| Author | Post |
|---|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 07:34 pm |
|
| I have some downtime at the moment. I thought I'd see what was happening in the blog. I don't have time once I'm at home.
|
incongruity
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jul 13th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 07:28 pm |
|
| So your at work now, posting on the blog?
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 07:10 pm |
|
Since I'm a new employee that was not an option they would allow. I have worked in the real world at Walsh Bros. as their Data Manager and Interim warehouse Manager until Target bought them out. I was the last to be laid off since my position was too critical to let me go in the first wave. I was unemployed for exactly 5 months to the day until I got this position at the VA.
So yes I have worked the real world and have been the victim of being laid off. I understand what's it's like to lose a job and wonder where the income will come from. Unemployment doesn't pay much ($265 weekly). A far cry from what I was making at Walsh Bros. I wanted to work at the VA since I retired to give back to the military retirees. It’s my way of saying thank you.
In my notary business I don’t charge any first responders a fee for my services.
|
incongruity
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jul 13th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 06:40 pm |
|
Let's see, if I have it right - you get retirement from the USAF - disability income - a new job with the VA - and you're running for council.
Looks to me like your new career field is sucking the taxpayers wallet. Have you tried working in the real world? The one where we get laid off, have pay cuts, reduced hours and/or lose benefits? Fixed incomes aren't much fun either.
Wow and sick leave after a week, dang that little waiting period, did you think of just taking it off without Pay?
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:57 pm |
|
It takes one pay period (2-weeks) to accumulate sick time and vacation hours but I wouldn't see a check for 3-weeks. So I hope you see the predicament I was in.
If your looking for a job go to usajobs.com for federal positions.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:47 pm |
|
Hey no problem just making observations. You only have to work 1 week to get sick time at the VA wow thats cool. No wonder health care is in the trouble it is in. Can you help me get a job like that?
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:44 pm |
|
| To give you an understanding why I didn't show is because I just started a new job at the Veterans Affairs in Phoenix on July 20th. I would had to work at least 40- hours to accumulate some sick time in order to attend. I did not want to miss the opportunity to address the committee but I had no choice so I had to decline.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:38 pm |
|
Seems hagan didnt show up either. I guess these guys will be councilman when they have time.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 12:09 pm |
|
No not televised but Lily form the republic will be tweeting it play by play. Not full of my self. I was just responding since i was given permission to approach the grand candidate. I forgot to ask yesterday how the republics editorial board interview went for him yesterday. Then i found out he didnt show. I guess he is the shy one. Too bad for him cause when the results of that interview hit the paper it just says he failed to show up. There is a thing about public office. Not taking advantage opportunities to get your message out in the only large newspaper wasnt too smart.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:26 am |
|
Is that going to be televised, anyone know?? 
|
cestmoi
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 05:24 am |
|
Craig wrote: Local celebrity today, rush limbaugh tomorrow.
Someone is getting full of himself. It was a nice picture, though.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 04:36 am |
|
Local celebrity today, rush limbaugh tomorrow.
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 04:24 am |
|
Sorry I'm only interested in autographs from famous celebrities. Thanks for the offer.... See you tomorrow.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 04:01 am |
|
Im never shy, Brian Lameira, bring your copy of the surprise republic and ill autograph it for you. See ya tomorrow.
Last edited on Thu Jul 30th, 2009 04:02 am by Craig
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 03:19 am |
|
I hope to meet both Cochise and Craig Mandel at the forum tomorrow night. Don't be shy and please approach me. I would like to speak with both of you in person versus on a blog. Thanks!
|
Cochise
Member
| Joined: | Sun Feb 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30th, 2009 03:05 am |
|
| Coming out party for Brian tomorrow night at 6:30. I'm looking forward to hearing his vision for Surprise and ,if elected, what he would to to attain his vision.
|
mike woodard
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27th, 2009 09:49 pm |
|
| League of Women Voters are sponsoring a District 5 forum Thursday evening, July 30th at 6:30 p.m. at the Mondell House, 15155 W. Mondell Rd., Surprise (in the Kingswood Parke community). The public is invited.
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27th, 2009 08:13 pm |
|
Is it just me or does this just sound odd.
Watchamn
Lookout
Previous post deleted by watchman at 10:15 and 10:16
Previous posts deleted by Lookout at 10:17
Just curious if this strikes anyone as odd as it did me...
Last edited on Mon Jul 27th, 2009 08:28 pm by Craig
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 01:41 pm |
|
Glad to see we all decided to play fair. 
