nice try your quoting your homegrown terror squad from FAUX NEWS (Americas Al Jazeera) thats tasteful...
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2009 06:14 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
Ahem...Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
|
LucifersLandlord
Member
| Joined: | Thu Feb 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 2401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2009 04:18 pm |
|
| LOL, you are asking me to provide proof and facts. So far you have not provided a shred of truth for anything you have posted. Your RNC email fed garbage isnt fact there Raz and its disappointing to see you reduced to their email messenger. When you can think for yourself and post something interesting and factual I will pay attention. Take care and you can have the last word ....
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2009 04:11 pm |
|
LucifersLandlord wrote: Glenn Beck, Oreilly and FAUX NEWS (America's Al Jazeera) have made false claims that they are not inciting violence and hate at the town hall meetings. While they call for people to go to the meeting and speak their minds and shout and scream and do what is needed to interrupt the meetings at all cost they claim they are innocent. These despicable acts of violence against their own countrymen has reduced the conservative wacko right from just a bunch of crazies to a serious home grown threat to the public. These 1 % of the population are a shameful group. These loons on FNC need to be held accountable for their unpatriotic actions.
That was a perfect talking point. You guys are really good little liberal soldiers, I've not seen any repeat the diatribe word for word as well as you do. Huff and puffy? Are you really sucking up this stuff or are you just trying to jerk my chain? Cause I thought you were more intelligent than that, maybe I was wrong.
Name some of those "despicable" acts of violence being perpetrated by the CRAZY right loons luci, LOL. You can't because there aren't any.
Free speech...Nah. Heck, why not just shut them all down? Every single one of them. Barack Hussein Obama is already trying to get access to shutting down the internet like they were able to in Iran when the dissenters came out, why not shut down all communication for those who disagree? THen we could have DEAR LEADER in charge of our Country forever. Make no mistake about who he is working for and it's not you.
This is how out of touch with reality you are luci... FNC, have as many liberals reporting and guests as conservatives, but shoot, get rid of all of them because they actually report the truth and let us decide. You would know that if you ever watched it but you would rather take puffy's word as truth (it's a blog site for money, wake up).
What is shameful here is what you are ascribing to is a different kind of violence. It is called Shredding the Constitution and Oppression. Is that the world you want to live in luci because guess what? There will come a time when you won't agree with your luvbug and then what? DEAR LEADER won't give a crap.
Last edited on Sun Aug 30th, 2009 04:12 pm by Razenkn
|
Current time is 04:43 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...   |
|
|
|