Last edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 11:32 pm by Craig
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 06:47 am |
|
Mike,
I agree with you 100%. Getting into one's personal life is not the way to do things. I asked my friend not do me any favors by posting in the blog. Even though he had good intentions that was over the line. Hopefully he will learn from this that it could cost me the election, even though or common goal is to win this election, but not in this manner. Sometimes people get over protective but it's never a reason to go after someone in this way. Sorry this had to happen to Joe. I asked him to stay out of my political affairs so hopefully this will not continue. My apologies to Joe!
Brian
|
mike woodard
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 06:20 am |
|
I am pleased to see the posts were removedLast edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 07:38 pm by mike woodard
|
Watchman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 59 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 05:30 am |
|
Last edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 06:15 pm by Watchman
|
Watchman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 59 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 04:49 am |
|
Last edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 06:16 pm by Watchman
|
Cochise
Member
| Joined: | Sun Feb 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 04:13 am |
|
| Not really saying Brian is not a factor at all. It's just that people in city hall know what Mike represents. Brian has yet to make meaningful statements on any issue facing Surprise. If Brian continues to operate under the radar, why should the establishment fear him? If Brian fears taking a stand as a candidate, isn't it sensible to assume he would continue to be a shrinking violet?
|
Sunny Surprise
Member
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 04:11 am |
|
Last edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 03:47 pm by Sunny Surprise
|
Watchman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 59 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 03:55 am |
|
So are you saying Brian isn't a factor in your mind? You don't think he can mix things up a bit? You are definitely underestimating him. The people will choose who they think best represents the district and the city, as long as it is not Joe the city wins!
|
Cochise
Member
| Joined: | Sun Feb 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 02:58 am |
|
| Voters have an opportunity to unseat Johnson in the September election. Some people in the Surprise power structure do not want Johnson replaced because they fear Mike Woodard would actually represent the will of the public, whereas Johnson , by focusing on benefits for himself has not paid much attention to constituent concerns.
|
The Lookout
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jul 25th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26th, 2009 02:21 am |
|
Last edited on Sun Jul 26th, 2009 06:17 pm by The Lookout
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 08:51 pm |
|
Bob he is only head of the council in the respect he conducts a meeting. He is not their boss, he did not appoint them and he is not their mother. They are only responsible to the voters not the mayor.
In the same respect on the district 1 thread. Saying longabaugh does what the mayor wants. Although that maybe true, he can go in any direction he wishes. He is not accountable to the mayor. If he chooses to side with the mayor 99% of the time he is still accountable to the voters, if he would decide to disagree with the mayor 99% of the time he is still accountable to the voters. The mayor as you know bob is not the CEO or boss of the council. Theres nothing to hold the mayor accountable for. Each councilman is accountable for their own actions and only to the voters.
|
Sunny Surprise
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 08:11 pm |
|
Craig wrote: 3 things will get you elected in this town.
1. Knowledge in the affairs of the city.
2. Solid ideas and plans on how to move the city forward in a positive way.
3. The ability to communicate those ideas to the voters.
What wont get you elected, is pie in the sky ideas that have no basis in reality.
Catch phrases like, politics as usual, career politicians and im going to turn this council upside down.
Coming on this blog disguised as someone else. I found watchmans grammatical errors to be quite the same as can be found on http://www.vote4vet.com
So Craig because of some grammar error you have come to a logical conclusion that these two people are the same. WOW! I'm absolutely amazed!
Can you please tell me what stocks I need to buy in the next few months?
And please don't compare my grammar to anyone in the financial arena. LOL
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 08:09 pm |
|
rvukanovich wrote: Is Lyn Truitt the head of the City Council or not, if he is , he should be held responsible. To see that the council gets back on course, instead of, laying back, not saying anything.
That is ridiculous. They are grown men and nobody is responsible for them but them. I don't see that the Council is off course and what would the Mayor possibly say that would make a difference on either incident anyway? Was Mayor Shafer responsible for your actions off Council or were you?
|
rvukanovich
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 08:01 pm |
|
| Is Lyn Truitt the head of the City Council or not, if he is , he should be held responsible. To see that the council gets back on course, instead of, laying back, not saying anything.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 07:40 pm |
|
rvukanovich wrote: With the actions of a couple of Council Members recently , where is Mayor Lyn Truitt.
Why, is he their Mother? Both incidents happened months ago BV.
|
rvukanovich
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 06:50 pm |
|
| With the actions of a couple of Council Members recently , where is Mayor Lyn Truitt.
|
Sunny Surprise
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 04:55 pm |
|
Craig wrote: I dont know how long Mr. Lameria has been retired and a full time resident of surprise but i would ask, where was he when;
Joe voted for the pension plan that cost the tax payers almost 300,000.00
Joe voted to increase the the council contingency funds and allowed them to be spent as they saw fit with no accountibility. Which allowed a former councilwoman to give away 20,000.00 to doggie washes.
Joe voted to increase the auto stipend to 400.00 a month with no record of actual miles driven on city business, which put 14000 dollars in Joes pocket.
I know where Mike Woodard was, fighting it all the way but where was Brian? There is a big difference between complaining and concern for the tax payers and you should learn the difference.
Thank you Craig for refreshing everone's minds on things Joe did in the past few years. Folks forget so quickly and now it is the new Joe. LOL
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 12:47 pm |
|
Forgot! it only came out yesterday and probably will be in the print version today. Most people haven't even seen it yet.
Last edited on Sat Jul 25th, 2009 12:48 pm by Craig
|
Watchman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 59 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 05:04 am |
|
Here is another version of the story.
http://www.azcentral.com/community/surprise/articles/2009/07/24/20090724gl-nwvjohnson0725.html
I would think the inspector had the right version of what really happened.... We all know Mr. Johnson likes to twist things around and make himself look good....
|
Watchman
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 7th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 59 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 04:57 am |
|
Does anyone remember this about Vice Mayor Johnson? Just a reminder if anyone forgot....
http://www.azcentral.com/ic/community/gl-johnsonletter.pdf
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25th, 2009 03:14 am |
|
Raz, probably not the candidates doing it, that would be political suicide if they got caught. More than likely it is their over zealous supporters thinking they are doing their guy or gal a favor. its an expensive waste but it happens and i think all candidates know it could happen when they put them out there. Im sure that the candidates this time around wouldnt make a huge deal of it. Plus the hoodlums around town know they go up and they like to tear it down.
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23rd, 2009 03:43 am |
|
Mike sorry to hear you had some signs stolen. I had five stolen in less than 24 hours. I asked everyone where I placed signs to let me know if they become missing and if they catch someone stealing them that I will prosecute them. If I hear of someone taken your signs I will let you know immediately. As we spoke a few months ago I want to run and honest campaign and what our main goal was. That hasn't changed.
|
Razenkn
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 4th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1805 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 11:38 pm |
|
Sign theft happened a lot during the last election. It sounds childish to me but it's also criminal. That is stealing someone else's property. I wouldn't want to see anyone get into office who would lower themselves to that level. I hope you find out who is doing that Mike and hopefully they will be exposed for the petty thieves they are.
Last edited on Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 11:39 pm by Razenkn
|
Craig
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 21st, 2006 |
| Location: | Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 3785 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 08:27 pm |
|
| That will make you wonder. MMmmm
|
mike woodard
Member
| Joined: | Wed Sep 28th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 401 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22nd, 2009 06:53 pm |
|
Watchman wrote: As I drive around District 5 I noticed that Brian Lameira has a lot of signs out in peoples yards. To me that shows that more people maybe behind Brian than the other two candidates. I have seen a few of Mike Woodards signs but as I said only a few. As for Vice Mayor Johnson I haven't seen a one. Maybe he thinks he has it in the bag or for other reasons we don't know about. Maybe he doesn't want to win and this is just a ploy to have his name on the ballott or by some small miracle he pulls it out and wins with even a surprise to him. His win would be a loss for the district as well as the city. I don't think Joe is seeking another office because of the disconnect he has with the people of Surprise and the fact he can't keep his word.
Why did he and the other three vote to have the GO Bond on the ballott. They wasted 100K to put the bond on the ballott. Simply put, the people don't want it right now and it will fail miserablly. And Joe won an award for being fiscally responsible with the peoples money. What a joke.....
Vote for Brian. He has the right ideas and will help lead Surprise in the right direction in job creation and will be the driving force to increase more family activities which the city is in dire need of.
The reason you didn't and don't see more signs for Mike Woodard, is because signs are expensive, and even though I place signs, with permission of the owners, they are gone the next day or a day or two later, removed by a person or persons unknown. It seemed like a foolish expense to continue. I am not in the habit of spending money foolishly.
|
rvukanovich
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20th, 2009 02:34 am |
|
The candidates running for Council seats in the City of Surprise should delve into the books to see if the City is basically broke and address the problem, what happens if the Go Bond fails to pass.
If a layman like myself can review the 2010 budget and see the problems that the city is facing by their own making, we’re in trouble. Even now I believe we are spending money in an untimely, unwise manner.
|
Cochise
Member
| Joined: | Sun Feb 1st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 259 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 05:11 am |
|
Bob V. and a lot of other people are drawing their own conclusions about why someone else wants the bond issue on the ballot. Has Bob ever thought that individuals actually oppose the question, but believe in American democracy of letting him and each voter express their opinion by ballot?
Most likely , the economy will not be markedly better in the next couple of years. The matter will be decided democratically in November.If you oppose the question, then campaign against it.
|
rvukanovich
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 04:44 am |
|
Vote4vet I hope some one in District 5 has the guts to stand up against selling the Bonds at this time.
The problem is that the City of Surprise other then paying employees and minor expenses might be broke, this is the first time that I can remember that there were no new capital projects budgeted, there is no money other then federal money to maintain our streets.
We just spent $55,000,000 for something that only God knows when we'll use it.
|
incongruity
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jul 13th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 04:43 am |
|
| Last edited on Sun Jul 19th, 2009 04:45 am by incongruity
|
vote4vet
Member
| Joined: | Wed May 27th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 29 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 04:15 am |
|
For the record I am against the GO Bond!. I go into detail on why in next weeks newspaper.
|
rvukanovich
Guest
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 03:59 am |
|
It wouldn’t make any difference if Councilman Joe Johnson were re-elected or Mike Woodward was elected, they both want the Go Bonds to pass, so there would be lot’s of money to spend, irregardless of us poor tax payers that have to pay the bill.
The three Council Members who voted against the Go Bonds should be addressing the public on how the City of Surprise should operate in a recession.
|
incongruity
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jul 13th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 5 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19th, 2009 02:57 am |
|
vote4vet wrote: Mr. Mandel,
I like the article you put int he Surprise Republic today mostly about me. To give you a little insight how I came upon Mr. Duran's website, Lawrence (Larry) Elsea gave me the template and wrote the words that are on that website, not Mr. Duran. I have been friends with Larry for many years serving together in the Air Force here at Luke AFB. Larry is also the owner of TeamLogicIT based in Youngtown and is very good friends with Mr. Duran who is also a minister at a local church.
Larry gave me the template to help with costs and he knew that the template was perfect for me and what I believe since I am all about the first responders and especially the military. Yes, Mr. Duran, Larry and I share alot of the same values and ideas. I was given full permission to use the words on Mr. Duran's website if I thought I agreed with them. So yes I borrowed a few phrases that I truly believe in and never said they were my own words. They were very fitting to what I truely believe in. I know that you were simply pointing out what may seem to you as some sort of Plagiarism.
Definition of Plagiarism: Plagiarism is not copyright infringement. While both terms may apply to a particular act, they are different transgressions. Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights of a copyright holder, when material protected by copyright is used without consent. On the other hand, plagiarism is concerned with the unearned increment to the plagiarizing author's reputation that is achieved through false claims of authorship.
I am also enclosing the letter I wrote to both Lawrence Elsea and Vice Mayor Duran about the website and the use of it's content.
Lawrence Elsea & Vice Mayor Duran,
Larry, I appreciate you allowing me to use Mr. Duran's website template along with some of the wording you wrote. I found a few phrases so fitting to my campaign that it was an honor for you to allow me to use part of it for my campaign website.
Vice Mayor Duran, thank you for the honor of allowing me to use some of your phrases posted on your website campaign as we both share so many of the same ideologies. The ideology we both share and the use of some phrases from your campaign website is an honor. As a 20-year retired Air Force member I feel compelled to run for city council because of the direction I see the city going and how its run. I know with my qualifications running multi-million dollar programs that I am the person to hold this public office. I’m urged by my community, family and friends to run for office and lead our district and city any way I can.
I would like to thank both of you once again for your inspirational words and many suggestions to the web site.
I am happy we all share the same goal in making both Surprise and Youngtown better than we found it. If elected you will have my full support if you need it.
May God bless you and this great city of ours.
Brian Lameira
Candidate for Councilman District 5
I hope this answers everyone's question on this matter. This is the last time I will respond to this or any other questions in any blog. I will have an article come out next week in both the Surprise Independent and Surprise Today that should answer some of your questions you have asked in these blogs. Stay tuned.
You also never said they were someone else's -it was your site so the impression would be they were your words - is that not a false claim of authorship? Sure seems like it to me.
|
Current time is 04:07 am | Page:   1 2 3 4   |
|